Individual and collaborative infographic design and cognitive strategies in visual literacy support process: a qualitative research perspective

References

• Adil, R. (2022). Use of images to support critical visual literacy: a small-scale study in a religious education (re) setting in Karachi, Pakistan. Scottish Educational Review, 54(1), 93–119. https://doi.org/10.1163/27730840-54010005
   Google Scholar
• Akmal, Y., Koeswantono, S., & Hartati, S. (2020). Character development in generation Alpha through social-emotional learning with parent involvement [Paper presentation]. 1st International Conference on Early Childhood Care Education and Parenting (ICECCEP 2019) (pp. 87–93). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201205.091
   Google Scholar
• Alhadreti, O. (2021). Comparing two methods of usability testing in Saudi Arabia: concurrent think-aloud vs. co-discovery. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(2), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1809152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alnashri, A., Alhadreti, O., & Mayhew, P. J. (2016). The influence of participant personality in usability tests. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction (IJHCI), 7(1), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, G. (1996). Active learning in a constructivist framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31(4), 349–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00369153
   Google Scholar
• Apaydın, Ç., & Kaya, F. (2020). An analysis of the preschool teachers’ views on Alpha generation. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(11). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3627158
   Google Scholar
• Apriyanti, N., Razak, R. A., Rahim, S. S. A., Shaharom, M. S. N., & Baharuldin, Z. (2020). Infographic instructional media as a solution and innovation in physics learning for senior high school students in Indonesia. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(10), 773–780. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.10.1457
   Google Scholar
• Arcia, A., Suero-Tejeda, N., Bales, M. E., Merrill, J. A., Yoon, S., Woollen, J., & Bakken, S. (2016). Sometimes more is more: iterative participatory design of infographics for engagement of community members with varying levels of health literacy. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 23(1), 174–183. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arifah, M. N., Munir, M. A., & Nudin, B. (2021). Educational design for Alpha generation in the industrial age 4.0 [Paper presentation]. 2nd Southeast Asian Academic Forum on Sustainable Development (SEA-AFSID 2018) (pp. 137–145). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.210305.026
   Google Scholar
• Arneson, J. B., & Offerdahl, E. G. (2018). Visual literacy in Bloom: Using Bloom’s taxonomy to support visual learning skills. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(1), ar7. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-08-0178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arslan, R., & Nalinci, G. Z. (2014). Development of visual literacy levels scale in higher education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 13(2), 61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Aydemir, A. (2021). Effect of infographic use on student achievement in the “global connections” learning domain in the social studies course. International Journal of Education Technology & Scientific Researches, 6(14) https://doi.org/10.35826/ijetsar.138
   Google Scholar
• BattelleforKids. (2019). Framework for 21st century learning definitions. https://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_DefinitionsBFK.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beyea, S. C., & Nicoll, L. H. (2000). Learn more using focus groups. AORN Journal, 71(4), 897–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-2092(06)62276-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boren, T., & Ramey, J. (2000). Thinking aloud: Reconciling theory and practice. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 43(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1109/47.867942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borkin, M. A., Vo, A. A., Bylinskii, Z., Isola, P., Sunkavalli, S., Oliva, A., & Pfister, H. (2013). What makes a visualization memorable? IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(12), 2306–2315. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett, G. E., & Ditsikas, D. (2006). Personality as a criterion for selecting usability testing participants [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Information and Communications Technologies, December (pp. 599–604).
   Google Scholar
• Çaka, C., & Dursun, Ö. (2022). Evaluation of the effectiveness of different infographic designs. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 5(3), 519–534. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1075352
   Google Scholar
• Çakiroğlu, Ü., Yildiz, M., Mazlum, E., Turan Güntepe, E., & Aydin, Ş. (2017). Exploring collaboration in learning by design via weblogs. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(2), 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9139-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, R. N., Monteiro, C. E. F., & Martins, M. N. P. (2022). Challenges for university teacher education in Brazil posed by the Alpha Generation. Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives, (28), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.7203/28.21408
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J. W., & Pow, J. W. (2020). The role of social annotation in facilitating collaborative inquiry-based learning. Computers & Education, 147, 103787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H. Y. (2023). Scaffolding online peer critiquing to develop students’ epistemic criteria of data visualization. Computers & Education, 203(2023), 104863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104863
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, V., Thapliyal, G., & Bisht, D. (2012). Social constructivism based classroom experiences of teachers (pre-service and in-service). Educational Quest-An International Journal of Education and Applied Social Sciences, 3(1), 75–79.
   Google Scholar
• Cortázar, C., Nussbaum, M., Alario-Hoyos, C., Goñi, J., & Alvares, D. (2022). The impacts of scaffolding socially shared regulation on teamwork in an online project-based course. The Internet and Higher Education, 55(2022), 100877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100877
   Google Scholar
• Darmuki, A., Nugrahani, F., Fathurohman, I., Kanzunnudin, M., & Hidayati, N. A. (2023). The impact of inquiry collaboration project based learning model of Indonesian language course achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16215a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellatola, E., Daradoumis, T., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2020). Exploring students’ engagement within a collaborative inquiry-based language learning activity in a blended environment. In E. Dellatola, T. Daradoumis & Y. Dimitriadis (Eds.), Emerging technologies and pedagogies in the curriculum (pp. 355–375).
   Google Scholar
• Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis. A user-friendly guide for social scientists. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2016). Getting graphic about infographics: Design lessons learned from popular infographics. Journal of Visual Literacy, 35(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2016.1205832
   Google Scholar
• Dyjur, P., & Li, L. (2015). Learning 21st century skills by engaging in an infographics assignment. Proceedings of the IDEAS: Designing Responsive Pedagogy (pp. 62–71.)
   Google Scholar
• Emueakporavwa, O. O. (2022). An investigation of the ımpact of task-types on the reactivity of the concurrent think-aloud in usability testing [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Sunderland.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3), 215–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Verbal reports on thinking. In C. Faerch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Introspection in second language research. Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ezzeldin, S. M. Y. (2022). The effect of learning by infographic-enhanced modeling and its role in developing engagement in learning science and cognitive representation of atomic structure and chemical bonds among middle school students in Saudi Arabia: A Mixed Study. Journal of Scientific Research in Education, 23(11), 126–189.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, M., Tibdewal, V., Zhao, Q., Cao, L., Peng, C., Shu, R., & Shan, Y. (2022). Older adults’ concurrent and retrospective think-aloud verbalizations for identifying user experience problems of VR games. Interacting with Computers, 34(4), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwac039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felten, P. (2008). Resource review: Visual literacy. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 40(6), 60–64. https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.40.6.60-64
   Google Scholar
• Fernando, P. A., & Premadasa, H. S. (2024). Use of gamification and game-based learning in educating generation Alpha: A systematic literature review. Educational Technology & Society, 27(2), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202404_27(2).RP03
   Google Scholar
• Guan, Z., Lee, S., Cuddihy, E., & Ramey, J. (2006). The validity of the stimulated retrospective think-aloud method as measured by eye tracking [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April (pp. 1253–1262). https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124961
   Google Scholar
• Guinibert, M. (2020). Learn from your environment: A visual literacy learning model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajhosseini, M., Zandi, S., Hosseini Shabanan, S., & Madani, Y. (2016). Critical thinking and social interaction in active learning: A conceptual analysis of class discussion from Iranian students’ perspective. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1175051. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1175051
   Google Scholar
• Halfin, H. H. (1973). Technology: A process approach [Doctoral dissertation]. West Virginia University.
   Google Scholar
• Han, J., & Kelley, T. R. (2022). STEM integration through shared practices: examining secondary science and engineering technology students’ concurrent think-aloud protocols. Journal of Engineering Design, 33(5), 343–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2022.2042498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanci, H. (2022). Investigation of high school students’ visual literacy levels. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 8(3), 611–625. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.2980
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, V. E. (2009). Collaborative learning. The sage handbook of management learning, education and development (pp. 126–140).
   Google Scholar
• Hou, H. T., & Keng, S. H. (2021). A dual-scaffolding framework integrating peer-scaffolding and cognitive-scaffolding for an augmented reality-based educational board game: An analysis of learners’ collective flow state and collaborative learning behavioral patterns. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(3), 547–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120969409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husssin, W. T. T., Harun, J., & A Shukor, N. (2019). Online interaction in social learning environment towards critical thinking skill: A framework. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.544
   Google Scholar
• ISTE. (2019). ISTE standarts for students. https://iste.org/standards/students
   Google Scholar
• Jaleniauskiene, E., & Kasperiuniene, J. (2021). Visual literacy development through infographics. In European conference on ınformation literacy (pp. 189–200). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, L., & Williams, L. M. (2003). Focus group methodology: Explanatory notes for the novice nurse researcher. Contemporary Nurse, 14(3), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.14.3.271
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jaspers, M. W., Steen, T., Van Den Bos, C., & Geenen, M. (2004). The think aloud method: A guide to user interface design. International Journal of Medical İnformatics, 73(11-12), 781–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayasekara, R. S. (2012). Focus groups in nursing research: Methodological perspectives. Nursing Outlook, 60(6), 411–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2012.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha, A. K. (2020). Understanding generation Alpha.
   Google Scholar
• Jukic, R., & Skojo, T. (2021). The educational needs of the Alpha generation [Paper presentation]. 44th International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO) (pp. 564–569). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, J., & Kim, Y. (2016). Effect of infographic instruction to promote elementary students’ use of scientific model. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 36(2), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.2.0279
   Google Scholar
• Kalaf-Hughes, N. (2023). Promoting information literacy and visual literacy skills in undergraduate students using infographics. PS: Political Science & Politics, 56(2), 321–327. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096522001214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan-Berkley, S. (2022). Digital tools and streaming media converge to inspire social interactions of generation Alpha. International Journal of Early Childhood, 54(2), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-021-00301-y
   Google Scholar
• Karaçam, E., & Gürbüz, O. (2023). Ortaöğretim öğrencileri için görsel okuryazarlık ölçeği geliştirme çalışması. International Journal of Social Science Research, 12(1), 60–77.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya, M. (2020). The impact of visual literacy awareness education on verbal and writing skills of middle school students. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 8(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.8n.2p.71
   Google Scholar
• Kedra, J. (2018). What does it mean to be visually literate? Examination of visual literacy definitions in a context of higher education. Journal of Visual Literacy, 37(2), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2018.1492234
   Google Scholar
• Kedra, J., & Zakeviciute, R. (2019). Visual literacy practices in higher education: What, why and how? Journal of Visual Literacy, 38(1-2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2019.1580438
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, T. R., Capobianco, B. M., & Kaluf, K. J. (2015). Concurrent think-aloud protocols to assess elementary design students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(4), 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9291-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiper, A., Arslan, S., Kıyıcı, M., & Akgün, Ö. E. (2012). Visual literacy scale: The study of validity and reliability. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 2(2), 73–83.
   Google Scholar
• Korhonen, A. M., Ruhalahti, S., & Veermans, M. (2019). The online learning process and scaffolding in student teachers’ personal learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 755–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9793-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraatz, E., Lin, T. J., Nagpal, M., & Anderman, L. (2023). Teacher scaffolding and equity in collaborative knowledge construction. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5(2023), 100306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100306
   Google Scholar
• Kuba, R., & Jeong, A. (2022). Demystifying visual design: A sequential analysis of visual design processes in infographic visual composition. Journal of Visual Literacy, 42(1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2023.2168394
   Google Scholar
• Kugler, E., & Kárpáti, A. (2023). Teaching Mathematics through art: Developing spatial skills and digital literacy of children with learning challenges through visual arts education. In A. Karpati (Ed.), Arts-based ınterventions and social change in Europe (pp. 30–38). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuusela, H., & Paul, P. (2000). A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal protocol analysis. The American Journal of Psychology, 113(3), 387. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q. (2002). Exploration of collaborative learning and communication in an educational environment using computer-mediated communication. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(4), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2002.10782364
   Google Scholar
• Lonnecker, M. E. (2018). Beyond the formula: using strategic scaffolding to foster critical thinking and authentic writing [Master thesis]. University of California San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Lysberg, J. (2023). Unpacking capabilities for professional learning: Teachers’ reflections on processes of collaborative inquiry in situated teamwork. Journal of Workplace Learning, 35(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-01-2022-0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maghsoudi, M., & Haririan, J. (2013). The impact of brainstorming strategies Iranian EFL learners’ writing skill regarding their social class status. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 1(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.20130101.20
   Google Scholar
• Mahawan, K., & Langprayoon, P. (2020). The effect of blended learning with collaborative learning upon English communication skills of English teaching program students [Paper presentation]. 5th International STEM Education Conference (iSTEM-Ed), November (pp. 55–58). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Maina, E. M., Wagacha, P. W., & Oboko, R. O. (2017). Enhancing active learning pedagogy through online collaborative learning. Information Reso Management Association, Artificial ıntelligence: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 1031–1054). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Major, C. (2020). Collaborative learning: A tried and true active learning method for the college classroom. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2020(164), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20420
   Google Scholar
• Maksum, A., Widiana, I. W., & Marini, A. (2021). Path analysis of self-regulation, social skills, critical thinking and problem-solving ability on social studies learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 613–628. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14336a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matrix, S., & Hodson, J. (2014). Teaching with infographics: Practising new digital competencies and visual literacies.
   Google Scholar
• McCrindle, M. (2021). Generation Alpha. Hachette Uk.
   Google Scholar
• McCrindle, M., & Fell, A. (2020). Understanding generation Alpha. https://generationAlpha.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Understanding-Generation-Alpha-McCrindle.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McCrindle, M., & Wolfinger, E. (2014). The ABC of XYZ: Understanding the global generations. UNSW Press Book.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, C., Palmgren, P. J., & Liljedahl, M. (2019). Twelve tips for conducting qualitative research interviews. Medical Teacher, 41(9), 1002–1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1497149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre, E. (2007). Story discussion in the primary grades: Balancing authenticity and explicit teaching. The Reading Teacher, 60(7), 610–620. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.60.7.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLafferty, I. (2004). Focus group interviews as a data collecting strategy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(2), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03186.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metros, S. E. (2008). The educator’s role in preparing visually literate learners. Theory Into Practice, 47(2), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840801992264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metros, S. E., & Woolsey, K. (2006). Visual literacy: An institutional imperative. Educause Review, 41(3), 80–81.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2023). Embracing the technological metamorphosis: Envisioning higher education for generation Alpha in a shifting educational landscape. International Journal Software Engineering and Computer Science (IJSECS), 3(2), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.35870/ijsecs.v3i2.1492
   Google Scholar
• Mintzes, J. J. (2020). From constructivism to active learning in college science. In J. J. Mintzes & E. M. Walter (Eds.), Active learning ın college science: The case for evidence-based practice (pp. 3–12).
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L., Krueger, R. A., & King, J. A. (1998). The focus group guidebook. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Muhammad, G. A. N., Hartinah, S., & Apriani, D. (2022). Transformational leadership in realizing humanist character education for the Alpha generation. MALAPY 2022: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, MALAPY 2022, 28 May 2022, Tegal, Indonesia (p. 258). European Alliance for Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Naparin, H., & Saad, A. B. (2017). Infographics in education: Review on infographics design. The International Journal of Multimedia & Its Applications,)9(4/5/6), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijma.2017.9602
   Google Scholar
• Nasution, M. I. S., Lubis, H. S. D., Tanjung, Y., & Nasution, A. A. B. (2021). Development of infographic-based minimum competency assessment instruments for high school students in medan city. International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC), 2(6), 1439–1450.
   Google Scholar
• Níkleva, D. G., & Rodríguez-Muñoz, F. J. (2022). Effects of a visual literacy programme for the improvement of reading comprehension in primary and secondary school students. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 22, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.21248/l1esll.2022.22.1.394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisa, H., Isnaini, M., Utami, L. S., & Islahudin, I. (2023). Collaborative learning effect on improving students’ creativity and critical thinking in the independent curriculum. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(3), 4038–4048. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.3538
   Google Scholar
• Noh, M. A. M., Fauzi, M. S. H. M., Jing, H. F., & Alias, M. F. (2017). Infographics: Teaching and learning tool. ATTARBAWIY: Malaysian Online Journal of Education, 1(1), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.53840/attarbawiy.v1i1.119
   Google Scholar
• Nuhoğlu Kibar, P., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2014). A new approach to equip students with visual literacy skills: Use of infographics in education. Information Literacy. Lifelong Learning and Digital Citizenship in the 21st Century: Second European Conference, ECIL 2014, Dubrovnik, Croatia, October 20-23, 2014. Proceedings 2 (pp. 456–465). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nuhoğlu Kibar, P., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2015). Searching for visual literacy: Secondary school students are creating infographics. Information Literacy: Moving Toward Sustainability: Third European Conference, ECIL 2015, Tallinn, Estonia, October 19-22, 2015, Revised Selected Papers 3 (pp. 241–251). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nuhoğlu Kibar, P., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2017). Fostering and assessing infographic design for learning: The development of infographic design criteria. Journal of Visual Literacy, 36(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2017.1331680
   Google Scholar
• Nuhoğlu Kibar, P., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2018). Modeling of infographic generation process as a learning strategy at the secondary school level based on the educational design research method. Ted Eğitim Ve Bilim, 43(196). https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2018.7592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuhoğlu Kibar, P., Sullivan, K., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2019). Creating infographics based on the Bridge21 model for team-based and technology-mediated learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 18, 87–111. https://doi.org/10.28945/4418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, L., & Wilson, S. (2023). Talking about thinking aloud: Perspectives from interactive think-aloud practitioners. Journal of User Experience, 18(3), 113–132.
   Google Scholar
• Omodan, B. I., & Tsotetsi, C. T. (2020). Decolonization of knowledge-construction in university classrooms: The place of social constructivism. African Journal of Gender, Society & Development, 9(2), 183.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. L. (1997). Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and interaction: Three communicative strands in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05510.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pangestu, T. I., & Sakti, A. W. (2022). Learning color theory in elementary school using basic infographic media during the Covid-19 Pandemic. ASEAN Journal for Science Education, 2(1), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Peltola, A. (2018). The classroom as think tank: small groups, authentic exercises, and instructional scaffolding in an advanced writing course. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(2), 322–333.
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, M. M., & Simões, D. (2012). Constructing knowledge: An experience of active and collaborative learning in ICT classrooms. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 392–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.046
   Google Scholar
• Provvidenza, C. F., Hartman, L. R., Carmichael, J., & Reed, N. (2019). Does a picture speak louder than words? The role of infographics as a concussion education strategy. Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine, 42(3), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453054.2019.1599683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pumahapinyo, S., Suwannatthachote, P., & Wiwitkunkasem, K. (2020). Proposal for a learning process using cognitive tools in an infographic design approach to improve visual literacy of undergraduate art education students. Journal of Education Studies, 48(2), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.EDUCU.48.2.14
   Google Scholar
• Pumahapinyo, S., Suwannathachote, P., & Wiwitkunkasem, K. (2022). Development of a blended learning model using cognitive tools and infographic design process to enhance visual literacy and creativity for art education students. Journal of Graduate Studies Valaya Alongkorn Rajabhat University, 16(3), 212–230.
   Google Scholar
• Ramadlani, A. K., & Wibisono, M. (2017). Visual literacy and character education for Alpha generation [Paper presentation]. ISoLEC Proceedings (pp. 1–7).
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, H. A., Sheffield, A., Phillips, A. S., & Moore, M. (2017). “Introduction to teaching online”: Usability evaluation of interactivity in an online social constructivist course. TechTrends, 61(6), 533–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0187-z
   Google Scholar
• Roehler, L. R., & Cantlon, D. J. (1997). Scaffolding: A powerful tool in social constructivist classrooms. Scaffolding Student Learning: Instructional Approaches and Issues, 1, 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas, M., Nussbaum, M., Guerrero, O., Chiuminatto, P., Greiff, S., Del Rio, R., & Alvares, D. (2022). Integrating a collaboration script and group awareness to support group regulation and emotions towards collaborative problem solving. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 17(1), 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-022-09362-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleem, A., Kausar, H., & Deeba, F. (2021). Social constructivism: A new paradigm in teaching and learning environment. Perennial Journal of History, 2(2), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.52700/pjh.v2i2.86
   Google Scholar
• Sayed, J. H., Mustafa, H. A., & Abdel Razek, A. E. (2022). The effect of an educational program using educational modules with infographic technology on Elementary school skill performance. International Journal of Sports Science & Arts-English, 21(1).
   Google Scholar
• Schoen, M. J. (2014). Teaching visual literacy skills in a one-shot session. Visual Resources Association Bulletin, 41(1).
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, J. (2018). Visual literacy: Academic libraries address 21st century challenges. Reference Services Review, 46(4), 479–499. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-04-2018-0048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senjaya, P., Purba, J. T., Parani, R., & Tukiran, M. (2021). Teacher perception of ICT and Alpha generation student. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 4(3), 740–748. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.4.3.2021.1508
   Google Scholar
• Serafini, F. (2017). Visual literacy. In B. Lingard, S. Sellar, S. Lewis, & G. W. Noblit (Eds.), Oxford research encyclopedia of education.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, L. A., & Whaley, B. (2018). Wikis as online collaborative learning experiences: “A different kind of brainstorming”. Adult Learning, 29(3), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045159518761095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, Y., Kim, D., & Song, D. (2020). Types and timing of scaffolding to promote meaningful peer interaction and increase learning performance in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(3), 640–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119877134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, K. N., & Piedmont, J. (2016). Reading the big picture: A visual literacy curriculum for today. Knowledge Quest, 44(5), 32–37.
   Google Scholar
• Sim, J. (1998). Collecting and analysing qualitative data: Issues raised by the focus group. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(2), 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00692.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smiciklas, M. (2012). The power of infographics: Using pictures to communicate and connect with your audiences. Que Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Soundy, C. S., & Drucker, M. F. (2010). Picture partners: A co-creative journey into visual literacy. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(6), 447–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-010-0374-4
   Google Scholar
• Sung, E., & Kelley, T. R. (2022). Using engineering design in technology education. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sung, E., & Kelley, T. R. (2023). Elementary students’ engineering design process: How young students solve engineering problems. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(5), 1615–1638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10317-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarkhova, L., Tarkhov, S., Nafikov, M., Akhmetyanov, I., Gusev, D., & Akhmarov, R. (2020). Infographics and their application in the educational process. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(13), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.3991/.vi.14647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taspolat, A., Kaya, O. S., Sapanca, H. F., Beheshti, M., & Ozdamli, F. (2017). An investigation toward advantages, design principles and steps of infographics in education. PONTE International Scientific Researchs Journal, 73(7), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.21506/j.ponte.2017.7.9
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D., Shemberger, M., & Wright, L. L. (2018). Evaluating visuals: Increasing visual literacy with infographics. Senses & Experiences: The Book of Selected Readings.
   Google Scholar
• Trentin, G. (2010). Networked collaborative learning: Social interaction and active learning. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, S. T., Huang, H. Y., & Chang, T. W. (2020). Developing a motion infographic-based learning system for effective learning. Education Sciences, 10(9), 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk, V. (2017). Understanding generation Alpha. Hotwire the Global Communications Agency Report. https://cnda.condenast.co.uk/wired/UnderstandingGenerationAlpha.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2011). Digital literacy in education. UNESCO Institute for Information. https://iite.unesco.org/pics/publications/en/files/3214688.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Uyan Dur, B. İ. (2018). The relation between infographic and visual literacy. The Online Journal of Communication and Media, 4(4), 48.
   Google Scholar
• Van Someren, M., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical approach to modelling cognitive (Vol. 11, pp. 29–41). AcademicPress.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderlip Taylor, K., & Buchman, K. (2022). Communication is key: Collaborative collages and visual literacy in primary grades. Art Education, 75(2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2021.2009277
   Google Scholar
• Vermeersch, L., & Vandenbroucke, A. (2015). Kids, take a look at this! Visual literacy skills in the school curriculum. Journal of Visual Literacy, 34(1), 106–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2015.11674725
   Google Scholar
• Visual Literacy Task Force. (2012). Visual literacy competency standards for higher education. College & Research Libraries News, 73, 97–104.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. H., & Liao, H. C. (2023). A scale development for visual literacy on health students and professionals. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 16, 3129–3141. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S416196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warsah, I., Morganna, R., Uyun, M., Afandi, M., & Hamengkubuwono, H. (2021). The impact of collaborative learning on learners’ critical thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14225a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WEF. (2015). New vision for education unlocking the potential of technology. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEFUSA_NewVisionforEducation_Report2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Whiting, L. S. (2008). Semi-structured interviews: Guidance for novice researchers. Nursing Standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain): 1987), 22(23), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2008.02.22.23.35.c6420
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. (1999). Focus groups: A feminist method. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(2), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00355.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S. Y. (2020). Incorporation of collaborative problem solving and cognitive tools to improve higher cognitive processing in online discussion environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(1), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119828044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, E., Wang, W., & Wang, Q. (2023). The effectiveness of collaborative problem solving in promoting students’ critical thinking: A meta-analysis based on empirical literature. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01508-1
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. A., Miller, K., Richman, T., Wendel, D., Schoenfeld, I., Anderson, E., & Shim, J. (2020). Encouraging collaboration and building community in online asynchronous professional development: Designing for social capital. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15(3), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09326-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yurtseven, N. (2020). Enriching Alpha classes with UbD-Based instructional design. In N. Yurtseven (Ed.), The teacher of generation Alpha. Peter Lang D.
   Google Scholar
• Yurtseven, N., & Karadeniz, Ş. (2020). An overview of generation Alpha. N. Yurtseven (Ed.), The teacher of generation Alpha. Peter Lang D.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., Bao, H., Shen, J., & Zhai, X. (2020). Investigating sequence patterns of collaborative problem-solving behavior in online collaborative discussion activity. Sustainability, 12(20), 8522. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziatdinov, R., & Cilliers, J. (2021). Generation Alpha: Understanding the next cohort of university students. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 10(3), 783–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar