2,438
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The attendees’ view of quality in community-based day centre services for people with psychiatric disabilities

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 162-171 | Received 30 Aug 2016, Accepted 13 Jan 2017, Published online: 01 Feb 2017

References

  • Aubin G, Hachey R, Mercier C. Meaning of daily activities and subjective quality of life in people with severe mental illness. Scand J Occup Ther. 1999;6:53–62.
  • Bejerholm U, Eklund M. Engagement in occupations among men and women with schizophrenia. Occup Ther Int. 2006;13:100–121.
  • Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. SFS 2001:453, Social Services Act. Stockholm, Sweden: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs; 2001.
  • Kielhofner G. A model of human occupation: theory and application. 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
  • Tjörnstrand C, Bejerholm U, Eklund M. Participation in day centres for people with psychiatric disabilities: characteristics of occupations. Scand J Occup Ther. 2011;18:243–253.
  • Rebeiro K, Cook JV. Opportunity, not prescription: an exploratory study of the experience of occupational engagement. Can J Occup Ther. 1999;66:176–187.
  • Tjörnstrand C, Bejerholm U, Eklund M. Participation in day centres for people with psychiatric disabilities. A focus on occupational engagement. Br J Occup Ther. 2013; 76:144–150.
  • Eklund M, Hansson L, Ahlqvist C. The importance of work as compared to other forms of daily occupations for wellbeing and functioning among persons with long-term mental illness. Community Ment Health J. 2004;40:465–477.
  • Argentzell E, Leufstadius C, Eklund M. Factors influencing subjective perceptions of everyday occupations: comparing day centre attendees with non-attendees. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19:68–77.
  • Shaw I. Assessing quality in health care services: lessons from mental health nursing. J Adv Nurs. 1997;26:758–764.
  • Crow R, Gage H, Hampson S, Hart J, et al. The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. Health Technol Assess. 2002;6:1–244.
  • Lundqvist LO, Ivarsson AB, Brunt D, et al. Quality of community–based day center services for people with psychiatric disabilities: psychometric properties of the QPC–DA. Scand J Occup Ther. 2016;23:91–96.
  • Schröder A, Ahlström G, Wilde Larsson B. Patient's perceptions of the concept of quality of care in the psychiatric setting: a phenomenograpic study. J Clin Nurs. 2006;15:93–102.
  • Schröder A, Wilde Larsson B, Ahlström G, Lundqvist LO. Psychometric properties of the instrument quality in psychiatric care and descriptions of quality of care among in-patients. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2010;23:554–570.
  • Schröder A, Ahlström G, Wilde Larsson B, et al. Psychometric properties of the Quality in Psychiatric Care–Out–Patient (QPC–OP) instrument. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2011;20:445–453.
  • Lundqvist LO, Ahlström G, Wilde Larsson B, et al. The patient's view of quality in psychiatric outpatient care. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2012;19:629–637.
  • Schröder A, Ågrim J, Lundqvist LO. The quality in psychiatric care–forensic in–patient instrument: psychometric properties and patient views of the quality of forensic psychiatric services in Sweden. J Forensic Nurs. 2013;9:225–234.
  • Schröder A, Lundqvist LO. The Quality in Psychiatric Care–Forensic In–Patient Staff (QPC–FIPS) instrument: psychometric properties and staff views of the quality of forensic psychiatric services in Sweden. OJN. 2013;3:330–341.
  • Lundqvist LO, Lorentzen K, Riiskjaer E, et al. A Danish adaptation of the quality in psychiatric care-forensic in-patient questionnaire: psychometric properties and factor structure. J Forensic Nurs. 2014;10:168–174.
  • Lundqvist LO, Riiskjaer E, Lorentzen K, et al. Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Danish adaptation of the Quality in Psychiatric Care–Forensic In–patient Staff (QPC–FIPS). Open J Nurs. 2014;4:878–885.
  • Lundqvist LO, Schröder A. Patient and staff views of quality in forensic psychiatric inpatient care. J Forensic Nurs. 2015;11:51–58.
  • Schröder A, Lorentzen K, Riiskjaer E, et al. Patients' view of the quality of the Danish forensic psychiatric in-patient care. J Forens Psychiatry Psychol. 2016;27:551–568.
  • Lundqvist LO, Rask M, Brunt D, et al. Measuring quality in community based housing support: the QPC-H instrument. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016;29:267–275.
  • Rask M, Schröder A, Lundqvist LO, Ivarsson AB, Brunt D. The client’s view of quality in ordinary housing with housing support for people with psychiatric disabilities. Iss Mental Health Nurs. 2016. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2016.1253806
  • Schröder A, Wilde Larsson B, Ahlström G. Quality in psychiatric care: an instrument evaluating patients' expectations and experiences. Int J Health Care QA. 2007;20:141–160.
  • Fitzpatrick R. Surveys of patients satisfaction: I-Important general considerations. BMJ. 1991;302:887–889.
  • Greenwood N, Key A, Burns T, et al. Satisfaction with in-patient psychiatric services. Relationship to patient and treatment factors. Br J Psychiatry. 1999;174:159–163.
  • Hiidenhovi H, Nojonen K, Laippala P. Measurement of outpatients' views of service quality in a Finnish university hospital. J Adv Nurs. 2002;38:59–67.
  • Gunnarsson AB, Eklund M. Young people with psychiatric disabilities and their views of day centres. Scand J Occup Ther. 2016. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2016.1178327
  • Dawes NP, Larson R. How youth get engaged: grounded-theory research on motivational development in organized youth programs. Dev Psychol. 2011;47:259–269.
  • Petersen K, Hounsgaard L, Borg T, et al. User involvement in mental health rehabilitation: a struggle for self-determination and recognition. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19:59–67.
  • Socialstyrelsen [National Board of Health and Welfare]. Delaktighet och inflytande i arbetet med genomförandeplaner. Kunskapsstöd till verksamheter för personer med funktionsnedsättning. [Participation and influence in the process of implementation plans. Knowledge support to daily activities for people with disabilities]. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen; 2014.
  • Kjellberg A, Kåhlin I, Haglund L, et al. The myth of participation in occupational therapy: reconceptualizing a client-centred approach. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19:421–427.
  • Eklund M, Tjörnstrand C. Psychiatric rehabilitation in community-based day centres: motivation and satisfaction. Scand J Occup Ther. 2013;20:438–445.
  • Elwyn G, Edwards A, Britten N. Doing prescribing’: how might clinicians work differently for better, safer care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(Suppl 1):i33–i36. ‘
  • SOU [Swedish Official Report Series]. Lindqvists nia: nio vägar att utveckla bemötandet av personer med funktionshinder [‘Lindqvist's Nine’: nine ways to develop the approach to people with disabilities]. Stockholm: Nordstedts; 1999:21.
  • Sutton DJ, Hocking CS, Smythe LA. A phenomenological study of occupational engagement in recovery from mental illness. Can J Occup Ther. 2012;79:142–150.
  • Wagman P, Håkansson C, Björklund A. Occupational balance as used in occupational therapy: a concept analysis. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19:322–327.
  • Kilian R, Lindenbach I, Lobig U, et al. Self-perceived social integration and the use of day centers of persons with severe and persistent schizophrenia living in the community: a qualitative analysis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2001;36:545–552.
  • Danielsen K, Garatt AM, Bjertneas O, et al. Patient experiences in relation to respondent and health service delivery characteristics: a survey of 26 938 patients attending 62 hospitals throughout Norway. Scand J Public Hlth. 2007;35:70–77.
  • Hall JA, Dornan MC. Patient sociodemographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care: a meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med. 1990;30:811–818.
  • Wells KB, Sherbourne C, Schoenbaum M, et al. Impact of disseminating quality improvement programs for depression in managed primary care: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000;283:212–220.
  • Cunningham CE, Walker JR, Eastwood JD, et al. Modeling mental health information preferences during the early adult years: a discrete choice conjoint experiment. Psych Serv. 2016;67:184–191.