Optimising the development of sustainable internet-based occupational therapy interventions: Important key actions and perspectives to consider

References

• Larsson-Lund M. The digital society: occupational therapists need to act proactively to meet the growing demands of digital competence. Br J OccupTher. 2018;81(12):733–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson-Lund M, Nyman A. Occupational challenges in a digital society: a discussion inspiring occupational therapy to cross thresholds and embrace possibilities. Scand J Occup Ther. 2019;27(8):550–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cason J. Telehealth: a rapidly developing service delivery model for occupational therapy. Int J Telerehabil. 2014;6(1):29–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nergårdh A, Andersson L, Eriksson J, et al. God och nära vård–En primärvårdsreform. [Good and close care - A primary care reform]. Stockholm: Social departementet; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Strategi för genomförde av e-hälsa vision 2025. [Strategies for the implementation of The EHealth vision 2025]. Stockholm: Sveriges kommuner och regioner; [cited 2020 Dec 10]. Available from https://ehalsa2025.se/
   Google Scholar
• eHealth: digital health and care. European Comission; [cited 2020 Dec 10]. Available from https://ec.europa.eu/health/ehealth/home_
   Google Scholar
• Lubanski N, Klaesøe B, Johns L. Välfärdsinnovation. [Welfare innovation]. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bason C. Leading public design: discovering human-centred governance. Bristol: Policy Press; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Zonneveld M, Patomella A-H, Asaba E, et al. The use of information and communication technology in healthcare to improve participation in everyday life: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2020; 42(23):3416–3423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung Kn G, Fong KN. Effects of telerehabilitation in occupational therapy practice: a systematic review. Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2019;32(1):3–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacono T, Stagg K, Pearce N, et al. A scoping review of Australian allied health research in ehealth. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamwesiga JT, Eriksson GM, Tham K, et al. A feasibility study of a mobile phone supported family-centred ADL intervention, F@ ce™, after stroke in Uganda. Global Health. 2018;14(1):1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patomella A-H, Guidetti S, Mälstam E, et al. Primary prevention of stroke: randomised controlled pilot trial protocol on engaging everyday activities promoting health. BMJ Open. 2019;9(11):e031984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards DA, Hallberg IR. Complex interventions in health: an overview of research methods. New York (NY): Routledge; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Vuorikari R, Punie Y, Gomez SC, et al. DigComp 2.0: the digital competence framework for citizens. Update phase 1: the conceptual reference model. Seville: European Commission, Joint Research Centre; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Gulliksen J, Göransson B, Boivie I, et al. Key principles for user-centred systems design. Behav Info Tech. 2003;22(6):397–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bason C. Leading public sector innovation 2E: co-creating for a better society. Bristol: Policy Press; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• O'Cathain A, Croot L, Duncan E, et al. Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare. BMJ Open. 2019;9(8):e029954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins J, Madden K, Fletcher A, et al. Development of a framework for the co-production and prototyping of public health interventions. BMC Publ Health. 2017;17(1):689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson-Lund M, Månsson Lexell E, Nyman A. Strategies for Empowering activities in Everyday life (SEE 1.0): study protocol for a feasibility study of an Internet-based occupational therapy intervention for people with stroke. Re-Submitted. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Bleijenberg N, Janneke M, Trappenburg JC, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste by optimizing the development of complex interventions: enriching the development phase of the Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;79:86–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. Convention on rights of people with disabilities (UNCRPD). Geneva: United Nations; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel K, Wolfe CD, Busch MA, et al. What are the social consequences of stroke for working-aged adults? A systematic review. Stroke. 2009;40(6):e431–e440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audulv Å, Packer T, Versnel J. Identifying gaps in knowledge: a map of the qualitative literature concerning life with a neurological condition. Chronic Illn. 2014;10(3):192–243.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellis-Hill C, Payne S, Ward C. Using stroke to explore the Life Thread Model: an alternative approach to understanding rehabilitation following an acquired disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(2):150–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robison J, Wiles R, Ellis-Hill C, et al. Resuming previously valued activities post-stroke: who or what helps? Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(19):1555–1566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund A, Mangset M, Wyller TB, et al. Occupational transaction after stroke constructed as threat and balance. J Occup Sci. 2015;22(2):146–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner G, Packer TL, Kervin E, et al. A systematic review examining whether community-based self-management programs for older adults with chronic conditions actively engage participants and teach them patient-oriented self-management strategies. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(12):2162–2182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. Vård vid multipel skleros och Parkinsons sjukdom. Nationella riktlinjer– Utvärdering. Sammanfattning med förbättringsområden. [Care for multiple sclerosis and parkinson disease. National guidelines- evalutation. Summary and areas of improvement]. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. Utvärdering av vård vid stroke – Huvudrapport med förbättringsområden Nationella riktlinjer – Utvärdering. [Evalutation of the care for stroke. Main report. National guidelines- evalutation]. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Amatya B, Galea M, Kesselring J, et al. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation interventions in persons with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2015;4(4):358–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead L, Seaton P. The effectiveness of self-management mobile phone and tablet apps in long-term condition management: a systematic review. J Med Int Res. 2016;18(5):e97.
   Google Scholar
• Wildevuur SE, Simonse LW. Information and communication technology-enabled person-centered care for the ‘big five’ chronic conditions: scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(3):e77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson T, Wild C. Telerehabilitation in stroke care-a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(1):1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vårdguiden 1177. [The Swedish 1177 Health Care Guide]. Stockholm: Sveriges Regioner; [cited 2020 Dec 7]. Available from https://www.1177.se/
   Google Scholar
• Bergvall-Kareborn B, Stahlbrost A. Living Lab: an open and citizen-centric approach for innovation. IJIRD. 2009;1(4):356–370.
   Google Scholar
• Innovationsguiden. Användardriven innovation [Internet]. [The innovation guide, user-driven innovation]. Stockholm: Sveriges Kommuner och regioner; [cited 2020 Dec 7]. Available from www.innovationsguiden.se
   Google Scholar
• Ritterband LM, Thorndike FP, Cox DJ, et al. A behavior change model for internet interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2009;38(1):18–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floryan MR, Ritterband LM, Chow PI. Principles of gamification for Internet interventions. Transl Behav Med. 2019;9(6):1131–1138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgart MM, Ritterband LM, Thorndike FP, et al. Using instructional design process to improve design and development of Internet interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(3):e89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short C, Rebar A, Plotnikoff R, et al. Designing engaging online behaviour change interventions: a proposed model of user engagement. Europ Health Psychologist. 2015; 17(1):32–38.
   Google Scholar
• Kassberg A-C, Nyman A, Larsson Lund M. Perceived occupational balance in people with stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;43(4):1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olofsson A, Larsson Lund M, Nyman A. Everyday activities outside the home are a struggle: narratives from two persons with acquired brain injury. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;27(3):194–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olofsson A, Nyman A, Larsson Lund M. Engagement in occupations outside home - experiences of people with acquired brain injury. Br J Occup Ther. 2017;80(8):486–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lexell EM, Iwarsson S, Lexell J. The complexity of daily occupations in multiple sclerosis. Scand J Occup Ther. 2006;13(4):241–248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lexell EM, Lund ML, Iwarsson S. Constantly changing lives: experiences of people with multiple sclerosis. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;63(6):772–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risser R, Lexell E, Bell D, et al. Use of local public transport among people with cognitive impairments–a literature review. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2015;29:83–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olofsson A, Nyman A, Kassberg AC, et al. Places visited for activities outside the home after stroke: relationship with the severity of disability. Br J Occup Ther. 2020;83(6):405–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinowsky C, Larsson-Lund M. The match between everyday technology in public space and the ability of working-age people with acquired brain injury to use it. Br J Occup Ther. 2016;79(1):26–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson G, Tham K, Borg J. Occupational gaps in everyday life 1–4 years after acquired brain injury. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38(3):159–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyman A, Kassberg A-C, Lund ML. Perceived occupational value in people with acquired brain injury. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;28(5):391–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggstrom A, Lund ML. The complexity of participation in daily life: a qualitative study of the experiences of persons with acquired brain injury. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(2):89–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson Lund M, Lövgren Engström A-L, Lexell J. Response actions to difficulties in using everyday technology after acquired brain injury. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19(2):164–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassberg A-C, Prellwitz M, Larsson Lund M. The challenges of everyday technology in the workplace for persons with acquired brain injury. Scand J Occup Ther. 2013;20(4):272–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygård L, Ryd C, Astell A, et al. Self-initiated management approaches and strategies in everyday occupations used by people with cognitive impairment; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Jin W, Zhang X-X, et al. Telerehabilitation approaches for stroke patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(12):2660–2668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan F, Amatya B, Kesselring J, et al. Telerehabilitation for persons with multiple sclerosis. A Cochrane review. Europ J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;51(3):311–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb T, Joseph J, Yardley L, et al. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(1):e4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelders SM, Kok RN, Ossebaard HC, et al. Persuasive system design does matter: a systematic review of adherence to web-based interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(6):e152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer W, Kroeze W, Crutzen R, et al. Which intervention characteristics are related to more exposure to internet-delivered healthy lifestyle promotion interventions? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(1):e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubart JR, Stuckey HL, Ganeshamoorthy A, et al. Chronic health conditions and internet behavioral interventions: a review of factors to enhance user engagement. Comput Inform Nurs. 2011;29(2):81–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kottorp A, Malinowsky C, Larsson-Lund M, et al. Gender and diagnostic impact on everyday technology use: a differential item functioning (DIF) analysis of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ). Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(22):2688–2694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills T, Lawton R, Sheard L. Advancing complexity science in healthcare research: the logic of logic models. BMC Med Res Method. 2019;19(1):1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund M, Orban K, Argentzell E, et al. The linkage between patterns of daily occupations and occupational balance: applications within occupational science and occupational therapy practice. Scand J Occup Ther. 2017;24(1):41–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandsson L-K, Persson C. Valmo-modellen. Arbetsterapi för hälsa genom görande. [The Valmo- model. Occupational therapy for health through doing]. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Eklund M, Gunnarsson B, Hultqvist J. Aktivitet och relation. [Occupation and relation]. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Dickie V, Cutchin MP, Humphry R. Occupation as transactional experience: a critique of individualism in occupational science. J Occupt Sci. 2006;13(1):83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Leplege A, Gzil F, Cammelli M, et al. Person-centredness: conceptual and historical perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(20–21):1555–1565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers CR. Significant aspects of client-centered therapy. Am Psychol. 1946;1(10):415–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranner M, Guidetti S, von Koch L, et al. Experiences of participating in a client-centred ADL intervention after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(25):3025–3033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranner M, von Koch L, Guidetti S, et al. Client-centred ADL intervention after stroke: occupational therapists' experiences. Scand J Occup Ther. 2016;23(2):81–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones F, Riazi A. Self-efficacy and self-management after stroke: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(10):797–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones F, Riazi A, Norris M. Self-management after stroke: time for some more questions? Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(3):257–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorig KR, Holman HR. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26(1):1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parke HL, Epiphaniou E, Pearce G, et al. Self-management support interventions for stroke survivors: a systematic meta-review. PloS One. 2015;10(7):e0131448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce G, Pinnock H, Epiphaniou E, et al. Experiences of self-management support following a stroke: a meta-review of qualitative systematic reviews. PloS One. 2015;10(12):e0141803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner G, Packer T, Villeneuve M, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of stroke self-management programs for improving function and participation outcomes: self-management programs for stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(23):2141–2163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray F, Clarke D, Forster A. Post-stroke self-management interventions: a systematic review of effectiveness and investigation of the inclusion of stroke survivors with aphasia. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(11):1237–1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm Ivarsson B. Motiverande samtal. Praktisk handbok för hälso-och sjukvården.[Motivation interviewing. Guidance for use in health care]. Stockholm: Gothia förlag; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997;12(1):38–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: helping people change. New York (NY): Guilford press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lexell J, R, Fischer M. Rehabiliteringsmetodik [Rehabilitation methodology]. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Moffett J. Twelve tips for ‘flipping’ the classroom. Med Teach. 2015;37(4):331–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Låg T, Sæle RG. Does the flipped classroom improve student learning and satisfaction? A systematic review and meta-analysis. AERA pen. 2019;5(3):233285841987048–233285841987017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abeysekera L, Dawson P. Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Edu Res Develop. 2015;34(1):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doria N, Condran B, Boulos L, et al. Sharpening the focus: differentiating between focus groups for patient engagement vs. qualitative research. Res Involv Engagem. 2018;4(1):1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yin RK. Case study research. Design and methods. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; 2003.
   Google Scholar