Creation Stories: Reproductive Crisis and the “Birth / Abortive” of Science Fiction

References

• Berlant, Lauren. “America, ‘Fat,’ the Fetus.” boundary 2 21.3 (1994): 145–95. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bewell, Alan. “‘An Issue of Monstrous Desire’: Frankenstein and Obstetrics.” Yale Journal of Criticism 2.1 (Fall 1988): 105–28. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Botting, Eileen Hunt. Mary Shelley and the Rights of the Child: Political Philosophy in “Frankenstein”. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 2018. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Brantlinger, Patrick. “Race and Frankenstein.” The Cambridge Companion to Frankenstein. Ed. Andrew Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2016. 128–42. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Judith. Afterword. “Animating Autobiography: Barbara Johnson and Mary Shelley's Monster.” A Life With Mary Shelley. By Barbara Johnson. Stanford: Standford UP, 2014. 37-50. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Octavia. Lilith’s Brood. New York: Grand Central, 2007. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield, Rosaria. “I Thought Planned Parenthood Protected Family Values.” The Gospel Coalition. 21 July, 2015. Web. 7 Feb. 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Calvin, John. Commentaries on The Book of Genesis. Vol. 1. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Printing Company, 1847. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, Drew. Joy of the Worm: Suicide and Pleasure in Early Modern English Literature. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2022. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Dowdall, Lisa. “Treasured Strangers: Race, Biopolitics, and the Human in Octavia E. Butler’s XENOGENESIS Trilogy.” Science Fiction Studies 44.3 (2017): 506–25. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, Diana Pérez. Embryology and the Rise of the Gothic Novel. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, Lee. No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Durham: Duke UP, 2004. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Federici, Silvia. Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation. Brooklyn: Autonomedia, 2004. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Catherine. The Body Economic: Life, Death, and Sensation in Political Economy and the Victorian Novel. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2006. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, Sandra M., and Susan Gubar. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. New Haven: Yale UP, 2000. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Glimp, David. Increase and Multiply: Governing Cultural Reproduction in Early Modern England. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2003. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Gomel, Elana. Science Fiction, Alien Encounters, and the Ethics of Posthumanism: Beyond the Golden Rule. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge, 1990. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Harol, Corrinne, and Jessica MacQueen. “Eve’s Choices: Procreation, Reproduction, and the Politics of Generation in Paradise Lost.” The Secrets of Generation: Reproduction in the Long Eighteenth Century. Ed. Raymond Stephanson and Darren Wagner. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 2015. 438–57. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Hogle, Jerrold. “The Gothic Image and the Quandaries of Science in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein.” Global Frankenstein. Ed. Carol Margaret Davison and Marie Mulvey-Roberts. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. 21–36. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, Fredric. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. London: Routledge, 1983. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Barbara. A Life With Mary Shelley. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2014. 15–26. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, James. Ulysses. New York: Vintage, 1986. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Koretsky, Deanna P. Death Rights: Romantic Suicide, Race, and the Bounds of Liberalism. Albany: SUNY P, 2021. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Matthew, Patricia. “‘A daemon whom I had myself created’: Race, Frankenstein, and Monstering.” Frankenstein in Theory: A Critical Anatomy. Ed. Orrin C. Wang. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021. 173–83. Print.
   Google Scholar
• McColley, Diane. “Free Will and Obedience in the Separation Scene of Paradise Lost.” SEL 12.1 (1972): 103–20. Print.
   Google Scholar
• McLane, Maureen. “Literate Species: Populations, ‘Humanities,’ and Frankenstein.” ELH 63.4 (Winter 1996): 959–88. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milton, John. Paradise Lost. Ed. David Scott Kastan. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2005. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Moers, Ellen. Literary Women: The Great Writers. New York: Doubleday, 1976. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, Jennifer. Laboring Women: Reproduction and Gender in New World Slavery. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 2004. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Erin. “Milton’s ‘Birth Abortive’: Remaking Family at the End of Paradise Lost.” Milton Studies 43 (2004): 145–70. Print.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, Mary. The Politics of Reproduction. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1982. Print.
   Google Scholar
• The Oxford Study Bible. Rev. standard ed. New York: Oxford UP, 1992. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Rampell, Palmer. “The Science Fiction of Roe v. Wade.” ELH 85.1 (Spring 2018): 221–52. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddle, John. Goddesses, Elixirs, and Witches: Plants and Sexuality Throughout Human History. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Ellen Cronan. “Custody Battles: Reproducing Knowledge about Frankenstein.” NLH 26.4 (Autumn 1995): 809–32. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, James C. Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States. New Haven: Yale UP, 2017. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sha, Richard C. “Mary Shelley’s Monstrous Abortion.” The Lost Romantics: Forgotten Poets, Neglected Works and One-Hit Wonders. Ed. Norbert Lennartz. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. 203–24. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Shelley, Mary. “Author’s Introduction to the Standard Novels Edition (1831).” Appendix A. Frankenstein. 1818. Ed. Marilyn Butler. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1993. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. 1818. Ed. Marilyn Butler. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1993. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Spillers, Hortense. “Mama’s Baby, Papa’s Maybe: An American Grammar Book.” Diacritics 17.2 (Summer 1987): 64–81. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stryker, Susan. “My Words to Victor Frankenstein above the Village of Chamounix: Performing Transgender Rage.” The Transgender Studies Reader. Ed. Susan Stryker and Stephen Whittle. New York: Routledge, 2006. 244–56. Print.
   Google Scholar
• United States. Supreme Court. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. 19-1392. 24 June, 2022. Web. 7 Feb., 2023.
   Google Scholar
• van den Berg, Sara. “Eve, Sin, and Witchcraft in Paradise Lost.” MLQ 47.4 (1986): 347–65. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollstonecraft, Mary. Maria. Mary and Maria; Matilda. By Mary Wollstonecraft and Mary Shelley. Ed. Janet Todd. London: Penguin, 1992. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Wynter, Sylvia, and Katherine McKittrick. “Unparalleled Catastrophe for Our Species? Or, to Give Humanness a Different Future: Conversations.” Sylvia Wynter: On Being Human as Praxis. Ed. Katherine McKittrick. Durham: Duke UP, 2015. 9–89. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Elizabeth. Black Frankenstein: The Making of an American Metaphor. New York: New York UP, 2008. Print.
   Google Scholar