Pregnancy outcome after cervical cone excision: a case-control study

References

• Ostor AG. Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1993; 12: 186–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Lower genital tract neoplasia: study group recommendations 2003. Retrieved 20 February 2006, from http://www.rcog.org.uk/index.asp?PageID=308.
   Google Scholar
• Wright TC, Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, Carlson J, Twiggs LB, Wilkinson EJ, et al. 2001 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 189: 295–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Hirsch PL, Paraskevaidis E, Kitchener H. Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2): CD001318.
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan JM, Kirkup W, Davis JA, Edington PT. Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by colposcopically directed cryosurgery and subsequent pregnancy experience. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982; 89: 387–92
   Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson E. Outcome of third trimester pregnancies after cryotherapy of the uterine cervix. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982; 89: 675–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wang W, Exeter M, Whittaker J, McCowan L. Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery. JAMA. 2004; 291: 2100–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rooijen M, Persson E. Pregnancy outcome after laser vaporization of the cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999; 78: 346–8
   Google Scholar
• El-Bastawissi AY, Becker TM, Daling JR. Effect of cervical carcinoma in situ and its management on pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 93: 207–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya G, Kjeldberg I, Hansen SM, Sorheim N, Jacobsen BK, Maltau JM. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005; 272: 109–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bekassy Z, Iosif CS. Laser ‘miniconisation’ and the outcome of subsequent pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1996; 258: 75–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomfield PI, Buxton J, Dunn J, Luesley DM. Pregnancy outcome after large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 169: 620–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferenczy A, Choukroun D, Falcone T, Franco E. The effect of cervical loop electrosurgical excision on subsequent pregnancy outcome: North American experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 172: 1246–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen B, Skjeldestad FE. The outcome of pregnancy after CO2 laser conisation of the cervix. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993; 100: 717–20
   Google Scholar
• Samson SLA, Bentley JR, Fahey TJ, McKay DJ, Gill GH. The effect of loop electrosurgical excision procedure on future pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105: 325–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane JM. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 102: 1058–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen J, Langhoff-Roos J, Wittrup M, Bock JE. Cervical conisation and preterm delivery/low birth weight. A systematic review of the literature. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1993; 72: 640–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund E, Bjerkedal T. Cancer in situ of the uterine cervix. Increased perinatal death and prematurity after conisation. Tidsskr nor Laegeforen. 1986; 106: 543–6
   Google Scholar
• Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. Wiley, New York 2002
   Google Scholar
• Hoyert DL, Kung HC, Smith BL. Deaths: preliminary data for 2003. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2005; 53: 1–48
   Google Scholar
• Richardus JH, Graafmans WC, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Mackenbach JP. EuroNatal International Audit Panel, EuroNatal Working Group. Differences in perinatal mortality and suboptimal care between 10 European regions: results of an international audit. BJOG. 2003; 110: 97–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu VY. Global, regional and national perinatal and neonatal mortality. J Perinat Med. 2003; 31: 376–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villar J, Abalos E, Carroli G, Giordano D, Wojdyla D, Piaggio G, et al. Heterogeneity of perinatal outcomes in the preterm delivery syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 104: 78–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson G, Grundsell H, Gullberg B, Svennerud S. Outcome of pregnancy after conisation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1982; 61: 461–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paraskevaidis E, Koliopoulos G, Lolis E, Papanikou E, Malamou-Mitsi V, Agnantis NJ. Delivery outcomes following loop electrosurgical excision procedure for microinvasive (FIGO stage IA1) cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2002; 86: 10–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiman G, Harrison NA, Rubin A. Pregnancy following conisation of the cervix: complications related to cone size. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980; 136: 14–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334: 567–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svare JA, Andersen LF, Langhoff-Roos J, Jensen ET, Bruun B, Lind I, et al. The relationship between prior cervical conisation, cervical microbial colonization and preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1992; 47: 41–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward RM, Beachy JC. Neonatal complications following preterm birth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003; 110: 8–16
   Google Scholar
• Dammann O, Leviton A, Gappa M, Dammann CE. Lung and brain damage in preterm newborns, and their association with gestational age, prematurity subgroup, infection/inflammation and long term outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005; 112: 4–9
   Google Scholar
• Sagot P, Caroit Y, Winer N, Lopes P, Boog G. Obstetrical prognosis for carbon dioxide laser conisation of uterine cervix. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1995; 58: 53–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrel FE, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariate prognostic models: Issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996; 15: 361–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar