3,051
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Acceptability, feasibility and preliminary efficacy of low-moderate intensity Constraint Induced Aphasia Therapy and Multi-Modality Aphasia Therapy in chronic aphasia after stroke

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 44-56 | Received 01 Nov 2022, Accepted 24 Mar 2023, Published online: 10 Apr 2023

References

  • Cavanaugh R, Kravetz C, Jarold L, Quique Y, Turner R, Evans WS. Is there a research–practice dosage gap in aphasia rehabilitation? Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021;30(5):2115–2129. doi:10.1044/2021_ajslp-20-00257.
  • Mozeiko J, Coelho CA, Myers EB. The role of intensity in constraint-induced language therapy for people with chronic aphasia. Aphasiology. 2015;30(4):339–363. doi:10.1080/02687038.2015.1070949.
  • Szaflarski JP, Ball AL, Vannest J, et al. Constraint-induced aphasia therapy for treatment of chronic post-stroke aphasia: a randomized, blinded, controlled pilot trial. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:2861–2869. doi:10.12659/msm.894291.
  • Code C, Heron C. Services for aphasia, other acquired adult neurogenic communication and swallowing disorders in the United Kingdom, 2000. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(21):1231–1237. doi:10.1080/09638280310001599961.
  • Mackenzie C, Le May M, Lendrem W, McGuirk E, Marshall J, Rossiter D. A survey of aphasia services in the United Kingdom. Eur J Disord Commun J Coll Speech Lang Ther Lond. 1993;28(1):43–61. doi:10.3109/13682829309033142.
  • Palmer R, Witts H, Chater T, Starrfelt R, Starrfelt R. What speech and language therapy do community dwelling stroke survivors with aphasia receive in the UK? PLoS One. 2018;13(7):e0200096. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200096.
  • Rose ML, Nickels L, Copland D, et al. Results of the COMPARE randomised controlled trial of constraint induced or multi-modality aphasia therapy compared with usual care in chronic post-stroke aphasia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2022;93(6):573–581. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2021-328422.
  • Verna A, Davidson B, Rose T. Speech-language pathology services for people with aphasia: a survey of current practice in Australia. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009;11(3):191–206. doi:10.1080/17549500902726059.
  • Harvey S, Rose ML, Brogan E, et al. Examining dose frameworks to improve aphasia rehabilitation research. Submitted.
  • Page SJ, Wallace SE. Speech language pathologists’ opinions of constraint-induced language therapy. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014;21(4):332–338. doi:10.1310/tsr2104-332.
  • Code C, Petheram B. Delivering for aphasia. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;13(1):3–10. doi:10.3109/17549507.2010.520090.
  • Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech, Lang Hear Res. 2008;51(1):S239. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/018).
  • Raymer AM, Beeson P, Holland AL, et al. Translational research in aphasia: from neuroscience to neurorehabilitation. J Speech, Lang Hear Res. 2008;51(1):S259–75. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/020).
  • Menahemi-Falkov M, Breitenstein C, Pierce JE, Hill AJ, O’Halloran R, Rose ML. A systematic review of maintenance following intensive therapy programs in chronic post-stroke aphasia: importance of individual response analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;2021(20):1–16. doi:10.1080/09638288.2021.1955303.
  • Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, Enderby P, Campbell P. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;6(6):CD000425. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000425.pub4.
  • Dignam JK, Rodriguez AD, Copland DA. Copland D. evidence for intensive aphasia therapy: consideration of theories from neuroscience and cognitive psychology. PM&R. 2016;8(3):254–267. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.06.010.
  • Middleton EL, Schuchard J, Rawson KA. A review of the application of distributed practice principles to naming treatment in aphasia. Top Lang Disord. 2020;40(1):36–53. doi:10.1097/tld.0000000000000202.
  • Bhogal SK, Teasell R, Speechley M. Intensity of aphasia therapy, impact on recovery. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 2003;34(4):987–993. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000062343.64383.D0.
  • Pierce JE, O’halloran R, Menahemi-Falkov M, Togher L, Rose ML. Comparing higher and lower weekly treatment intensity for chronic aphasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020;31(8):1289–1313. doi:10.1080/09602011.2020.1768127.
  • Simic T, Leonard C, Laird L, Stewart S, Rochon E. The effects of intensity on a phonological treatment for anomia in post-stroke aphasia the effects of intensity on a phonological treatment for anomia in post-stroke apha-sia. J Commun Disord. 2021;93:106125. Published Online First: 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106125.
  • Monetta L, Lavoie M, Routhier S, Macoir J. Intensive and non-intensive treatment of lexical anomia are equally efficient in post-stroke aphasia. Neurocase. 2021;27(1):76–85. doi:10.1080/13554794.2020.1868534.
  • Auclair-Ouellet N, Tittley L, Root K. Effect of an intensive comprehensive aphasia program on language and communication in chronic aphasia. Aphasiology. 2022;2021(11):1–21. doi:10.1080/02687038.2021.1959016.
  • The REhabilitation and recovery of peopLE with Aphasia after StrokE (RELEASE) Collaborators, Brady MC, Ali M, et al. Dosage, intensity, and frequency of language therapy for aphasia: a systematic review–based, individual participant data network meta-analysis. Stroke. 2022;53(3):956–967. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035216.
  • Kertesz A. Western Aphasia Battery (Revised). New York: Grune & Stratton; 2007.
  • Rose ML, Copland D, Nickels L, et al. Constraint-induced or multi-modal personalized aphasia rehabilitation (COMPARE): a randomized controlled trial for stroke-related chronic aphasia. Int J Stroke. 2019;14(9):972–976. doi:10.1177/1747493019870401.
  • Dignam JK, Copland D, McKinnon E, et al. Intensive versus distributed aphasia therapy a nonrandomized, parallel-group, dosage-controlled study. Stroke. 2015;46(8):2206–2211. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009522.
  • Nicholas LE, Brookshire RH. A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. J Speech, Lang Hear Res. 1993;36(2):338–350. doi:10.1044/jshr.3602.338.
  • van der Meulen I, van de Sandt-Koenderman WME, Duivenvoorden HJ, et al. Measuring verbal and non-verbal communication in aphasia: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Scenario Test. Int J Lang Commun Disord R Coll Speech Lang Ther. 2010;45(4):424–435. doi:10.3109/13682820903111952.
  • Lomas J, Pickard L, Bester S, Elbard H, Finlayson A, Zoghaib C. The communicative effectiveness index: development and psychometric evaluation of a functional communication measure for adult aphasia. J Speech Hear Disord. 1989;54(1):113–124. doi:10.1044/jshd.5401.113.
  • Hilari K, Lamping DL, Smith SC, Northcott S, Lamb A, Marshall J. Psychometric properties of the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) in a generic stroke population. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(6):544–557. doi:10.1177/0269215508101729.
  • Dekhtyar M, Braun EJ, Billot A, et al. Videoconference administration of the western aphasia battery–revised: feasibility and validity. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2020;29:673–687. doi:10.1044/2019_ajslp-19-00023
  • Caute A, Northcott S, Clarkson L, Pring T, Hilari K. Does mode of administration affect health-related quality-of-life outcomes after stroke? Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012;14(4):329–337. doi:10.3109/17549507.2012.663789.
  • de Boer MR, Waterlander WE, Kuijper LDJ, Steenhuis IH, Twisk JW. Testing for baseline differences in randomized controlled trials: an unhealthy research behavior that is hard to eradicate. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;12(1):4. doi:10.1186/s12966-015-0162-z.
  • Schober P, Vetter TR. Correct baseline comparisons in a randomized trial. Anesth Analg. 2019;129(3):639. doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000004211.
  • Kiran S, Thompson CK. Neuroplasticity of language networks in aphasia: advances, updates, and future challenges. Front Neurol. 2019;10:S225. doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.00295.