References
- Ahmed H, Allaf M, Elghazaly H. COVID-19 and medical education. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(7):777–9.
- World Health Organization. Thailand: how a strong health system fights a pandemic [Internet]. 2020 Sep 20 cited 2022 Jan 19. Available from 2022. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/country-case-studies/thailand-c19-case-study-20-september.pdf.
- Wanigasooriya K, Beedham W, Laloo R, et al. The perceived impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical student education and training – an international survey. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):566.
- Abdul Razzak R, Al-Shaibani T, Naguib Y. Do students effectively learn physiology through distance online instruction? Medical students’ perceptions and academic performance. Adv Physiol Educ. 2022;46(1):65–70.
- Rose S. Medical student education in the time of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;323(21):2131–2132.
- Casotti G, Rieser-Danner L, Knabb M. Successful implementation of inquiry-based physiology laboratories in undergraduate major and nonmajor courses. Adv Physiol Educ. 2009;32:286–296.
- Ji M, Luo Z, Feng D, et al. Short- and long-term influences of flipped classroom teaching in physiology course on medical students’ learning effectiveness. Front Public Health. 2022;10:835810.
- Anderson LC, Krichbaum KE. Best practices for learning physiology: combining classroom and online methods. Adv Physiol Educ. 2017;41(3):383–389.
- Felder E, Fauler M, Geiler S. Introducing e-learning/teaching in a physiology course for medical students: acceptance by students and subjective effect on learning. Adv Physiol Educ. 2013;37(4):337–342.
- Memon I, Feroz Z, Alkushi A, et al. Switching from face-to-face to an online teaching strategy: how anatomy and physiology teaching transformed post-COVID-19 for a university preprofessional program. Adv Physiol Educ. 2021;45(3):481–485.
- Casotti G, Beneski J, Knabb M. Teaching physiology online: successful use of case studies in a graduate course. Adv Physiol Educ. 2013;37:65–69.
- Mahanta A, Sundareswaran L, Krishnan S, et al. Sharing a preliminary experience of an effective online teaching strategy for physiology practicals. Cureus. 2021;13(11):e19388.
- Kositanurit W, Vivatvakin S, Kaikaew K, et al. Asynchronous online lecture may not be an effective method in teaching cardiovascular physiology during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):162.
- Item Analysis and Interpretation of Results. In: Paniagua MA, Swygert KA editors. Constructing written test questions for the basic and clinical sciences, 4th, 21–26. National Board of Medical Examiners: Philadelphia PA. 2016.
- D’Sa J, Visbal-Dionaldo M. Analysis of multiple choice questions: item difficulty, discrimination index and distractor efficiency. Int J Nurs Educ. 2017;9:109.
- Wangsaturaka D. Standard setting. in: medical education unit faculty of medicine Chulalongkorn University, editor. In: Medical education: learning evaluation and assessment. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing House; 2011. p. 152–167.
- Turner RC, Carlson L. Indexes of item-objective congruence for multidimensional items. Int J Test. 2003;3(2):163–171.
- Yusoff MSB, Hadie SNH, Mohamad I, et al. Sustainable medical teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: surviving the new normal. Malays J Med Sci. 2020;27(3):137–142.
- Baber H. Determinants of students’ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID-19. J Educ e-Learn Res. 2020;7(3):285–292.
- Syed S, Rastogi A, Bansal A, et al. Future of e-learning in medical education—perception, readiness, and challenges in a developing country. Front Educ. 2021;6:598309.
- AlQhtani A, AlSwedan N, Almulhim A, et al. Online versus classroom teaching for medical students during COVID-19: measuring effectiveness and satisfaction. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):452.
- Hew KF, Lo CK. Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):38.
- Wut T-m, Xu J. Person-to-person interactions in online classroom settings under the impact of COVID-19: a social presence theory perspective. Asia Pac Educ Rev. 2021;22(3):371–383.
- Kibble J. Use of unsupervised online quizzes as formative assessment in a medical physiology course: effects of incentives on student participation and performance. Adv Physiol Educ. 2007;31(3):253–260.
- Marden NY, Ulman LG, Wilson FS, et al. Online feedback assessments in physiology: effects on students’ learning experiences and outcomes. Adv Physiol Educ. 2013;37(2):192–200.
- Gupta S, Ojeh N, Sa B, et al. Use of an adaptive e-Learning platform as a formative assessment tool in the cardiovascular system course component of an MBBS programme. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020;11:989–996.
- Khan RA, Jawaid M. Technology enhanced assessment (TEA) in COVID-19 pandemic. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(Covid19–s4):S108–10.
- Elsalem L, Al-Azzam N, Jum’ah AA, et al. Stress and behavioral changes with remote e-exams during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study among undergraduates of medical sciences. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020;60:271–279.
- Ben-Peretz M. The impossible role of teacher educators in a changing world. J Teach Educ. 2001;52(1):48–56.
- Lampe LC, Müller-Hilke B. Mindfulness-based intervention helps preclinical medical students to contain stress, maintain mindfulness and improve academic success. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):145.
- Abdulghani HM, AlKanhal AA, Mahmoud ES, et al. Stress and its effects on medical students: a cross-sectional study at a college of medicine in Saudi Arabia. J Health Popul Nutr. 2011;29(5):516–522.