Exploring two subdimensions of participation, involvement and engagement: A scoping review

References

• Bedell G, Coster W, Law M, et al. Community participation, supports, and barriers of school-age children with and without disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(2):315–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien C-W, Rodger S, Copley J, et al. Comparative content review of children's participation measures using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Children and Youth. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(1):141–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coster W, Law M, Bedell G, et al. Development of the participation and environment measure for children and youth: conceptual basis. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(3):238–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imms C, Adair B, Keen D, et al. 'Participation': a systematic review of language, definitions, and constructs used in intervention research with children with disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58(1):29–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei C, Reilly S, Reddihough D, et al. Activities and participation of children with cerebral palsy: parent perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(23):2164–2173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shikako-Thomas K, Kolehmainen N, Ketelaar M, et al. Promoting leisure participation as part of health and well-being in children and youth with cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol. 2014;29(8):1125–1133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imms C, Granlund M, Wilson PH, et al. Participation, both a means and an end: a conceptual analysis of processes and outcomes in childhood disability. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59(1):16–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adair B, Ullenhag A, Rosenbaum P, et al. Measures used to quantify participation in childhood disability and their alignment with the family of participation-related constructs: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60(11):1101–1116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simeonsson RJ, Leonard M, Lollar D, et al. Applying the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) to measure childhood disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(11–12):602–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson P, Dada S, Granlund M, et al. Content validity and usefulness of Picture My Participation for measuring participation in children with and without intellectual disability in South Africa and Sweden. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;27(5):336–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lexico [Internet]. Oxford University Press. 2019. [cited 2019 Aug 13]. Available from: https://www.lexico.com/en?search_filter=dictionary.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. International Classification of Function, Disability, and Health World Health Organisation. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Jonsson H. An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-some critical remarks. Am J Occup Ther. 2005;59(5):569–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coster W, Bedell G, Law M, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Participation and Environment Measure for Children and Youth. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(11):1030–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogan AM, Carlson M. Deciphering participation: an interpretive synthesis of its meaning and application in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(22):2692–2703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G, Dijkers MP. Difficult to measure constructs: conceptual and methodological issues concering participation and environmental factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(11):22–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badley EM. Enhancing the conceptual clarity of the activity and participation components of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(11):2335–2345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra S, Shakespeare T. Remodeling the ICF. Disabil Health J. 2019;12(3):337–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granlund M, Arvidsson P, Niia A, et al. Differentiating activity and participation of children and youth with disability in Sweden: a third qualifier in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health for children and youth? Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91(13):84–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himmelfarb HS. Measuring religious involvement. Soc Forces. 1975;53(4):606–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaichkowsky JL. Measuring the involvement construct. J Consum Res. 1985;12(3):341–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barki H, Hartwick J. Rethinking the concept of user involvement. MIS Q. 1989;13(1):53–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews JC, Durvasula S, Akhter SH. A framework for conceptualizing and measuring the involvement construct in advertising research. J Advert. 1990;19(4):27–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Currie M, Petersen P. Child and parent engagement in the mental health intervention process: a motivational framework. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2014;19(1):2–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodogical framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk DC, James J. The psychological continuum model: a conceptual framework for understanding an individual’s psychological connection to sport. Sport Manage Rev. 2001;2001(4):119–150.
   Google Scholar
• Laurent G, Kapferer J-N. Measuring consumer involvement profiles. J Market Res. 1985;22(1):41–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havitz ME, Dimanche F. Leisure involvement revisited: conceptual conundrums and measurement advances. J Leisure Res. 1997;29(3):245–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley CGE, Shaw SM, Havitz ME. Men's and women's involvement in sports: an examination of the gendered aspects of leisure involvement. Leisure Sci. 2000;22(1):19–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk DC, Ridinger LL, Moorman AM. Exploring origins of involvement: understanding the relationship between consumer motives and involvement with professional sport teams. Leisure Sci. 2004;26(1):35–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle G, Absher J, Norman W, et al. A Modified Involvement Scale. Leisure Stud. 2007;26(4):399–427.
   Google Scholar
• Jun J, Kyle GT, Vlachopoulos SP, et al. Reassessing the structure of enduring leisure involvement. Leisure Sci. 2012;34(1):1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havitz ME, Kaczynski AT, Mannell RC. Exploring relationships between physical activity, leisure involvement, self-efficacy, and motivation via participant segmentation. Leisure Sci. 2013;35(1):45–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhartanto D, Dean D, Sumarjan N, et al. Leisure involvement, job satisfaction, and service performance among frontline restaurant employees. J Qual Assur Hosp Tour. 2019;20(4):387–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhuvanaiah T, Raya RP. Employee engagement: key to organizational success. SCMS J Indian Manage. 2014;11(4):61–71.
   Google Scholar
• Madan S. Moving from employee satisfaction to employee engagement. CLEAR Int J Res Comm Manage. 2017;8(6):46–50.
   Google Scholar
• Harashitha. Employee engagement: a literature review. Int J Res Comm Manage. 2015;6(12):97–100.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn WA. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad Manage J. 1990;33(4):692–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho Kim W, Park JG, Kwon B. Work engagement in South Korea: validation of the Korean version 9-item Utrecht work engagement scale. Psychol Rep. 2017;120(3):561–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Pansari A. Competitive advantage through engagement. J Market Res. 2016;53(4):497–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megha S. A brief review of employee engagement: definition, antecendents and approaches. CLEAR Int J Res Comm Manage. 2016;7(6):79–88.
   Google Scholar
• Appleton JJ, Christenson SL, Furlong MJ. Student engagement with school: critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychol Schs. 2008;45(5):369–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleton JJ, Christenson SL, Kim D, et al. Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: validation of the student engagement instrument. J Sch Psychol. 2006;44(5):427–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelson RD, Flick A. Defining student engagement. Change. 2010;43(1):38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Dhanesh GS. Putting engagement in its proper place: state of the field, definition and model of engagement in public relations. Public Relat Rev. 2017;43(5):925–933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchan JF. Engagement: a concept and some possible uses. Semin Speech Lang. 2009;30(1):11–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finn JD, Zimmer KS. Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In: Christenson SL, Reschly AL, Wylie C, editors. Handbook of research on student engagement. Buston: Springer; 2012. p. 93–128.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH. School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev Educ Res. 2004;74(1):59–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks JA, Bohnert AM, Burdette K. Moving beyond attendance: lessons learned from assessing engagement in afterschool contexts. New Dir Youth Dev. 2014;2014(144):45–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hollingshead A, Carnahan CR, Lowrey KA, et al. Engagement for students with severe intellectual disability: the need for a common definition in inclusive education. Inclusion. 2017;5(1):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp C, Kishida Y, Carter M, et al. The effect of activity type on the engagement and interaction of young children with disabilities in inclusive childcare settings. Early Childhood Res Q. 2013;28(1):134–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liem GA, Martin AJ. The motivation and engagement scale: theoretical framework, psychometric properties, and applied yields. Aust Psychol. 2012;47(1):3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira PAS, Bilimoria H, Pedrosa C, et al. Engagement with school in students with special educational needs. Int J Psychol Psychol Ther. 2015;15(3):361–375.
   Google Scholar
• Alegria M, Carson N, Flores M, et al. Activation, self-management, engagement, and retention in behavioral health care: a randomized clinical trial of the DECIDE intervention. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(5):557–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright FAS, Kayes NM, Worrall L, et al. A conceptual review of engagement in healthcare and rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(8):643–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graffigna G, Barello S, Bonanomi A. The role of Patient Health Engagement Model (PHE-model) in affecting patient activation and medication adherence: a structural equation model. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179865–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Chiarello LA, Thompson L, et al. Development of an observational measure of therapy engagement for pediatric rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(1):86–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortte KB, Falk LD, Castillo RC, et al. The Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale: development and psychometric properties. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(7):877–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lequerica AH, Kortte K. Therapeutic engagement: a proposed model of engagement in medical rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89(5):415–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayhew E, Beresford B, Laver-Fawcett A, et al. The Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale – Reablement Version (HRERS-RV): development and psychometric properties. Health Soc Care Community. 2019;2019;27(3):777–787. ():
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieckmann P, Boyko A, Centonze D, et al. Achieving patient engagement in multiple sclerosis: a perspective from the multiple sclerosis in the 21st Century Steering Group. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2015;4(3):202–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinger D. William Kahn: Q&A with the founding father of engagement. 2017. https://www.saba.com/blog/william-kahn-qa-with-the-founding-father-of-engagement-part-1 & https://www.saba.com/blog/william-kahn-qa-with-the-founding-father-of-engagement-part-2.
   Google Scholar
• Martin AJ. Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. Br J Educ Psychol. 2007;77(Pt 2):413–440.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Havitz ME, Mannell RC. Enduring involvement, situational involvement, and flow in leisure and non-leisure activities. J Leisure Res. 2005;37(2):152–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Imms C, Stewart D, et al. A transactional framework for pediatric rehabilitation: shifting the focus to situated contexts, transactional processes, and adaptive developmental outcomes. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(15):1829–1841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieger B, Piskur B, Schulze C, et al. Supporting and hindering environments for participation of adolescents diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder: a scoping review. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0202071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar