Quantitative structure–property relationship of distribution coefficients of organic compounds

References

• M. Remko, A. Boháč, and L. Kováčiková, Molecular structure, pKa, lipophilicity, solubility, absorption, polar surface area, and blood brain barrier penetration of some antiangiogenic agents, J. Struct. Chem. 22 (2011), pp. 635–648. doi:10.1007/s11224-011-9741-z.
   Google Scholar
• J.A. Arnott and S.L. Planey, The influence of lipophilicity in drug discovery and design, Expert. Opin. Drug Discov. 7 (2012), pp. 863–875. doi:10.1517/17460441.2012.714363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.J. Livingstone, Theoretical property predictions, Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 3 (2003), pp. 1171–1192. doi:10.2174/1568026033452078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Liang and H. Lian, Recent advances in lipophilicity measurement by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography, Trends. Anal. Chem. 68 (2015), pp. 28–36. doi:10.1016/j.trac.2015.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Mansouri, N.F. Cariello, A. Korotcov, V. Tkachenko, C.M. Grulke, C.S. Sprankle, D. Allen, W.M. Casey, C. Kleinstreuer, and A.J. Williams, QSAR models for pKa prediction using multiple machine learning approaches, J. Cheminform. 11 (2019), pp. 60. doi:10.1186/s13321-019-0384-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Testa, P. Crivori, M. Reist, and P.A. Carrupt, The influence of lipophilicity on the pharmacokinetic behavior of drugs: Concepts and examples, Perspect. Drug Discov. Des. 19 (2000), pp. 179–211. doi:10.1023/A:1008741731244.
   Google Scholar
• M. Kah and C.D. Brown, Log D: Lipophilicity for ionisable compounds, Chemosphere 72 (2008), pp. 1401–1408. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.04.074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Chen and S.G. Weber, High-throughput method for lipophilicity measurement, Anal. Chem. 79 (2007), pp. 1043–1049. doi:10.1021/ac061649a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. De Bruijn, F. Busser, W. Seinen, and J. Hermens, Determination of octanol/water partition coefficients for hydrophobic organic chemicals with the “slowstirring” method, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 8 (1989), pp. 499–512. doi:10.1002/etc.5620080607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Gao, C.H. Yu, K.Y. Tam, and S.C. Tsang, New magnetic nano-absorbent for the determination of n-octanol/water partition coefficients, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 38 (2005), pp. 197–203. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2004.12.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Barzanti, R. Evans, J. Fouquet, L. Gouzin, N.M. Howarth, G. Kean, E. Levet, D. Wang, E. Wayemberg, A.A. Yeboah, and A. Kraft, Potentiometric determination of octanol-water and liposome-water partition coefficients (log P) of ionizable organic compounds, Tetrahedron Lett. 48 (2007), pp. 3337–3341. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.03.085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.A. Marine, S.A. Klein, and J.D. Posner, Partition coefficient measurements in picoliter drops using a segmented flow microfluidic device, Anal. Chem. 81 (2009), pp. 1471–1476. doi:10.1021/ac801673w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Dohta, T. Yamashita, S. Horiike, T. Nakamura, and T. Fukami, A system for logD screening of 96-well plates using a water-plug aspiration/injection method combined with high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, Anal. Chem. 79 (2007), pp. 8312–8315. doi:10.1021/ac0709798.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• A. Tsantili-Kakoulidou, I. Panderi, F. Csizmadia, and F. Darvas, Prediction of distribution coefficient from structure. 2. Validation of Prolog D, an expert system, J. Pharm. Sci. 86 (1997), pp. 1173–1179. doi:10.1021/js9601804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O.A. Raevsky, S.V. Trepalin, H.P. Trepalina, V.A. Gerasimenko, and O.E. Raevskaja, SLIPPER-2001 - Software for predicting molecular properties on the basis of physicochemical descriptors and structural similarity, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42 (2001), pp. 540–549. doi:10.1021/ci010097o.
   Google Scholar
• R. Scherrer, Biolipid pKa values and the lipophilicity of ampholytes and ion pairs, in Pharmacokinetic Optimization in Drug Research, B. Testa, H. van de Waterbeemd, G. Folkers, and R. Guy, eds., Publ. Wily-VCH, Germany, 2001, pp. 351–338.
   Google Scholar
• I.V. Tetko and V.Y. Tanchuk, Application of associative neural networks for prediction of lipophilicity in ALOGPS 2.1 program, J. Chem. Inf. Mod. 42 (2002), pp. 1136–1145.
   Google Scholar
• Molecular Operating Environment (MOE), 10th ed, Chemical Computing Group Inc., 1010 Sherbooke St. West, Suite #910, Montreal, QC, Canada, H3A 2R7, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• ACD/Labs ACD/LogD, 2020. Available at http://www.acdlabs.com/products/percepta/predictors/logd/.
   Google Scholar
• ChemAxon, 2020. Available at https://chemaxon.com/products/chemicalize.
   Google Scholar
• Schrödinger Release 2020-2: QikProp, Schrödinger LLC, New York, NY, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• I.V. Tetko and G.I. Poda, Application of ALOGPS 2.1 to predict log D distribution coefficient for pfizer proprietary compounds, J. Med. Chem. 47 (2004), pp. 5601–5604. doi:10.1021/jm049509l.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.P. Andreeva and O.A. Raevsky, Lipophilicity of organic compounds calculated using structural similarity and molecular physicochemical descriptors, Pharm. Chem. J. 43 (2009), pp. 258–262. doi:10.1007/s11094-009-0280-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.R. Rekker, The Hydrophobic Fragment Constant, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• A.J. Leo, P.Y.C. Jow, C. Silipo, and C. Hansch, Calculation of hydrophobic constant (log P) from pi and f constants, J. Med. Chem. 18 (1975), pp. 865–868. doi:10.1021/jm00243a001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.A. Wildman and G.M. Crippen, Prediction of physicochemical parameters by atomic contributions, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 39 (1999), pp. 868–873. doi:10.1021/ci990307l.
   Google Scholar
• X. Yu, Y. Wang, H. Yang, and X. Huang, Prediction of the binding affinity of aptamers against the influenza virus, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 30 (2019), pp. 51–62. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2018.1558416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Yu, H. Yang, and X. Huang, Novel method for structure−activity relationship of aptamer sequences for human prostate cancer, ACS Omega 3 (2018), pp. 10002–10007. doi:10.1021/acsomega.8b01464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Vistoli, A. Pedretti, and B. Testa, Partition coefficient and molecular flexibility: The concept of lipophilicity space, Chem. Biodiv. 6 (2009), pp. 1152–1169. doi:10.1002/cbdv.200900072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Comba, B. Martin, A. Sanyal, and H. Stephan, The computation of lipophilicities of 64Cu PET systems based on a novel approach for fluctuating charges, Dalton. Trans. 42 (2013), pp. 11066–11073. doi:10.1039/c3dt51049b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I.A. Sima, M.V. Diudea, and C. Sârbu, Prediction of lipophilicity of catecholamine related compounds based on the hypermolecule concept, Rev. Roum. Chim. 60 (2015), pp. 665–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.-B. Wang, D.-S. Cao, M.-F. Zhu, Y.-H. Yun, N. Xiao, and Y.-Z. Liang, In silico evaluation of logD7.4 and comparison with other prediction methods, J. Chemom. 29 (2015), pp. 389–398. doi:10.1002/cem.2718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Todeschini, V. Consonni, A. Mauri, and M. Pavan, DRAGON Software for the Calculation of Molecular Descriptors, Revision 6.0 For Windows, Talete Srl, Milan, Italy, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• M. Daszykowski, S. Serneels, K. Kaczmarek, P.V. Espen, C. Croux, and B. Walczak, TOMCAT: A MATLAB toolbox for multivariate calibration techniques, Chemom. Intellig. Lab. Syst. 85 (2007), pp. 269–277. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2006.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.C. Lee, C.-Y. Liong, and A.A. Jemain, Iterative random vs. Kennard-Stone sampling for IR spectrum-based classification task using PLS2-DA, AIP Conf. Proc. 1940 (2018), pp. 020116. doi:10.1063/1.5028031.
   Google Scholar
• X. Yu, J. Deng, J. Chen, and H. Yang, Prediction of 13C NMR chemical shifts of quinolone derivatives based on DFT calculations, J. Struct. Chem. 60 (2019), pp. 772–779. doi:10.1134/S0022476619050093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.R. Burden and D.A. Winkler, Relevance vector machines: Sparse classification methods for QSAR, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 55 (2015), pp. 1529–1534. doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Shadmanesh, A.P. Jadid, Z. Azari, M. Niazi, and M.S. Aghbolagh, QSAR study of active human glucagon receptor antagonists by SW-MLR and SW-SVM methods, Med. Chem. Res. 23 (2014), pp. 2639–2650. doi:10.1007/s00044-013-0851-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Yu, Extrapolation for aeroengine gas path faults with SVM bases on genetic algorithm, Sound Vib. 53 (2019), pp. 237–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.P. Doucet, E. Papa, A. Doucet-Panaye, and J. Devillers, QSAR models for predicting the toxicity of piperidine derivatives against Aedes aegypti, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 28 (2017), pp. 451–470. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2017.1328855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.C. Chang and C.J. Lin, LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines, ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2 (2011), pp. 27. doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Yu and L. Dang, Complete sets of descriptors for the prediction of 13C NMR chemical shifts of quinoline derivatives, J. Chemom. 33 (2019), pp. e3107. doi:10.1002/cem.3107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Moriguchi, S. Hirono, I. Nakagome, and H. Hirano, Comparison of reliability of log P values for drugs calculated by several methods, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 42 (1994), pp. 976–978. doi:10.1248/cpb.42.976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.J. Leo, CLOGP, Version 3.63, Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Irvine, CA, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• A.K. Ghose, V.N. Viswanadhan, and J.J. Wendoloski, Prediction of hydrophobic (lipophilic) properties of small organic molecules using fragmental methods: An analysis of ALOGP and CLOGP methods, J. Phys. Chem. A 102 (1998), pp. 3762–3772. doi:10.1021/jp980230o.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar