Female Pre-Service Elementary Teachers’ Conceptualizations of Engineers and Engineering: A Critical Consciousness Perspective

References

• Capobianco, B. M., & Radloff, J. (2022). Elementary preservice teachers’ trajectories for appropriating engineering design–based science teaching. Research in Science Education, 52(5), 1623–1641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10020-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capobianco, B. M., Radloff, J., & Clingerman, J. (2022). Facilitating preservice elementary science teachers’ shift from learner to teacher of engineering design-based science teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(4), 747–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10193-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, R. L., & Diefes-Dux, H. A. (2012, June). Change in elementary student conceptions of engineering following an intervention as seen from the draw-an-engineer test. In 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas (pp. 25–299).
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, A., Rodriguez, F. D., Pena, C., Hinojosa, E., Morales, L., Del Bosque, V., Tijerina, Y., & Tarawneh, C. (2020). “Nothing is impossible”: Characteristics of hispanic females participating in an informal STEM setting. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(3), 723–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09947-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diefes-Dux, H., & Capobianco, B. M. (2011) Work in progress – interpreting elementary students; advanced conceptions of engineering from the draw-an-engineering test. 41st ASEE/ISEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Rapid City, South Dakota.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage. (P. Clarke, Trans.). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum. (Original work published 1970).
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (2018). Teachers as cultural workers: Letters to those who dare teach. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. (2020). Critical pedagogy. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Guion, L. A., Diehl, D. C., & McDonald, D. (2011). Triangulation: Establishing the validity of qualitative studies. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, EDIS.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, J., Hense, J., Scheersoi, A., & Keinonen, T. (2019). Gender study on the relationships between science interest and future career perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 41(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1534021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L. (2008). Critical pedagogy primer (Vol. 1). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, M., & Cunningham, C. (2004, June). Draw an engineer: Development of a tool to investigate students’ ideas about engineers and engineering. In 2004 Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah (pp. 9–482).
   Google Scholar
• Kolmos, A., Mejlgaard, N., Haase, S., & Holgaard, J. E. (2013). Motivational factors, gender and engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(3), 340–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2013.794198
   Google Scholar
• Koul, R., Lerdpornkulrat, T., & Poondej, C. (2017). Gender contentedness in aspirations to become engineers or medical doctors. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(6), 1422–1438. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1303450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuchynka, S. L., Eaton, A., & Rivera, L. M. (2022). Understanding and addressing gender‐based inequities in STEM: Research synthesis and recommendations for US K‐12 education. Social Issues and Policy Review, 16(1), 252–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuvac, M., & Koc, I. (2022). Enhancing preservice science teachers’ perceptions of engineer and engineering through STEM education: A focus on drawings as evidence. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2052038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, F., Edmonds, J., & Fogg-Rogers, L. (2021). Engineering science education: The impact of a paired peer approach on subject knowledge confidence and self-efficacy levels of student teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 43(5), 793–822. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1887544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightner, T., Cardella, M. E., Huggins, N., Hampton, C., Lee, W. C., & Knight, D. B. (2021, January). Draw an engineer: A critical examination of efforts to shift how elementary-aged students perceive engineers. 2021 CoNECD, Virtual.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, C. J., Medina, M. A., Bañales, J., Pinetta, B. J., Marchand, A. D., Agi, A. C., Miller, S. M., Hoffman, A. J., Diemer, M. A., & Rivas-Drake, D. (2020). Mapping the intersections of adolescents’ ethnic-racial identity and critical consciousness. Adolescent Research Review, 5(4), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-019-00122-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, P. (2002). Critical pedagogy: A look at the major concepts. Routledge/Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, P., & Kincheloe, J. L. (Eds.). (2007). Critical pedagogy: Where are we now? (Vol. 299). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R., Liu, K., & Ball, A. F. (2020). Critical counter-narrative as transformative methodology for educational equity. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 269–300. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20908501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. I., Nolla, K. M., Eagly, A. H., & Uttal, D. H. (2018). The development of children’s gender‐science stereotypes: A meta‐analysis of 5 decades of US draw‐a‐scientist studies. Child Development, 89(6), 1943–1955. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, H. R., IV, & Howard, T. C. (2013). Counter-narrative as method: Race, policy, and research for teacher education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(4), 536–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2013.817772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moote, J., Archer, L., DeWitt, J., & MacLeod, E. (2020). Comparing students’ engineering and science aspirations from age 10 to 16: Investigating the role of gender, ethnicity, cultural capital, and attitudinal factors. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muimongkol, S. C., Subramaniam, K. & Wickstrom, C. (2022). Dimensions and orientations of pre-service early childhood teachers’ conceptions of teaching science. Early Childhood Education Journal, 50(1), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01146-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumba, F., Rutt, A., & Chabalengula, V. M. (2022). Representation of science and engineering practices and design skills in engineering design-integrated science units developed by pre-service teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10266-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13165/a-frameworkfor-k-12-science-education-practices-crosscutting-concepts
   Google Scholar
• Newley, A. D., Kaya, E., Yesilyurt, E., & Deniz, H. (2017, June). Board# 104: Measuring engineering perceptions of fifth-grade minority students with the draw-an-engineer-test (DAET) (work in progress). 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio.
   Google Scholar
• Next Generation Science Standards Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press. https://www.nextgenscience.org
   Google Scholar
• Ong, M., Jaumot‐Pascual, N., & Ko, L. T. (2020). Research literature on women of color in undergraduate engineering education: A systematic thematic synthesis. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(3), 581–615. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 172–209. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.2.t022245n7x4752v2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawley, A. L., Schimpf, C., & Nelson, L. (2016). Gender in engineering education research: A content analysis of research in JEE, 1998–2012. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(3), 508–528. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinisch, B., Krell, M., Hergert, S., Gogolin, S., & Krüger, D. (2017). Methodical challenges concerning the draw-a-scientist test: A critical view about the assessment and evaluation of learners’ conceptions of scientists. International Journal of Science Education, 39(14), 1952–1975. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1362712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rendón, M. J., & Nicolas, G. (2012). Deconstructing the portrayals of Haitian women in the media: A thematic analysis of images in the associated press photo archive. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(2), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311429110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, T. (2014). Raising awareness to transcend disciplines: Developing teachers’ critical awareness across disciplines to increase indigenous learner engagement. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 43(2), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1017/jie.2014.20
   Google Scholar
• Solórzano, D. G., & Yosso, T. J. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040200800103
   Google Scholar
• Sonu, D. (2022). Possibilities for using visual drawing with student-teachers: Linking childhood memories to future teaching selves. Teaching and Teacher Education, 110, 103599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, K. (2022). Prospective teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development in an elementary science methods course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 33(4), 345–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1939944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, K., Asim, S., Lee, E. Y. & Koo, Y. (2018). Student teachers’ images of science instruction in informal settings: A focus on field trip pedagogy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(4), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560x.2018.1452531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdugo-Castro, S., García-Holgado, A., & Sánchez-Gómez, M. C. (2022). The gender gap in higher STEM studies: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 8(8), e10300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, R. J., Diemer, M. A., & Voight, A. M. (2011). Critical consciousness: Current status and future directions. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2011(134), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.310
   PubMedGoogle Scholar