3,152
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Applying motivational framework in medical education: a self-determination theory perspectives

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Article: 2178873 | Received 24 Nov 2022, Accepted 07 Feb 2023, Published online: 22 Feb 2023

References

  • Williams G, Deci E. The importance of supporting autonomy in medical education. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129(4):303–9.
  • Williams G, Saizow R, Ryan R. The importance of self-determination theory for medical education. Acad Med. 1999;74(9):992–995.
  • Ryan R, Deci E. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist. 2000;55(1):68–78.
  • Guay F, Ratelle C, Chanal J. Optimal learning in optimal contexts: the role of self-determination in education. Can Psychol/Psychol Canadienne. 2008;49(3):233–240.
  • Mallia L, Lucidi F, Zelli A, et al. Predicting moral attitudes and antisocial behavior in young team sport athletes: a self‐determination theory perspective. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2019;49(4):249–263. DOI:10.1111/jasp.12581
  • Liu L. Why do Chinese college students learn ESP: an analysis of language learning motivations within SDT framework. Engl Lang Teach. 2016;9(4):92.
  • Gagné M, Deci E, Ryan R. Self-determination theory applied to work motivation and organizational behavior. In: Ones D, Anderson N, Viswesvaran C, and Sinangil H, editors. The SAGE handbook of industrial. Sage Reference.: Work & Organizational Psychology; 2018. pp. 97–121.
  • Hardy S, Nelson J, Frandsen S, et al. Adolescent religious motivation: a self-determination theory approach. Int J Psychol Relig. 2020;32:1–15.
  • Ryan R, Patrick H, Deci H, et al. Facilitating health behaviour change and its maintenance: interventions based on self-determination theory. Eur Psychol. 2008;10(1):2–5.
  • Huang Y, Backman S, Backman K, et al. An investigation of motivation and experience in virtual learning environments: a self-determination theory. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2019;24(1):591–611. DOI:10.1007/s10639-018-9784-5
  • Vanderfaeillie J, Van Den Abbeele S, Fiorentino G, et al. The role of foster parents’ basic psychological needs satisfaction and frustration as predictors of autonomy-supportive parenting and the functioning of foster children. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020;116:105229.
  • ten Cate O, Kusurkar R, Williams G. How self-determination theory can assist our understanding of the teaching and learning processes in medical education. Med Teach. 2011;33(12):961–973.
  • Kusurkar R, Croiset G. Autonomy support for autonomous motivation in medical education. Med Educ Online. 2015;20(1):27951.
  • Biondi E, Varade W, Garfunkel L, et al. Discordance between resident and faculty perceptions of resident autonomy. Acad Med. 2015;90(4):462–471. DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000522
  • Bondevik G, Holst L, Haugland M, et al. Interprofessional workplace learning in primary care: students from different health professions work in teams in real-life settings. Int J Teach Learn High Educ. 2015;27(2):175-182.
  • Visser C, Kusurkar R, Croiset G, et al. Students’ motivation for interprofessional collaboration after their experience on an IPE ward: a qualitative analysis framed by self-determination theory. Med Teach. 2018;41(1):44–52. DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2018.1436759
  • Ganotice F, Gill H, Fung J, et al. Autonomous motivation explains interprofessional education outcomes. Med Educ. 2021;55(6):701–712. DOI:10.1111/medu.14423
  • Centre for the Advancement of Interprofessional Education (CAIPE). Collaborative practice through learning together to work together. In: Barr H, Ford J, Gray R, Helme M, Reeves S, editors. Centre for the advancement of interprofessional education. Fareham (UK): CAIPE Publications; 2017.
  • Varpio L, Hall P, Lingard L, et al. Interprofessional communication and medical error: a reframing of research questions and approaches. Acad Med. 2008;83(10):S76–81.
  • Gagné M. The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motiv Emot. 2003;27(3):199–223.
  • Johnston M, Finney S. Measuring basic needs satisfaction: evaluating previous research and conducting new psychometric evaluations of the basic needs satisfaction in general scale. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2010;35(4):280–296.
  • Neff K. The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity. 2003;2(3):223–250.
  • Wei M, Shaffer P, Young S, et al. Adult attachment, shame, depression, and loneliness: the mediation role of basic psychological needs satisfaction. J Couns Psychol. 2005;52(4):591–601.
  • Kashdan TB, Julian T, Merritt K, et al. Social anxiety and posttraumatic stress in combat veterans: relations to well-being and character strengths. Behav Res Ther. 2006;44(4):561–583. DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2005.03.010
  • Meyer B, Enström M, Harstveit M, et al. Happiness and despair on the catwalk: need satisfaction, well-being, and personality adjustment among fashion models. J Posit Psychol. 2007;2(1):2–17. DOI:10.1080/17439760601076635
  • Kashdan T, Mishra A, Breen W, et al. Gender differences in gratitude: examining appraisals, narratives, the willingness to express emotions, and changes in psychological needs. J Pers. 2009;77(3):691–730. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00562.x
  • Thøgersen-Ntoumani C, Ntoumanis N. A self-determination theory approach to the study of body image concerns, self-presentation and self-perceptions in a sample of aerobic instructors. J Health Psychol. 2007;12(2):301–315.
  • Vansteenkiste M, Lens W, Soenens B, et al. Autonomy and relatedness among Chinese sojourners and applicants: conflictual or independent predictors of well-being and adjustment? Motiv Emot. 2006;30(4):273–282. DOI:10.1007/s11031-006-9041-x
  • Stolk J, Jacobs J, Girard C, et al. 2018. Learners’ needs satisfaction, classroom climate, and situational motivations: evaluating self-determination theory in an engineering context. Proceedings of 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference; 2018 Oct 3-6; San Jose, CA. San Jose, (CA): IEEE; p.1–5.
  • Thomas L, Hudson J, Oliver E. Modelling motivational dynamics: demonstrating when, why, and how we self-regulate motivation. J Motiv Emot Personality. 2019;7:43–56.
  • Chettiar C. A study of need satisfaction in joint and nuclear families in Mumbai. J Psychosoc Res. 2015;10(1):85–90.
  • Mueller M, Lovell G. Relatedness need satisfaction in senior executives. Eur J Bus Soc Sci. 2013;2(7):105–135.
  • Center for Self-Determination Theory. Self-determination theory. [cited 2022 Nov 22]. Available from: https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/basic-psychological-need-satisfaction-and-frustration-scale/
  • Hean S, Craddock D, Hammick M, et al. Theoretical insights into interprofessional education AMEE Guide No. 62. Med Teach. 2012;34(2):e78–101. DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2012.650740
  • O’leary N, Salmon N, Clifford AM. The contribution of theory to an ethnographic case study on interprofessional placements in healthcare education. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2020;24:1–14.
  • Deci E, Ryan R. Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Can Psychol/Psychol Canadienne. 2008;49(3):182–185.
  • Clark L, Watson D. Constructing validity: basic issues in objective scale development. Psychol Assess. 1995;7(3):309–319.
  • DeVellis R. Scale development: theory and applications. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2003.
  • Suhr D. Exploratory or confirmatory factor analysis? In: SAS Users Group International Conference. Cary (NC): SAS Institute, Inc.; 2021:1–17.
  • Heuze JP, Eys M, Dubuc M, et al. Psychological needs, and intrinsic motivation in youth team sport contexts. Int J Sport Psychol. 2018;49(1):55–73.
  • Kent M. Oxford dictionary of sports science and medicine. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2006.
  • Seashore SE. Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group. Michigan (MI): University of Michigan; 1954.
  • Ganotice FA, Chan L, Shen X, et al. Team cohesiveness and collective efficacy explain outcomes in interprofessional education. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1). DOI:10.1186/s12909-022-03886-7
  • Finney S, DiStefano C. Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In: Hancock G Mueller R, editors. Structural equation modeling: a second course. North Carolina(NC): Information Age Publishing, Inc.; 2006. pp. 269–314.
  • Hu L, Bentler P. Evaluating model fit. In: Hoyle R, editor. Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications. New York (NY): Sage Publications; 1995. pp. 76–99.
  • Leo F, Mouratidis A, Pulido J, et al. Perceived teachers’ behavior and students’ engagement in physical education: the mediating role of basic psychological needs and self-determined motivation. Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy. 2020;27:1–18.
  • Domen J, Hornstra L, Weijers D, et al. Differentiated need support by teachers: student‐specific provision of autonomy and structure and relations with student motivation. Br J Educ Psychol. 2020;90(2):403–423. DOI:10.1111/bjep.12302
  • Stroet K, Opdenakker M, Minnaert A. Effects of need supportive teaching on early adolescents’ motivation and engagement: a review of the literature. Educ Res Rev. 2013;9:65–87.
  • Tian L, Tian Q, Huebner E. School-related social support and adolescents’ school-related subjective well-being: the mediating role of basic psychological needs satisfaction at school. Soc Indic Res. 2016;128(1):105–129.
  • Amado D, Maestre M, Montero-Carretero C, et al. Associations between self-determined motivation, team potency, and self-talk in team sports. J Hum Kinet. 2019;70(1):245–259. DOI:10.2478/hukin-2019-0116
  • Zhen J, Xie Z, Dong K. Relationship between information security behavior and satisfaction degree of psychological needs and the mediation effect of team effectiveness and organizational commitment. Rev Argentina de Clin Psicol. 2020;442-452.
  • Deci E, Ryan R. Self-determination theory . In: Van Lange PA, Kruglanski AW, Higgins ET, editors. Handbook of theories of social psychology. Vol. 1. New York (NY): SAGE Publications; 2012. pp. 416–437.
  • Michaelsen L, Knight A, Fink L. Team-based Learning: a transformative use of small groups in college teaching. New York (NY): Sterling Publishing; 2004.
  • Bear G, Yang C, Chen D, et al. Differences in school climate and student engagement in China and the United States. Sch Psychol Q. 2018;33(2):323–335. DOI:10.1037/spq0000247
  • Fransen J, Kirschner P, Erkens G. Mediating team effectiveness in the context of collaborative learning: the importance of team and task awareness. Comput Human Behav. 2011;27(3):1103–1113.
  • Salanova M, Llorens S, Cifre E, et al. Perceived collective efficacy, subjective well-being and task performance among electronic work groups. Small Group Res. 2003;34(1):43–73. DOI:10.1177/1046496402239577
  • Kusurkar R. Autonomous motivation in medical education. Med Teach. 2019;41(9):1083–1084.