Comments on environmental impact of radiofrequency fields from mobile phone base stations

References

• Agarwal, A., Deepinder, F., Sharma, R.K., Ranga, G., and Li, J. (2008). Effect of cell phone usage on semen analysis in men attending infertility clinic: An observational study. Fertility and Sterility, 89(1), 124–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberts, B., Bray, D., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., and Watson, J.D. (1994). Molecular biology of the cell. Garland Publishing, Inc.: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Balmori, A. (2005). Possible effects of electromagnetic fields from phone masts on a population of white stork (Ciconia ciconia). Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 24, 109–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmori, A. (2006). The incidence of electromagnetic pollution on the amphibian decline: Is this an important piece of the puzzle? Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, 88, 287–299.
   Google Scholar
• Balmori, A. (2009). Electromagnetic pollution from phone masts. Effects on wildlife. Pathophysiology, 16, 191–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Balmori, A., and Hallberg, O. (2007). The urban decline of the house sparrow (Passer domesticus): A possible link with electromagnetic radiation. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 26, 141–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmori, A. (2010a). Mobile phone mast effects on common frog (Rana temporaria) tadpoles: The city turned into a laboratory. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 29, 31–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmori, A. (2010b). The incidence of electromagnetic pollution on wild animals: A new “poison” with slow effect on nature? Environmentalist, 30, 90–97.
   Google Scholar
• Balmori, A. (2014). Electrosmog and species conservation. Science of the Total Environment, 496: 314–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmori, A. (2015). Anthropogenic radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as an emerging threat to wildlife orientation. Science of the Total Environment, 518: 58–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balodis, V., Kalviskis, K., Ramans, K., Liepa, I., Brumelis, G., Magone, I., and Nikodemus, O. (1993). Environmental assessment in Latvia: Overview of past research and future perspectives. Journal of Baltic Studies, 24, 223–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balodis, V.G., Brumelis, K., Kalviskis, O., Nikodemus, D.Y., and Tjarve, V.Z. (1996). Does the Skrunda radio location station diminish the radial growth of pine trees? The Science of the Total Environment, 180, 57–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawin, S.M., and Adey, W.R. (1976). Sensitivity of calcium binding in cerebral tissue to weak environmental electric fields oscillating at low frequency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States America, 73, 1999–2003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, R., and Roy, R. (2014). Impact of electromagnetic pollution from mobile phone towers on local birds. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science Engineering and Technology, 3, 32–36
   Google Scholar
• Cammaerts, M.-C., Debeir, O., and Cammaerts, R. (2011). Changes in Paramecium caudatum (Protozoa) near a switched-on GSM telephone. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 30, 57–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammaerts, M. C., De Doncker, P., Patris, X., Bellens, F., Rachidi, Z., and Cammaerts, D. (2012). GSM 900 MHz radiation inhibits ants' association between food sites and encountered cues. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 31, 151–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammaerts, M.C., and Johansson, O. (2013). Ants can be used as bio-indicators to reveal biological effects of electromagnetic waves from some wireless apparatus. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine. doi:10.3109/15368378.2013.817336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavdoula, E.D., Panagopoulos D.J., and Margaritis, L.H. (2010). Comparison of biological effects between continuous and intermittent exposure to GSM-900 MHz mobile phone radiation. Detection of apoptotic cell death features. Mutation Research, 700, 51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Cucurachi, S., Tamis, W.L., Vijver, M.G., Peijnenburg, W.J., Bolte, J.F., and de Snoo, G.R. (2013). A review of the ecological effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF). Environment International, 51, 116–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curwen, P., and Whalley, J. (2008). Mobile communications in the 21st century. In A.C. Harper and R.V. Buress (Eds.), Mobile telephones: Networks, Applications and performance (pp. 29–75). Nova Science Publishers: New York.
   Google Scholar
• De Iuliis, G.N., Newey, R.J., King, B.V., and Aitken, R.J. (2009). Mobile phone radiation induces reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human spermatozoa in vitro. PLoS One, 4(7), e6446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everaert, J., and Bauwens, D. (2007). A possible effect of electromagnetic radiation from mobile phone base stations on the number of breeding house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 26, 63–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favre, D. (2011). Mobile phone-induced honeybee worker piping. Apidologie, 42, 270–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gary, N.E., and Westerdahl, B.B. (1981). Flight, orientation, and homing abilities of honeybees following exposure to 2.45-GHz CW microwaves. Bioelectromagnetics, 2, 71–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodman, E.M., Greenebaum, B., and Marron, M.T. (1995). Effects of electromagnetic fields on molecules and cells. International Review of Cytology, 158, 279–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul, A., Celebi, H., and Uğras, S. (2009). The effects of microwave emitted by cellular phones on ovarian follicles in rats. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 280(5), 729–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haessig, M., Jud, F., Nageli, H., Kupper, J., and Spiess, M.M. (2009). Prevalence of nuclear cataract in Swiss veal calves and its possible association with mobile telefon antenna base stations (in German). Schweizer Archiv Fur Tierheilkunde, 151, 471–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haessig, M., Jud, F., and Spiess, B. (2012). Increased occurrence of nuclear cataract in the calf after erection of a mobile phone base station (in German). Schweizer Archiv Fur Tierheilkunde, 15, 82–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamzelou, J. (2007). Where have all the bees gone? Lancet, 370, 639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillebrand, F. (2002). GMS and UMTS. The creation of global mobile communication (580 pp.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• IARC. (2013). Non-ionizing radiation, part 2: Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (Vol. 102), Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Joos, K., Masumy, S., Schweingruber, F.H., and Staeger, C. (1988). Untersuchung¨uber m¨oglishe Einfl¨usse hochfrequenter elektromagnetischer Wellen auf den Wald. Technische Mitteilungen PTT, 1/1988, 2–11.
   Google Scholar
• Khalafallah, A.A., and Sallam, S.M. (2009). Response of maize seedlings to microwaves at 945 MHz. Romanian Journal of Biophysics, 19, 49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Kramar, P.O., Emery, A.F., Guy, A.W., and Lin, J.C. (1975). The ocular effects of microwaves on hyperthermic rabbits: A study of microwave cataractogenic mechanisms. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 247, 155–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krug, E. (1990). Pollenkeimung unter Einfluss electromagnetischer Wellen und Felder. European Journal of Forest Pathology, 20, 251–255.
   Google Scholar
• Lin-Liu, S., and Adey, W.R. (1982). Low frequency amplitude modulated microwave fields change calcium efflux rates from synaptosomes. Bioelectromagnetics, 3(3), 309–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pall, M.L. (2013). Electromagnetic fields act via activation of voltage-gated calcium channels to produce beneficial or adverse effects. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 17, 958–965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pall, M.L. (2015) Scientific evidence contradicts findings and assumptions of Canadian Safety Panel 6: Microwaves act through voltage-gated calcium channel activation to induce biological impacts at non-thermal levels, supporting a paradigm shift for microwave/lower frequency electromagnetic field action. Reviews on Environmental Health, 30, 99–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, D.J., Karabarbounis, A., and Margaritis, L.H. (2002). Mechanism for action of electromagnetic fields on cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 298(1), 95–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, D.J., Karabarbounis, A., and Margaritis, L.H. (2004). Effect of GSM 900-MHz mobile phone radiation on the reproductive capacity of drosophila melanogaster. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 23(1), 29–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, D.J., Chavdoula, E.D., Karabarbounis, A., and Margaritis, L.H. (2007a). Comparison of bioactivity between 900 MHz and DCS1800 MHz mobile telephony radiation. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 26, 33–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, D.J., Chavdoula, E.D., Nezis, I.P., and Margaritis, L.H. (2007b). Cell death induced by GSM 900 MHz and DCS 1800 MHz mobile telephony radiation. Mutation Research, 626, 69–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, D.J., Chavdoula, E.D., and Margaritis, L.H. (2010). Bioeffects of mobile telephony radiation in relation to its intensity or distance from the antenna. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 86(5), 345–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, D.J. (2012). Effect of Microwave Exposure on the Ovarian Development of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, 63, 121–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, D.J., Johansson, O., and Carlo, G.L. (2013). Evaluation of specific absorption rate as a dosimetric quantity for electromagnetic fields bioeffects. PLoS One, 8(6), e62663. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penafiel, L.M., Litovitz, T., Krause, D., Desta, A., and Mullins, M.J. (1997). Role of modulation on the effect of microwaves on ornithine decarboxylase activity in L929 cells. Bioelectromagnetics, 18(2), 132–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux, D., Vian, A., Girard, S., Bonnet, P., Paladian, F., Davies, E., and Ledoigt, G. (2006). Electromagnetic fields (900 MHz) evoke consistent molecular responses in tomato plants. Physiologia Plantarum, 128, 283–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux, D., Vian, A., Girard, S., Bonnet, P., Paladian, F., Davies, E., and Ledoigt, G. (2008). High frequency (900 MHz) low amplitude (5 V m−1) electromagnetic field: A genuine environmental stimulus that affects transcription, translation, calcium and energy charge in tomato. Planta, 227, 883–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmutz, P., Siegenthaler, J., Staeger, C., Tarjan, D., and Bucher, J. B. (1996). Long term exposure of young spruce and beech trees to 2450-MHz microwave radiation. The Science of the Total Environment, 180, 43–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selga, T., and Selga, M. (1996). Response of Pinus sylvestris L. needles to electromagnetic fields. Cytological and ultrastructural aspects. The Science of the Total Environment, 180, 65–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, V. P., and Kumar, N. R. (2010). Changes in honeybee behaviour and biology under the influence of cellphone radiations. Current Science, 98, 1376–1378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staeger, C. (1989). Felduntersuchung ¨uber eventuelle Schadenwirkungen von Mikrowellenfeldern auf den Wald. Technische Mitteilungen PTT, 12/1989, 517–526.
   Google Scholar
• Tisal, J. (1998). GSM cellular radio telephony. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Verschaeve, L. (2014). Environmental impact of radiofrequency fields from mobile phone base stations. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 44, 1313–1369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschaeve, L., and Maes, A. (1998). Genetic, carcinogenic and teratogenic effects of radiofrequency fields. Mutation Research, 410, 141–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschaeve, L. (2012). Chapter 20: Evaluations of international expert group reports on the biological effects of radiofrequency fields. In E. Ali (Ed.), Wireless communications (pp. 523–546). ISBN: 978-953-51-0189-5, InTech. doi:10.5772/37762. INTECH Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Vian, A., Faure, C., Girard, S., Davies, E., Halle, F., Bonnet, P., Ledoigt, G., and Paladian, F. (2007). YES, Plants do respond to GSM-like radiations!!! Plant Signaling and Behavior, 2, e1–e3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vian, A., Roux, D., Girard, S., Bonnet, P., Paladian, F., Davies, E., and Ledoigt, G. (2006). Microwave irradiation affects gene expression in plants. Plant Signaling and Behavior, 1, 67–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weisbrot, D., Lin, H., Blank, M., and Goodman, R. (2003). Effects of mobile phone radiation on reproduction and development in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 89, 48–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. (1993). Environmental health criteria 137. Electromagnetic fields 300 Hz to 300 GHz. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar