A Typology of Orthodox Russians: Toward the Operationalization of a Generalized Descriptor of Religiosity

References

• Babich, N.S., and V.I. Khomenko. “Kontseptual’nye osnovy postroeniia odnomernoy shkaly religioznosti.” Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2016, no. 6, pp. 65–71.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen K., and R. Lennox. “Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective.” Psychological Bulletin, 1991, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 305–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breskaia, O.Iu. “Izuchenie religioznosti: k neobkhodimosti integral’nogo podkhoda.” Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2011, no. 12, pp. 77–87.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T.A. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York: Guilford Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Chesnokova, V.F. Tesnym putem: Protsess votserkovleniia naseleniia Rossii v kontse XX veka. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, R.R., and J.W. Gladden. “The five dimensions of religiosity: Toward demythologizing a sacred artifact.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 1974, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 135–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deviatko, I.F. Metody sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniia. Moscow: Knizhnyi dom Universitet, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Divisenko, K.S. “Tesnym putem i v nuzhnom napravlenii: problema vyiavleniia sil’noi gruppy pravoslavnykh veruiushchikh.” Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2016, no. 10, pp. 128–138.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, Émile. “Elementarnye formy religioznoi zhizni. Totemicheskaia sistema v Avstralii.” In Mistika. Religiia. Nauka. Klassiki mirovogo religiovedeniia. Antologiia, trans. from English, German, French, ed. A.N. Krasnikov. Moscow: Kanon+, 1998, pp. 174–238.
   Google Scholar
• European Values Study. (Available at http://www.europeanvaluesstudy.eu; accessed on October 20, 2016.)
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, J.E., and G.F. De Jong. “Religioznost’ v pyati izmereniiakh: empiricheskii analiz.” Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2011, no. 12, pp. 69–77.
   Google Scholar
• Glock, C.Y. “On the study of religious commitment.” Religious Education, 1962, vol. 57(4), pp. 98–110.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, P.C., and R.W. Hood. Measures of Religiosity. Birmingham, Alabama: Religious Education Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, S. “Religion Monitor 2008: Structuring principles, operational constructs, interpretive strategies.” In What the World Believes: Analyses and Commentary on the Religion Monitor 2008, ed. M. Rieger. Gütersloh: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2009, pp. 17–51.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, S., and O.W. Huber. “The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS).” Religions, 2012, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 710–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpov, V., E. Lisovskaya, and D. Barry. “Ethnodoxy: How popular ideologies fuse religious and ethnic identities.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 2012, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 638–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebedev, S.D., and V.V. Sukhorukov. “Tesnyi put’ ne tuda?” Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2013, no. 1, pp. 118–126.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L. Recognizing the Nonreligious: Reimagining the Secular. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Luckmann, T. The Invisible Religion: The Problem of Religion in Modern Society. New York: MacMillan, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Orthodox Monitor. 2011. (Available at http://socrel.pstgu.ru/RU/orthodoxmonitor; accessed on February 29, 2016.)
   Google Scholar
• Prutskova, E.V. “Operatsionalizatsiia poniatiia ‘religioznost’ v empiricheskikh issledovaniiakh.” Gosudarstvo, religiya, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom, 2012, no. 2, pp. 268–293.
   Google Scholar
• Prutskova, E.V. “Religioznost’ i ee sledstviia v tsennostno-normativnoi sfere.” Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal, 2013, no. 2, pp. 72–88.
   Google Scholar
• Ryzhova, S.V. “Osobennosti izucheniia religioznoi identichnosti rossiian.” Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2016, no. 10, pp. 118–127.
   Google Scholar
• Siegers, P. “A multiple group latent class analysis of religious orientations in Europe.” In Cross-Cultural Analysis: Methods and Applications, ed. E. Davidov, P. Schmidt, and J. Billiet. New York: Routledge, 2011, pp. 385–414.
   Google Scholar
• Sinelina, Iu.Iu. Izmerenie religioznosti naseleniia Rossii: pravoslavnye i musul’mane: suevernoe povedenie rossiian. Moscow: Nauka, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Sinelina, Iu.Iu. Kontseptsii sekuliarizatsii v sotsiologicheskoi teorii. Moscow: Institute of Socio-Political Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Sinelina, Iu.Iu. “O dinamike religioznosti rossiian i nekotorykh metodologicheskikh problemakh ee izucheniia (religioznoe soznanie i povedenie pravoslavnykh i musul’man).” Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2013, no. 10, pp. 104–115.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, R., and C.Y. Glock. American Piety: The Nature of Religious Commitment. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Troeltsch, E. “Tserkov’ i sekta.” Religiia i obshchestvo. Khrestomatiia po sotsiologii religii, ed. V.I. Garadzhi, and E.D. Rutkevich. Moscow: Nauka, 1994, pp. 140–148.
   Google Scholar
• Welzel, C., and R.F. Inglehart. “Misconceptions of measurement equivalence: Time for a paradigm shift.” Comparative Political Studies, 2016, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 1068–1094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabaev, I.V., D.A. Oreshina, and E.V. Prutskova. Tri moskovskikh prikhoda: osnovnye sotsial’no-demograficheskie pokazateli i ustanovki predstavitelei obshchin krupnykh prikhodov. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo PSTGU, 2012.
   Google Scholar