Stroke survivor, caregiver and therapist experiences of home-based stroke rehabilitation: a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies

References

• GBD 2016 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(5):439–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Stroke Organization. World Stroke Organisation Annual Report 2021. Geneva: world Stroke Organization; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Li L, Scott CA, Rothwell PM. Trends in stroke incidence in high-income countries in the 21st century. Stroke. 2020;51(5):1372–1380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou S, Carstensen K, Møldrup M, et al. Early supported discharge following mild stroke: a qualitative study of patients’ and their partners’ experiences of rehabilitation at home. Scand J Caring Sci. 2017;31(2):302–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377(9778):1693–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander T, Capell J, Simmonds F. NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation Rehabilitation Unwarranted Clinical Variation Project FINAL REPORT. Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre, Australian Health Services Research. University of Wollongong; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Siemonsma P, Döpp C, Alpay L, et al. Determinants influencing the implementation of home-based stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Disability Rehabil. 2014;36(24):2019–2030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Baylan S. Early supported discharge trialists. Early supported discharge services for people with acute stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7(7):CD000443-CD.
   Google Scholar
• Godwin KM, Wasserman J, Ostwald SK. Cost associated with stroke: outpatient rehabilitative services and medication. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18:676–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier S, Inglis-Jassiem G. Rehabilitation for community-dwelling people with stroke: home or Centre based? A systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2010;5(3):178–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi N-F, Huang Y-C, Chiu H-Y, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of home-based rehabilitation on improving physical function among home-dwelling patients with a stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101(2):359–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanderKaay S, Moll SE, Gewurtz RE, et al. Qualitative research in rehabilitation science: opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Disability Rehabil. 2018;40(6):705–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearman M, Dawson P. Qualitative synthesis and systematic review in health professions education. Med Educ. 2013;47(3):252–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemming K, Noyes J. Qualitative evidence synthesis: where are we at? Int J Qual Methods. 2021;20:160940692199327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long HA, French DP, Brooks JM. Optimising the value of the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis. Res Methods Med Health Sci. 2020;1(1):31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8(1):45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP qualitative studies checklist 2022. 2020 Aug 18. Available from: https://casp-uk.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/CASP-Qualitative-Checklist-2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(10):1435–1443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Presenting syntheses of qualitative research findings. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York: springer Publishing Company; 2007. p. 235–262.
   Google Scholar
• Collins G, Breen C, Walsh T, et al. An exploration of the experience of early supported discharge from the perspective of stroke survivors. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2016;23(5):207–214.
   Google Scholar
• Gillot AJ, Holder-Walls A, Kurtz JR, et al. Perceptions and experiences of two survivors of stroke who participated in constraint-induced movement therapy home programs. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57(2):168–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale L, Bennett D, Bentley M, et al. Stroke rehabilitation – comparing hospital and home-based physiotherapy: the patient’s perception. NZ J Physiother. 2003;31(2):84–92.
   Google Scholar
• Kåringen I, Dysvik E, Furnes B. The elderly stroke patient’s long-term adherence to physiotherapy home exercises. Adv Physiother. 2011;13(4):145–152.
   Google Scholar
• Kylén M, Ytterberg C, von Koch L, et al. M. How is the environment integrated into post-stroke rehabilitation? A qualitative study among community-dwelling persons with stroke who receive home rehabilitation in Sweden. Health Soc Care Community. 2021;20:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Levy T, Christie J, Killington L, et al. “Just that four letter word, hope”: stroke survivors’ perspectives of participation in an intensive upper limb exercise program; a qualitative exploration. Physiother Theory Pract. 2021;37(11):1624–38.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood A, Nayak P, Kok G, et al. Factors influencing adherence to home-based exercises among community-dwelling stroke survivors in India: a qualitative study. Eur J Physiother. 2021;23(1):48–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordin Å, Sunnerhagen KS, Axelsson ÅB. Patients’ expectations of coming home with very early supported discharge and home rehabilitation after stroke - an interview study. BMC Neurol. 2015;15(235):235–235.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reunanen MAT, Järvikoski A, Talvitie U, et al. Individualised home-based rehabilitation after stroke in Eastern Finland - the client’s perspective. Health Soc Care Commun. 2016;24(1):77–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe VT, Neville M. Client perceptions of task-oriented training at home: “I forgot I was sick”. OTJR. 2018;38(3):190–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taule T, Strand LI, Skouen JS, et al. Striving for a life worth living: stroke survivors’ experiences of home rehabilitation. Scand J Caring Sci. 2015;29(4):651–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dongen L, Hafsteinsdóttir TB, Parker E, et al. Stroke survivors’ experiences with rebuilding life in the community and exercising at home: a qualitative study. Nurs Open. 2021;8(5):2567–2577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron TM, Koller K, Byrne A, et al. A qualitative study exploring how stroke survivors’ expectations and understanding of stroke early supported discharge shaped their experience and engagement with the service. Disabil Rehabil. 2022:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scorrano M, Ntsiea V, Maleka D. Enablers and barriers of adherence to home exercise programmes after stroke: caregiver perceptions. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2018;25(7):353–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale LA, Piggot J. Exploring the content of physiotherapeutic home-based stroke rehabilitation in New Zealand. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(10):1933–1940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Veen DJ, Döpp CME, Siemonsma PC, et al. Factors influencing the implementation of home-based stroke rehabilitation: professionals’ perspective. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0220226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Koch L, Holmqvist LW, Wottrich AW, et al. Rehabilitation at home after stroke: a descriptive study of an individualized intervention. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14(6):574–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wottrich AW, von Koch L, Tham K, et al. The meaning of rehabilitation in the home environment after acute stroke from the perspective of a multiprofessional team (including commentary by Jensen GM). Phys Ther. 2007;87(6):778–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobley CS, Fisher RJ, Chouliara N, et al. A qualitative study exploring patients’ and carers’ experiences of early supported discharge services after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27(8):750–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbertson L, Ainge S, Dyer R, et al. Consulting service users: the stroke association home therapy project. Br J Occup Ther. 2003;66(6):255–262.
   Google Scholar
• Schnabel S, van Wijck F, Bain B, et al. Experiences of augmented arm rehabilitation including supported self-management after stroke: a qualitative investigation. Clin Rehabil. 2021;35(2):288–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark A, Färber C, Tetzlaff B, et al. Stroke patients’ and non-professional coaches’ experiences with home-based constraint-induced movement therapy: a qualitative study. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(9):1527–1539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson S, Wiles R. Advantages and disadvantages of the home setting for therapy: views of patients and therapists. Br J Occup Ther. 2000;63(2):59–64.
   Google Scholar
• von Koch L, Wottrich AW, Holmqvist LW. Rehabilitation in the home versus the hospital: the importance of context. Disabil Rehabil. 1998;20(10):367–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffler E, Mash R. Figuring it out by yourself: perceptions of home-based care of stroke survivors, family caregivers and community health workers in a low-resourced setting, South Africa. Afr J Primary Health Care Fam Med. 2020;12(1):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham P, Turton AJ, Van Wijck F, et al. Task-specific reach-to-grasp training after stroke: development and description of a home-based intervention. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(8):731–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satink T, Cup EH, Ilott I, et al. Nijhuis-van der sanden MW. Patients’ views on the impact of stroke on their roles and self: a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(6):1171–1183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter K, Hellings C, Foley N, et al. The experience of living with stroke: a qualitative meta-synthesis. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(8):595–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcheschi E, Koch V, Pessah‐Rasmussen L, et al. M. Home setting after stroke, facilitators and barriers: a systematic literature review. Health Soc Care Community. 2018;26(4):e451–e9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh Y-W, Chang K-C, Hung J-W, et al. Effects of home-based versus clinic-based rehabilitation combining mirror therapy and task-specific training for patients with stroke: a randomized crossover trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(12):2399–2407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen H, Ada L, Bernhardt J, et al. An enriched environment increases activity in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation in a mixed rehabilitation unit: a pilot non-randomized controlled trial. Disability Rehabil. 2014;36(3):255–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White JH, Bartley E, Janssen H, et al. Exploring stroke survivor experience of participation in an enriched environment: a qualitative study. Disability Rehabil. 2015;37(7):593–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelrod L, Fitzpatrick G, Burridge J, et al. The reality of homes fit for heroes: design challenges for rehabilitation technology at home. J Assistive Technol. 2009;3(2):35–43.
   Google Scholar
• Lawton M, Haddock G, Conroy P, et al. Therapeutic alliances in stroke rehabilitation: a meta-ethnography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(11):1979–1993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luker J, Lynch E, Bernhardsson S, et al. Stroke survivors’ experiences of physical rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(9):1698–1708.e10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denham AMJ, Wynne O, Baker AL, et al. The long-term unmet needs of informal carers of stroke survivors at home: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Disability Rehabil. 2022;44(1):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokorelias KM, Lu FKT, Santos JR, et al. Caregiving is a full-time job" impacting stroke caregivers’ health and well-being: a qualitative meta-synthesis. Health Soc Care Community. 2020;28(2):325–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton J, Booth A, Noyes J, et al. Potential value of systematic reviews of qualitative evidence in informing user-centered health and social care: findings from a descriptive overview. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;88:37–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar