The outcome measures for loss of functionality in the activities of daily living of adults after stroke: a systematic review

References

• Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;4:CD000197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wardlaw JM, Murray V, Berge E, Del Zoppo GJ. Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;4:CD000213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandercock PAG, Counsell C, Kamal AK. Anticoagulants for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;4:CD000024.
   Google Scholar
• MedicineNet: https://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/hp.asp. updated 18 August; Accessed September 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison JK, McArthur KS, Quinn TJ. Assessment scales in stroke: clinimetric and clinical considerations. Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:201–211. doi:10.2147/CIA.S32405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxman AD, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH. Users’ guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-based medicine working group. JAMA. 1994;272:1367–1371. doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03520170077040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swingler GH, Volmink J, Ioannidis JP. Number of published systematic reviews and global burden of disease: database analysis. BMJ. 2003;327:1083–1084. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7420.895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Green S Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: the cochrane collaboration; 2011. http://handbook.cochrane.org/. updated March; Accessed December 18, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Lasserson T, Chandler J, Tovey D, Churchill R. Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews (MECIR) standards for the conduct and reporting of new cochrane intervention reviews, reporting of protocols and the planning, conduct and reporting of updates.  https://methods.cochrane.org/mecir. updated 18 August; Accessed September 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler J, Churchill R, Higgins J, Lasserson T, Tovey D Methodological standards for the conduct of new cochrane intervention reviews version 2.3: the cochrane library; 2013. http://editorial-unit.cochrane.org/sites/editorialunit.cochrane.org/files/uploads/MECIR_conduct_standards%202.3%2002122013.pdf. updated 2 December; Accessed October 21, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Methods guide for effectiveness and comparative effectiveness reviews. Rockville MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK47095/. Accessed December 18, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rethlefsen ML, MLS, Koffel J, Kirtley S. PRISMA-search (PRISMA-S) extension to PRISMA development protocol. http://www.equator-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/Protocol-PRISMA-S-Delphi.pdf. updated 18 august; Accessed September 2013
   Google Scholar
• The Internet Stroke Centre. Stroke assessment scales overview. 1995. http://www.strokecenter.org/trials/scales/scales-overview.htm. Accessed December 7, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Wade DT. Measurement in Neurological Rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Fava GA, Tomba E, Sonino N. Clinimetrics: the science of clinical measurements. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66:11–15. doi:10.1111/ijcp.12013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noyes J, Lewin S. Chapter 5: extracting qualitative evidence. In: Noyes J, Booth A, Hannes K, et al., eds. Supplementary Guidance for Inclusion of Qualitative Research in Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 1. Cochrane Collaboration Qualitative Methods Group; 2011. http://cqrmg.cochrane.org/supplemental-handbook-guidance. Accessed August, 2011
   Google Scholar
• Bates S, Coren E. Systematic Map No.1: The Extent and Impact of Parental Mental Health Problems on Families and the Acceptability, Accessibility and Effectiveness of Interventions. London: SCIE; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–745. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–549. doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9655-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:22. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-10-22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. COSMIN checklist manual. COSMIN; 2012. http://www.cosmin.nl/images/upload/files/COSMIN%20checklist%20manual%20v9.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Shuang F, Hou SX, Z JL, Ren DF, Cao Z, Tang JG. 2014. Accessed October 13, 2017 (GMT). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111695.t001.
   Google Scholar
• Batcho CS, Tennant A, Thonnard JL. ACTIVLIM-stroke: a crosscultural Rasch-built scale of activity limitations in patients with stroke. Stroke. 2012;43(3):815–823. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.638965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosseau L, Potvin L, Philippe P, Boulanger YL, Dutil E. The construct validity of the functional independence measure as applied to stroke patients. Physiother Theory Pract. 1996;12(3):161–171. doi:10.3109/09593989609036432
   Google Scholar
• Chan VWK, Chung JCC, Packer TL. Validity and reliability of the activity card sort–Hong Kong version. OTJR-Occup Part Heal. 2006;26(4):152–158. doi:10.1177/153944920602600405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen HF, Wu CY, Lin KC, et al. Rasch validation of a combined measure of basic and extended daily life functioning after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27(2):125–132. doi:10.1177/1545968312457828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cup EH, Scholte Op Reimer WJ, Thijssen MC, van Kuyk-Minis MA. Reliability and validity of the Canadian occupational performance measure in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17(4):402–409. doi:10.1191/0269215503cr635oa
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond AE, Parker CJ, Gladman JR, Logan PA, TOTAL Study Group. Development and validation of the Nottingham Leisure Questionnaire (NLQ). Clin Rehabil. 2001;15(6):647–656. doi:10.1191/0269215501cr438oa
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallahpour M, Jonsson H, Joghataei MT, Kottorp A. Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA): psychometric evaluation of the Persian version to use for persons with stroke. Scand J Occup Ther. 2011;18:59–71. doi:10.3109/11038121003628353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallahpour M, Tham K, Joghataei MT, Eriksson G, Jonsson H. Occupational gaps in everyday life after stroke and the relation to functioning and perceived life satisfaction. OTJR. 2011;31(4):200–208.
   Google Scholar
• Gompertz P, Pound P, Ebrahim S. Validity of the extended activities of daily living scale. Clin Rehabil. 1994;8(4):275–280. doi:10.1177/026921559400800401
   Google Scholar
• Hamed R, Tariah HA, Malkawi S, Holm MB. The Arabic version of the Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory 4: a validation study. Int J Rehabil Res. 2012;35(3):243–247. doi:10.1097/MRR.0b013e3283544c9f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horgan NF, Cunningham CJ, Coakley D, Walsh JB, O’Regan M, Finn AM. The stroke activity scale: results of a validity study. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(15):937–941. doi:10.1080/09638280500404461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh IP, Wang CH, Liou TH, Lin CH, Hsieh CL. Test-retest reliability and validity of the comprehensive activities of daily living measure in patients with stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44:637–641. doi:10.2340/16501977-0915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansa J, Pogacnik T, Gompertz P. An evaluation of the extended Barthel index with acute ischemic stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2004;18(1):37–41. doi:10.1177/0888439003262287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz N, Karpin H, Lak A, Furman T, Hartman-Maeir A. Participation in occupational performance: reliability and validity of the activity card sort. OTJR. 2003;23:10–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korpelainen JT, Niilekselä E, Myllylä VV. The Sunnaas index of activities of daily living: responsiveness and concurrent validity in stroke. Scand J Occup Ther. 1997;4:31–36. doi:10.3109/11038129709035719
   Google Scholar
• Lee YC, Chen SS, Koh CL, Hsueh IP, Yao KP, Hsieh CL. Development of two barthel index-based supplementary scales for patients with stroke. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e110494. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung SO, Chan CC, Shah S. Development of a Chinese version of the modified Barthel Index – validity and reliability. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21(10):912–922. doi:10.1177/0269215507077286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li HY, Cheng HL, Fang L, Bi RX, Fang XQ, Hu M. Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the daily living self-efficacy scale among stroke patients. Int J Rehabil Res. 2016;39(3):219–225. doi:10.1097/MRR.0000000000000170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin KC, Chen HF, Wu CY, Yu TY, Ouyang P. Multidimensional Rasch validation of the Frenchay activities index in stroke patients receiving rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44(1):58–64. doi:10.2340/16501977-0911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln NB, Edmans JA. A re-validation of the Rivermead ADL scale for elderly patients with stroke. Age Ageing. 1990;19:19–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln NB, Gladman JR. The extended activities of daily living scale: a further validation. Disabil Rehabil. 1992;14:41–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lundgren-Nilsson A, Tennant A, Grimby G, Sunnerhagen KS. Cross-diagnostic validity in a generic instrument: an example from the functional independence measure in Scandinavia. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:55. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-4-55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maujean A, Davis P, Kendall E, Casey L, Loxton N. The daily living self-efficacy scale: a new measure for assessing self-efficacy in stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(6):504–511. doi:10.3109/09638288.2013.804592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mennem TA, Warren M, Yuen HK. Preliminary validation of a vision-dependent activities of daily living instrument on adults with homonymous hemianopia. Am J Occup Ther. 2012;66(4):478–482. doi:10.5014/ajot.2012.004762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miki E, Yamane S, Yamaoka M, et al. Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the FIM + FAM in patients with cerebrovascular accident. Scand J Occup Ther. 2016;23(5):398–404. doi:10.3109/11038128.2015.1095236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro M, Maso I, Sasaki AC, Neto BN, Filho OJ, Pinto EB. Validation of the Frenchay activity index on stroke victims. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2017;75(3):167–171. doi:10.1590/0004-282X20170014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghdi S, Ansari NN, Raji P, Shamili A, Amini M, Hasson S. Cross-cultural validation of the Persian version of the functional independence measure for patients with stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(3):289–298. doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1036173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottiger B, Vanbellingen T, Gabriel C, et al. Validation of the new Lucerne ICF Based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale (LIMOS) for stroke patients. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0130925. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang MY, Lau RW, Yeung PK, Liao LR, Chung RC. Development and validation of the Chinese version of the reintegration to normal living index for use with stroke patients. J Rehabil Med. 2011 Feb;43(3):243–250. doi:10.2340/16501977-0660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piercy M, Carter J, Mant J, Wade DT. Inter-rater reliability of the Frenchay activities index in patients with stroke and their carers. Clin Rehabil. 2000 Aug;14(4):433–440. doi:10.1191/0269215500cr327oa
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post MW, de Witte LP. Good inter-rater reliability of the Frenchay activities index in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17(5):548–552. doi:10.1191/0269215503cr648oa
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlote A, Richter M, Wunderlich MT, et al. WHODAS II with people after stroke and their relatives. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(11):855–864. doi:10.1080/09638280802355262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer C, Clark M, Smith DS. A modification of the Northwick Park ADL index (The Australian ADL index). Br J Occup Ther. 1986;49(11):350–353. doi:10.1177/030802268604901103
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira-Salmela LF, Devaraj R, Olney SJ. Validation of the human activity profile in stroke: A comparison of observed, proxy and self-reported scores. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(19):1518–1524. doi:10.1080/09638280601055733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooth LR, McKenna KT, Smith M, O’Rourke PK. Reliability of scores between stroke patients and significant others on the Reintegration to Normal Living (RNL) index. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(9):433–440. doi:10.1080/0963828031000069726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson PA. The motor activity log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology. 2006;67(7):1189–1194. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000238164.90657.c2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Knol DL, de Vet HC, Bouter LM. Clinimetric properties of the motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 2004;35(6):1410–1414. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000126900.24964.7e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang TN, Lin KC, Wu CY, Chung CY, Pei YC, Teng YK. Validity, responsiveness and clinical important difference of the ABILHAND questionnaire in patient with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(7):1086–1091. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada S, Liu M, Hase K, et al. Development of a short version of the motor fim for use in long-term care settings. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38:50–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization Geneva. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health ICF. WHO/EIP/GPE/CAS/01.3; 2002. http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/icfchecklist.pdf?ua=1.
   Google Scholar
• Galeoto G, Lauta A, Palumbo A, Castiglia SF, Mollica R, Santilli V. The Barthel index: Italian translation, adaptation and validation. Int J Neurol Neurother. 2015;2:1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Culicchia G, Nobilia M, Asturi M, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Jebsen-Taylor hand function test in an Italian population. Rehabilitation Research and Practice. 2016; Article ID 8970917:12.
   Google Scholar
• Castiglia SF, Galeoto G, Lauta A, et al. The culturally adapted Italian version of the Barthel Index (IcaBI): assessment of structural validity, inter-rater reliability and responsiveness to clinically relevant improvements in patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation centers. Funct Neurol. 2017;32(4):221. doi:10.11138/FNeur/2017.32.4.221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquez MA, De Santis R, Ammendola V, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the “spinal cord injury-falls concern scale” in the Italian population. Spinal Cord. 2018;1:712–718
   Google Scholar
• Galeoto G, Sansoni J, Scuccimarri M, et al. A psychometric properties evaluation of the Italian version of the geriatric depression scale. Depress Res Treat. 2018. doi:10.1155/2018/1797536
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murgia M, Bernetti A, Delicata M, et al. Inter-and intra-interviewer reliability of Italian version of pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Ann Ig. 2018;30:153–161. doi:10.7416/ai.2018.2206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berardi A, De Santis R, Tofani M, et al. The wheelchair use confidence scale: Italian translation, adaptation, and validation of the short form. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;13(6):1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tofani M, Candeloro C, Sabbadini M, et al. The psychosocial impact of assistive device scale: Italian validation in a cohort of nonambulant people with neuromotor disorders. Assistive Technol. 2018;1–6. doi:10.1080/10400435.2018.1469553
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galeoto G, Berardi A, De Santis R, et al. Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Van Lieshout test in an Italian population with cervical spinal cord injury: a psychometric study. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2018;4(1):49. doi:10.1038/s41394-018-0083-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parente M, Tofani M, De Santis R, Esposito G, Santilli V, Galeoto G. The role of the occupational therapist in disaster areas: systematic review. Occup Ther Int. 2017;2017:6474761. doi:10.1155/2017/6474761
   PubMedGoogle Scholar