Dynamical Systems Therapy (DST): Theory and Practical Applications

REFERENCES

• Adams, D. (2003). The salmon of doubt. New York, NY: Pan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Amini, F., Lewis, T., Lannon, R., Louie, A., Baumbacher, G., McGuinness, T., & Schiff, E. Z. (1996). Affect, attachment, memory: Contributions toward psychobiologic integration. Psychiatry,59, 213–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, P. W. (1972). More is different: Broken symmetry and the nature of hierarchical structure in science. Science,177, 393–396. doi:10.1126/science.177.4047.393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auffray, C., & Nottale, L. (2008). Scale relativity theory and integrative systems biology: 1. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology,97, 79–114. doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2007.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauregard, M. (2009). Effect of mind on brain activity: Evidence from neuroimaging studies of psychotherapy and placebo effect. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry,63, 5–16. doi:10.1080/08039480802421182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beebe, B., & Lachmann, F. (2003). The relational turn in psychoanalysis: A dyadic systems view from infant research. Contemporary Psychoanalysis,39, 379–409. doi:10.1080/00107530.2003.10747213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beutel, M., Stern, E., & Silbersweig, D. (2003). The emerging dialogue between psychoanalysis and neuroscience: Neuroimaging perspectives. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association,51, 773–801. doi:10.1177/00030651030510030101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boston Change Process Study Group. (2008). Forms of relational meaning: Issues in the relations between the implicit and reflective-verbal domains. Psychoanalytic Dialogues,18, 125–148. doi:10.1080/10481880801909351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1984). Psychoanalysis as a natural science. Psychoanalytic Psychology,1, 7–21. doi:10.1037/0736-9735.1.1.7
   Google Scholar
• Brockman, R. (1998). A map of the mind: Toward a science of psychotherapy. Madison, CT: Psychosocial Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P. C. W. (2004). John Archibald Wheeler and a clash of ideas. In J. D. Barrow, P. C. W. Davies, & C. L. Harper, Jr (Eds.), Science and ultimate reality: Quantum theory, cosmology and complexity (pp. 3–23). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Descartes, R. (1985/1647). Principles of philosophy. In The philosophical writings of Descartes, vol. 1. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Waal, F. (1996). Good-natured: The origins of right and wrong in humans and other animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, G. (2004). Wider than the sky: The phenomenal gift of consciousness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P. (1999). Guest editorial: Memory and therapeutic action. International Journal of Psychoanalysis,80, 215–223. doi:10.1516/0020757991598620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1989/1895). Project for a scientific psychology. In P. Gay (Ed.), The Freud reader. New York, NY and London, UK: W.W. Norton & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbard, G. (1994). Mind and brain in psychiatric treatment. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic,58, 427–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbard, G. (2000). A neurobiologically informed perspective on psychotherapy. The British Journal of Psychiatry,177, 117–122. doi:10.1192/bjp.177.2.117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gell-Mann, M. (1994). Complex adaptive systems. In G. Cowan et al. (Eds.), Complexity: Metaphors, models, and reality. SFI studies in the sciences of complexity (Vol. XIX, pp. 17–45). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grossmark, R. (2007). The edge of chaos: Enactment, disruption, and emergence in group psychotherapy. Psychoanalytic Dialogues,17, 479–499. doi:10.1080/10481880701487193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jablonka, E. (2002). Information: Its interpretation, its inheritance, and its sharing. Philosophy of Science,69, 578–605. doi:10.1086/344621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, E. (1999). Biology and the future of psychoanalysis: A new intellectual framework for psychiatry revisited. American Journal of Psychiatry,156, 505–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, E. (2001). Psychotherapy and the single synapse: The impact of psychiatric thought on neurobiological research. Journal of Neuropsychiatry,13, 290–300. doi:10.1176/appi.neuropsych.13.2.290 (Original work published 1979)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman, S., & Clayton, P. (2006). On emergence, agency, and organization. Biology and Philosophy,21, 501–521. doi:10.1007/s10539-005-9003-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeDoux, J. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience,23, 155–184. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, S. (2003). Mapping the mind: The intersection of psychoanalysis and neuroscience. London, UK: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons-Ruth, K., & Boston Change Process Study Group. (1998). Implicit relational knowing: Its role in development and psychoanalytic treatment. Infant Mental Health Journal,19, 282–289. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0355(199823)19:3<282::AID-IMHJ3>3.0.CO;2-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons-Ruth, K., & Boston Change Process Study Group. (2001). The emergence of new experiences: Relational improvisation, recognition process, and non-linear change in psychoanalytic theory. Psychologist-Psychoanalist,21, 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Malan, D. (1963). A study of brief psychotherapy. London, UK: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Marks-Tarlow, T. (2011). Merging and emerging: A nonlinear portrait of intersubjectivity during psychotherapy. Psychoanalytic Dialogues,21, 110–127. doi:10.1080/10481885.2011.545333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menninger, K. A. (1958). Theory of psychoanalytic technique. Menninger Clinic Monograph Series. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity: A guided tour. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. (2000). Relationality: From attachment to intersubjectivity. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, N. (2007). Reductionism: How did we fall into it and can we emerge from it? In N. Murphy & W. R. Stoeger (Eds.), Evolution and emergence: Systems, organisms, persons (pp. 19–39, Ch. 1). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. (1986). Internal object relations. In J. Aronson (Ed.), The matrix of the mind: Object relations and the psychoanalytic dialogue (pp. 131–165). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Osimo, F. (2003). Experiential short-term dynamic psychotherapy: A manual. Bloomington, IN: 1st Books Library.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, I. R. (2009). Talk, action and belief: How the intentionality model combines attachment-oriented psychodynamic therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy. New York, NY: iUniverse, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prigogine, I. (1997). The end of certainty: Time, chaos, and the new laws of nature. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sagan, C. (2006). The varieties of scientific experience. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, S. (2011). Remembering with emotion in dynamic psychotherapy. New York, NY: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Schore, A. (2002). Advances in neuropsychoanalysis, attachment theory, and trauma research: Implications for self-psychology. Psychoanalytic Inquiry,22, 433–484. doi:10.1080/07351692209348996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, S. (2005). Dynamic systems theories as a metaframework for psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues,15, 285–319. doi:10.1080/10481881509348832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, Y. (2014). Psychodynamic formulation in the age of neuroscience: A dynamical systems model. Psychoanalytic Dialogues,24, 175–192. doi:10.1080/10481885.2014.893777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, Y., & Gabbard, G. O. (1994). A reconsideration of altruism from an evolutionary and psychodynamic perspective. Ethics and Behavior,4, 23–42. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb0401_2
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, D. (2006). An interpersonal neurobiology approach to psychotherapy: Awareness, mirror neurons, and neural plasticity in the development of well-being. Psychiatric Annals,36, 248–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigmund, K. (1998). Complex adaptive systems and the evolution of reciprocation. Ecosystems (New York, N.Y.),1, 444–448. doi:10.1007/s100219900039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skar, P. (2004). Chaos and self-organization: Emergent patterns at critical life transitions. Journal of Analytical Psychology,49, 243–262. doi:10.1111/j.1465-5922.2004.00456.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, M., & Kriegman, D. (1992). The adaptive design of the human psyche: Psychoanalysis, evolutionary biology, and the therapeutic process. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sloman, L., & Atkinson, L. (2000). Social competition and attachment. In L. Sloman & P. Gilbert (Eds.), Subordination and defeat: An evolutionary approach to mood disorders and their therapy (pp. 205–220). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Smolin, L. (2012). Time reborn: From the crisis in physics to the future of the universe. Boston, MA and New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Spruiell, V. (1993). Deterministic chaos and the sciences of complexity: Psychoanalysis in the midst of a general scientific revolution. Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association,41, 3–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, M. H. (1996). The self-organizing psyche: Nonlinear and neurobiological contributions to psychoanalysis. In W. Sulis & A. Combs (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamics in human behavior (pp. 256–275). New Jersey: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R. (1997). Dynamic, dyadic, intersubjective systems: An evolving paradigm for psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology,114, 337–346. doi:10.1037/h0079729
   Google Scholar
• Stungkur, H. (2004). On selfish memes: Culture as complex adaptive system. Journal of Social Complexity,2, 20–32.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, E. (2005). Dynamic systems theory and the complexity of change. Psychoanalytic Dialogues,15, 255–283. doi:10.1080/10481881509348831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tononi, G., & Koch, C. (2008). The neural correlates of consciousness: An update. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,1124, 239–261. doi:10.1196/annals.1440.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and Sociobiology,11, 375–424. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(90)90017-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velmans, M. (2009). Understanding consciousness, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Von Bayer, H. C. (2003). Information: The new language of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yalom, I. (2008). Staring at the sun: Overcoming the terror of death. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar