Factors affecting rehabilitation and use of upper limb after stroke: views from healthcare professionals and stroke survivors

References

• Stroke Association. State of the nation: stroke statistics. https://www.stroke.org.uk/system/files/sotn_2018.pdf. Accessed March 2, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Stroke Association. A new era for stroke 2016. https://www.stroke.org.uk/sites/default/files/anefs_report_web.pdf. Accessed March 2, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke care 2: stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377:1693–1702. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan P, Goldstein L, Horner R, Landsman P, Samsa G, Matchar D. Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke. 1994;25:1181–1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, De Wit L, et al. Time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:173–179. doi:10.1177/1545968307305456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobkin B. Rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(16):1677–1684. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp043511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen B. Predicting activities after stroke: what is clinically relevant. Int J Stroke. 2013;8:25–32. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00967.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand D, Eng JJ. Disparity between functional recovery and daily use of the upper and lower extremities during subacute stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26:76–84. doi:10.1177/1545968311408918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang CE, Macdonald JR, Reisman DS, et al. Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(10):1692–1698. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.04.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand D, Eng JJ. Predicting daily use of the affected upper extremity 1 year after stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(2):274–283. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.07.039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson H, Gard G, Brogardh C. Upper-limb sensory impairments after stroke: self-reported experiences of daily life and rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50:45–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle S, Bennett S, Dudgeon B. Upper limb post-stroke sensory impairments: the survivor’s experience. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:993–1000. doi:10.3109/09638288.2013.825649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris J, Oliver T, Kroll T, Joice S, Williams B. From physical and functional to continuity with pre-stroke self and participation in valued activities: a qualitative exploration of stroke survivors’, carers’ and physiotherapists’ perceptions of physical activity after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(1):64–77. doi:10.3109/09638288.2014.907828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poltawski L, Boddy K, Forster A, Goodwin VA, Pavey AC, Dean S. Motivators for uptake and maintenance of exercise: perceptions of long-term stroke survivors and implications for design of exercise programmes. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;3(9):795–801. doi:10.3109/09638288.2014.946154.
   Google Scholar
• Barker R, Brauer S. Upper limb recovery after stroke: the stroke survivors’ perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:1213–1223. doi:10.1080/09638280500075717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker R, Gill T, Brauer S. Factors contributing to upper limb recovery after stroke: a survey of stroke survivors in Queensland Australia. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(13):981–989. doi:10.1080/09638280500243570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger R, Casey M. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICE. Stroke in adults. Quality Standard 2010. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs2/resources/stroke-in-adults-pdf-58292707525. Accessed March 2, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Jones F, Mandy A, Partridge C. Reasons for recovery after stroke: a perspective based on personal experience. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(7):507–516. doi:10.1080/09638280701355561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardcastle S, Hancox J, Hattar A, Maxwell-Smith C, Thorgersen-Ntoumani C, Hagger M. Motivating the unmotivated: how can health behaviour be changed in those unwilling to change? Front Psychol. 2015;6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Tawashy AE. Exercise perceptions among people with stroke: barriers and facilitators to participation. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2011;18(9):520–530. doi:10.12968/ijtr.2011.18.9.520.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ward N, Suhaimei U, Strawson A, et al. The queen square intensive upper limb neurorehabilitation programme. Poster session presented at: UK Stroke Forum; 20–30 November, 2016; Liverpool, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Meadmore K, Exell T, Hallewell E, et al. The application of precisely controlled functional electrical stimulation to the shoulder, elbow and wrist for upper limb stroke rehabilitation: a feasibility study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:105. doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar