Partitioning the total seatback reaction force amongst the lumbar spine motion segments during simulated rear-impact collisions

References

• Fast A, Sosner J, Begeman P, et al. Lumbar spinal strains associated with whiplash injury: a cadaveric study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;81(9):645–650. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200209000-00002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gushue DL, Probust BW, Benda B, et al. Effects of velocity and occupant sitting position on kinematics and kinetics of the lumbar spine during simulated low-speed rear impacts. Paper presented at ASSE Professional Development Conference and Exposition; 2006 Jun 14; Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Berglund A, Alfredsson L, Jensen I, et al. The association between exposure to a rear-end collision and future health complaints. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(8):851–856. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00369-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brison RJ, Hartling L, Pickett W. A prospective study of acceleration–extension injuries following rear-end motor vehicle collisions. J Musculoskelet Pain. 2000;8(1/2):97–113. doi: 10.1300/J094v08n01_08
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence JM, Siegmund GP. Seat back and head restraint response during low-speed rear-end automobile collisions. Accid Anal Prev. 2000;32(2):219–232. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00108-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zehr JD, Fewster KM, Kingston DC, et al. Quantifying the seat-occupant interface during low speed rear-impact collisions. Paper presented at 20th Biennial Meeting of the Canadian Society for Biomechanics; 2018 Aug 14–17; Halifax, NS.
   Google Scholar
• Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. 4th ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• McGill SM, Norman RW, Yingling VR, et al. Shear happens! Suggested guidelines for ergonomists to reduce risk of low back injury from shear loading. In: 30th Annual Conference of the Human Factors Association of Canada; 1998 Oct 19–22; Mississauga, ON. p. 157–161.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher S, Marras WS. Tolerance of the lumbar spine to shear: a review and recommended exposure limits. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012;27(10):973–978. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyron BM, Hutton WC, Troup JD. Spondylolytic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1976;58-B(4):462–466. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.58B4.1018032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cripton PA, Berleman U, Visarius H, et al. Response of the lumbar spine due to shear loading. Detriot (MI): Centers for Disease Control on Injury Prevention through Biomechanics; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher KM, Howarth SJ, Callaghan JP. Effect of anterior shear displacement rate on the structural properties of the porcine cervical spine. J Biomech Eng. 2010;132(9):1149–1154. doi: 10.1115/1.4001885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth SJ, Callaghan JP. Compressive force magnitude and intervertebral joint flexion/extension angle influence shear failure force magnitude in the porcine cervical spine. J Biomech. 2012;45(3):484–490. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.11.051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Carvalho DE, Callaghan JP. Spine posture and discomfort during prolonged simulated driving with self-selected lumbar support prominence. Hum Factors. 2015;57(6):976–987. doi: 10.1177/0018720815584866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly CJ, Callaghan JP, Durkin JL. The effect of an active lumbar system on the seating comfort of officers in police fleet vehicles. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2009;15(3):295–307. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2009.11076809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelek F, Kheir RB, Caby I, et al. On the quantitative relationships between individual/occupational risk factors and low back pain prevalence using nonparametric approaches. Joint Bone Spine. 2011;78(6):619–624. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2011.01.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JC, Dennerlein JT, Chang CC, et al. Seat inclination, use of lumbar support and low-back pain of taxi drivers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005;31(4):258–265. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed MP, Schneider LW. Lumbar support in auto seats: conclusions from a study of preferred driving posture. SAE Technical Paper. 1996;960478.
   Google Scholar
• De Carvalho DE, Callaghan JP. Influence of automobile seat lumbar support prominence on spine and pelvic postures: a radiological investigation. Appl Ergon. 2012;43(5):876–882. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbogast KB, Mathews EA, Seacrist T, et al. The effect of pretensioning and age on torso rollout in restrained human volunteers in far-side lateral and oblique loading. Stapp Car Crash J. 2012;56:443–467.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siegmund GP, Heinrichs BE, Lawrence JM, et al. Kinetic and kinematic responses of the RID2a, hybrid III and human volunteers in low-speed rear-end collisions. Stapp Car Crash J. 2001;45:239–256.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barrett JM, Fewster KM, Gooyers CE, et al. Model-aided design of a rear-vehicle impact testing system for in-vivo investigations. Paper presented at 14th Annual Injury Biomechanics Symposium; 2018 May 20–22; Columbus, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Kingston DC, Acker SM. Thigh-calf contact parameters for six high knee flexion postures: onset, maximum angle, total force, contact area, and center of force. J Biomech. 2018;67:46–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.11.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams MA, Green TP, Dolan P. The strength in anterior bending of lumbar intervertebral discs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19(19):2197–2203. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199410000-00014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman RW, Wells RP, Neumann P, et al. A comparison of peak vs cumulative physical work exposure risk factors for the reporting of low back pain in the automotive industry. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1998;13(8):561–573. doi: 10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00020-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fewster KM, Viggiani D, Gooyers CE, et al. Characterizing in-vivo exposures of the lumbar spine during simulated low-speed rear impact collisions. Traffic Inj Prev. 2018: In Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso M, McKinnon C, Viggiani D, et al. Biomechanical investigation of prolonged driving in an ergonomically designed truck seat prototype. Ergonomics. 2018;61(3):367–380. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1355070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheeran L, Hemming R, van Deursen R, et al. Can different seating aids influence a sitting posture in healthy individuals and does gender matter? Cogent Eng. 2018;5(1):1442109. doi: 10.1080/23311916.2018.1442109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Carvalho DE, Soave D, Ross K, et al. Lumbar spine and pelvic posture between standing and sitting: a radiologic investigation including reliability and repeatability of the lumbar lordosis measure. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010;33(1):48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yingling VR, McGill SM. Anterior shear of spinal motion segments: kinematics, kineatics, and resultant injuries observed in a porcine model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(18):1882–1889. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199909150-00004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConell WE, Howard RP, Guzman HM, et al. Analysis of human test subject kinematic responses to low velocity rear end impacts. The Engineering Society for Advancing Mobility Land Sea Air and Space Technical Paper Series. 1993;970889.
   Google Scholar