1,420
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Nourish: A pilot program to support self-Efficacy, learning, and wellness during USMLE step 1 preparation

, & ORCID Icon
Article: 2153781 | Received 08 Feb 2022, Accepted 28 Nov 2022, Published online: 10 Dec 2022

References

  • Chen DR, Priest KC, Batten JN, et al. Student perspectives on the “step 1 climate” in preclinical medical education. Acad Med. 2019;94(3):302–9.
  • Carmody JB, Rajasekaran SK. On step 1 mania, USMLE score reporting, and financial conflict of interest at the national board of medical examiners. Acad Med. 2020;95:1332–1337.
  • Prober CG, Kolars JC, First LR, et al. A plea to reassess the role of USA medical licensing examination step 1 scores in residency selection. Acad Med. 2016;91(1):12–15.
  • Cortes-Penfield NW, Khazanchi R, Talmon G. Educational and personal opportunity costs of medical student preparation for the USA medical licensing examination step 1 exam: a single-center study. Cureus. 2020;12(10):e10938.
  • Steinmayr R, Crede J, McElvany N, et al. Subjective well-Being, test anxiety, academic achievement: testing for reciprocal effects. Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 8;6. PMID: 26779096; PMCID: PMC4705295. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01994.
  • Mott NM, Kercheval JB, Daniel M. Exploring students’ perspectives on well-being and the change of USA medical licensing examination step 1 to pass/fail. Teach Learn Med. 2021; 1–11. Advance online publication. 10.1080/10401334.2021.1899929
  • Kumar AD, Shah MK, Maley JH, et al. Preparing to take the USMLE step 1: a survey on medical students’ self-reported study habits. Postgrad Med J. 2015;91(1075):257–261.
  • Burk-Rafel J, Santen SA, Purkiss J. Study behaviors and USMLE step 1 performance: implications of a student self-directed parallel curriculum. Acad Med. 2017;92(11):S67–S74.
  • Slavin SJ, Schindler DL, Chibnall JT. Medical student mental health 3.0: improving student wellness through curricular changes. Acad Med. 2014 April;89(4):573–577.
  • Wasson LT, Cusmano A, Meli L, et al. Association between learning environment interventions and medical student well-being: a systematic review. JAMA. 2016;316(21):2237–2252.
  • Slavin S. Reflections on a Decade Leading a Medical Student Well-Being Initiative. Acad Med. 2019 June;94(6):771–774.
  • Klein HJ, McCarthy SM. Student wellness trends and interventions in medical education: a narrative review. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2022;9(92). 10.1057/s41599-022-01105-8
  • Lynch TV, Beach IR, Kajtezovic S, et al. Step siblings: a novel peer-mentorship program for medical student wellness during USMLE step 1 preparation. Med.Sci.Educ. 2022;32(4):803–810.
  • Tackett S, Jeyaraju M, Moore J, et al. Student well-being during dedicated preparation for USMLE step 1 and COMLEX level 1 exams. BMC Med Educ. 2022Jan4;22(1):16. PMID: 34983481; PMCID: PMC8728922.
  • Schwartz LF, Lineberry M, Park YS, et al. Development and evaluation of a student-initiated test preparation program for the USMLE Step 1 examination. Teach Learn Med. 2018;30(2):193–201.
  • Gonzalez S, Gonzalez B, Singh R, et al. Founding a USMLE Step 1 student organization: a new approach to promote student engagement and peer support in exam preparation [version 1]. MedEdPublish. 2019;8:168.
  • Lindert J, Bain PA, Kubzansky LD, et al. Well-being measurement and the WHO health policy health 2010: systematic review of measurement scales. Eur J Public Health. 2015 Jan 22;25(4):731–740.
  • Zhou L, Parmanto B. Development and validation of a comprehensive well-Being scale for people in the university environment (Pitt wellness scale) using a crowdsourcing approach: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2020Apr29;22(4):e15075. PMID: 32347801; PMCID: PMC7221649.
  • Artino AR. Academic self-efficacy: from educational theory to instructional practice. Perspect Med Educ Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012;1(76):85.
  • Zheng B, Chang C, Lin CH, et al. Self-Efficacy, academic motivation, and self-Regulation: how do they predict academic achievement for medical students? Med Sci Educ. 2020Nov10;31(1):125–130. PMID: 34457872; PMCID: PMC8368447.
  • Wu H, Li S, Zheng J, et al. Medical students’ motivation and academic performance: the mediating roles of self-efficacy and learning engagement. Med Educ Online. 2020Dec;25(1):1742964. PMID: 32180537; PMCID: PMC7144307.
  • Ray EC, Arpan L, Oehme K, et al. Helping students cope with adversity: the influence of a web-based intervention on students’ self-efficacy and intentions to use wellness-related resources. J Am College Health. 2021;69(4):444–451.
  • Bandura A. Social Learning Theory. Vol. 1. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1977.
  • Peters H, Zdravkovic M, João Costa M, et al. Twelve tips for enhancing student engagement. Med Teach. 2019;41(6):632–637.
  • Luberto CM, Goodman JH, Halvorson B, et al. Stress and coping among health professions students during COVID-19: a perspective on the benefits of mindfulness. Glob Adv Health Med. 2020;9:2164956120977827. Published 2020 Dec 13.
  • Phillips A, Klocksieben F. Attitude of gratitude: evaluation of a wellness program to improve dispositional gratitude among medical students. J Wellness. 2020;2:1–5.
  • Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M, editors. Measures in health psychology: a user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. Windsor UK: NFER-NELSON; 1995. p. 35–37.
  • Cohen TK, Mermelstein R, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24:385–396.
  • McKerrow I, Carney PA, Caretta-Weyer H, et al. Trends in medical students’ stress, physical, and emotional health throughout training. Med Educ Online. 2020;25(1). 10.1080/10872981.2019.1709278
  • Cohen S, Williamson G. Perceived stress in a probability sample of the USA. In: Spacapan S, Oskamp S, editors. The social psychology of health. Newbury Park CA: Sage; 1988.
  • Ware JE, Kosinski M, Dewey JE, et al. How to score and interpret single-item health status measures: a manual for users of the SF-8 health survey. Lincoln RI: Quality Metric Inc; 2001.
  • Bauer M. Classical content analysis: a review. In: Qualitative researching with text, image and sound. Bauer MW, Gaskell G, editors. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. 2000;132–151. https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781849209731