Welfare Reform, Employment, and Drug and Alcohol Use Among Low-Income Women

REFERENCES

• Schmidt L A, McCarty D. Welfare reform and the changing landscape of substance abuse services for low-income women. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2000; 24: 1298–311, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of National Drug Control Policy. The economic costs of drug abuse in the United States, 1992–1998. Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC 2001
   Google Scholar
• Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2002 national survey on drug use and health: national findings. SAMHSA, Rockville, MD 2003
   Google Scholar
• Danziger S K, Corcoran M, Danziger S, . Barriers to the employment of welfare recipients. Prosperity for all? The economic boom and African Americans, R Cherry, W Rodgers, et al. Russell Sage Foundation, New York 2000; 245–78
   Google Scholar
• Morgenstern J, McCrady B S, Blanchard K A, McVeigh K H, Riordan A, Irwin T W. Barriers to employability among substance dependent and nonsubstance-affected women on federal welfare: implications for program design. J Stud Alcohol 2003; 64: 239–46, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legal Action Center. State, local welfare officials see important role for drugs and treatment in welfare reform. Legal Action Center, Washington, DC 1995
   Google Scholar
• Nakashian M. Substance abuse and welfare reform. J Am Med Womens Assoc 2002; 57: 36–7, 40[INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Jayakody R, Danziger S, Seefeldt K S, Pollack H. Substance abuse and welfare reform: comprehensive programs needed to address recipients' multiple problems. Connection Feb, 2004; 1–2, [newsletter of AcademyHealth][CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Legal Action Center. The state of state policy on TANF & addiction. 2002, http://www.lac.org/pubs/gratis/state_of_state.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Blank R. Evaluating welfare reform in the United States. J Econ Lit 2002; 60: 1105–66, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Metsch L R, Pollack H A. Welfare reform and substance abuse. Milbank Q 2005; 83: 65–99, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor M J, Barusch A S. Personal, family, and multiple barriers of long-term welfare recipients. Soc Work 2004; 49: 175–81, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya I D, Atkinson J S. A synthesis of welfare reform policy and its impact on substance users. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2002; 28: 133–46, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zedlewski S R, Loprest P. Will TANF Work for the most disadvantaged families?. New world of welfare, R Blank. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC 2001; 311–34
   Google Scholar
• Parra G. Welfare reform and substance abuse: innovative state strategies. NHPF Issue Brief Mar 7, 2002; 1–16, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Jayakody R, Danziger S, Pollack H A. Welfare reform, substance use and mental health. J Health Polit Policy Law 2000; 25: 623–51, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaestner R. Drug use and AFDC participation: is there a connection?. J Policy Anal Manag 1998; 17: 495–520, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcenko M O, Fagan J. Welfare to work: what are the obstacles?. J Sociol Soc Welfare 1996; 23: 113–31, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Pollack H A, Danziger S, Jayakody R, Seefeldt K S. Substance use among welfare recipients: trends and policy responses. Soc Serv Rev 2002; 76: 256–74, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins A. Substance abuse and TANF. National Conference of State Legislatures, Washington, DC, 2003, http://www.ncsl.org/statefed/welfare/substance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt L A, Dohan D, Wiley J, Zabkiewicz D. Addiction and welfare dependency: interpreting the connection. Soc Probl 2002; 49: 221–41, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack H A, Danziger S, Jayakody R, Seefeldt K S. Drug testing welfare recipients—false positives, false negatives, unanticipated opportunities. Womens Health Issues 2002; 12: 23–31, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya I D, Bell D C, Atkinson J S, Nagy C W, Whitsett D D. Mental health, drug use, and the transition from welfare to work. J Behav Health Serv Res 2002; 29: 144–56, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson K, Pavetti L. Personal and family challenges to the successful transition from welfare to work. Urban Institute, Washington, DC 1996
   Google Scholar
• Gutman M A, McKay J, Ketterlinus R D, McLellan A T. Potential barriers to work for substance abusing women on welfare: findings from the CASAWORKS for Families pilot demonstration. Eval Rev 2003; 27: 681–706, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickizer T M, Campbell K, Krupski A, Stark K. Employment outcomes among AFDC recipients treated for substance abuse in Washington State. Milbank Q 2000; 78: 585–608, iv[INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya I D, Atkinson J S, Struse H M. A comparison of psychosocial barriers among welfare recipients: implications for drug treatment. Subst Use Misuse 2001; 36: 771–88, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson J, Lee D, Dayton-Shotts C, French C. Self-perceived job skills and employment barriers among non–drug using and chronic drug using welfare-to-work participants. J Drug Issues 2001; 31: 747–56, [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt L, Weisner C, Wiley J. Substance abuse and the course of welfare dependency. Am J Public Health 1998; 88: 1616–22, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt L, Dohan D, Wiley J, Zabkiewicz D. Addiction and welfare dependency: interpreting the connection. Soc Probl 2002; 49: 221–41, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulia N, Schmidt L A. Conflicts and trade-offs due to alcohol and drugs: clients' accounts of leaving welfare. Soc Serv Rev 2003; 77: 499–522, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Ettner S, Frank R, Ronald K. The impact of psychiatric disorders on labor market outcomes. Ind Labor Relations Rev 1997; 51: 64–81, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones A S. Wage and non-wage compensation among young alcoholic and heavy drinking women: a preliminary analysis. J Fam Econ Issues 2002; 23: 3–25, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Zarkin G A, French M T, Mroz T, Bray J W. Alcohol use and wages: new results from the national household survey on drug abuse. J Health Econ 1998; 17: 53–68, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullahy J, Sindelar J. Alcoholism, work, and income. J Labor Econ 1993; 11: 494–520, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLellan A T, Gutman M, Lynch K, et al. One-year outcomes from the CASAWORKS for Families intervention for substance-abusing women on welfare. Eval Rev 2003; 27: 656–80, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutman M A, Ketterlinus R D, McLellan A T. Characteristics of substance-abusing women on welfare: findings from the evaluation of CASAWORKS for Families pilot demonstration. Eval Rev 2003; 27: 597–628, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya I D, Atkinson J S, Lichtiger B, Whitsett D D. Prevalence of hepatitis C in a drug using and non-using welfare population. Health Policy 2003; 64: 221–8, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montoya I D. Effect of peers on employment and implications for drug treatment. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2005; 31: 657–68, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metsch L R, McCoy C B, Miller M, McAnany H, Pereyra M. Moving substance-abusing women from welfare to work. J Public Health Policy 1999; 20: 36–55, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield S F, Brooks A J, Gordon S M, et al. Predictors of treatment entry, retention, and outcome for women with substance use disorders: a review of the literature. Drug Alcohol Depend, (in press)[CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Metsch L R, Pereyra M, Miles C C, McCoy C B. Welfare and work outcomes after substance abuse treatment. Soc Serv Rev 2003; 77: 237–54, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler D, Meisel J, Jordan P, Rienzi B M, Goodwin S N. Substance abuse, employment, and welfare tenure. Soc Serv Rev 2004; 78: 628–51, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown V L, Riley M A. Social support, drug use, and employment among low-income women. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2005; 31: 203–23, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson J S, Montoya I D, Whitsett D D, Bell D C, Nagy C W. The relationship among psychological distress, employment, and drug use over time in a sample of female welfare recipients. J Community Psychol 2003; 31: 223–34, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Merrill J C. Providing care coordination and treatment services for substance-abusing women in the Work First/New Jersey (TANF) Program. J Health Soc Policy 2004; 18: 1–18, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmidt L, Sevak P. AFDC, SSI, and welfare reform aggressiveness: caseload reductions vs. caseload shifting. J Hum Resourc 2004; 39: 792–812, [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autor D H, Duggan M G. The rise in the disability rolls and the decline in unemployment. Q J Econ 2003; 118: 157–206, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann C. Prepared testimony before Subcommittee on Health of the Committee on Energy and Commerce U. S. House of Representatives. April, 232002
   Google Scholar
• Silverman K, Robles E. Employment as a drug abuse treatment intervention: a behavioral economic analysis. The economic analysis of substance use and abuse, F J Chaloupka, M Grossman, W K Bickel, Saffer Henry. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1999; 279–99
   Google Scholar