Doing, being, becoming and belonging at the heart of occupational therapy: An analysis of theoretical ways of knowing

References

• Hitch D, Pepin G, Stagnitti K. The pan occupational paradigm: development and key concepts. Scand J Occup Ther. 2018;6(4):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy. 4th ed. Chicago (IL): F.A. Davis Co; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn T. The structure of scientific revolutions. 4th ed. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock A. An occupational perspective of health. Thorofare (NJ): SLACK Incorporated; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Goldingay S, Macfarlane S, Hitch D, et al. Multidimensional framework for embedded academic skill development. Geelong (Australia): Deakin University; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Yerxa E. An introduction to occupational science, a foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. Occup Ther Health Care. 1990;6(4):1–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hitch D, Pepin G, Lhuede K, et al. Development of the translating allied health knowledge (TAHK) framework. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(7):412–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryden P, Ginsburg S, Kurabi B, et al. Professing professionalism: are we our own worst enemy? Faculty members' experiences of teaching and evaluating professionalism in medical education at one school. Acad Med. DOI:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ce64ae
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haglund L, Ekbladh E, Thorell L-H, et al. Practice models in Swedish psychiatric occupational therapy. Scand J Occup Ther. 2000;7(3):107–113.
   Google Scholar
• Ashby S, Gray M, Ryan S, et al. Maintaining occupation-based practice in Australian mental health practice: a critical stance. Br J Occup Ther. 2015;78(7):431–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SW, Kielhofner G, Morley M, et al. Impact of using the model of human occupation: a survey of occupational therapy mental health practitioners’ perceptions. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19(5):450–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SW, Taylor R, Kielhofner G, et al. Theory use in practice: a national survey of therapists who use the model of human occupation. Am J Occup Ther. 2008;62(1):106–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickles D, Hawe P, Shiell A. A simple guide to chaos and complexity. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2007;61:933–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitch D, Pepin G, Stagnitti K. In the footsteps of Wilcock, part one: The evolution of doing, being, becoming and belonging. Occup Ther Health Care. 2014;28(3):231–246.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weichhart G. The learning environment as a chaotic and complex adaptive system. Systems. 2013;1(1):36–53. Available from: http://www.systema-journal.org/article/view/130.
   Google Scholar
• Creek J. The core concepts of occupational therapy: a dynamic framework for practice. London (UK): Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Moore F, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. Br Med J. 2015;350(6):h1258–h1258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid HAJ, Hocking C, Smythe L. The unsustainability of occupational based model diagrams. Scand J Occup Ther. 2019. DOI:10.1080/11038128.2018.1544663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale N, Heath G, Cameron E, et al. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason W, Mirza N, Webb C. Using the framework method to analyze mixed-methods case studies [Internet]. In: SAGE research methods cases in sociology (Encyclopaedia). Sage Publications; 2018. DOI:10.4135/9781526438683
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson S, Eatough V, Holmes J, et al. Framework analysis: a worked example of a study exploring young people’s experiences of depression. Qual Res Psychol. 2016;13(2):109–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu S, Reynolds F. Occupational therapy for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), part 1: a delineation model of practice. Br J Occup Ther. 2007;70(9):372–383.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn W. Best practice occupational therapy in community service with children and families. Thorofare (NJ): Slack; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Polatajko HJ, Townsend EA, Craik J. Canadian model of occupational performance and engagement (CMOP-E). Ottawa (ON): CAOT Publications ACE; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. A model of human occupation: theory and application. 4th ed. Baltimore (MD): Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Laver-Fawcett A. Canadian model of occupational performance: 30 years of impact! Br J Occup Ther. 2013;76(12):519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwama M. The Kawa Model: culturally relevant occupational therapy. Edinburgh (UK): Churchill Livingstone-Elsevier Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Turpin M, Iwama M. Using occupational therapy models in practice: a field guide. London (UK): Churchill Livingstone; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hitch D, Pepin G, Stagnitti K. In the footsteps of Wilcock, part two: the interdependent nature of doing, being, becoming and belonging. Occup Ther Health Care. 2014;28(3):247–263.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher I, Ziviani J. Explanatory case studies: Implications and applications for clinical research. Aust Occ Ther J. 2004;51(4):185–191.
   Google Scholar
• Hitch D, Pépin G, Stagnitti K. The development of inquiry methods in mental health occupational therapy: looking to the past to inform the future. In: Sherman LR, editor. Advances in occupational therapy research. New York (NY): Nova; 2014. p. 135–192.
   Google Scholar
• Fazio K, Hicks E, Kuzma C, et al. The Canadian practice process framework: using a conscious approach to occupational therapy practice. OT Now. 2008;10(4):6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bouteloup Z, Beltran R. Application of the occupational adaptation framework in child and adolescent occupational therapy practice. a case study. Aust Occ Ther J. 2007;54(3):228–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmody S, Nolan R, Ni Chonchuir N, et al. The guiding nature of the Kawa (river) Model in Ireland: creating bothbopportunities and challenges for occupational therapists. Occup Ther Int. 2007;14(4):221–236.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson R, Reznick H. The power of occupational engagement: Norm’s story. OT Now. 2015;18(3):22–24.
   Google Scholar
• Polatajko HJ. Fit chart. In: Townsend E, Polatajko HJ, editors. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision of health, well-being and justice through occupation. Ottawa (ON): CAOT Publications ACE; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M. Good business: leadership, flow, and the making of meaning. London (UK): Penguin; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Brenneman Baron K, Littleton MJ. The model of human occupation: a return to work case study. Work. 1999;12(1):3–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larsson-Lund M, Nyman A. Participation and occupation in occupational therapy models of practice:A discussion of possibilities and challenges. Scand J Occup Ther. 2017;24(6):393–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend E, Polatajko HJ. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well‐being and justice through occupation. Ottawa (ON): CAOT Publications ACE; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Opportunities for well-being: the right to occupational engagement. Can J Occup Ther. 2017;84(4–5):209–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association of Occupational Therapy. Occupational therapy practice framework: domain and process, 3rd edition. Am J Occup Ther. 2014;68(Supp 1):S1–S48.
   Google Scholar
• Fung C, Wiseman-Hakes C, Stergiou-Kita M, et al. Time to wake up: bridging the gap between theory and practice for sleep in occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther. 2013;76(8):384–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke C. Clinical application of the Canadian model of occupational performance in a forensic rehabilitation hostel. Br J Occup Ther. 2003;66(4):171–174.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock A. An occupational perspective of health. 2nd ed. Thorofare (NJ): SLACK Incorporated; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Jones J, Topping A, Wattis J, et al. A concept analysis of spirituality in occupational therapy practice. J Study Spirituality. 2016;6(1):38–57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang C. A psycho spiritual integration frame of reference for occupational therapy. Aust Occ Ther J. 2003;50(2):92–103.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, et al. Canadian occupational performance measure. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Association of Occupational Therapy; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Braveman B, Robson M, Velozo C, et al. Worker role interview. Champaign (IL): University of Illinois; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Schkade JK, Schultz S. Occupational adaptation: towards a holistic approach to contemporary practice: part 1. Am J Occup Ther. 1992;46(9):829–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis J, Polatajko HJ. Occupational development. In: Christiansen C, Townsend E, editors. An introduction to occupation: the art and science of living. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Education; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Rebeiro Gruhl K, Lacarte S, Boucher M, et al. Being, belonging and becoming: development of the 3B scale. Aust Occup Ther J. 2018;65(5):354–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonsaksen T, Yazdani F. The Norwegian occupational wholeness questionnaire (N-OWQ): Scale development and psychometric properties. Scand J Occup Ther. 2018;12:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ikiugu MN, Smallfield S. Ikiugu’s eclectic method of combining theoretical conceptual practice models in occupational therapy. Aus Occup Ther J. 2011;58(6):437–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamm T, Cieza A, Machold K, et al. Exploration of the link between conceptual occupational therapy models and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Aust Occ Ther J. 2006;53(2):143–117.
   Google Scholar