675
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The association of a scholarly concentrations program with medical students’ matched residencies

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Article: 2234651 | Received 30 Mar 2023, Accepted 05 Jul 2023, Published online: 11 Jul 2023

References

  • Association of American Medical Colleges. Table A1. Continuity of specialty preference on the matriculating student questionnaire and the 2021 graduation questionnaire | AAMC 2021 report on residents. Association of American Medical Colleges Accessed March 8, 2022. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/students-residents/interactive-data/report-residents/2021/table-a1-continuity-specialty-preference-matriculating-student-questionnaire
  • Yang Y, Li J, Wu X, et al. Factors influencing subspecialty choice among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019;9(3):e022097. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022097
  • Schor NF, Troen P, Kanter SL, et al. The scholarly project initiative: introducing scholarship in medicine through a longitudinal, mentored curricular program. Acad Med. 2005;80(9):824–10. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200509000-00009
  • Gotterer GS, Oʼday D, Miller BM. The emphasis program: A scholarly concentrations program at Vanderbilt University School of medicine. Acad Med. 2010;85(11):1717–1724. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181e7771b
  • Sawarynski KE, Baxa DM, Folberg R. Embarking on a journey of discovery: developing transitional skill sets through a scholarly concentration program. Teach Learn Med. 2019;31(2):195–206. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2018.1490184
  • George P, Green EP, Park YS, et al. A 5-year experience with an elective scholarly concentrations program. Med Educ Online. 2015;20(1):29278. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.29278
  • Green EP, Borkan JM, Pross SH, et al. Encouraging scholarship: medical school programs to promote student inquiry beyond the traditional medical curriculum. Acad Med. 2010;85(3):409–418. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181cd3e00
  • Wolfson RK, Alberson K, McGinty M, et al. The impact of a scholarly concentration program on student interest in career-long research: a longitudinal study. Acad Med. 2017;92(8):1196–1203. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001486
  • DiBiase RM, Beach MC, Carrese JA, et al. A medical student scholarly concentrations program: scholarly self-efficacy and impact on future research activities. Med Educ Online. 2020;25(1):1786210. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1786210
  • Havnaer AG, Chen AJ, Greenberg PB. Scholarly concentration programs and medical student research productivity: a systematic review. Perspect Med Educ. 2017; 6(4):216–226. doi: 10.1007/S40037-017-0328-2
  • Chang Y, Ramnanan CJ. A review of literature on medical students and scholarly research: experiences, attitudes, and outcomes. Acad Med. 2015;90(8):1162–1173. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000702
  • Bierer SB, Chen HC. How to measure success: the impact of scholarly concentrations on students—A literature review. Acad Med. 2010;85(3):438–452. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181cccbd4
  • Sozio SM, Kazancıoğlu R, Küçükdurmaz F, et al. Transforming a U.S. scholarly concentrations program internationally: lessons learned. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1545-7
  • Sozio SM, Chan KS, Beach MC. Development and validation of the medical student scholar-ideal mentor scale (MSS-IMS). BMC Med Educ. 2017; 17(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0969-1
  • American Association of Medical Colleges. Table B3. number of active residents, by type of medical school, GME specialty, and sex | AAMC. Report on Residents. Accessed March 8, 2022. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/students-residents/interactive-data/report-residents/2021/table-b3-number-active-residents-type-medical-school-gme-specialty-and-sex
  • Manuel RS, Borges NJ, Jones BJ. Person-oriented versus technique-oriented specialties: early preferences and eventual choice. Med Educ Online. 2009; 14(1):4504. doi: 10.3402/meo.v14i.4504
  • Doximity. Doximity Residency Navigator (2020-2021). 2020. [cited March 9, 2022]. Available from: https://www.doximity.com/residency/
  • Charting Outcomes in the Match: Senior Students of U.S. MD Medical Schools Characteristics of U.S. MD Seniors Who Matched to Their Preferred Specialty in the 2020 Main Residency Match.
  • Alberson K, Arora VM, Zier K, et al. Goals of medical students participating in scholarly concentration programmes. Med Educ. 2017;51(8):852–860. doi: 10.1111/medu.13342
  • Zuzuarregui JR, Connie W, Hohler AD. Promoting careers in neurology: mentorship of medical students. Semin Neurol. 2018; 38(4):413–417. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1666988
  • Bassuner J, Duncan D, Molloy C, et al. Recruiting medical students to interventional radiology: current state of Affairs. Acad Radiol. 2019;26(9):1274–1277. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.01.015
  • Garg T. Strategies for recruiting medical students to radiology. Acad Radiol. 2020;27(9):1334. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.10.028
  • Stumpo V, Latour K, Traylor JI, et al. Medical Student interest and recruitment in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg. 2020;141:448–454.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.248
  • Wolfson RK, Fairchild PC, Bahner I, et al. Residency program directors’ views on research conducted during medical school: A national survey. Acad Med. 2023. Publish Ahead of Print. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005256
  • Burkhart RJ, Hecht CJ, Karimi AH, et al. What are the trends in research publication misrepresentation among orthopaedic residency and fellowship applicants from 1996 to 2019? A systematic review. Clin Orthop. 2023;481(7):1292–1303. Publish Ahead of Print. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002549
  • Chung CK, Hernandez-Boussard T, Lee GK. “Phantom” publications among plastic surgery residency applicants. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68(4):391–395. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31823d2c4e
  • Freshman RD, Cortez XC, Kim HT, et al. The outcomes of “submitted” publications from applicants to orthopaedic surgery residency programs: A retrospective review of 1303 residency applications. JAAOS Glob Res Rev. 2020; 4(7):e20.00112. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00112
  • Hsi RS, Hotaling JM, Moore TN, et al. Publication misrepresentation among urology residency applicants. World J Urol. 2013;31(3):697–702. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0895-0
  • Ishman SL, Smith DF, Skinner ML, et al. Unverifiable publications in otolaryngology residency applications. Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2012;147(2):249–255. doi: 10.1177/0194599812440662
  • Kaley JR, Bornhorst J, Wiggins M, et al. Prevalence and types of misrepresentation of publication record by pathology residency applicants. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013;137(7):979–982. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0253-OA
  • Kuo PC, Schroeder RA, Shah A, et al. “Ghost” publications among applicants to a general surgery residency program. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(4):485–489. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.04.029
  • Smith BB, Long TR, Tooley AA, et al. Impact of doximity residency navigator on graduate medical education recruitment. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2018;2(2):113–118. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2018.01.006
  • Rolston A, Hartley S, Khandelwal S, et al. Effect of doximity residency rankings on residency applicants’ program choices. West J Emerg Med. 2015;16(6):889–893. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.8.27343