Using Personas to Support Augmentative Alternative Communication Device Design: A Validation and Evaluation Study

References

• AAC-RERC. (2015, June 29). Colin Portnuff – AAC: A user’s perspective [Video File]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldXC3FbShn0
   Google Scholar
• Adlin, T., & Pruitt, J. (Eds.). (2010). The essential persona lifecycle. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2004). Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists with respect to augmentative and alternative communication [Technical Report]. Retrieved from www.asha.org/policy
   Google Scholar
• Astbrink, G., & Kadous, W. (2003, September). Using disability scenarios for user centred product design. Presented at AAATE conference, Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Babic, J., Slivar, I., Car, Z., & Podobnik, V. (2015, July). Prototype-driven software development process for augmentative and alternative communication applications. Presented at Telecommunications (ConTEL), 2015 13th International Conference on Telecommunications (ConTel), Graz, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Baldassarri, S., Marco, J., Cerezo, E., & Moreno, L. (2014, June). Accessibility evaluation of an alternative and augmentative communication (AAC) tool. Presented at International Conference on Universal Access in Human–Computer Interaction (pp. 529–540). Crete, Greece: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children & adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Pub Co.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., Ball, L. J., & Fager, S. (2008). An AAC personnel framework: Adults with acquired complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(3), 255–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., Fager, S., Ball, L., & Dietz, A. (2007). AAC for adults with acquired neurological conditions: A review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(3), 230–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bias, R. G., & Mayhew, D. J. (Eds.). (2005). Cost-justifying usability: An update for the Internet age. San Francisco, CA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S. W., Williams, M. B., & Wilkins, D. P. (2007). Key principles underlying research and practice in AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(3), 191–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongioanni, P. (2012). Communication impairment in ALS patients assessment and treatment. Rijeka, Croatia: INTECH Open Access Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Caltenco, H. A., Breidegard, B., Jönsson, B., & Andreasen Struijk, L. N. (2012). Understanding computer users with tetraplegia: Survey of assistive technology users. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 28(4), 258–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, C. N., & Milham, R. P. (2006). The personas’ new clothes: Methodological and practical arguments against a popular method. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA (Vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 634–636).
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, A., Reimann, R., Cronin, D., & Noessel, C. (2014). About face: The essentials of interaction design. Indianapolis, IN: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, R., Marcella, S., McGrenere, J., & Purves, B. (2004). The ethnographically informed participatory design of a PD application to support communication. (No. 77-78, pp. 153-160). Paris, France: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Dedoose, Version 4.5 (2013). Web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data. Los Angeles, CA: 1040 SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Dorrington, P., Wilkinson, C., Tasker, L., & Walters, A. (2016). User-centered design method for the design of assistive switch devices to improve user experience, accessibility, and independence. Journal of Usability Studies, 11(2), 66–82.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, E., Artman, H., & Swartling, A. (2013). The secret life of a persona: When the personal becomes private. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2677–2686). Paris, France: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Fager, S., Bardach, L., Russell, S., & Higginbotham, J. (2012). Access to augmentative and alternative communication: New technologies and clinical decision-making. Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, 5(1), 53–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faily, S., & Flechais, I. (2011, May). Persona cases: A technique for grounding personas. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, Canada (pp. 2267–2270). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Grudin, J., & Pruitt, J. (2002). Personas, participatory design, and product development: An infrastructure for engagement. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, Malmö, Sweden (pp. 144–161).
   Google Scholar
• Gruen, D., Rauch, T., Redpath, S., & Ruettinger, S. (2002). The use of stories in user experience design. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 14(3–4), 503–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henka, A., & Zimmermann, G. (2014). Persona based accessibility testing. Presented at International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction (pp. 226–231). Crete, Greece: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Fulcher, K., Min, H., Hanna, C., & Kirkland, C. (2010). Developing personas to aid in AAC design. Philadelphia, PA: American Speech-Language and Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. (2004). Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17(2), 133–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberati, G., Pizzimenti, A., Simione, L., Riccio, A., Schettini, F., Inghilleri, M., … Cincotti, F. (2015). Developing brain–computer interfaces from a user-centered perspective: Assessing the needs of persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, caregivers, and professionals. Applied Ergonomics, 50, 139–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubas, M., Mitchell, J., & De Leo, G. (2014). User-centered design and augmentative and alternative communication apps for children with autism spectrum disorders. Sage Open, 4(2), 2158244014537501.
   Google Scholar
• Mallin, S. S. V., & De Carvalho, H. G. (2015). Assistive technology and user-centered design: Emotion as element for innovation. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 5570-5578.
   Google Scholar
• Mauri, C., Solanas, A., & Granollers, T. (2012). A nonformal interactive therapeutic multisensory environment for people with cerebral palsy. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 28(3), 202–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffat, K., McGrenere, J., Purves, B., & Klawe, M. (2004). The participatory design of a sound and image enhanced daily planner for people with Aphasia. Presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Pruitt, J., & Grudin, J. (2003) Personas: Practice and theory. Presented at the 2003 Conference on Designing for User Experiences, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Pullin, G. (2009). Design meets disability (1st ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pullin, G., Treviranus, J., Patel, R., & Higginbotham, J. (submitted). ISAAC 2016 research symposium design stream designing interaction, voice and inclusion submitted for review, augmentative and alternative communication.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, S., Osawa, H., Hu, J., & Rauterberg, M. (2015, October). E-Gaze: Create gaze communication for people with visual disability. Presented at the 3rd International Conference on Human–Agent Interaction, Kyungpook, Republic of Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Robillard, A. (1999). Meaning of a disability: The lived experience of paralysis. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robillard, A. (2006). Paralysis. In G. Albrecht (Ed.). Encyclopedia of disability (Volume 3, pp. 1197–1201). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., & Preece, J. (2011). Interaction design: Beyond human–computer interaction. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, J. (2008). User-centered technology for blind children. Human Technology: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments, 42, 96–122.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, M. (2017). Matching person and technology. In M. M. Maheu, K. P. Drude, & S. D. Wright (Eds.), Career paths in telemental health (pp. 269–275). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln, (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Subrahmaniyan, N. (2014b). Development of personas to support augmentative alternative communication device design and clinical decision making ( Doctoral dissertation). State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Subrahmaniyan, N., Fulcher, K. R., Hutchinson, T. E., Min, H., Seale, J. M., Bisantz, A. M., & Higginbotham, D. J. (2013). Application of personas in the design of augmentative alternative communication devices. Presented at the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA (Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 1022–1026).
   Google Scholar
• Subrahmaniyan, N., & Higginbotham, D. J. (2014a, January 20). User personas for AAC design and clinical decision making. Orlando, FL: Assistive Technology Industry Association.
   Google Scholar
• Thoma, V., & Williams, B. (2009, August). Developing and validating personas in e-commerce: A heuristic approach. Presented at IFIP Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, Uppsala, Sweden (pp. 524–527). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar