Individuals’ perception about upper limb influence on participation after stroke: an observational study

References

• Naghdi S, Ansari NN, Mansouri K, Hasson S. A neurophysiological and clinical study of Brunnstrom recovery stages in the upper limb following stroke. Brain Inj. 2010;24(11):1372–1378.10.3109/02699052.2010.506860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamper DG, McKenna-Cole AN, Kahn LE, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Alterations in reaching after stroke and their relation to movement direction and impairment severity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(5):702–707.10.1053/apmr.2002.32446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Gauthier LV, White S. Size doesn't matter: cortical stroke lesion volume is not associated with upper extremity motor impairment and function in mild, chronic hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(5):817–821.10.1016/j.apmr.2013.01.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cauraugh JH, Summers JJ. Neural plasticity and bilateral movements: A rehabilitation approach for chronic stroke. Prog Neurobiol. 2005;75(5):309–320.10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coupar F, Pollock A, Rowe P, Weir C, Langhorne P. Predictors of upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26(4):291–313.10.1177/0269215511420305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farias N, Buchalla CM. The international classification of functioning, disability and health: concepts, uses and perspectives. Rev Bras de Epidemiol. 2005;8(2):187–193.10.1590/S1415-790X2005000200011
   Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, Amman E, Kollerits B, Chatterji S, et al. Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med. 2002;34(5):205–210.10.1080/165019702760279189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, Foley NC, Bitensky J. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Body Functions. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(4):191–207.10.1080/09638280400008537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, Foley NC, Bitensky J, Bayley M. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF activity. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(6):315–340.10.1080/09638280400008545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, Foley NC, Bitensky J, Bayley M. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Participation. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(9):507–528.10.1080/0963828040008552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paanalahti M, Lundgren-Nilsson A, Arndt A, Sunnerhagen KS. Applying the comprehensive international classification of functioning, disability and health core sets for stroke framework to stroke survivors living in the community. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(4):331–340.10.2340/16501977-1110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti G, Kalaska JF. Voluntary Movement: The Parietal and Premotor Cortex. In: Kandel E, Schwartz J, Jessell T, Siegelbaum S, Hudspeth A, eds. Principles of Neural Science. 5ª ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2012. p. 865:92.
   Google Scholar
• Bernier PM, Grafton ST. Human posterior parietal cortex flexibly determines reference frames for reaching based on sensory context. Neuron. 2010;68(4):776–788.10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton FN, Reding MJ. Effect of lesion location on upper limb motor recovery after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32(1):107–112.10.1161/01.STR.32.1.107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R, Wood VA, Skilbeck CE, Ismail HM. The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1983;46(6):521–524.10.1136/jnnp.46.6.521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker VM, Wade DT, Langton Hewer R. Loss of arm function after stroke: measurement, frequency, and recovery. Int Rehabil Med. 1986;8(2):69–73.10.3109/03790798609166178
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olsen TS. Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1990;21(2):247–251.10.1161/01.STR.21.2.247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJ. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34(9):2181–2186.10.1161/01.STR.0000087172.16305.CD
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathian K, Buxbaum LJ, Cohen LG, Krakauer JW, Lang CE, Corbetta M, et al. Neurological principles and rehabilitation of action disorders: common clinical deficits. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(5 Suppl):21S–32S.10.1177/1545968311410941
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris JE, Eng JJ. Paretic upper-limb strength best explains arm activity in people with stroke. Phys Ther. 2007;87(1):88–97.10.2522/ptj.20060065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria-Fortini I, Michaelsen SM, Cassiano JG, Teixeira-Salmela LF. Upper extremity function in stroke subjects: relationships between the international classification of functioning, disability, and health domains. J Hand Ther. 2011;24(3):257–265; quiz 65.10.1016/j.jht.2011.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smutok MA, Grafman J, Salazar AM, Sweeney JK, Jonas BS, DiRocco PJ. Effects of unilateral brain damage on contralateral and ipsilateral upper extremity function in hemiplegia. Phys Ther. 1989;69(3):195–203.10.1093/ptj/69.3.195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer SY, Haaland KY, Sainburg RL. Ipsilesional motor deficits following stroke reflect hemispheric specializations for movement control. Brain. 2007;130(Pt 8):2146–2158.10.1093/brain/awm145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer SY, Haaland KY, Sainburg RL. Hemispheric specialization and functional impact of ipsilesional deficits in movement coordination and accuracy. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47(13):2953–2966.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.06.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haaland KY, Mutha PK, Rinehart JK, Daniels M, Cushnyr B, Adair JC. Relationship between arm usage and instrumental activities of daily living after unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(11):1957–1962.10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani S, Mutha PK, Przybyla A, Haaland KY, Good DC, Sainburg RL. Contralesional motor deficits after unilateral stroke reflect hemisphere-specific control mechanisms. Brain. 2013;136(Pt 4):1288–1303.10.1093/brain/aws283
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moriello C, Byrne K, Cieza A, Nash C, Stolee P, Mayo N. Mapping the stroke impact scale (SIS-16) to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(2):102–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carod-Artal FJ, Coral LF, Trizotto DS, Moreira CM. The stroke impact scale 3.0: evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity of the brazilian version. Stroke. 2008;39(9):2477–2484.10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.513671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Hill V, White S. Portable upper extremity robotics is as efficacious as upper extremity rehabilitative therapy: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27(6):494–503.10.1177/0269215512464795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9(1):97–113.10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–198.10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolucci PH, Brucki SM, Campacci SR, Juliano Y. The mini-mental state examination in a general population: impact of educational status. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1994;52(1):1–7.10.1590/S0004-282X1994000100001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu EC, Yu MY, Wu WC, Chou CX, Hung JW, Chen PC. Validation of the test of visual perceptual skills-third edition in patients with stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2017:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The stroke impact scale version 2.0 : Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30(10):2131–2140.10.1161/01.STR.30.10.2131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66(2):69–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987;67(2):206–207.10.1093/ptj/67.2.206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Page SJ, Fulk GD, Boyne P. Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke. Phys Ther. 2012;92(6):791–798.10.2522/ptj.20110009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafayette I. Purdue pegboard test – model 32020 user instructions. 2002:1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Bleyenheuft Y, Thonnard JL. Tactile spatial resolution in unilateral brain lesions and its correlation with digital dexterity. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(3):251–256.10.2340/16501977-0651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coqueiro PR, de Freitas SMSF, e Silva CMA, Alouche SR. Effects of direction and index of dificulty on aiming movements post-Stroke. Behav Neurol. 2014:09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Paiva Silva FP, Freitas SM, Silva PV, Banjai RM, Alouche SR. Ipsilesional arm motor sequence performance after right and left hemisphere damage. J Mot Behav. 2014;46(6):407–414.10.1080/00222895.2014.924473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field A, Miles J, Field Z. Discovering Statistics Using R. 1st ed. London: Sage; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Lin KC, Chang YF, Chen CL, Liu JS. Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2009;40(4):1386–1391.10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.530584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan KJ, Tilson JK, Cen SY, Rose DK, Hershberg J, Correa A, et al. Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor function after stroke: standardized training procedure for clinical practice and clinical trials. Stroke. 2011;42(2):427–432.10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.592766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinear CM, Barber PA, Smale PR, Coxon JP, Fleming MK, Byblow WD. Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. Brain. 2007;130(Pt 1):170–180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar