Developing linear ADL ability measures based on the ADL Taxonomy: A Rasch analysis

References

• Fisher, AG. Assessment of Motor and Process Skills, vol 1: Development, standardization, and administration manual6th ed. Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Tennant A, Penta M, Tesio L, Grimby G., Thonnard JL, Slade A, et al. Assessing and adjusting for cross-cultural validity of impairment and activity limitation scales through differential item functioning within the framework of the Rasch model: The PRO-ESOR project. Med Care 2004; 42: I37–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesio L. Measuring behaviours and perceptions: Rasch analysis as a tool for rehabilitation research. J Rehab Med 2003; 35: 105–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tesio L, Simone A, Bernardinello M. Rehabilitation and outcome measurement: where is Rasch analysis going?. Eura Medicophys 2007; 43: 417–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klein S, Barlow I, Hollis V. Evaluating ADL measures from an occupational therapy perspective. Can J Occup Ther 2008; 75: 69–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Törnquist K, Sonn U. ADL Taxonomien—bedömning av aktivitetsförmåga. [The ADL taxonomy—evaluation of ADL ability]. Swedish ed. Förbundet Sveriges Arbetsterapeuter, Nacka 2001
   Google Scholar
• Törnquist K, Sonn U. Towards an ADL taxonomy for occupational therapists. Scand J Occup Ther 1994; 1: 69–76
   Google Scholar
• Sonn U, Tornquist K, Svensson E. The ADL taxonomy—from individual categorical data to ordinal categorical data. Scand J Occup Ther 1999; 6: 11–20
   Google Scholar
• Törnquist, K. Att fastställa og mäta förmåga til dagliga livets aktiviteter (ADL): en kritisk granskning av ADL-instrumenten och arbetsterapipraksis. [Verifying and measuring the ability to perform activities of daily living], Dissertation. Göteborg University, 1995
   Google Scholar
• Wright B, Linacre JM. Differences between scores and measures. Rasch Measurement Transactions 1989; 3: 63
   Google Scholar
• Merbitz C, Morris J, Grip JC. Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989; 70: 308–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson U, Grahn B. Validation of the General Motor Function Assessment Scale: An instrument for the elderly. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 1–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hariz GM, Lindberg M, Bergenheim AT. Impact of thalamic deep brain stimulation on disability and health-related quality of life in patients with essential tremor. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72: 47–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hariz GM, Lindberg GM. Does the ADL part of the unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale measure ADL? An evaluation in patients after pallidotomy and thalamic deep brain stimulation. Mov Disorder 2003; 18: 373–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright BD, Linacre JM. Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989; 70: 857–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant A, Conaghan PG. The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper?. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 57: 1358–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model. Fundamental measurement in the human sciences2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 2007
   Google Scholar
• Hermansson L, Fisher A, Bernspång B, Eliasson AC. Assessment of capacity for myoelectric control: A new Rasch-built measure of prosthetic hand control. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 166–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wæhrens E. ADL Taxonomien [The ADL taxonomy]Danish edn. Ergoterapeutforeningen, Copenhagen 1998
   Google Scholar
• Wright B, Master GN. Rating scale analysis. MESA Press, Chicago, IL 1982
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. WINSTEPS® Rasch measurement computer software [computer program]. Version 3.63.0. Chicago, IL. 2006
   Google Scholar
• Wright BD. Logits?. Rasch Measurement Transactions 1993; 7: 288
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, JM. A Users Guide to Winsteps® Ministep Rasch-model computer programs [Internet] [cited 20 July 2007]. Available at: http://www.winsteps.com/aftp/winsteps.pdf2006.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. J Applied Measurement 2002; 3: 85–106
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linacre JM. Category disordering vs. step (threshold) disordering. Rasch Measurement Transactions 1999; 13: 675
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Investigating rating scale category utility. J Outcome Measurement 1999; 3: 103–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linacre JM. Differential Item and Test Functioning (DIF & DTF). Rasch Measurement Transactions 2002; 16: 889
   Google Scholar
• Smith EV. Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Applied Measurement 2002; 3: 205–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Draba, R. The identification and interpretation of item bias. Research Memorandum No 25 1977 [cited 8 September 2008]. Available at:, , http://www.rasch.org/memo25.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Fleishman JA, Spector WD, Altman BM. Impact of differential item functioning on age and gender differences in functional disability. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2002; 57: S275–S284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niti M, Ng T-P, Chiam P-C, Kua E-H. Item response bias was present in instrumental activity of daily living scale in Asian older adults. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 366–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, WP. Reliability statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions 1992;238.
   Google Scholar
• Wright B. Reliability and separation. Rasch Measurement Transactions 2008; 9: 472
   Google Scholar
• Árnadottir G, Fisher AG. Rasch analysis of the ADL Scale of the A-ONE. Am J Occup Ther 2007; 62: 51–60
   Google Scholar
• Tsuji T, Sonoda S, Domen K, Saitoh E, Liu M, Chino N. ADL structure for stroke patients in Japan based on the Functional Independence Measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 74: 432–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright B, Granger CV, Hamilson BB. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 127–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kücükdeveci AA, Yavuzer G, Tennant A, Süldür N, Sonel B, Arasil T. Adaptation of the modified Barthel Index for use in physical medicine and rehabilitation in Turkey. Scand J Rehabil Med 2000; 32: 87–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Myers ND, Wolfe EW, Feltz DL, Penfield RD. Identifying differential item functioning of rating scale items with the Rasch model: An introduction and an application. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci 2006; 10: 215–40
   Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min Lai S, Perera S. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 950–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Measurement Transactions 1994; 7: 328
   Google Scholar