Conceptualization of power sharing between partners in couple relationships: a scale development study in Turkey

References

• Akçabozan-Kayabol, N. B. (2017). Relationship maintenance behaviors and marital satisfaction: The mediator roles of relational equity and appreciation ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University, Graduate School of Social Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Akgül-Gök, F., & İl, S. (2017). Reflection of gender perception of married men and women to family functions. The Journal of International Social Research, 10(54), 523–533. doi:10.17719/jisr.20175434616
   Google Scholar
• Akyıl, Y., Prouty, A., Blanchard, A., & Lyness, K. (2016). Experiences of families transmitting values in a rapidly changing society: Implications for family therapists. Family Process, 55(2), 368–381. doi:10.1111/famp.12163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alpar, R. (2011). Uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistiksel yöntemler [Applied multivariate statistical methods] (3rd ed.). Ankara, Turkey: Detay.
   Google Scholar
• Arıcı-Şahin, F. (2017). Effects of the Feminist-Informed Relationship Enhancement Program on power sharing, self orientations and dyadic adjustment of married couples ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Hacettepe University, Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Black, L., & Piercy, F. P. (1991). A feminist family therapy scale. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 17(2), 111–120. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1991.tb00874.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolak-Boratav, H., Fişek, G. O., & Eslen-Ziya, H. (2017). Erkekliğin Türkiye halleri [Masculinities in Turkey]. İstanbul, Turkey: İstanbul Bilgi University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., & Krasner, B. R. (1986). Between give and take: A clinical guide to contextual therapy. New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York, NY: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum [Data analysis guidebook for social sciences: Statistics, research design, SPSS application and interpretation] (13th ed.). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, C. P., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 37–55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları [Multivariate statistics for social sciences: SPSS and LISREL applications]. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
   Google Scholar
• Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. (2011). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Enns, C. Z. (1988). Dilemmas of power and equality in marital and family counseling: Proposals for a feminist perspective. Journal of Counseling and Development, 67, 242–248. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1988.tb02591.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eraslan, D., Yakalı-Çamoğlu, D., Profeta Harunzade, Y., Ergun, B. M., & Dokur, M. (2012). Interpersonal communication in and through family: Structure and therapy in Turkey. International Review of Psychiatry, 24(2), 133–138. doi:10.3109/09540261.2012.657162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbane, M. D. (2011). Facilitating relational empowerment in couple therapy. Family Process, 50(3), 337–352. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2011.01364.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbane, M. D. (2013). Loving with the brain in mind: Neurobiology & Couple therapy. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gottman, J. M., & Notarius, C. I. (2002). Marital research in the 20th century and a research agenda for the 21st century. Family Process, 41(2), 159–197. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.41203.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (2000). The seven principles for making marriage work. New York, NY: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Gray-Little, B., & Burks, N. (1983). Power and satisfaction in marriage: A review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 93(3), 513–538. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.93.3.513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddock, S. A., & Zimmerman, T. S. (2001). The power equity guide: An activity to assist couples in negotiating a fair and equitable relationship. Journal of Clinical Activities, Assignments & Handouts in Psychotherapy Practice, 1(2), 1–15. doi:10.1300/J182v01n02_01
   Google Scholar
• Haddock, S. A., Zimmerman, T. S., & MacPhee, D. (2000). The power equity guide: Attending to gender in family therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 26(2), 153–170. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2000.tb00286.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). New Jersey, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hare-Mustin, R. (1978). A feminist approach to family therapy. Family Process, 17, 181–194. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1978.00181.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horst, E. A., & Doherty, W. J. (1995). Gender, power, and intimacy. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 6(4), 63–85. doi:10.1300/J086v06n04_05
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• İmamoğlu, E. O., & Selçuk, E. (2018). Cultural and self-related considerations in relationship well-being: With particular reference to marriage in Turkey. In C. C. Weisfeld, G. E. Weisfeld, & L. M. Dillon (Eds.), The psychology of marriage: An evolutionary and cross-cultural view (pp. 89–106). Maryland, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund. (2018). World Economic Outlook Report. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2018/01/weodata/index.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Jonathan, N., & Knudson-Martin, C. (2012). Building connection: Attunement and gender equality in heterosexual relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 11(2), 95–111. doi:10.1080/15332691.2012.666497
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80 for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kayış, A. (2009). Güvenilirlik analizi [Reliability analysis]. In Ş. Kalaycı (Ed.), SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri [SPSS applied multivariate statistical techniques] (pp. 403–419). Ankara, Turkey: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
   Google Scholar
• Keklik, I. ̇. (2011). Mate selection preferences of Turkish university students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 44, 129–148.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knudson-Martin, C. (1995). Constructing gender in marriage: Implications for counseling. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 3(3), 188–199. doi:10.1177/1066480795033002
   Google Scholar
• Knudson-Martin, C. (1997). The politics of gender in family therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 23(4), 421–437. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1997.tb01054.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson-Martin, C. (2013). Why power matters: Creating a foundation of mutual support in couple relationships. Family Process, 52(1), 5–18. doi:10.1111/famp.12011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson-Martin, C., & Huenergardt, D. (2010). A socio-emotional approach to couple therapy: Linking social context and couple interaction. Family Process, 49(3), 369–384. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2010.01328.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson-Martin, C., Huenergardt, D., Lafontant, K., Bishop, L., Schaepper, J., & Wells, M. (2015). Competencies for addressing gender and power in couple therapy: A socio emotional approach. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41(2), 205–220. doi:10.1111/jmft.12068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson-Martin, C., & Mahoney, A. R. (1999). Beyond different worlds: A “postgender” approach to relational development. Family Process, 38(3), 325–340. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1999.00325.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson-Martin, C., & Mahoney, A. R. (Eds.). (2009). Couples, gender, and power: Creating change in intimate relationships. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Knudson-Martin, C., Quek, K., Glebova, T., Arıcı-Şahin, F., & Moghadam, S. (2016, June). Relational justice across cultures and contexts. Paper presented at the 38th American Family Therapy Academy (AFTA) Annual Meeting & Open Conference, Denver, CO, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Knudson-Martin, C., Wells, M. A., & Samman, S. K. (Eds.). (2015). Bridging emotion, societal context, and couple interaction. New York, NY: AFTA Springer Briefs in Family Therapy.
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., & Hong, S. (1997). Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2), 193–210. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, T. (2015). Applying critical social theories to family therapy practice. New York, NY: AFTA Springer Briefs in Family Therapy.
   Google Scholar
• McGeorge, C. R., Carlson, T. S., & Guttormson, H. (2009). The feminist couple therapy scale: A measure of therapists’ ability to promote equality in couple relationships. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 21(3), 198–215. doi:10.1080/08952830903079060
   Google Scholar
• McGoldrick, M., & Hardy, K. V. (Eds.). (2008). Re-visioning family therapy: Race, culture, and gender in clinical practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, L. (1998). The unequal bargain: Power issues in couples therapy. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 10(3), 17–38. doi:10.1300/J086v10n03_02
   Google Scholar
• Parker, L., & Almeida, R. (2002). Balance as fairness for whom? Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 13(2–3), 153–168. doi:10.1300/J086v13n02_08
   Google Scholar
• Prouty Lyness, A. M., & Lyness, K. P. (2007). Feminist issues in couple therapy. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy: Innovations in Clinical and Educational Interventions, 6(1–2), 181–195. doi:10.1300/J398v06n01_15
   Google Scholar
• Rabin, C. (1994). Towards fairness in marriage. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 6(2), 41–71. doi:10.1300/J086v06n02_03
   Google Scholar
• Rabin, C. (1996). Equal partners-good friends: Empowering couples through therapy. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rampage, C. (2003). Gendered constraints to intimacy in heterosexual couples. In L. B. Silverstein & T. J. Goodrich (Eds.), Feminist family therapy: Empowerment in social context (pp. 199–210). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, P. (1994). Love between equals: How peer marriage really works. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları [Introduction to structural equation modelling: Basic principles and LISREL applications]. Ankara, Turkey: Ekinoks.
   Google Scholar
• Steil, J. M. (1997). Marital equality: Its relationship to the well-being of husbands and wives. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sunar, D., & Fişek, G. O. (2005). Contemporary Turkish families. In U. Gielen & J. Roopnarine (Eds.), Families in global perspective (pp. 169–183). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Ministry of Family and Social Policies. (2014). Türkiye aile yapısı araştırması: Tespitler, öneriler [Study of the Turkish family structure: Findings, recommendations]. İstanbul, Turkey: ASPB. Retrieved from https://ailetoplum.aile.gov.tr/arastirmalar
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2016). The Global Gender Gap Report 2016. Retrieved from http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2016/rankings/
   Google Scholar
• Yıldırım, I. ̇. (2007). Üniversite öğrencilerinin eş seçme kriterleri [Partner selection criteria of university students]. Turkish Journal of Psychological Counseling and Guidance, 3(27), 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, T. S., Haddock, S. A., Current, L. R., & Ziemba, S. (2003). Intimate partnership: Foundation to the successful balance of family and work. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 31(2), 107–124. doi:10.1080/01926180301126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar