303
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Systematic Reviews

Assessment of spasticity: an overview of systematic reviews

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 290-303 | Received 19 Oct 2021, Accepted 27 Mar 2022, Published online: 04 Apr 2022

References

  • Petropoulou KB, Panourias IG, Rapidi CA, et al. The phenomenon of spasticity: a pathophysiological and clinical introduction to neuromodulation therapies. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2007;97(Pt 1):137–144.
  • Malhotra S, Pandyan AD, Day CR, et al. Spasticity, an impairment that is poorly defined and poorly measured. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(7):651–658.
  • Pandyan AD, Gregoric M, Barnes MP, et al. Spasticity: clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(1–2):2–6.
  • Scholtes VA, Becher JG, Beelen A, et al. Clinical assessment of spasticity in children with cerebral palsy: a critical review of available instruments. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48(1):64–73.
  • Wood DE, Burridge JH, van Wijck FM, et al. Biomechanical approaches applied to the lower and upper limb for the measurement of spasticity: a systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(1–2):19–32.
  • Lance JW. The control of muscle tone, reflexes, and movement: Robert wartenberg lecture. Neurology. 1980;30(12):1303–1313.
  • Banky M, Ryan HK, Clark R, et al. Do clinical tests of spasticity accurately reflect muscle function during walking: a systematic review. Brain Inj. 2017;31(4):440–455.
  • Botte MJ, Nickel VL, Akeson WH. Spasticity and contracture. Physiologic aspects of formation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;233:7–18.
  • Dressler D, Bhidayasiri R, Bohlega S, et al. Defining spasticity: a new approach considering current movement disorders terminology and botulinum toxin therapy. J Neurol. 2018;265(4):856–862.
  • Bar-On L, Aertbelien E, Molenaers G, et al. Manually controlled instrumented spasticity assessments: a systematic review of psychometric properties. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014;56(10):932–950.
  • Patrick E, Ada L. The Tardieu scale differentiates contracture from spasticity whereas the ashworth scale is confounded by it. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(2):173–182.
  • Francis HP, Wade DT, Turner-Stokes L, et al. Does reducing spasticity translate into functional benefit? An exploratory Meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75(11):1547–1551. PubMed PMID: 15489384; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1738826.
  • Voerman GE, Gregoric M, Hermens HJ. Neurophysiological methods for the assessment of spasticity: the hoffmann reflex, the tendon reflex, and the stretch reflex. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(1–2):33–68.
  • Cha Y, Arami A. Quantitative modeling of spasticity for clinical assessment, treatment and rehabilitation. Sensors (Basel). 2020;20(18):5046. PubMed PMID: 32899490; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7571189.
  • Haugh AB, Pandyan AD, Johnson GR. A systematic review of the Tardieu scale for the measurement of spasticity. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(15):899–907.
  • Persson CU, Holmegaard L, Redfors P, et al. Increased muscle tone and contracture late after ischemic stroke. Brain Behav. 2020;10(2):e01509. PubMed PMID: 31893564; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7010575.
  • Aloraini SM, Gaverth J, Yeung E, et al. Assessment of spasticity after stroke using clinical measures: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(25):2313–2323.
  • Ertzgaard P, Nene A, Kiekens C, et al. A review and evaluation of patient-reported outcome measures for spasticity in persons with spinal cord damage: Recommendations from the ability network – an international initiative. J Spinal Cord Med. 2020;43(6):813–823. PubMed PMID: 30758270; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7808317.
  • Meseguer-Henarejos AB, Sanchez-Meca J, Lopez-Pina JA, et al. Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the modified ashworth scale: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;54(4):576–590.
  • Calota A, Levin MF. Tonic stretch reflex threshold as a measure of spasticity: implications for clinical practice. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009;16(3):177–188.
  • Nene AV, Rainha Campos A, Grabljevec K, et al. Clinical assessment of spasticity in people with spinal cord damage: recommendations from the ability network, an international initiative. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(9):1917–1926.
  • Hunt H, Pollock A, Campbell P, et al. An introduction to overviews of reviews: planning a relevant research question and objective for an overview. Syst Rev. 2018;7(1):39.
  • Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7(1):1010.
  • Shea BJ, Bouter LM, Peterson J, et al. External validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR). PLoS One. 2007;2(12):e1350. PubMed PMID: 18159233; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2131785.
  • Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):401–406.
  • Ayala L, Winter S, Byrne R, et al. Assessments and interventions for spasticity in infants with or at high risk for cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Pediatr Neurol. 2021;118:72–90.
  • Shu X, McConaghy C, Knight A. Validity and reliability of the modified Tardieu scale as a spasticity outcome measure of the upper limbs in adults with neurological conditions: a systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open. 2021;11(12):e050711. PubMed PMID: 34952873; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC8712979.
  • Flamand VH, Masse-Alarie H, Schneider C. Psychometric evidence of spasticity measurement tools in cerebral palsy children and adolescents: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(1):14–23.
  • Hsieh JT, Wolfe DL, Miller WC, SCIRE Research Team. et al. Spasticity outcome measures in spinal cord injury: psychometric properties and clinical utility. Spinal Cord. 2008;46(2):86–95.
  • Pandyan AD, Johnson GR, Price CI, et al. A review of the properties and limitations of the ashworth and modified ashworth scales as measures of spasticity. Clin Rehabil. 1999;13(5):373–383.
  • Platz T, Eickhof C, Nuyens G, et al. Clinical scales for the assessment of spasticity, associated phenomena, and function: a systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(1–2):7–18.
  • Rahimi F, Eyvazpour R, Salahshour N, et al. Objective assessment of spasticity by pendulum test: a systematic review on methods of implementation and outcome measures. Biomed Eng Online. 2020;19(1):82. PubMed PMID: 33168030; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7653760.
  • van der Velden LL, de Koff MAC, Ribbers GM, et al. The diagnostic levels of evidence of instrumented devices for measuring viscoelastic joint properties and spasticity; a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022;19(1):16. PubMed PMID: 35148805; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC8832664.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.