MOTHERS LISTEN TO CHILDREN AND UNIQUELY ACCOMMODATE THEIR LANGUAGE WITH THEM

REFERENCES

• Bernhold, Q., & Giles, H. (2019). Communication Accommodation Theory as a lens to examine painful self-disclosures in grandparent-grandchild relationships. In T. Avtgis, A. Rancer, E. MacGeorge, & C. Liberman (Eds.), Casing communication theory (pp. 31–48). Kendall Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Bohannon, J. N., & Bonvillian, J. D. (2016). Theoretical approaches to language acquistion. In J. Berko Gleason, and N. Bernstein Ratner (Eds.), The development of language. Allyn & Bacon 158–195 .
   Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol 1. Attachment. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1995). The bioecological model from a life course perspective: Reflections of a participant observer. In P. Moen, G. H. Edler Jr., & K. Luscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context (pp. 599–618). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In A. Sinclair, R. Jarvella, & W. Levelt (Eds.), The child’s conception of language (pp. 241–256). Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron-Faulkner, T., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2003). A construction based analysis of child directed speech. Cognitive Science, 27(6), 843–873. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2706_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Card, N. A., Selig, J. P., & Little, T. D. (2008). Modeling dyadic and interdependent data in the developmental and behavioral sciences. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cristia, A., Dupoux, E., Gurven, M., & Stieglitz, J. (2019). Child-Directed Speech Is Infrequent in a Forager-Farmer Population: A Time Allocation Study. Child Developmet, 90(3), 759–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, T. (1977). Mothers’ speech adjustments: The contribution of selected child listener variables. In C. Snow & C. Ferguson (Eds.), Talking to children: Language input and acquisition (pp. 151–188). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar, R. I. M., & Shultz, S. (2007). Evolution in the Social Brain. Science, 317(5843), 1344–1347. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1145463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, R. I. M. (2009). The social brain hypothesis and its implications for social evolution. Annals of Human Biology, 36(5), 562–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460902960289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farzadnia, S., and Giles, H. (2015). Patient-Provider Interaction: A Communication Accommodation Theory Perspective. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 3(2), 17–34.
   Google Scholar
• Gasiorek, J. (2016). Theoretical perspectives on communication adjustment in interaction. In H. Giles (Ed.), Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal and social identities across contexts (pp. 13–35). University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316226537.002
   Google Scholar
• Giles, H. (1973). Accent Mobility: A Model and Some Data. Anthropological Linguistics, 15(2), 87–105. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30029508
   Google Scholar
• Giles, H. (Ed.). (2016). Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal and social identities in context. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, H., & Ogay, T.et al (2007). Communication Accommodation Theory. In B. B. Whaley, and W. Samter (Eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars. (pp. 293–310). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1986). Function and structure in maternal speech: Their relation to the child’s development of syntax. Developmental Psychology, 22(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.22.2.155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, N., Hadley, P. A., & Rispoli, M. (2017). Diversity matters: parent input predicts toddler verb production. Journal of Child Language, 44(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huttenlocher, J., Waterfall, H., Vasilyeva, M., Vevea, J., & Hedges, L. V. (2010). Sources of variability in children’s language growth. Cognitive Psychology, 61(14), 343–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.08.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kenny, D. A. (2020). Interpersonal perception: The foundation of social relationships, 2nd ed. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., & Malloy, T. E. (1988). Partner effects in social interaction. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12(1), 34–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., Mohr, C. D., & Levesque, M. J. (2001). A social relations variance partitioning of dyadic behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 128–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & Malloy, T. E. (2019). Question asking as a dyadic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(6), 1127–1138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., Malloy, T. E., Pery, S., Itzchakov, G., Castro, D. R., Lipetz, L., Sela, Y., Turjeman, L. Y., Lehmann, M., New, M., & Borut, L. (2021). Dyadic listening in teams: Social relations model. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 70(3), 1045–1099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakey, B., & Orehek, E. (2011). Relational regulation theory: A new approach to explain the link between perceived social support and mental health. Psychological Review, 118(3), 482–495. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality; a functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation. Ronald Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malloy, T. E., & Albright, L. (2001). Single and multiple interaction dyadic research designs: Conceptual and analytic issues. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2301_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malloy, T. E., Kluger, A. N., Martin, J., & Pery, S. (2021). Women Listening to Women at Zero-Acquaintance: Interpersonal Befriending at the Individual and Dyadic Levels. International Journal of Listening, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2021.1884080
   Google Scholar
• Malloy, T. E. (2018a). Interpersonal Attraction in Dyads and Groups: Effects of the Hearts of the Beholder and the Beheld. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(3), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malloy, T. E. (2018b). Social relations modeling of behavior in dyads and groups. Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCartney, K., Robeson, W. W., Jordan, E., & Mouradian, V. (1991). Mothers’ language with first- and second-born children: A within-family study. In K. Pillemer & K. McCartney (Eds.), Parent-child relations throughout life (pp. 125–142). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Nencheva, M. L., Piazza, E. A., & Lew-Williams, C. (2021). Moment to moment pitch dynamics of child-directed speech shape toddlers’ attention and learning. Developmental Science, 24(1), e12997. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ninio, A., & Snow, C. E. (1996). Pragmatic development. Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ninio, A., & Snow, C. (1999). The development of pragmatics: Learning to use language appropriately. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of child language acquisition (pp. 347–386). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1992). Natural language and natural selection. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 451–493). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. William Morrow & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Pitts, M. J., & Giles, H. (2008). 2. Social Psychology and personal relationships: Accommodation and relational influence across time and contexts. In Handbook of Interpersonal Communication (pp. 15–32). De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. F., & Lew-Williams, C. (2016). Language learning, socioeconomic status, and child-directed speech. WIREs Cognitive Science, 7(4), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, S. R., Casella, G., & McCulloch, C. E. (1992). Variance components. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. (1972). Mothers’ speech to children learning language. Child Development, 43(2), 549–565. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87(2), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsksy, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. B., & Giles, H. (2018). Communication accommodation theory. The international encyclopedia of intercultural communication, 95–108.
   Google Scholar