Licensing of a product innovation by an outside innovator to a Stackelberg duopoly

References

• Akhundjanov, S. B., R. Karina Gallardo, and B. J. Richard. 2020. “Commercialization of a demand-enhancing innovation: The release of a new apple variety by a public university.” Economic Modelling 86: 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S., and M. Engers. 1992. “Stackelberg versus Cournot oligopoly equilibrium.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 10 (1): 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7187(92)90052-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antelo, M., and L. Bru. 2023. “Licensing a product innovation in a duopoly.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2023.2226090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arce, N. 2015. Ford opens up electric car Patents at a Cost, Tech Times, (May 30). https://www.techtimes.com/articles/56453/20150530/ford-opens-up-electric-car-patents-toother-carmarkers-but-not-for-free.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Arundel, A., and I. Kabla. 1998. “What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms.” Research Policy 27 (2): 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00033-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avagyan, V., M. Esteban-Bravo, and J. M. Vidal-Sanz. 2014. “Licensing radical product innovations to speed up the diffusion.” European Journal of Operations Research 239 (2): 542–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.05.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, S., A. Mukherjee, and S. Poddar. 2023. “Optimal patent licensing—Two or three-part tariff.” Journal of Public Economic Theory 25 (3): 624–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, M., and M. Moreaux. 1987. “On Stackelberg equilibria with differentiated products: the critical role of the strategy space.” Journal of Industrial Economics 36 (2): 217–230. https://doi.org/10.2307/2098414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffoni, A., A. de Angelis, V. Grüntges, and A. Krieg. 2017. How to make sure your next product or service launch drives growth. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/growth-marketing-and-sales/our-insights/how-to-make-sure-your-next-product-or-service-launch-drives-growth.
   Google Scholar
• Caballero-Sanz, F., R. Moner-Colonques, and J. J. Sempere-Monerris. 2005. “Licensing policies for a new product.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 14 (8): 697–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740500063915
   Google Scholar
• Chang, R. Y., and C. H. Peng. 2013. “Cost asymmetry and vertical product licensing.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics 20 (3): 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2013.782809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., R. R. Nelson, and J. P. Walsh. 2000. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper No. 7552.
   Google Scholar
• Cumbul, E. 2021. “Stackelberg versus Cournot oligopoly with private information.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 74: 102674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2020.102674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elia, S., S. Munjal, and V. G. Scalera. 2020. “Sourcing technological knowledge through foreign inward licensing to boost the performance of Indian firms: The contingent effects of internal R&D and business group affiliation.” Management International Review 60 (5): 695–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-020-00419-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, D., T. J. Richards, and B. J. Rickard. 2015. “Optimal licensing of agricultural patents: Fees versus royalties.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 40 (1): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filippini, L., and C. Vergari. 2012. Product innovation in a vertically differentiated model, Quaderni DSE Working Paper No. 83. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2082896
   Google Scholar
• Fjell, K., and J. S. Heywood. 2002. “Public Stackelberg leadership in a mixed oligopoly with foreign firms.” Australian Economic Papers 41 (3): 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.00164
   Google Scholar
• Fradkin, H. 2014. Should you license your competition? Ipstrategy.com, (November 24). https://ipstrategy.com/2014/11/24/should-you-license-your-competition/.
   Google Scholar
• Gambardella, A., P. Giuri, and A. Luzzi. 2007. “The market for patents in Europe.” Research Policy 36 (8): 1163–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Sánchez, A., and R. Rama. 2020. “Foreign ownership and domestic cooperation for innovation during good and harsh economic times.” International Journal of Multinational Corporation Strategy 3 (1): 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMCS.2020.107674
   Google Scholar
• Hirose, K., and T. Matsumura. 2019. “Comparing welfare and profit in quantity and price competition within Stackelberg mixed duopolies.” Journal of Economics 126 (1): 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-018-0603-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoesel, S. V. 2008. “An overview of Stackelberg pricing in networks.” European Journal of Operational Research 189 (3): 1393–1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.08.064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, C. 2014. Why Microsoft makes $5 to $15 from every Android devise sold, (March 5). Retrieved from https://www.howtogeek.com/183766/why-microsoft-makes-5-to-15-from-every-android-device-sold/.
   Google Scholar
• Inderst, R., and G. Tirosh. 2015. “Refunds and returns in a vertically differentiated industry.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 38: 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2014.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, B., and H. Shi. 2018. “Intercompetitor licensing and product innovation.” Journal of Marketing Research 55 (5): 738–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243718802846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabiraj, T. 2004. “Patent licensing in a leadership structure.” The Manchester School 72 (2): 188–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.2004.00388.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. H., H. Lao, and P. W. Dobson. 2021. “Identifying price-leadership structures in oligopoly.” Oxford Economic Papers 73 (1): 350–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpz066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C., and J. Song. 2009. “Technology licensing in a vertically differentiated duopoly.” Japan and the World Economy 21 (2): 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japwor.2008.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C., and J. Wang. 2010. “Licensing a vertical product innovation.” Economic Record 85 (275): 517–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2010.00630.x
   Google Scholar
• Liao, P. 2008. “A note on market coverage in vertical differentiation models with fixed costs.” Bulletin of Economic Research 60 (1): 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8586.2007.00270.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, S., D. Sen, and Y. Tauman. 2022. Optimal patent licensing: From three to two-part tariffs, MPRA Paper No. 111624. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/111624/.
   Google Scholar
• Moorhead, P. 2019. Who is ‘really’ leading in mobile 5 g, part 4: mobile headsets. Forbes Magazine. https://www.forbes.com/sites/moorinsights/2019/07/19/who-is-really-leading-in-mobile-5g-part-4-infrastructure-equipment-providers/.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, A. 2010. “Competition and welfare: The implications of licensing.” Manchester School 78 (1): 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.2009.02126.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussa, M., and S. Rosen. 1978. “Monopoly and product quality.” Journal of Economic Theory 18 (2): 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(78)90085-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Science Board. 2016. Science and engineering indicators. Technical report, National Science Board. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind/.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. 2012. Science and engineering indicators. Technical report, National Science Board. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind/.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, X., P. Sgro, and M. Nabin. 2017. “Optimal licensing policy under vertical product differentiation.” Review of Development Economics 21 (3): 497–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishimura, J., and Y. Okada. 2014. “R&D portfolios and pharmaceutical licensing.” Research Policy 43 (7): 1250–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal, R. 2010. “Technology adoption in a differentiated duopoly: Cournot versus Bertrand.” Research in Economics 64 (2): 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2009.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Parhankangas, A., P. Holmlund, and T. Kuusisto. 2003. “Managing non-core technologies experiences from Finnish, Swedish and US corporations.” Technology Review 149: 1–81.
   Google Scholar
• Ringel, M., A. Taylor, and H. Zablit. 2017. Bringing outside innovation inside (January 25, 2017). https://www.bcg.com/publications/2017/growth-bringing-outside-innovation-inside.
   Google Scholar
• Ruckman, K., and I. McCarthy. 2016. “Why do some patents get licensed while others do not?” Industrial and Corporate Change 26: 667–688. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtw046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinkai, T. 2000. “Second mover disadvantages in a three-player Stackelberg game with private information.” Journal of Economic Theory 90 (2): 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1999.2608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamatopoulus, G., and Y. Tauman. 2008. “Licensing of a quality-improving innovation.” Mathematical Social Sciences 56 (3): 410–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2008.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, Y. 2001. “Profitability of price and quantity strategies in a duopoly with vertical product differentiation.” Economic Theory 17 (3): 693–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00004124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesoriere, A. 2017. “Stackelberg equilibrium with many leaders and followers: The case of zero fixed costs.” Research in Economics 71 (1): 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2016.11.004
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, N. C., A. A. Ziedonis, and D. C. Mowery. 2018. “University licensing and the flow of scientific knowledge.” Research Policy 47 (6): 1060–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, X. 2016. “Licensing a quality-enhancing innovation to an upstream firm.” Economic Modelling 53: 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, W. 2019a. Who is ‘really’ leading in mobile 5 g, part 3: Infrastructure, equipment providers. Forbes Magazine. https://www.forbes.com/sites/patrickmoorhead/ 2019/06/27/who-is-really-leading-in-mobile-5g-part-3-5g-mobile-handsets/.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, W. 2019b. Who is ‘really’ leading in mobile 5 g, part 5: Global carriers. Forbes Magazine. https://www.forbes.com/sites/moorinsights/2019/07/29/who-is-really-leading-in-mobile-5g-part-5-global-carriers/.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, K.-H., and J.-C. Wang. 2009. “External technology sourcing and innovation performance in LMT sectors: An analysis based on the Taiwanese Technological Innovation Survey.” Research Policy 38 (3): 518–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. 2012. “Licensing choice for a non-productive firm.” Science Research Management 10: 37–47.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2017. World Development Indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, L., and Z. Huang. 2023. “Quality-improving licensing of an outside innovator in a mixed Cournot duopoly.” Economic Modelling 126: 106432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, Y., and T. L. Chen. 2020. “Quality differentiation and product innovation licensing.” Economic Modelling 87: 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar