Optical biosensors for cell adhesion

References

• Curtis ASG. The Cell Surface: Its Molecular Role in Morphogenesis. New York: Logos-Academic, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Coman DR. Decreased mutual adhesiveness. A property of cells from squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer Res 1944, 4, 625–629.
   Google Scholar
• van Oss CJ. Forces interfaciales en milieux aqueux. Paris: Masson, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden JJ. Biomedical Surfaces. Norwood, MA: Artech House, 2008:71.
   Google Scholar
• Bruinsma R. Physical aspects of adhesion of leukocytes. In: Riste T, Sherrington D, eds. Physics of Biomaterials: Fluctuations, Self-Assembly and Evolution. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996:61–101.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbe MA. Adhesion and detachment of biological cells in vitro. Prog Surf Sci 1981, 11, 65–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall DG. Thermodynamic treatment of some factors affecting the interaction between colloidal particles. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans II 1972, 68, 2169–2182.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor AC. Attachment and spreading of cells in culture. Exp Cell Res Suppl 1961, 8, 154–173.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden JJ. Biomedical Surfaces. Norwood, MA: Artech House, 2008:117.
   Google Scholar
• Witkowski JA, Brighton WD. Influence of serum on attachment of tissue cells to glass surfaces. Exp Cell Res 1972, 70, 41–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hug TS, Prenosil JE, Morbidelli M. Optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy as a new method to study adhesion of anchorage-dependent cells as an indicator of metabolic state. Biosens Bioelectron 2001, 16, 865–874.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Albrecht-Buehler G. Filopodia of spreading T3 cells. Do they have a substrate-exploring function ? J Cell Biol 1976, 69, 275–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burridge K, Fath K, Kelly T, Nuckolls G, Turner C. Focal adhesions. A Rev Cell Biol 1988, 4, 487–525.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen WT, Singer SJ. Immunoelectron microscopic studies of the sites of cell–substratum and cell–cell contacts in cultured fibroblasts. J Cell Biol 1982, 95, 205–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poste G, Greenham LW, Mallucci L, Reeve P, Alexander DJ. The study of cellular microexudates by ellipsometry and their relationship to the cell coat. Exp Cell Res 1973, 78, 303–313.
   Google Scholar
• Hanein D, Sabanay H, Addadi L, Geiger B. Selective interactions of cells with crystal surfaces. J Cell Sci 1993, 104, 275–288.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schindl M, Wallraff E, Deubzer B, Witke W, Gerisch G, Sackmann E. Cell–substrate interactions and locomotion of Dictyostelium wild-type and mutants defective in three cytoskeletal proteins: a study using quantitative reflection interference contrast microscopy. Biophys J 1995, 68, 1177–1190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden JJ. Review of new experimental methods for investigating random sequential adsorption. J Statist Phys 1993, 73, 853–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tien PK. Integrated optics and new wave phenomena in optical waveguides. Rev Mod Phys 1977, 49, 361–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiefenthaler K, Lukosz W. Sensitivity of grating couplers as integrated-optical chemical sensors. J Opt Soc Am B 1989, 6, 209–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath R, Lindvold LR, Larsen NB. Reverse-symmetry waveguides: theory and fabrication. Appl Phys B 2002, 74, 383–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden JJ. OWLS—a versatile technique for drug discovery. Frontiers Drug Design Discovery 2006, 2, 211–223.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath R, Vörös J, Graf R, Fricsovszky G, Textor M, Lindvold LR, Spencer ND, Papp E. Effect of patterns and inhomogeneities on the surface of waveguides used for optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy applications. Appl Phys B 2001, 72, 441–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottier K, Horvath R. Imageless microscopy of surface patterns using optical waveguides. Appl Phys B 2008, 91, 319–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Ferrie AM, Fontaine NH, Mauro J, Balakrishnan J. Resonant waveguide grating biosensor for living cell sensing. Biophys J 2006, 91, 1925–1940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghatak A, Thyagarajan K. Optical Electronics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989:Chapter 14.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath R, Pedersen HC, Larsen NB. Demonstration of reverse symmetry waveguides sensing in aqueous solutions. Appl Phys Lett 2002, 81, 2166–2168.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath R, Cottier K, Pedersen HC, Ramsden JJ. Multidepth screening of living cells using optical waveguides. Biosensors Bioelectronics 2008, 24, 805–810.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horvath R, Pedersen HC, Skivesen N, Svanberg C, Larsen NB. Fabrication of reverse symmetry polymer waveguide sensor chips on nanoporous substrates using dip-floating. J Micromechanics Microengng 2005, 15, 1260–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath R, Pedersen HC, Skivesen N, Selmeczi D, Larsen NB. Optical waveguide sensor for on-line monitoring of bacteria. Optics Lett 2003, 28, 1233–1235.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath R, Pedersen HC, Skivesen N, Selmeczi D, Larsen NB. Monitoring of living cell attachment and spreading using reverse symmetry waveguide sensing. Appl Phys Lett 2005, 86, 071101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunz RE, Cottier K. Optimizing integrated optical chips for label-free (bio) and chemical sensing. Anal Bioanal Chem 2006, 384, 180–190.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath R, Pedersen HC, Cuisinier FJG. Guided wave sensing of polyelectrolyte multilayers. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 88, 111102.
   Google Scholar
• Kutsevlyak VI, Starikova SL, Starikov VV, Mamalis AG, Lavrynenko SN, Ramsden JJ. Influence of implant surface modification on integration with bone tissue. J Biol Phys Chem 2008, 8, 147–150.
   Google Scholar
• Nozawa RT, Guerrant RL. Fibrin adherent CHO cell behavior in response to chelators and enterotoxin. Exp Cell Res 1977, 107, 25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Li S-Y, Ramsden JJ, Prenosil JE, Heinzle E. Measurement of adhesion and spreading kinetics of baby hamster kidney and hybridoma cells using an integrated optical method. Biotechnol Prog 1994, 10, 520–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voros J, Graf R, Kenausis GL, Bruinink A, Mayer J, Textor M. Feasibility study of an online toxicological sensor based on the optical waveguide technique. Biosens Bioelectron 2000, 15, 423–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hug TS, Prenosil JE, Maier P, Morbidelli M. On-line monitoring of adhesion and proliferation of cultured hepatoma cells using optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy (OWLS). Biotechnol Prog 2002, 18, 1408–1413.
   Google Scholar
• Hug TS, Prenosil JE, Morbidelli M. Optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy to monitor cell proliferation quantitatively. Biotechnol Bioengng 2002, 80, 213–221.
   Google Scholar
• Fang Y. Label-free cell-based assays with optical biosensors in drug discovery. Assay Drug Development Technol 2006, 4, 583–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden JJ, Li SY, Heinzle E, Prenosil JE. An optical method for the measurement of number and shape of attached cells in real time. Cytometry 1995, 19, 97–102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feller W. On the logistic law of growth and its experimental verifications in biology. Acta Biotheoretica 1940, 5, 51–65.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden JJ, Li SY, Heinzle E, Prenosil JE. Kinetics of adhesion and spreading of animal cells. Biotechnol Bioengng 1994, 43, 939–945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavalle Ph, DeVries AL, Cheng C-HC, Scheuring S, Ramsden JJ. Direct observation of postadsorption aggregration of antifreeze glycoproteins on silicates. Langmuir 2000, 16, 5785–5789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aref A, Horvath R, McColl J, Ramsden JJ. Optical monitoring of stem cell-substratum interactions. J Biomed Opt 2009, 14, 010501.
   Google Scholar