Remedial and compensatory writing technologies for middle school students with learning disabilities and their classmates in inclusive classrooms

References

• Atanga, C., Jones, B. A., Krueger, L. E., & Lu, S. (2020). Teachers of students with learning disabilities: Assistive technology knowledge, perceptions, interests, and barriers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 35(4), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643419864858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrot, J. S. (2022). Integrating technology into ESL/EFL writing through Grammarly. RELC Journal, 53(3), 764–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220966632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blose, A. (2023). As ChatGPT enters the classroom, teachers weigh pros and cons. NeaToday. https://www.nea.org/advocating-for-change/new-from-nea/chatgpt-enters-classroom-teachers-weigh-pros-and-cons
   Google Scholar
• Boon, R. T., Barbetta, P. M., & Paal, M. (2018). The efficacy of graphic organizers on the writing outcomes of students with learning disabilities: A research synthesis of single-case studies. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(2), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.18666/LDMJ-2018-V23-I2-9042
   Google Scholar
• Brady, K. K., Evmenova, A. S., Regan, K. S., Ainsworth, M. K., & Gafurov, B. S. (2022). Using a technology-based graphic organizer to improve the planning and persuasive paragraph writing by adolescents with disabilities and writing difficulties. Journal of Special Education, 55(4), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669211008256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S., & Allmond, A. (2021). Emergent bilinguals’ use of word prediction software amid digital composing. Reading Teacher, 74(5), 607–616. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, L. (2023). Technological leap or cheating tool? Why L.A. schools have banned ChatGPT. Los Angeles Magazine. https://lamag.com/news/la-schools-ban-chatgpt-debate#:∼:text=In%20December%2C%20within%20weeks%20of,schools%20followed%20suit%20shortly%20after.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, C. (2023). Australian universities to return to ‘pen and paper’ exams after students caught using AI to write essays. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/jan/10/universities-to-return-to-pen-and-paper-exams-after-students-caught-using-ai-to-write-essays
   Google Scholar
• Caulfield, J. (2023). ChatGPT citations|formats & examples. https://www.scribbr.com/ai-tools/chatgpt-citations/
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P., Tate, T. P., & Warschauer, M. (2019). Technology as a lever for adolescent writing. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(2), 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732219836440
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, K., Antonenko, P., Lane, H., & Zhu, J. (2019). Assistive technologies to support students with dyslexia. Teaching Exceptional Children, 51(3), 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918794027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De La Paz, S., & Sherman, C. (2013). Revising instruction in inclusive settings: Effects for English learners and novice writers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28(3), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doren, B., Murray, C., & Gau, J. M. (2014). Salient predictors of school dropout among secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(4), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsen-Rooney, M. (2023). NYC education department blocks ChatGPT on school devices, networks. Chalkbeat New York. https://ny.chalkbeat.org/2023/1/3/23537987/nyc-schools-ban-chatgpt-writing-artificial-intelligence
   Google Scholar
• Evmenova, A. S., Graff, H. J., Jerome, M. K., & Behrmann, M. M. (2010). Word prediction programs with phonetic spelling support: Performance comparisons and impact on journal writing for students with writing difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25(4), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2010.00315.x
   Google Scholar
• Evmenova, A. S., & Regan, K. (2019). Supporting the writing process with technology for students with disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 55(2), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451219837636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evmenova, A. S., Regan, K., Ahn, S. Y., & Good, K. (2020). Teacher implementation of a technology-based intervention for writing. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 18(1), 27–47. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1264337.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Evmenova, A. S., Regan, K., Boykin, A., Good, K., Hughes, M. D., MacVittie, N. P., Sacco, D., Ahn, S. Y., & Chirinos, D. S. (2016). Emphasizing planning for essay writing with a computer-based graphic organizer. Exceptional Children, 82(2), 170–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915591697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evmenova, A. S., Regan, K., & Hutchison, A. (2020). AT for writing: Technology-based graphic organizers with embedded supports. Teaching Exceptional Children, 52(4), 266–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059920907571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewoldt, K. B. (2018). Productivity apps supporting higher order writing skills for secondary students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53(5), 313–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451217736868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, A. R., Mackinnon, J. R., & Miller, L. T. (2009). Keyboarding for students with handwriting problems. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 25(1), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/J006v25n01_08
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, A., & Graham, S. (2014). A meta-analysis of writing interventions for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 454–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914527238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Ledo, M., Barbetta, P. M., & Unzueta, C. H. (2015). The effects of computer graphic organizers on the narrative writing of elementary school students with specific learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 30(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341503000103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2019). Changing how writing is taught. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 277–303. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Capizzi, A., Harris, K. R., Hebert, M., & Morphy, P. (2014). Teaching writing to middle school students: A national survey. Reading and Writing, 27(6), 1015–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9495-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Collins, A. A., & Rigby-Wills, H. (2017). Writing characteristics of students with learning disabilities and typically achieving peers: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 83(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402916664070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2016). A path to better writing. Reading Teacher, 69(4), 359–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & McKeown, D. (2013). The writing of students with learning disabilities, meta-analysis of self-regulated strategy development writing intervention studies, and future directions: Redux. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 405–438). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Fitzgerald, J., Friedrich, L. D., Greene, K., Kim, J. S., Olson, C. B. (2016). Teaching secondary students to write effectively (NCEE 2017-4002). https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/508_WWCPG_SecondaryWriting_122719.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Kiuhara, S. A., & MacKay, M. (2020). The effects of writing on learning in science, social studies, and mathematics: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(2), 179–226. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320914744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A. L., & Stormont, M. (2018). Creating culturally responsive and evidence-based lessons for diverse learners with disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53(3), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451217702114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert, M., Kearns, D. M., Hayes, J. B., Bazis, P., & Cooper, S. (2018). Why children with dyslexia struggle with writing and how to help them. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(4), 843–863. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_LSHSS-DYSLC-18-0024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetzroni, O. E., & Shrieber, B. (2004). Word processing as an assistive technology tool for enhancing academic outcomes of students with writing disabilities in the general classroom. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194040370020501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. L., & Raskind, M. H. (2004). The compensatory effectiveness of the Quicktionary reading pen II on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340502000103
   Google Scholar
• Holdinga, L., Janssen, T., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2021). The relationship between students’ writing process, text quality, and thought process quality in 11th-grade history and philosophy assignments. Written Communication, 38(4), 544–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883211028853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, M. D., Regan, K. S., & Evmenova, A. (2019). A computer-based graphic organizer with embedded self-regulated learning strategies to support student writing. Intervention in School and Clinic, 55(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451219833026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Dyslexia Association. (n.d). Dyslexia at a glance. https://dyslexiaida.org/dyslexia-at-a-glance/
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. J., Deshler, D. D., & Lloyd, J. W. (2015). Effects of multimedia vocabulary instruction on adolescents with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413487406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroesch, A. M., Peeples, K. N., Pleasant, C. L., & Cuenca-Carlino, Y. (2022). Let’s argue: Developing argumentative writing skills for students with learning disabilities. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 38(5), 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1970659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A., Rose., & D. H., Gordon. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The Nation’s Report Card: Writing 2011. Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education, Washington, D.C. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pubs/main2011/2012470.aspx
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Learning Disabilities. (2017, May 2). The state of LD: Understanding 1 in 5. https://www.ncld.org/news/newsroom/the-state-of-ld-understanding-the-1-in-5/
   Google Scholar
• Ok, M. W., & Rao, K. (2017). Using a digital pen to support secondary students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451217692567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ok, M. W., Rao, K., Pennington, J., & Ulloa, P. R. (2022). Speech recognition technology for writing: Usage patterns and perceptions of students with high incidence disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 37(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643420979929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osewalt, G. (n.d). What’s the difference between remedial instruction and a compensatory approach? https://www.understood.org/en/articles/whats-the-difference-between-remedial-instruction-and-a-compensatory-approach
   Google Scholar
• Park, H. J., Takahashi, K., Roberts, K. D., & Delise, D. (2017). Effects of text-to-speech software use on the reading proficiency of high school struggling readers. Assistive Technology: The Official Journal of RESNA, 29(3), 146–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2016.1171808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perelmutter, B., McGregor, K. K., & Gordon, K. R. (2017). Assistive technology interventions for adolescents and adults with learning disabilities: An evidence-based systematic review and meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 114, 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, K., Torres, C., & Smith, S. J. (2021). Digital tools and UDL-based instructional strategies to support students with disabilities online. Journal of Special Education Technology, 36(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643421998327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, A. B., Graham, S., Houston, J. D., & Harris, R. (2016). Teachers use of writing to support students’ learning in middle school: A national survey in the United States. Reading and Writing, 29(5), 1039–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9602-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, K., Evmenova, A. S., Good, K., Legget, A., Ahn, S. Y., Gafurov, B., & Mastropieri, M. (2018). Persuasive writing with mobile-based graphic organizers in inclusive classrooms across the curriculum. Journal of Special Education Technology, 33(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417727292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, A., Smith, S. J., & Lowrey, K. A. (2022). Pairing technology with 6 traits of writing instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 37(1), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643420945600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, C. K., & De La Paz, S. (2018). FIX: A strategic approach to writing and revision for students with learning disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 50(4), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918757944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegle, D. (2023). A role for ChatGPT and AI in gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 46(3), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175231168443
   Google Scholar
• Siegle, D. (2020). I have an idea I need to share: Using technology to enhance brainstorming. Gifted Child Today, 43(3), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217520919967
   Google Scholar
• Silio, M., & Barbetta, P. M. (2010). The effects of word prediction and text-to-speech technologies on the narrative writing skills of Hispanic students with specific learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(4), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341002500402
   Google Scholar
• Staake, J. (2023). 20 ways teachers can use ChatGPT to make their lives easier. We Are Teachers. https://www.weareteachers.com/chatgpt-for-teachers/
   Google Scholar
• Thi, N. K., Nikolov, M., & Simon, K. (2023). Higher-proficiency students’ engagement with and uptake of teacher and Grammarly feedback in an EFL writing course. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(3), 690–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2122476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timothy, M. (2023). 5 ways students can use ChatGPT in school. MUO Make Use Of: Technology. https://www.makeuseof.com/how-students-use-chatgpt-in-school/?newsletter_popup=1
   Google Scholar
• Twyman, J. S., & Heward, W. L. (2018). How to improve student learning in every classroom now. International Journal of Educational Research, 87, 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unzueta, C., & Barbetta, P. M. (2012). The use of computer graphic organizers for persuasive writing by Hispanic students with specific learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 27(3), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341202700302
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2017). WWC intervention report: Self-regulated strategy development. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/InterventionReports/wwc_srsd_111417.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, K. C., Jeffery, J. V., & Gardner-Bixler, A. (2016). Writing to the common core: Teachers’ responses to changes in standards and assessments for writing in elementary schools. Reading and Writing, 29(5), 903–928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9588-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C., & Beam, S. (2019). Technology and writing: Review of research. Computers & Education, 128, 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S. G., Moxley, J. H., Tighe, E. L., & Wagner, R. K. (2018). Does use of text-to-speech and related read-aloud tools improve reading comprehension for students with reading disabilities? A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416688170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. C., Courtad, C. A., Douglas, K. H., & Chung, Y. C. (2019). The effects of text-to-speech on reading outcomes for secondary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 34(2), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643418786047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar