Toxicity of engineered nanomaterials mediated by nano–bio–eco interactions

References

• Vance ME, Kuiken T, Vejerano EP, et al. Nanotechnology in the real world: Redeveloping the nanomaterial consumer products inventory. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2015:1769. doi:10.3762/bjnano.6.181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Hwang H-M. Nanotechnology in food science: Functionality, applicability, and safety assessment. J Food and Drug Anal. 2016;24(4):671–681. doi:10.1016/j.jfda.2016.06.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Aker WG, Huang M-J, D. Watts J, Hwang H-M. Metal oxide nanomaterials in nanomedicine: Applications in photodynamic therapy and potential toxicity. Curr Top Med Chem. 2015;15(18):1887–900. doi:10.2174/1568026615666150506145251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Aker WG, Pelaez M, Lin Y, Dionysiou DD, Hwang H-m. Assessment of nitrogen–fluorine-codoped TiO2 under visible light for degradation of BPA: Implication for field remediation. J Photochem Photobiol A: Chem. 2016;314:81–92. doi:10.1016/j.jphotochem.2015.08.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller AA, McFerran S, Lazareva A, Suh S. Global life cycle releases of engineered nanomaterials. J Nanopart Res. 2013;15(6):1692. doi:10.1007/s11051-013-1692-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourzahedi L, Vance ME, Eckelman MJ. Life cycle assessment and release studies for 15 nanosilver-enabled consumer products: Investigating hotspots and patterns of contribution. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51(12):7148–7158. doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b05923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zion Market Research. Nanomaterials market (metal oxide, metals, chemicals & polymers and others) for construction, chemical products, packaging, consumer goods, electrical and electronics, energy, health care, transportation and other applications: Global market perspective, comprehensive analysis and forecast, 2016–2022. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Taujale S, Huang J, Lee GJ. Effects of NOM on oxidative reactivity of manganese dioxide in binary oxide mixtures with goethite or hematite. Langmuir. 2015;31(9):2790–2799. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b00101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McShan D, Zhang Y, Deng H, Ray PC, Yu H. Synergistic antibacterial effect of silver nanoparticles combined with ineffective antibiotics on drug resistant Salmonella typhimurium DT104. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2015;33(3):369–384. doi:10.1080/10590501.2015.1055165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray PC, Yu H, Fu PP. Nanogold-based sensing of environmental toxins: Excitement and challenges. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2011;29(1):52–89. doi:10.1080/10590501.2011.551315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He W, Wamer W, Xia Q, Yin JJ, Fu PP. Enzyme-like activity of nanomaterials. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2014;32(2):186–211. doi:10.1080/10590501.2014.907462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu XG, Zhou QX. Health and ecosystem risks of graphene. Chem Rev. 2013;113(5):3815–3835. doi:10.1021/cr300045n.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umebayashi T, Yamaki T, Tanaka S, Asai K. Visible light-induced degradation of methylene blue on S-doped TiO2. Chem Lett. 2003;32(4):330–331. doi:10.1246/cl.2003.330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohno T, Mitsui T, Matsumura M. Photocatalytic activity of S-doped TiO2 photocatalyst under visible light. Chem Lett. 2003;32(4):364–365. doi:10.1246/cl.2003.364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Aker WG, Hwang H-M. An in vivo study on the photo-enhanced toxicities of S-doped TiO2 nanoparticles to zebrafish embryos (Danio rerio) in terms of malformation, mortality, rheotaxis dysfunction, and DNA damage. Nanotoxicology. 2014;8(S1):185–195. doi:10.3109/17435390.2013.874050.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ray PC, Yu H, Fu PP. Toxicity and environmental risks of nanomaterials: Challenges and future needs. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2009;27(1):1–35. doi:10.1080/10590500802708267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Aker WG, Fu PP, Hwang H-M. Toxicity of engineered metal oxide nanomaterials mediated by nano–bio–eco–interactions: A review and perspective. Environ Sci: Nano. 2015;2:564–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Aker WG, Leszczynski J, Hwang H-M. Using a holistic approach to assess the impact of engineered nanomaterials inducing toxicity in aquatic systems. J Food and Drug Anal. 2014;22(1):128–146. doi:10.1016/j.jfda.2014.01.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerrillo C, Barandika G, Igartua A, Areitioaurtena O, Mendoza G. Key challenges for nanotechnology: Standardization of ecotoxicity testing. J Environ Sci Health C: Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2017;35(2):104–126. doi:10.1080/10590501.2017.1298361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesner MR, Lowry GV, Jones KL, et al. Decreasing uncertainties in assessing environmental exposure, risk, and ecological implications of nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43:6458–6462. doi:10.1021/es803621k.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, McAlliser D, Aker WG, Hwang H-M. Assessing the effect of different natural dissolved organic matters on the cytotoxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles with bacteria. J Environ Sci. 2016;48:230–236. doi:10.1016/j.jes.2016.02.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baun A, Hartmann NB, Grieger K, Kusk KO. Ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to aquatic invertebrates: A brief review and recommendations for future toxicity testing. Ecotoxicology. 2008;17(5):387–395. doi:10.1007/s10646-008-0208-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pathakoti K, Huang MJ, Watts JD, He X, Hwang HM. Using experimental data of Escherichia coli to develop a QSAR model for predicting the photo-induced cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. J Photochem Photobiol B: Biol. 2014;130:234–240. doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2013.11.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puzyn T, Rasulev B, Gajewicz A, et al. Using nano-QSAR to predict the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. Nat Nanotechnol. 2011;6(3):175–178. doi:10.1038/nnano.2011.10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiser MA, Westerhoff P, Benn T, Wang Y, Perez-Rivera J, Hristovski K. Titanium nanomaterial removal and release from wastewater treatment plants. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43(17):6757–6763. doi:10.1021/es901102n.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge Y, Schimel J, Holden P. Evidence for negative effects of TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles on soil bacterial communities. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45(4):1659–1664. doi:10.1021/es103040t.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitbrink WA, Lo L-M, Dunn KH. Exposure controls for nanomaterials at three manufacturing sites. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12(1):16–28. doi:10.1080/15459624.2014.930559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard AS. One-to-one comparison of sunscreen efficacy, aesthetics and potential nanotoxicity. Nat Nanotechnology. 2010;5:271–274. doi:10.1038/nnano.2010.25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir A, Westerhoff P, Fabricius L, Hristovski K, Goetz Nv. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles in food and personal care products. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46(4):2242–2250. doi:10.1021/es204168d.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benn T, Cavanagh B, Hristovski K, Posner JD, Westerhoff P. The release of nanosilver from consumer products used in the home. J Environ Qual. 2010;39(6):1875–1882. doi:10.2134/jeq2009.0363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller AA, Lazareva A. Predicted releases of engineered nanomaterials: From global to regional to local. Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2013;1(1):65–70. doi:10.1021/ez400106t.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caballero-Guzman A, Sun T, Nowack B. Flows of engineered nanomaterials through the recycling process in Switzerland. Waste Manage. 2015;36:33–43. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.11.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun TY, Gottschlk F, Hungerbühler K, Nowack B. Comprehensive probabilistic modelling of environmental emissions of engineered nanomaterials. Environ Pollut. 2014(185):69–76. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2013.10.004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keller AA, Lazareva A. Predicted releases of engineered nanomaterials: From global to regional to local. Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2014;1(1):65–70. doi:10.1021/ez400106t.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song R, Qin Y, Suh S, Keller AA. Dynamic model for the stocks and release flows of engineered nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol. 2017; In Press. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b01907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu HH, Cohen Y. Multimedia environmental distribution of engineered nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;46(6):3281–3292. doi:10.1021/es405132z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dumont E, Johnson AC, Keller VD, Williams RJ. Nano silver and nano zinc-oxide in surface waters—Exposure estimation for Europe at high spatial and temporal resolution. Environ Pollut. 2015;196:341–349. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2014.10.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard AD, Aitken RJ. Assessing exposure to airborne nanomaterials: Current abilities and future requirements. Nanotoxicology. 2007;1(1):26–41. doi:10.1080/17435390701314720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson DR, Methner MM, Kennedy AJ, Steevens JA. Potential for occupational exposure to engineered carbon-based nanomaterials in environmental laboratory studies. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118(1):49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIOSH. Building a safety program to protect the nanotechnology workforce: A guide for small to medium-sized enterprises. In: U.S. department of health and human services CfDCaP, national institute for occupational safety and health, editor. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Coll C, Notter D, Gottschalk F, Sun T, Som C, Nowack B. Probabilistic environmental risk assessment of five nanomaterials (nano-TiO2, nano-Ag, nano-ZnO, CNT, and fullerenes). Nanotoxicology. 2016;10(4):436–444. doi:10.3109/17435390.2015.1073812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Kattan A, Wichser A, Zuin S, et al. Behavior of TiO2 released from nano-TiO2-containing paint and comparison to pristine nano-TiO2. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(12):6710–6718. doi:10.1021/es5006219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gondikas AP, von der Kammer F, Reed RB, Wagner S, Ranville JF, Hofmann T. Release of TiO2 nanoparticles from sunscreens into surface waters: a one-source survey at the old danube recreational lake. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(10):5415–5422. doi:10.1021/es405596y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschalk F, Sonderer T, Scholz RW, Nowack B. Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO2, ZnO, Ag, CNT, fullerenes) for different regions. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43(24):9216–9222. doi:10.1021/es9015553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quadros ME, Pierson R, Tulve NS, et al. Release of silver from nanotechnology-based consumer products for children. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(15):8894–8901. doi:10.1021/es4015844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Rosas E, Vilar G, Janer G, et al. Influence of nanomaterial compatibilization strategies on polyamide nanocomposites properties and nanomaterial release during the use phase. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50(5):2584–2594. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b05727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selck H, Handy RD, Fernandes TF, Klaine SJ, Petersen EJ. Nanomaterials in the aquatic environment: A European Union–United States perspective on the status of ecotoxicity testing, research priorities, and challenges ahead. Environ Toxicol chem. 2016;35(5):1055–1067. doi:10.1002/etc.3385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiede K, Hanssen SF, Westerhoff P, et al. How important is drinking water exposure for the risks of engineered nanoparticles to consumers? Nanotoxicology. 2016;10(1):102–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musee N. Nanowastes and the environment: Potential new waste management paradigm. Environ Int. 2011;37(1):112–128. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2010.08.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang ZL, Jiang T, Xu L. Toward the blue energy dream by triboelectric nanogenerator networks. Nano Energy. 2017;39:9–23. doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.06.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasemzadeh G, Momenpour M, Omidi F, Hosseini MR, Ahani M, Barzegari A. Applications of nanomaterials in water treatment and environmental remediation. Front Environ Sci Eng. 2014;8(4):471–482. doi:10.1007/s11783-014-0654-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin TH, Cheon J. Synergism of nanomaterials with physical stimuli for biology and medicine. Acc Chem Res. 2017;50(3):567–572. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng L, Wang C, Feng L, Yang K, Liu Z. Functional nanomaterials for phototherapies of cancer. Chem Rev. 2014;114(21):10869–10939. doi:10.1021/cr400532z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinones M, Zhang Y, Riascos P, et al. Effects of light energy and reducing agents on C60-mediated photosensitizing reactions. J Photochem Photobiol: Chem. 2014;90:374–379. doi:10.1111/php.12206.
   Google Scholar
• Yin Z, Zhu J, He Q, et al. Graphene-based materials for solar cell applications. Adv Energy Mater. 2014;4(1):1300574. doi:10.1002/aenm.201300574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamat PV, Tvrdy K, Baker DR, Radich JG. Beyond photovoltaics: Semiconductor nanoarchitectures for liquid-junction solar cells. Chem Rev. 2010;110(11):6664–6688. doi:10.1021/cr100243p.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo S, Wang E. Noble metal nanomaterials: Controllable synthesis and application in fuel cells and analytical sensors. Nano Today. 2011;6(3):240–264. doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2011.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan Z, Mora-Seró I, Shen Q, et al. High-efficiency “green” quantum dot solar cells. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;135(25):9203–9210. doi:10.1021/ja504310w.
   Google Scholar
• Di Paola A, García-López E, Marcì G, Palmisano L. A survey of photocatalytic materials for environmental remediation. J Hazard Mater. 2012;211:3–29. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.11.050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Sanders S, Aker WG, Lin Y, Douglas J, Hwang H-m. Assessing the effects of surface-bound humic acid on the phototoxicity of anatase and rutile TiO2 nanoparticles in vitro. J Environ Sci. 2016;42:50–60. doi:10.1016/j.jes.2015.05.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu XG, Zhou M, Zhou QX. Ambient water and visible-light irradiation drive changes in graphene morphology, structure, surface chemistry, aggregation and toxicity. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49(6):3410–3418 doi:10.1021/es503003y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng H, Zhang Y, Yu H. Nanoparticles considered as mixtures for toxicological research. J Environ Sci Health Part C. 2017; In Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Li J, Yang K, Liu J, Lin D. Physicochemical transformation and algal toxicity of engineered nanoparticles in surface water samples. Environ Pollut. 2016;211:132–140. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2015.12.041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu S, Liu J, Yin Y, Shen M. Interactions between engineered nanoparticles and dissolved organic matter: A review on mechanisms and environmental effects. J Environ Sci. 2017; In Press. doi:10.1016/j.jes.2017.06.021.
   Google Scholar
• Pan B, Xing B. Adsorption mechanisms of organic chemicals on carbon nanotubes. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42(24):9005–9013. doi:10.1021/es801777n.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyung H, Kim JH. Natural organic matter (NOM) adsorption to multi-walled carbon nanotubes: Effect of NOM characteristics and water quality parameters. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42(12):4416–4421. doi:10.1021/es702916h.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao T, Zhou T, Yao Q, Hao C, Chen X. Metal nanoclusters: Applications in environmental monitoring and cancer therapy. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2015;33(2):168–187. doi:10.1080/10590501.2015.1030490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linard EN, van den Hurk P, Karanfil T, Apul OG, Klaine SJ. Influence of carbon nanotubes on the bioavailability of fluoranthene. Environ. Toxicol Chem. 2015;34(3):658–666. doi:10.1002/etc.2853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks AN, Chandler GT, Portis LM, et al. Effects of single-walled carbon nanotubes on the bioavailability of PCBs in field-contaminated sediments. Nanotoxicology. 2014;8(S1):111–117. doi:10.3109/17435390.2013.858794.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu JY, Hurt RH. Ion release kinetics and particle persistence in aqueous nano-silver colloids. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44:2169–2175. doi:10.1021/es9035557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent RD, Vikesland PJ. Dissolution and persistence of copper-based nanomaterials in undersaturated solutions with respect to cupric solid phases. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50(13):6772–6781. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b04719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunsolus IL, Mousavi MP, Hussein K, Bühlmann P, Haynes CL. Effects of humic and fulvic acids on silver nanoparticle stability, dissolution, and toxicity. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49(13):8078–8086. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b01496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velicogna JR, Ritchie EE, Scroggins RP, Princz JI. A comparison of the effects of silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate on a suite of soil dwelling organisms in two field soils. Nanotoxicology. 2016;10(8):1144–1151. doi:10.1080/17435390.2016.1181807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink J. The capacity of soils to preserve organic C and N by their association with clay and silt particles. Plant and soil. 1997;191(1):77–87. doi:10.1023/A:1004213929699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azimzada A, Tufenkji N, Wilkinson KJ. Transformations of silver nanoparticles in wastewater effluents: Links to Ag bioavailability. Environ Sci: Nano. 2017;4(6):1339–1349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbone S, Hertel-Aas T, Joner EJ, Oughton DH. Bioavailability of CeO2 and SnO2 nanoparticles evaluated by dietary uptake in the earthworm Eisenia fetida and sequential extraction of soil and feed. Chemosphere. 2016;162:16–22. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.07.044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinsch BC, Forsberg B, Penn RL, Kim CS, Lowry GV. Chemical transformations during aging of zerovalent iron nanoparticles in the presence of common groundwater dissolved constituents. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44(9):3455–3461. doi:10.1021/es902924h.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Li W, Fortner JD. Photoenhanced oxidation of C60 aggregates (nC60) by free chlorine in water. Environ Sci: Nano. 2017;4(1):117–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadjidemetriou M, Kostarelos K. Nanomedicine: Evolution of the nanoparticle corona. Nat Nanotechnol. 2017;12(4):288–2890. doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raesch SS, Tenzer S, Storck W, et al. Proteomic and lipidomic analysis of nanoparticle corona upon contact with lung surfactant reveals differences in protein, but not lipid composition. ACS Nano. 2015;9(12):11872–11885. doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b04215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monopoli MP, Walczyk D, Campbell A, et al. Physical–chemical aspects of protein corona: Relevance to in vitro and in vivo biological impacts of nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133(8):2525–2534. doi:10.1021/ja107583h.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundqvist M, Augustsson C, Lilja M, et al. The nanoparticle protein corona formed in human blood or human blood fractions. PloS one. 2017;12(4):e0175871. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil S, Sandberg A, Heckert E, Self W, Seal S. Protein adsorption and cellular uptake of cerium oxide nanoparticles as a function of zeta potential Biomaterials. 2007;28:4600–4607.
   Google Scholar
• Chandran P, Riviere JE, Monteiro-Riviere NA. Surface chemistry of gold nanoparticles determines the biocorona composition impacting cellular uptake, toxicity and gene expression profiles in human endothelial cells. Nanotoxicology. 2017;11(4):507–519. doi:10.1080/17435390.2017.1314036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keleştemur S, Altunbek M, Culha M. Influence of EDC/NHS coupling chemistry on stability and cytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles modified with proteins. Appl Surf Sci. 2017;403:455–463. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirshafiee V, Kim R, Park S, Mahmoudi M, Kraft ML. Impact of protein pre-coating on the protein corona composition and nanoparticle cellular uptake. Biomaterials. 2016;75:295–304. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokkinopoulou M, Simon J, Landfester K, Mailänder V, Lieberwirth I. Visualization of the Protein Corona: Towards a biomolecular understanding of nanoparticle-cell-interactions. Nanoscale. 2017;9:8858–8870. doi:10.1039/C7NR02977B.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens DE, Peppas NA. Opsonization, biodistribution, and pharmacokinetics of polymeric nanoparticles. Int J Pharm. 2006;307(1):93–102. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.10.010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen F, Wang G, Griffin JI, et al. Complement proteins bind to nanoparticle protein corona and undergo dynamic exchange in vivo. Nat Nanotechnology. 2017;12(4):387–393. doi:10.1038/nnano.2016.269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisesi Jr JH, Robinson SE, Lavelle CM, et al. Influence of the gastrointestinal environment on the bioavailability of ethinyl estradiol sorbed to single-walled carbon nanotubes. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51(2):948–957. doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b04728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horie M, Nishio K, Fujita K, et al. Protein adsorption of ultrafine metal oxide and its influence on cytotoxicity toward cultured cells. Chem Res Toxicol. 2009;22:543–553. doi:10.1021/tx800289z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells MA, Abid A, Kennedy IM, Barakat AI. Serum proteins prevent aggregation of Fe2O3 and ZnO nanoparticles. Nanotoxicology. 2012;6:837–846. doi:10.3109/17435390.2011.625131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisani C, Rascol E, Dorandeu C, et al. The species origin of the serum in the culture medium influences the in vitro toxicity of silica nanoparticles to HepG2 cells. PloS one. 2017;12(8):e0182906. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0182906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babu EP, Subastri A, Suyavaran A, et al. Size dependent uptake and hemolytic effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on erythrocytes and biomedical potential of ZnO–Ferulic acid conjugates. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):4203. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-04440-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang H, Lai W, Cui M, et al. An evaluation of blood compatibility of silver nanoparticles. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25518. doi:10.1038/srep25518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang X, Wang T. Breaking of the phosphodiester bond: A key factor that induces hemolysis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(1):129–136. doi:10.1021/am503865g.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson HL, Cronholm P, Hedberg Y, et al. Cell membrane damage and protein interaction induced by copper containing nanoparticles—Importance of the metal release process. Toxicol Lett. 2013;313(1):59–69. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2013.07.012.
   Google Scholar
• Avellan A, Schwab F, Masion A, et al. Nanoparticle uptake in plants: Gold nanomaterial localized in roots of arabidopsis thaliana by X-ray computed nanotomography and hyperspectral imaging. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51(15):8682–8691. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b01133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi DK, Singh S, Singh S, et al. An overview on manufactured nanoparticles in plants: Uptake, translocation, accumulation and phytotoxicity. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017;110:2–12. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.07.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alalaiwe A, Roberts G, Carpinone P, Munson J, Roberts S. Influence of PEG coating on the oral bioavailability of gold nanoparticles in rats. Drug Deliv. 2017;24(1):591–598. doi:10.1080/10717544.2017.1282554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou QX, Hu XG. Systemic stress and recovery patterns of rice roots in response to graphene oxide nanosheets. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51(4):2022–2030. doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b05591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Ren C, Ouyang S, Hu X, Zhou Q. Mitigation in multiple effects of graphene oxide toxicity in zebrafish embryogenesis driven by humic acid. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49(16):10147–10154. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b02220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nel AE, Mädler L, Velegol D, et al. Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano–bio interface. Nat Mater. 2009;8(7):543–557. doi:10.1038/nmat2442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoudi M, Bertrand N, Zope H, Farokhzad OC. Emerging understanding of the protein corona at the nano–bio interfaces. Nano Today. 2016;11(6):817–832. doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2016.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasari TP, Hwang H-M. The effect of humic acids on the cytotoxicity of silver nanoparticles to a natural aquatic bacterial assemblage. Sci Total Environ. 2010;408:5817–5823. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar