A qualitative study exploring views and experiences of people with stroke undergoing transcranial direct current stimulation and upper limb robot therapy

References

• Yozbatiran N, Alonso-Alonso M, See J, et al. Safety and behavioral effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke. Stroke. 2009;40(1):309–12.10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.522144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijland RH, van, Wegen EE, Harmeling-van der Wel BC, Kwakkel G. Presence of finger extension and shoulder abduction within 72 h after stroke predicts functional recovery early prediction of functional outcome after stroke: the EPOS cohort study. Stroke. 2010;41(4):745–50.10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.572065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJH. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2013;34(9):2181–86.
   Google Scholar
• Houwink A, Nijland RH, Geurts AC, et al. Functional recovery of the paretic upper limb after stroke: Who regains hand capacity? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:839–44.10.1016/j.apmr.2012.11.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris JH, van Wijck F, Joice S, Donaghy M. Predicting health related quality of life 6 months after stroke: the role of anxiety and upper limb dysfunction. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(4):291–99.10.3109/09638288.2012.691942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschini M, La Porta F, Agosti M, Massucci M. Is health-related-quality of life of stroke patients influenced by neurological impairments at one year after stroke? Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;46(3):389–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tedesco Triccas L, Burridge JH, Hughes AM, et al. Multiple sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation and upper extremity rehabilitation in stroke: A review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127(1):946–55.10.1016/j.clinph.2015.04.067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veerbeek JM, Langbroek-Amersfoort AC, van, Wegen EE, Meskers CG, Kwakkel G. Effects of robot-assisted therapy for the upper limb after stroke. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31(2):107–21.10.1177/1545968316666957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klamroth-Marganska V, Blanco J, Campen K, et al. Three-dimensional, task-specific robot therapy of the arm after stroke: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(2):159–66.10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70305-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh Y-w Wu, C-y Liao W-w, Lin K-c Wu, K-y Lee C-y. Effects of treatment intensity in upper limb robot-assisted therapy for chronic stroke. A pilot randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(6):503–11.10.1177/1545968310394871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke. 2016;47(6):e98–169.10.1161/STR.0000000000000098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milot MH, Spencer SJ, Chan V, et al. Corticospinal excitability as a predictor of functional gains at affected upper limb following robotic training in chronic stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014;28(9):819–27.10.1177/1545968314527351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Waldner A, Mehrholz J, et al. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients an exploratory, randomized multicenter trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(9):838–46.10.1177/1545968311413906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunoni AR, Nitsche MA, Bolognini N, et al. Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Challenges and future directions. Brain Stimul. 2012;31;5(3):175–95.10.1016/j.brs.2011.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggio PS, Nunes A, Rigonatti SP, et al. Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25:123–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, et al. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain. 2005;128(3):490–99.10.1093/brain/awh369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allman C, Amadi U, Winkler AM et al. Ipsilesional anodal tDCS enhances the functional benefits of rehabilitation in patients after stroke. Sci Transl Med. 2016; 8(330), 330re1–330re1.10.1126/scitranslmed.aad5651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khedr EM, Shawky OA, El-Hammady DH, et al. Effect of anodal versus cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on stroke rehabilitation a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27:592–601.10.1177/1545968313484808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straudi S, Fregni F, Martinuzzi C, et al. tDCS and robotics on upper limb stroke rehabilitation: Effect modification by stroke duration and type of stroke. Biomed Res Int. 2016;. doi:10.1155/2016/5068127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin S, Glenton C, Oxman AD. Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study. BMJ. 2009;339:b3496.10.1136/bmj.b3496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arain M, Campbell MJ, Cooper CL, Lancaster GA. What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10(1):67.10.1186/1471-2288-10-67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry COB, Chumbler NR, Richards K, Huff A, et al. Expanding stroke telerehabilitation services to rural veterans: a qualitative study on patient experiences using the robotic stroke therapy delivery and monitoring system program. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015; 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadmore KL, Hughes AM, Freeman CT, et al. Participant feedback in the evaluation of novel stroke rehabilitation technologies. J Rehabil Rob. 2013;1(2):82–92.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes A-M, Burridge J, Freeman CT, et al. Stroke participants’ perceptions of robotic and electrical stimulation therapy: a new approach. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(2):130–138.10.3109/17483107.2010.509882
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tedesco Triccas L, Burridge JH, Hughes AM, et al. Double-blinded randomised controlled trial exploring the effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation and uni-lateral robot therapy for the impaired upper limb in sub-acute and chronic stroke. Neurorehabilitation. 2015;27:181–191.10.3233/NRE-151251
   Google Scholar
• Grbich BC. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Introduction. 1st ed. London: Sage; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kimchi J, Polivka B. Stevenson JS. Triangulation: operational definitions. Nursing research. 1991;40(6):364–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Medical Research Council. Aids to Examination of the Peripheral Nervous System. Memorandum No. 45. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office; 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Inter rater reliability of a modified Ashworth Scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987;67:206–207.10.1093/ptj/67.2.206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psych Res. 1975;12(3):189–198.10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59–82.10.1177/1525822X05279903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry L, Nunez-Smith M. Mixed Methods in Health Sciences Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Ward NS. Restoring brain function after stroke – bridging the gap between animals and humans. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13(4):244–255.10.1038/nrneurol.2017.34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luker J, Lynch E, Berhardsson S, et al. Stroke survivors’ experiences of physical rehabilitation: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:1698–708.10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demain S, Burridge J, Ellis-Hill, C, et al. Assistive technologies after stroke: self-management or fending for yourself? A focus group study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013; 13(1), 334.10.1186/1472-6963-13-334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar