Exploring medical students’ metacognitive and regulatory dimensions of diagnostic problem solving

References

• Thammasitboon S, Rencic JJ, Trowbridge RL, et al. The assessment of reasoning tool (ART): structuring the conversation between teachers and learners. Diagnosis. 2018;5(4):197–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colbert CY, Graham L, West C, et al. Teaching metacognitive skills: helping your physician trainees in the quest to ‘know what they don’t know’. Am j med. 2015;128(3):318–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusue AV, Alonso AT, Gonzalez AB, et al. Learning how to order imaging tests and make subsequent clinical decisions: a randomized study of the effectiveness of a virtual learning environment for medical students. Med Sci Educator. 2021;31(2):469–477.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leeds FS, Atwa KM, Cook AM, et al. Teaching heuristics and mnemonics to improve generation of differential diagnoses. Med Educ Online. 2020;25(1):1742967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang GC, Lindell D, Jaffe LE, et al. A multi-site study of strategies to teach critical thinking: ‘Why do you think that? Med Educ. 2016;50(2):236–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trowbridge RL, Dhaliwal G, Cosby KS. Educational agenda for diagnostic error reduction. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:ii28–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon M, van Baalen S, Groenier M, et al. Interdisciplinary expertise in medical practice: Challenges of using and producing knowledge in complex problem-solving. Med Teach. 2019;41(6):668–677. DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2018.1544417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary TJ, Durning SJ, Artino AR. Microanalytic assessment of self-regulated learning during clinical reasoning tasks: recent developments and next steps. Acad Med. 2016;91(11):1516–1521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artino AR, Cleary TJ, Dong T, et al. Exploring clinical reasoning in novices: a self-regulated learning microanalytic assessment approach. Med Educ. 2014;48(3):280–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesewetter J, Ebersbach R, Tsalas N, et al. Knowledge is not enough to solve the problems - the role of diagnostic knowledge in clinical reasoning activities. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winne PH . Students’ calibration of knowledge and learning processes: Implications for designing powerful software learning environments, International Journal of Educational Research. 1998;41(6):66–488. DOI:10.1016/j.ijer.2005.08.012 . Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rovers SFE, Clarebout G, Savelberg HHCM, et al. Granularity matters: comparing different ways of measuring self-regulated learning. Metacogn Learn. 2019;14:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandevelde S, Van Keer H, Schellings G, et al. Using think-aloud protocol analysis to gain in-depth insights into upper primary school children’s self-regulated learning. Learn Individual Differences. 2015;43:11–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenman MVJ, van Hout-Wolters BHAM, Afflerbach P. Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacogn Learn. 2006;1(1):3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Perry NE, Rahim A. Studying self-regulated learning in classrooms. In: Zimmerman B Schunk D, editors. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York: Routledge; 2011. pp. 122–136.
   Google Scholar
• Gandomkar R, Yazdani K, Fata L, et al. Using multiple self-regulated learning measures to understand medical students’ biomedical science learning. Med Educ. 2020;54(8):727–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdani S, Abardeh MH. Five decades of research and theorization on clinical reasoning: a critical review. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019;10:703–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poitras EG, Doleck T, Lajoie SP. Towards detection of learner misconceptions in a medical learning environment: a subgroup discovery approach. Educ Technol Res Dev. 2018;66(1):129–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croskerry P. Narrowing the mindware gap in medicine. Diagnosis. 2021;9(2):176–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graber ML, Kissam S, Payne VL, et al. Cognitive interventions to reduce diagnostic error: a narrative review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(7):535–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royce CS, Hayes MM, Schwartzstein RM. Teaching critical thinking: a case for instruction in cognitive biases to reduce diagnostic errors and improve patient safety. Acad Med. 2019;94(2):187–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesewetter J, Ebersbach R, Gorlitz A, et al. Cognitive problem solving patterns of medical students correlate with success in diagnostic case solutions. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(8):e71486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell JH. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist. 1979;34(10):906–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw G, Dennison RS. Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemp Educ Psychol. 1994;19(4):460–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman BJ. Chapter 2 - Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective. In: Boekaerts M, Pintrich P Zeidner M, editors. Handbook of self-regulation. Academic Press; 2000. pp. 13–39. DOI:10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7.
   Google Scholar
• Lajoie SP, Li S, Zheng J. The functional roles of metacognitive judgement and emotion in predicting clinical reasoning performance with a computer simulated environment. Interact Learn Environ. 2021;12. DOI:10.1080/10494820.2021.1931347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge X, Land SM. A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educ Technol Res Dev. 2004;52(2):5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai MJ, Liang JC, Lee SWY, et al. Structural validation for the developmental model of computational thinking. J Educ Comput Res. 2022;60(1):56–73. DOI:10.1177/07356331211017794
   Google Scholar
• Lin HM, Lee MH, Liang JC, et al. A review of using partial least square structural equation modeling in e-learning research. Br J Educ Technol. 2020;51(4):1354–1372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard BC, McGee S, Shia R, et al. (2000, April 24-28). Metacognitive self-regulation and problem-solving: expanding the theory base through factor analysis. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Wang CY. Exploring general versus task-specific assessments of metacognition in university chemistry students: a multitrait-multimethod analysis. Res Sci Educ. 2015;45(4):555–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J Marketing Theory Pract. 2011;19:139–151.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, et al. Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, et al. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Chin W, Marcoulides G. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides G, editor. Modern methods for business research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers: Psychology Press; 1998. pp. 295–336.
   Google Scholar
• Croskerry P. The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Acad Med. 2003;78(8):775–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew KS, van Merrienboer JJG, Durning SJ. Perception of the usability and implementation of a metacognitive mnemonic to check cognitive errors in clinical setting. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19:18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salkowski LR, Russ R. Cognitive processing differences of experts and novices when correlating anatomy and cross-sectional imaging. J Med Imaging. 2018;5(3):031411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St Pierre M, Nyce JM. How novice and expert anaesthetists understand expertise in anaesthesia: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(262). DOI:10.1186/s12909-020-02180-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yuruk N, Beeth ME, Andersen C. Analyzing the effect of metaconceptual teaching practices on students’ understanding of force and motion concepts. Res Sci Educ. 2009;39(4):449–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar