Linking the choice of the class format and preclass learning experiences sheds light on a step further in blended medical education

References

• Papapanou M, Routsi E, Tsamakis K, et al. Medical education challenges and innovations during COVID-19 pandemic. Postgrad Med J. 2022;98:321–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly N, Abdalla ME. Impact of COVID-19 on medical education in different income countries: a scoping review of the literature. Med Educ Online. 2022;27:2040192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu CH, You-Hsien Lin H. The impact of COVID-19 on medical education: experiences from one medical university in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2021;120:1782–1784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seif E, Tableman B, Carlson JS. Climate of learning. In: Seel NM, editor. Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. New York: Springer; 2012. pp. 554–557.
   Google Scholar
• Freiberg HJ, Huzinec CA, Templeton SM. Classroom management – a pathway to student achievement: a study of fourteen inner-city elementary schools. Elem Sch J. 2009;110:63–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palés J, Gual A, Escanero J, et al. Educational climate perception by preclinical and clinical medical students in five Spanish medical schools. Int J Med Educ. 2015;6:65–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera C, Pacheco J, Rosso F, et al. Evaluación Del ambiente educacional pre-clínico en seis Escuelas de Medicina en Chile [Evaluation of the undergraduate educational environment in six medical schools in Chile]. Rev Med Chil. 2010;138:677–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hongkan W, Arora R, Muenpa R, et al. Perception of educational environment among medical students in Thailand. Int J Med Educ. 2018;9:18–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hee JM, Yap HW, Ong ZX, et al. Understanding the mentoring environment through thematic analysis of the learning environment in medical education: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34:2190–2199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann R, Vallade JI. Exploring connections in the online learning environment: student perceptions of rapport, climate, and loneliness. Interact Learn Environ. 2020;30:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekwunife-Orakwue KC, Teng TL. The impact of transactional distance dialogic interactions on student learning outcomes in online and blended environments. Comput Educ. 2014;78:414–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng MF, Wang C, Wu JG. Metacognitive strategies, language learning motivation, self-efficacy belief, and English achievement during remote learning: a structural equation modelling approach. Relc J. 2021;003368822110402. DOI:10.1177/00336882211040268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann R, Sellnow DD, Frisby BN. The development and validation of the online learning climate scale (OLCS). Commun Educ. 2016;65:307–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derakhshesh A, Fathi J, Mohammad Hosseini H, et al. An investigation of the structural model of online course satisfaction, online learning self-efficacy, and online learning climate in the EFL context. Comput Assist Lang Learn Electron J (CALL-EJ). 2022;23:261–281.
   Google Scholar
• Learning Environment Preferences. Educause. [cited 2023 Jan 1]. Available from: https://www.educause.edu/ecar/research-publications/ecar-study-of-undergraduate-students-and-information-technology/2018/learning-environment-preferences.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson CC, Hullinger H. New benchmarks in higher education: student engagement in online learning. J Educ Bus. 2008;84:101–109.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs D. Constructivist approach to web course design: a review of the literature. Int J E-Learn. 2002;1:60–65.
   Google Scholar
• Jaggars SS. Choosing between online and face-to-face courses: community college student voices. Am J Distance Educ. 2014;28:27–38.
   Google Scholar
• Paechter M, Maier B. Online or face-to-face? Students’ experiences and preferences in e-learning. Internet High Educ. 2010;13:292–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp N, Grieve R. Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates’ opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning. Front Psychol. 2014;5:1278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty BJ Hybrid-Flexible Course Design (1st ed.). EdTech Books; 2019 [cited 2022 Jul 10]. Available from: https://edtechbooks.org/hyflex.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty B Can HyFlex Options support students in the midst of uncertainty? Why IT matters to higher education. cited 2022 Jul 10. Available from: https://er.educause.edu/blogs/2020/5/can-hyflex-options-support-students-in-the-midst-of-uncertainty.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo-Lledó A, Lledó A, Gilabert-Cerdá A, et al. The pedagogical model of hybrid teaching: difficulties of university students in the context of COVID-19. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2021;11:1320–1332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zydney JM, McKimm P, Lindberg R, et al. Here or there instruction: lessons learned in implementing innovative approaches to blended synchronous learning. Tech Trends. 2019;63:123–132.
   Google Scholar
• Detyna M, Sanchez-Pizani R, Giampietro V, et al. Hybrid flexible (HyFlex) teaching and learning: climbing the mountain of implementation challenges for synchronous online and face-to-face seminars during a pandemic. Learn Environ Res. 2022;1–15. doi: 10.1007/s10984-022-09408-y. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35399562; PMCID: PMC8982310.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knowles MS. Self-directed learning: a guide for learners and teachers. New York: Association Press; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Picciano AG. Theories and frameworks for online education: seeking an integrated model. Online Learn. 2017;21:166–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho CM, Yeh CC, Wang JY, et al. Preclass online video learning and class style expectation: patterns, association, and precision medical education. Ann Med. 2021;53:1390–1401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller J. Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learn Instr. 1994;4:295–312.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller J. Cognitive load theory: recent theoretical advances. In: Plass J, Moreno R Brünken R, editors. Cognitive Load Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. pp. 29–47.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer RE. Multimedia learning. 2nd ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer RE, Moreno R. Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educ Psychol. 2003;38:43–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milman N, Irvine V, Kelly K, et al. 7 things you should know about the HyFlex course model. 2020. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative (ELI). [cited 2022 Jul 10]. Available from: https://library.educause.edu/resources/2020/7/7-things-you-should-know-about-the-hyflex-course-model.
   Google Scholar
• Ho CM, Yeh CC, Wang JY, et al. Curiosity in online video concept learning and short-term outcomes in blended medical education. Front Med. 2021;8:772956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng M. Conceptualization of cross-sectional mixed methods studies in health science: a methodological review. Int J Quant Qual Res Methods (IJQQRM). 2015;3:66–87.
   Google Scholar
• Ho CM, Wang JY, Yeh CC, et al. Experience of applying threshold concepts in medical education. J Formos Med Assoc. 2021;120:1121–1126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NTU COurses OnLine (NTU COOL). [cited 2022 Jul 10]. Available from: https://cool.ntu.edu.tw/login/portal.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Dost S, Hossain A, Shehab M, et al. Perceptions of medical students towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical students. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e042378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorp AA, Kingwell BA, Owen N, et al. Breaking up workplace sitting time with intermittent standing bouts improves fatigue and musculoskeletal discomfort in overweight/obese office workers. Occup Environ Med. 2014;71:765–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal S, Lau V, Prior K, et al. Twelve tips for medical students on how to maximise remote learning. Med Teach. 2021;44(8):851–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheiderer J What’s the difference between asynchronous and synchronous learning? Ohio State Online. [cited 2022 Jul 10]. Available from: https://online.osu.edu/resources/learn/whats-difference-between-asynchronous-and-synchronous-learning.
   Google Scholar
• Kositanurit W, Vivatvakin S, Kaikaew K, et al. Asynchronous online lecture may not be an effective method in teaching cardiovascular physiology during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22:162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav SK, Para S, Singh G, et al. Comparison of asynchronous and synchronous methods of online teaching for students of medical laboratory technology course: a cross-sectional analysis. J Educ Health Promot. 2021;10:232.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Asaduddin AH, Maulani UN. Beyond synchronous and asynchronous systems towards blended learning: perspective on Medical education through COVID-19 pandemic. J Acad Perspect. 2021;1:110–116.
   Google Scholar
• Aslam S, Akram H, Saleem A, et al. Experiences of international medical students enrolled in Chinese medical institutions towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. PeerJ. 2021;9:e12061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar