69
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Supporting K-8 Teachers’ Capacity to Develop Quality Formative Science Assessments

ORCID Icon, , , & ORCID Icon

References

  • Allen, M. (2006). Misconceptions in primary science. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Alonzo, A. C. (2017). An argument for formative assessment with science learning progressions. Applied Measurement in Education, 31(2), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2017.1408630
  • Anderson, C. W., de Los Santos, E. X., Bodbyl, S., Covitt, B. A., Edwards, K. D., Hancock, J. B., Welch, M. M., Morrison Thomas, C., Penuel, W. R., & Welch, M. M. (2018). Designing educational systems to support enactment of the next generation science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 1026–1052. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21484
  • Atasoy, V., & Kaya, G. (2022). Formative assessment practices in science education: A meta-synthesis study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 75, 101186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101186
  • Bell, B. (2013). Classroom assessment of science learning. In S. K. Abell, K. Appleton & D. L. Hanuscin (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 979–1020). Routledge.
  • Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85(5), 536–553. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1022
  • Bell, B., & Gilbert, B. (1996). Teacher development: A model for science education. Falmer Press.
  • Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. (2016). Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1082–1112. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21257
  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
  • Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement Issues & Practice, 30(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2010.00195.x
  • Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Learning is the primary source of coherence in assessment. Educational Measurement Issues & Practice, 37(1), 35–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12190
  • Capps, D. K., Crawford, B. A., & Constas, M. A. (2012). A review of empirical literature on inquiry professional development: Alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(3), 291–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9275-2
  • Carver, S. M. (2005). Assessing for deep understanding. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 205–221). Cambridge University Press.
  • Coburn, C. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023002145
  • Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1109–1136. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20440
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education. Routledge.
  • Covitt, B. A., Gunckel, K. L., Caplan, B., & Syswerda, S. (2017). Teachers’ use of learning progression-based formative assessment in water instruction. Applied Measurement in Education, 31(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2017.1408627
  • Daehler, K. R., & Folsom, J. (2014). Making sense of student work: A protocol for teacher collaboration. WestEd.
  • Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
  • Desimone, L., Porter, A., Garet, M., Birman, B., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024002081
  • Dewey, J. (1986). Experience and education. In The educational forum (Vol. 50, pp. 241–252). Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131728609335764
  • DiRanna, K. (2008). Assessment-centered teaching: A reflective practice. Corwin, SAGE distributor.
  • Dogan, S., Pringle, R., & Mesa, J. (2016). The impacts of professional learning communities on science teachers: A review. Professional Development in Education, 42(4), 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2015.1065899
  • Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children’s ideas and the learning of science. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children’s ideas in science (pp. 1–9). Open University Press.
  • Fishman, E. J., Borko, H., Osborne, J., Gomez, F., Rafanelli, S., Reigh, E. & Berson, E. (2017). A practice-based professional development program to support scientific argumentation from evidence in the elementary classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(3), 222–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2017.1302727
  • Furtak, E. M., Circi, R., & Heredia, S. C. (2017). Exploring alignment among learning progressions, teacher-designed formative assessment tasks, and student growth: Results of a four-year study. Applied Measurement in Education, 31(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2017.1408624
  • Furtak, E. M., Circi, R., & Heredia, S. C. (2018). Exploring alignment among learning progressions, teacher-designed formative assessment tasks, and student growth: Results of a four-year study. Applied Measurement in Education, 31(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2017.1408624
  • Furtak, E. M., Morrison, D., & Kroog, H. (2014). Investigating the link between learning progressions and classroom assessment. Science Education, 98(4), 640–673. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21122
  • Furtak, E. M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2012). Learning progressions to support ambitious teaching practices. In A. Alonzo & W. G. Amilia (Eds.), Learning progressions in science (pp. 405–433). Brill.
  • Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birman, B., & Yoon, K. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
  • Hardré, P. L. (2008). Taking on the motivating challenge: Rural high school teachers’ perceptions and practice. Teacher Education & Practice, 21(1), 72–88.
  • Harris, C. J., Krajcik, J. S., Pellegrino, J. W., & McElhaney, K. W. (2016). Constructing assessment tasks for classroom formative applications. SRI.
  • Harrison, C. (2015, December). Assessments for learning in science classrooms. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 1(2), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.51355/jstem.2015.12
  • Haug, B. S., & Ødegaard, M. (2015). Formative assessment and teachers’ sensitivity to student responses. International Journal of Science Education, 37(4), 629–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.1003262
  • Heller, J. I., Daehler, K. R., Wong, N., Shinohara, M., & Miratrix, L. W. (2012). Differential effects of three professional development models on teacher knowledge and student achievement in elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 333–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21004
  • Heredia, S. C. (2020). Exploring the role of coherence in science teachers’ sensemaking of science‐specific formative assessment in professional development. Science Education, 104(3), 581–604.
  • Heredia, S. C., Furtak, E. M., Morrison, D., & Renga, I. P. (2016). Science teachers’ representations of classroom practice in the process of formative assessment design. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(7), 697–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9482-3
  • Heritage, M. (2007). Formative assessment: What do teachers need to know and do? Phi Delta Kappan, 89(2), 140–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170708900210
  • Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T., & Herman, J. (2009). From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment? Educational measurement. Educational Measurement Issues & Practice, 28(3), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00151.x
  • Hodgson, C., & Pyle, K. (2010). A literature review of assessment for learning in science. Nfer. Chicago.
  • Horn, I. S., & Little, J. W. (2009). Attending to problems of practice: Routines and resources for professional learning in teachers’ workplace interactions. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345158
  • Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
  • Kang, H., & Anderson, C. W. (2015). Supporting preservice science teachers’ ability to attend and respond to student thinking by design. Science Education, 99(5), 863–895. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21182
  • Kang, H., Thompson, J., & Windschitl, M. (2014). Creating opportunities for students to show what they know: The role of scaffolding in assessment tasks. Science Education, 98(4), 674. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21123
  • Kloser, M., Borko, H., Martinez, J. F., Stecher, B., & Luskin, R. (2016). Evidence of middle school science assessment practice from classroom‐based portfolios. Science Education, 101(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21256
  • Lebak, K. (2015). Unpacking the complex relationship between beliefs, practice, and change related to inquiry-based instruction of one science teacher. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(8), 695–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9445-0
  • Linn, R., Baker, E., & Dunbar, S. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 20, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176232
  • Llewellyn, D. (2010). Differentiated science inquiry. Corwin Press.
  • Loewenberg Ball, D., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
  • McFadden, J. (2019). Transitions in the perpetual beta of the NGSS: One science teacher’s beliefs and attempts for instructional change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(3), 229–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1559559
  • McFadden, J., Jung, K., Tretter, T., & Robinson, B. (2022). Teacher-developed multi-dimensional science assessments supporting elementary teacher learning about the next generation science standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 33(1), 55–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1905331
  • Mislevy, R. J., & Haertel, G. (2006). Implications of evidence-centered design for educational assessment. Educational Measurement Issues & Practice, 25(4), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2006.00075.x
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). How people learn II: Learners, contexts, and cultures. National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council. (1999). The assessment of science meets the science of assessment: Summary of a workshop. National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9588
  • National Research Council. (2014). Developing assessments for the next generation science standards. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18409
  • National Research Council. (2015). Guide to implementing the next generation science standards. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18802
  • National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K‐12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
  • Osborne, J. F., Borko, H., Fishman, E., Gomez Zaccarelli, F., Berson, E., Busch, K. C., Reigh, E., & Tseng, A. (2019). Impacts of a practice-based professional development program on elementary teachers’ facilitation of and student engagement with scientific argumentation. American Educational Research Journal, 56(4), 1067–1112. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218812059
  • Otero, V. K. (2006). Moving beyond the “get it or don’t” conception of formative assessment. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105285963
  • Palmer, D. J., Stough, L. M., Burdenski, T. K., Jr., & Gonzales, M. (2005). Identifying teacher expertise: An examination of researchers’ decision making. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4001_2
  • Passmore, C., Schwarz, C., & Mankowski, J. (2017). Helping students make sense of the world using next generation science and engineering practices. NSTA Press.
  • Pellegrino, J. W. (2012). Assessment of science learning: Living in interesting times. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 831–841. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21032
  • Pellegrino, J. W. (2013). Proficiency in science: Assessment challenges and opportunities. Science, 340(6130), 320–323. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232065
  • Pellegrino, J. W. (2014). Assessment as a positive influence on 21st century teaching and learning: A systems approach to progress. Psicología Educativa, 20(2), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2014.11.002
  • Pellegrino, J. W. (2016). 21st Century science assessment: The future is now. SRI International.
  • Pellegrino, J. W., Wilson, M., & Koenig, J. (2014). Developing assessments for the next generation science standards. (Beatty, A., Eds.). National Academies Press.
  • Penuel, W. R., & Shepard, L. A. (2016). Assessment and teaching. In D. H. Gitomer & C. A. Bell (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 787–850). AERA.
  • Penuel, W., Van Horne, K., & Bell, P. (2016). Steps to designing a three-dimensional assessment. http://stemteachingtools.org/
  • Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176586
  • Sabel, J. L., Forbes, C. T., & Zangori, L. (2015). Promoting prospective elementary teachers’ learning to use formative assessment for life science instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(4), 419–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9431-6
  • Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.
  • Sandlin, B., Harshman, J., & Yezierski, E. (2015). Formative assessment in high school chemistry teaching. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(10), 1619–1625. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00163
  • Schweingruber, H., & Beatty, A. (2017). Seeing students learn science: Integrating assessment and instruction in the classroom. National Academies Press.
  • Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176145
  • Shepard, L. A. (2019). Classroom assessment to support teaching and learning. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 683(1), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716219843818
  • Shepard, L. A., Penuel, W. R., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2018). Using learning and motivation theories to coherently link formative assessment, grading practices, and large‐scale assessment. Educational Measurement Issues & Practice, 37(1), 21–34.
  • Siedlcki, S. L. (2020). Understanding descriptive research designs and methods. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 34(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000493
  • Spillane, J. P., Hopkins, M., & Sweet, T. M. (2018). School district educational infrastructure and change at scale: Teacher peer interactions and their beliefs about mathematics instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 55(3), 532–571. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217743928
  • Supovitz, J. (2012). Getting at student understanding – the key to teachers’ use of test data. Teachers College Record, 114(11), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811211401105
  • Talanquer, V., Bolger, M., & Tomanek, D. (2015). Exploring prospective teachers’ assessment practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(5), 585–609. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21209
  • Trzaskus, M. D., (2022). An analysis of public comments on the implementation of the NGSS in Kentucky [Doctoral dissertation, Electronic Theses and dissertations, University of Louisville]. Paper 3948. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/3948
  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations (3). Sage.
  • Wei, L., Murphy, P. K., & Firetto, C. M. (2018). How can teachers facilitate productive small- group talk? Elementary School Journal, 118(4), 578–609. https://doi.org/10.1086/697531
  • William, D. (2018). How can assessment support learning? A response to Wilson and Shepard, Penuel, and Pellegrino. Educational Measurement Issues & Practice, 37(1), 42–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12192
  • Wilson, S. M. (1987). “150 different ways” of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. Exploring teachers’ thinking. Taylor and Francis.
  • Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20(1), 99–149. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1999.0497

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.