Exploring the Relationship Between Televised Presidential Debate and Twitter: A Network Analysis of Intermedia Agenda Setting

References

• Adams, A., & McCorkindale, T. (2013). Dialogue and transparency: A content analysis of how the 2012 presidential candidates used Twitter. Public Relations Review, 39(4), 357–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, J. H. (1995). Why Parties? The Origin and Transformations of Political Parties in America. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arman, Z. R. (2022). Networked Huawei agendas during the US-China trade conflict: The interrelationships between Huawei, the news media, and public tweets. International Journal of Communication, 16, 21. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/19359/3950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberá, P., Boydstun, A. E., Linn, S., McMahon, R., & Nagler, J. (2021). Automated text classification of news articles: A practical guide. Political Analysis, 29(1), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2020.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawn, K., Cohen, M., Karol, D., Masket, S., Noel, H., & Zaller, J. (2012). A theory of political parties: Groups, policy demands and nominations in American politics. Perspectives on Politics, 10(3), 571–597. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592712001624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identificaton. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2(1), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1972.9989806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2018). Analyzing Social Networks. LosAngeles, SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Carmines, E. G., & Woods, J. (2002). The role of party activists in the evolution of the abortion issue. Political Behavior, 24(4), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022510927796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceron, A. (2014). Twitter and the traditional media: Who is the real agenda-setter?. APSA 2014 Annual Meeting Paper. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2454310
   Google Scholar
• Chang, S. I., Gable, G., Smythe, E., & Timbrell, G. (2000). A Delphi examination of public sector ERP implementation issues. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2000/49
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M., Karol, D., Noel, H., & Zaller, J. (2008). The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, B. A., Kenski, K., & Wang, D. (2013). Twitter use by the presidential primary candidates during the 2012 campaign. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(11), 1596–1610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213489014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, B. A., Kenski, K., & Wang, D. (2015). The rise of Twitter in the political campaign: Searching for intermedia agenda-setting effects in the presidential primary. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(4), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1954). The Public and Its Problems. Swallow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doerfel, M. F. (1998). What comparison semantic network analysis? A comparison of research and methodology. Connection, 2(2), 16–26. https://qualquant.org/wp-content/uploads/cda/Doerfel%20What%20constitutes%20semantic%20network%20analysis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Doerfel, M. F., & Connaughton, S. L. (2008). Semantic networks and competition: Election year winning and losing in U.S. televised presidential debates,1960-2004. Journal of the American Society for Information and Technology, 60(1), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, Y. R. (2013). Intermedia agenda-setting in the age of globalization: A multinational agenda-setting test. Global Media and Communication, 9(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766512463038
   Google Scholar
• Fuhse, J. A. (2015). Networks from communication. European Journal of Social Theory, 18(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431014549683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, W. J., Moon, B., & Grant, J. B. (2010). Digital dialogue? Australian politicians’ use of the social network tool twitter. Australian Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 579–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2010.517176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groshek, J., & Groshek, M. C. (2010). Agenda trending: Reciprocity and the predictive capacity of social networking sites in intermedia agenda-setting across topics over time. Media and Communication, 1(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2199144
   Google Scholar
• Gueorguieva, V. (2008). Voters, MySpace, and YouTube: The impact of alternative communication channels on the 2006 election cycle and beyond. Social Science Computer Review, 26(3), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307305636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, L. (2012). The Application of Social Network Analysis in agenda-setting research: A methodological exploration. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 616–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, L., & McCombs, M. (2011). Toward the third level of agenda-setting theory: A network agenda-setting model. Presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication annual conference, Boston, MA, USA. St. Louis.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, L., & McCombs, S. (2011). Network agenda-setting: A third level of media effects. Presented at the International Communication Association annual conference, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, L., & Vargo, C. (2015). The power of message networks: A big-data analysis of the network agenda-setting model and issue ownership. Mass Communication and Society, 18(5), 557–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1045300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, L., Vargo, C. J., Pan, Z., Ding, W., & Ishwar, P. (2016). Big social data analytics in journalism and mass communication: Comparing dictionary-based text analysis and unsupervised topic modeling. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(2), 332–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016639231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, L., Vu, H. T., & McCombs, M. (2012). An expanded perspective on agenda-setting effects. Exploring the third level of agenda-setting. Revista de Comunicación, 11(1), 51–68. https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/2755
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. S. (2014). The American Political Party System: Continuity and Change over Ten Presidential Elections. Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. (1973). Cognitive maps in perception and thought. In R. M. Downs & D. Stea (Eds.), Image and environment: Cognitive mapping and spatial behavior (pp. 63–78). Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Krackardt, D. (1987). QAP partialling as a test of spuriousness. Social Networks, 6(1), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(87)90012-8
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. (2005). A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500250438
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. E. (1981). The Agenda-Setting Approach. In D. D. Nimmo, & K. R. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of Political Communication (pp. 121–140). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meraz, S. (2009). Is there an elite hold? Traditional media to social media agenda-setting influence in blog networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(3), 682–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01458.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzgar, E., & Maruggi, A. (2009). Social media and the 2008 U.S. presidential election. Journal of New Communications Research, 4, 141–165. https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A9%3A9797689/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Ascholar&id=ebsco%3Agcd%3A51533393&crl=c
   Google Scholar
• Ognyanova, K., & Monge, P. (2013). A multitheoretical, multilevel, multidimensional network model of the media system: Production, content, and audiences. Annals of the International Communication Association, 37(1), 67–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679146
   Google Scholar
• Sayre, B., Bode, L., Shah, D., Wilcox, D., & Shah, C. (2010). Agenda-setting in a digital age: Tracking attention to California proposition 8 in social media, online news, and conventional news. Policy & Internet, 2(2), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-2866.1040
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, A. (2015). Twitter to partner with CBS News for Iowa democratic debate. Twitter. Retrieved from. https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/a/2015/twitter-to-partner-with-cbs-news-for-iowa-democratic-debate.html
   Google Scholar
• Shrestha, M. K., & Feiock, R. C. (2009). Governing U.S. metropolitan areas: Self-organizing and multiplex service network. American Politics Research, 37), 5(5), 801–823. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X09337466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, S., Livan, G., & Smith, R. E. (2020). A network perspective on intermedia agenda-setting. Applied Network Science, 5(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-020-00272-4
   Google Scholar
• Su, Y. (2022). Networked agenda flow between elite US newspapers and Twitter: A case study of the 2020 black lives matter movement. Journalism, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221092521.
   Google Scholar
• Su, L., Cassiatore, M. A., Liang, X., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Xenos, M. A. (2017). Analyzing public sentiments online: Combining human- and computer-based content analysis. Information, Communication & Society, 20(3), 406–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1182197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, Y., Hu, J., & Lee, D. K. L. (2020). Delineating the transnational network agenda-setting model of mainstream newspapers and twitter: A machine-learning approach. Journalism Studies, 21(15), 2113–2134. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1812421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towner, T. L., & Dulio, D. A. (2012). New media and political marketing in the United States: 2012 and beyond. Journal of Political Marketing, 11(1–2), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2012.642748
   Google Scholar
• van Klingeren, M., Trilling, D., & Möller, J. (2021). Public opinion on Twitter? How vote choice and arguments on Twitter comply with patterns in survey data, evidence from the 2016 Ukraine referendum in the Netherlands. Acta Politica, 56(3), 436–455. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-020-00160-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargo, C. J., & Guo, L. (2017). Networks, big data, and intermedia agenda-setting: An analysis of traditional, partisan, and emerging online US news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(4), 1031–1055. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016679976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L. (2014). Network issue agendas on Twitter during the 2012 U.S. presidential election. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 296–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., Lefevere, J., & Tresch, A. (2012). The associative dimension of issue ownership. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(4), 771–782. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, B. D., & Vedlitz, A. (2007). Issue definition, information processing, and the politics of global warming. American Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 552–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00267.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar