Associations of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and outcomes of labor induction with prostaglandin vaginal inserts

References

• Report of the national high blood pressure education program working group on high blood pressure in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(1):S1–S22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet gynecol. 2013 Nov;122(5):1122-31. doi: 10.1097/01
   Google Scholar
• Sibai, B.M., Ewell, M, Levine, R.J., Klebanoff, M.A., Esterlitz, J, Catalano, P.M. Risk factors associated with preeclampsia in healthy nulliparous women. The calcium for preeclampsia prevention (CPEP) study group. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(5):1003–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckitt K, Harrington D. Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ. 2005;330(7491):565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seed, P.T., Chappell, L.C., Blac, M.A., Poppe, K.K., Hwang, Y.C., Kasabov, N. Prediction of preeclampsia and delivery of small for gestational age babies based on a combination of clinical risk factors in high-risk women. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2011;30(1):58–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulletins–Obstetrics, A.C.o.P. ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33, January 2002. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99(1):159–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajik, P., van der Tuuk, K., Koopmans, C.M., Groen, H., van Pampus, M.G.,van der Berg, P.P., et al. Should cervical favourability play a role in the decision for labour induction in gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia at term? An exploratory analysis of the HYPITAT trial. Bjog. 2012;119(9):1123–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of, O., Gynecologists, and P. Task Force on Hypertension in. Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ task force on hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(5):1122–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durst, J.K., Subramaniam, A., Tang, Y., Szychowski, J.M., Campbell, S.B., Biggio, J.R. Mode of delivery in nulliparous women with gestational hypertension undergoing early term induction of labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016:1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, C.M., Bijlenga, D., Groen, H., Vijgen, S.M., Aarnoudse, J.G., Bekedam, D.J. Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks’ gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;30(19):2291–2296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing DA, Tran S, Paul RH. Factors affecting the likelihood of successful induction after intravaginal misoprostol application for cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(6):1237–40; discussion 1240-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., Fairclough, A., Kavanagh, J., Kelly, A.J. Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;19(6):CD003101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferring. Misodel summary of product characteristics. 2011. Switzerland: Ferring International Center.
   Google Scholar
• Cervidil [package insert]. 2016. Parsippany, NJ: Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Wing DA, C. Misoprostol Vaginal Insert. Misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(4):801–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing, D.A., et al. Misoprostol vaginal insert for successful labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(3):533–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing, D.A., Miller, H., Parker, L., Powers, B.L., Rayburn, W.F. Misoprostol vaginal insert and time to vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(2 Pt 1):201–09.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, P.K., Geskus, R.B., de Witte, T., Putter, H. Competing risks in epidemiology: possibilities and pitfalls. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(3):861–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rj G. A class of K-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat. 1988;16:1141–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Paiva Marques, R.M., Souza, A.S., de Lucena Feitosa, F.E., da Costa, A.A., Amorim, M.M. Maternal and perinatal outcomes in women with and without hypertensive syndromes submitted to induction of labor with misoprostol. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2017;36(1):1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xenakis, E.M., Piper, J.M., Conway, D.L., Langer, O. Induction of labor in the nineties: conquering the unfavorable cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90(2):235–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szal, SE, Croughan-Minihane, M.S, Kilpatrick, S.J. Effect of magnesium prophylaxis and preeclampsia on the duration of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(6 Pt 1):1475–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fomin, V.P., Gibbs, S.G., Vanam, R., Morimiya, A., Hurd, W.W. Effect of magnesium sulfate on contractile force and intracellular calcium concentration in pregnant human myometrium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(5):1384–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantas, E., Cetin, A., Kaya, T., Cetin, M. Effect of magnesium sulfate, isradipine, and ritodrine on contractions of myometrium: pregnant human and rat. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81(9):825–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nippita, T.A., Trevena, J.A., Patterson, J.A., Ford, J.B., Morris., J.M, Roberts, C.L. Inter-hospital variations in labor induction and outcomes for Nullipara: an Australian population-based linkage study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(4):411–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar