Daily life among the oldest old with and without previous hip fractures

References

• Population statistics 2004. In: Statistics Sweden 2004 [available at: www.scb.se].
   Google Scholar
• Care and services to elderly persons 2003: The National Board of Health and Welfare, 2004 [available at: www.sos.se].
   Google Scholar
• Population statistics 2001. Part 3 Distribution by sex, age, country of birth and citizenship etc. In: Statistics Sweden, Örebro, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper C. The crippling consequences of fractures and their impact on quality of life. Am J Med. 1997;103(2A):12S-9S.
   Google Scholar
• Thorngren KG, Hommel A, Norrman PO, Thorngren J, Wingstrand H. Epidemiology of femoral neck fractures. Injury. 2002;33(Suppl 3):C1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Rogmark C, Sernbo I, Johnell O, Nilsson JA. Incidence of hip fractures in Malmo, Sweden, 1992-1995. A trend-break. Acta Orthop Scand. 1999;70(1):19–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zethraeus N, Stromberg L, Jonsson B, Svensson O, Ohlen G. The cost of a hip fracture. Estimates for 1,709 patients in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand. 1997;68(1):13–7.
   Google Scholar
• Marottoli R, Berkman L, Cooney L, Jr. Decline in physical function following hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992; 40(9):861–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sernbo I, Johnell O. Consequences of a hip fracture: a prospective study over 1 year. Osteoporos Int. 1993;3(3): 148–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magaziner J, Hawkes W, Hebel JR, Zimmerman SI, Fox KM, Dolan M, et al. Recovery from hip fracture in eight areas of function. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55(9):M498–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. A model of human occupation: theory and application. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Sonn U, Frandin K, Grimby G. Instrumental activities of daily living related to impairments and functional limitations in 70-year-olds and changes between 70 and 76 years of age. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995;27(2):119–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bachrach-Lindstrom MA, Ek AC, Unosson M. Nutritional state and functional capacity among elderly Swedish people with acute hip fracture. Scand J Caring Sci. 2000;14(4):268–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton R, Butler M, Robinson E, Lee-Joe T, Campbell AJ. Declines in physical functioning attributable to hip fracture among older people: a follow-up study of casecontrol participants. Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22(8):345–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cree M, Carriere KC, Soskolne CL, Suarez-Almazor M. Functional dependence after hip fracture. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80(10):736–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenvall M, Elinge E, von Heideken Wågert P, Lundström M, Gustafson Y, Nyberg L. Having had a hip fracture—association with dependency among the oldest old. Submitted, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman D, Fried V, Castel H, Weitzmann S, Lowenthal MN, Galinsky D. Factors related to successful rehabilitation after hip fracture: a case-control study. Disabil Rehabil. 1996; 18(5):224–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker MJ, Palmer CR. Prediction of rehabilitation after hip fracture. Age Ageing. 1995;24(2):96–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorngren KG, Ceder L, Svensson K. Predicting results of rehabilitation after hip fracture. A ten-year follow-up study, Clin Orthop 1993(287): 76–81.
   Google Scholar
• von Heideken Wågert P, Gustavsson J, Lundin-Olsson L, Kallin K, Nygren B, Lundman B, et al. Health status in the oldest old: age and sex differences in the Umea° 85+Study. Submitted, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Leinonen R, Heikkinen E, Jylha M. Predictors of decline in self-assessments of health among older people—a 5-year longitudinal study. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52(9):1329–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nybo H, Gaist D, Jeune B, McGue M, Vaupel JW, Chris-tensen K. Functional status and self-rated health in 2,262 nonagenarians: the Danish 1905 Cohort Survey. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49(5):601–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton MP. The dimensions of morale. In: Kent D KR, Sherwood S, editors. Research planning and action for the elderly: the power and potential of social science. New York: Behavioral Publications; 1972. p. 144–65.
   Google Scholar
• von Heideken Wågert P, Rönnmark B, Rosendahl E, Lundin-Olsson L, Gustavsson J, Nygren B, et al. Morale in the oldest old: The Umeå 85 +Study. Submitted, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. ‘‘Mini-mental state’’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–98.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen E, Dehlin O, Gustafson L. A comparison between three psychogeriatric rating scales. Int J Geriatr Psych. 1993; 8:215–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheik J, Yesavage J. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin Gerontol. 1986;5:165–72.
   Google Scholar
• Åsberg M, Montgomery S, Perris C, Schalling D, Sedvall G. A comprehensive psychopathological rating scale. Acta Psy-chiat Scand 1978; Suppl. 271: 5–27.
   Google Scholar
• Sonn U. Longitudinal studies of dependence in daily life activities among elderly persons. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl. 1996;34:1–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lawton MP. The Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale: a revision. J Gerontol. 1975;30(1):85–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ryden M, Knopman D. Assess not assume. Measuring the morale of cognitively impaired elderly. J Gerontol Nurs. 1989; 15:27–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Standardised assessment scales for elderly people. London: Royal College of Physicians/British Geriatrics Society, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Philp I, Lowles RV, Armstrong GK, Whitehead C. Repeatability of standardized tests of functional impairment and well-being in older people in a rehabilitation setting. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(5):243–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirkka M, Bränholm I-B. Consequences of a hip fracture in activity performance and life satisfaction in an elderly Swedish clientele. Scand J Occup Ther. 2003;10:34–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman D. Rehabilitation after proximal femur fracture surgery in the oldest old. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83(10):1360–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher AG. Uniting practice and theory in an occupational framework. 1998 Eleanor Clarke Slagle Lecture. Am J Occup Ther. 1998;52(7):509–21.
   Google Scholar
• Iwarsson S, Isacsson A. Quality of life in the elderly population: an example exploring interrelationships among subjective well-being, ADL dependence, and housing accessibility. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 1997;26:71–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dening TR, Chi LY, Brayne C, Huppert FA, Paykel ES, O’Connor DW Changes in self-rated health, disability and contact with services in a very elderly cohort: a 6-year followup study. Age Ageing. 1998;27(1):23–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofgren B, Gustafson Y, Nyberg L. Psychological well-being 3 years after severe stroke. Stroke. 1999;30(3):567–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw C, McColl E, Bond S. Functional abilities and continence: the use of proxy respondents in research involving older people. Qual Life Res. 2000;9(10):1117–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers AM, Holliday PJ, Harvey KA, Hutchinson KS. Functional performance measures: are they superior to self-assessments? J Gerontol. 1993;48(5):M196–206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Magaziner J, Bassett SS, Hebel JR, Gruber-Baldini A. Use of proxies to measure health and functional status in epidemiologic studies of community-dwelling women aged 65 years and older. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143(3):283–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorov A, Kirchner C. Bias in proxies’ reports of disability: data from the National Health Interview Survey on Disability. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(8):1248–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar