977
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Identity conflicts of student affairs officers in a medical university

ORCID Icon, &
Article: 2182216 | Received 19 Jul 2022, Accepted 15 Feb 2023, Published online: 25 Feb 2023

References

  • Gordon L, Cleland JA. Change is never easy: how management theories can help operationalise change in medical education. Med Educ. 2021;55(1):55–8.
  • Pei L, Wu H. Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ Online. 2019;24(1):1666538.
  • Englander R, Frank JR, Carraccio C, et al. Toward a shared language for competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2017;39(6):582–587.
  • van der Vleuten CP, Driessen EW. What would happen to education if we take education evidence seriously? Perspect Med Educ. 2014;3(3):222–232.
  • Bochatay N, Bajwa NM, Ju M, et al. Towards equitable learning environments for medical education: bias and the intersection of social identities. Med Educ. 2022;56(1):82–90.
  • Schwerdtle N, Horton G, Kent F, et al. Education for sustainable healthcare: a transdisciplinary approach to transversal environmental threats. Med Teach. 2020;42(10):1102–1106.
  • Cox WC, Wingo B, Todd AJ. How we transitioned to a comprehensive professional and graduate student affairs office. Med Teach. 2015;37(5):417–421.
  • Long D. The foundations of student affairs: a guide to the profession. In: Hinchliffe L Wong M, editors. Environments for student growth and development: librarians and student affairs in collaboration. Chicago: Association of College & Research Libraries; 2012. p. 1–39.
  • Vanstone M, Grierson L. Thinking about social power and hierarchy in medical education. Med Educ. 2022;56(1):91–97.
  • Wenger E. Communities of practice and social learning systems: the career of a concept. In: Blackmore C. (eds) Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice. London: Springer; 2010. p. 179–198.
  • Gordon LJ, Rees CE, Ker JS, et al. Dimensions, discourses and differences: trainees conceptualising health care leadership and followership. Med Educ. 2015;49(12):1248–1262.
  • O’keefe M, Ward H. Implementing interprofessional learning curriculum: how problems might also be answers. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):132.
  • Cruess SR, Cruess RL, Steinert Y. Supporting the development of a professional identity: general principles. Med Teach. 2019;41(6):641–649.
  • Fitzgerald A, Clukey L. Professional identity in graduating nursing students. J Nurs Educ. 2021;60(2):74–80.
  • van Lankveld T, Thampy H, Cantillon P, et al. Supporting a teacher identity in health professions education: AMEE guide No. 132. Med Teach. 2021;43(2):124–136.
  • Holland D, Lachicotte W Jr. Vygotsky, mead, and the new sociocultural studies of identity. In: Daniels H, Cole M, and Wertsch J, editors. The Cambridge companion to vygotsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007:101–135.
  • Holland D, Lachicotte W, Skinner D, et al. Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1998.
  • Mann K, MacLeod A. Constructivism. In: Cleland J Durning S, editors. Researching medical education. Chichester UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2015. p. 51–65.
  • Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications Ltd.; 2014.
  • Merriam S. Case study research in education. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 1988.
  • Stake R. The art of case research. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications Ltd.; 1995.
  • DeJonckheere M, Vaughn LM. Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigour. Fam Med Commun Health. 2019;7(2):e000057.
  • Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
  • Kiger ME, Varpio L. Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE guide No. 131. Med Teach. 2020;42(8):846–854.
  • Berger R. Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qual Res. 2015;15(2):219–234.
  • Kassab SE, Taylor D, Hamdy H. Student engagement in health professions education: AMEE guide No. 152 [published online ahead of print, 2022 Oct 28]. Med Teach. 2022;1–17. DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2022.2137018
  • Hsih KW, Iscoe MS, Lupton JR, et al. The student curriculum review team: how we catalyze curricular changes through a student-centered approach. Med Teach. 2015;37(11):1008–1012.
  • Bridges DR, Davidson RA, Odegard PS, et al. Interprofessional collaboration: three best practice models of interprofessional education. Med Educ Online. 2011;16(1):6035.
  • Hean S, Craddock D, Hammick M, et al. Theoretical insights into interprofessional education: AMEE guide No. 62. Med Teach. 2012;34(2):e78–101.
  • Vogan CL, McKimm J, Da Silva AL, et al. Twelve tips for providing effective student support in undergraduate medical education. Med Teach. 2014;36(6):480–485.
  • Saiki T, Imafuku R, Suzuki Y, et al. The truth lies somewhere in the middle: swinging between globalization and regionalization of medical education in Japan. Med Teach. 2017;39(10):1016–1022.
  • Bennett D, Solomon Y, Bergin C, et al. Possibility and agency in figured worlds: becoming a ‘good doctor’. Med Educ. 2017;51(3):248–257.
  • Helmich E, Yeh HM, Yeh CC, et al. Emotional learning and identity development in medicine: a cross-cultural qualitative study comparing Taiwanese and Dutch medical undergraduates. Acad Med. 2017;92(6):853–859.
  • Stubbing EA, Helmich E, Cleland J. Authoring the identity of learner before doctor in the figured world of medical school. Perspect Med Educ. 2018;7(1):40–46.
  • Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M. Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. rev. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010:89–134.
  • Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M. Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. rev. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010:73–76.