Phronesis: Recognising a neglected dimension of knowledge within occupational therapy research

References

• Wilcock AA. Occupational science: bridging occupation and health. Can J Occup Ther. 2005;72(1):1–15. doi:10.1177/000841740507200105.
   Google Scholar
• Njelesani J, Tang A, Jonsson H, et al. Articulating an occupational perspective. Journal of Occupational Science. 2012;21(2):226–235. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.717500.
   Google Scholar
• Lauvås P, Handal G. Handledning och praktisk yrkesteori. 3rd ed. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Law M. Learning by doing: creating knowledge for occupational therapy. WFOT Bulletin. 2010;62(1):12–18. doi:10.1179/otb.2010.62.1.004.
   Google Scholar
• Brekland R, Flinn N. Therapy as learning, in occupational therapy: performance, participation, and well-being. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Incoporated; 2005. p. 420–448.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann S. Philosophies of qualitative research. Understanding qualitative research. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsella EA. Knowledge paradigms in occupational science: pluralistic perspectives. In: Whiteford GE, Hocking C, editors. Occupational Science: Society, Inclusion, Participation. 1st ed. Chichester (UK): Blackwell Publishing; 2012. p. 69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson G, Tham K. Correlating facts or interpreting meaning: two different epistemological projects within medical research. Scand J Occup Ther. 2006;13(2):68–75. doi:10.1080/11038120600772965.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blair SEE, Robertson LJ. Hard complexities – soft complexities: an exploration of philosophical positions related to evidence in occupational therapy. Bri J Occup Ther. 2005;68(6):269–276. doi:10.1177/030802260506800605.
   Google Scholar
• Flaming D. Using phronesis instead of ‘research-based practice’ as the guiding light for nursing practice. Nursing Philosophy. 2001;2(3):251–258. doi:10.1046/j.1466-769X.2000.00066.x.
   Google Scholar
• Christ TW. Scientific-Based research and randomized controlled trials, the “gold” standard? Alternative paradigms and mixed methodologies. Qualitative Inquiry. 2014;20(1):72–80. doi:10.1177/1077800413508523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borell L, Nygård L, Asaba E, et al. Qualitative approaches in occupational therapy research. Scand J Occup Ther. 2014;21(Suppl 1):80–88. doi:10.3109/11038128.2014.95291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella EA, Whiteford GE. Knowledge generation and utilisation in occupational therapy: towards epistemic reflexivity. Aust Occup Ther J. 2009;56(4):249–258. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00726.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilding C, Whiteford G. From practice to praxis: reconnecting moral vision with philosophical underpinnings. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2009;72(10):434–441. doi:10.1177/030802260907201004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristotle. Aristotle: nicomachean ethics. In: Crisp R, editor. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bornemark J. Horisonten finns alltid kvar – om det bortglmda omdömet. Stockholm, Sweden: Volante; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Massingham P. An aristotelian interpretation of practical wisdom: the case of retirees. Palgrave Commun. 2019;5(1):123. doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0331-9.
   Google Scholar
• Lukka K, Suomala P. Relevant interventionist research: balancing three intellectual virtues. Accounting and Business Research. 2014;44(2):204–220. doi:10.1080/00014788.2013.872554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella EA, Pitman A. Engaging phronesis in professional practice and education, in phronesis as professional knowledge: practical wisdom in the professions. In: Kinsella EA, Pitman A, editors. Sense: Rotterdam; 2012. p. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Davidoff F. Systems of service: reflections on the moral foundations of improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20 (Suppl_1):i5–10. doi:10.1136/bmjqs.2010.046177.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kinsella EA. The art of reflective practice in health and social care: reflections on the legacy of donald schön. Reflective Practice. 2010;11(4):565–575. doi:10.1080/14623943.2010.506260.
   Google Scholar
• Leathard HL, Cook MJ. Learning for holistic care: addressing practical wisdom (phronesis) and the spiritual sphere. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(6):1318–1327. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04949.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breier M, Ralphs A. In search of phronesis: recognizing practical wisdom in the recognition (assessment) of prior learning. Br J Sociol Edu. 2009;30(4):479–493. doi:10.1080/01425690902954646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella EA, Pitman A. Phronesis as professional knowledge: implications for education and practice. In: Kinsella EA, Pitman A, editors. Phronesis as professional knowledge: practical wisdom in the professions. Rotterdam (The Netherlands): Sense Publishers; 2012. p. 163–172.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins K, Kinsella EA, DeLuca S. Perspectives on phronesis in professional nursing practice. Nurs Philos. 2019;20(1):e12231. doi:10.1111/nup.12231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teghe D. Using applied phronesis to explore productivism in elderly care policy. Qualitative Research Journal. 2012;12(2):173–182. doi:10.1108/14439881211248329.
   Google Scholar
• Bergstrom A, et al. The jigsaw puzzle of activities for mastering daily life; service recipients and professionals’ perceptions of gains and changes attributed to reablement-A qualitative meta-synthesis. Scand J Occup Ther. 2022;30(5): 604–615. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2022.2081603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCorquodale L, Kinsella EA. Critical reflexivity in client-centred therapeutic relationships. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22(4):311–317. doi:10.3109/11038128.2015.1018319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeff M, Rennie S. Phronesis:beyond the research ethics committee—A crucial decision-making skill for health researchers During community research. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016;11(2):170–179. doi:10.1177/1556264616650070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronenberg F, Kathard H, Laliberte Rudman D, et al. Can post-apartheid South Africa be enabled to humanise and heal itself? S Afr j Occup Ther. 2015;45(1):20–27. doi:10.17159/2310-3833/2015/v45no1a4.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, et al. Thematic analysis. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Handbook of research methods in health social sciences. Singapore: Springer; 2019, p. 843–860.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans S, Tavory I. Theory construction in qualitative research. Sociological Theory. 2012;30(3):167–186. doi:10.1177/0735275112457914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assander S, Bergström A, Eriksson C, et al. ASSIST: a reablement program for older adults in Sweden – a feasibility study. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):618. doi:10.1186/s12877-022-03185-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergström A, Borell L, Meijer S, et al. Evaluation of an intervention addressing a reablement programme for older, community-dwelling persons in Sweden (ASSIST 1.0): a protocol for a feasibility study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):e025870. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Reason P, Bradbury H. The SAGE handbook of action research. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Schön DA. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Aldershot: Arena; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Salama AM. Spatial design education: new directions for pedagogy in architecture and beyond. Surrey/London (UK): Ashgate Publishing, Ltd; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Freire P. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren AS, Atler K, Nilsson I. Negotiating occupation: how older people make sense of the concept of occupation. J Occup Sci. 2020;27(2):236–250. doi:10.1080/14427591.2020.1731845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson I, Luborsky M, Rosenberg L, et al. Perpetuating harms from isolation among older adults with cognitive impairment: observed discrepancies in homecare service documentation, assessment and approval practices. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):800–800. doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3616-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilsson I, Häggström Lundevaller E, Fisher AG. The reationship between engagement in leisure activities and self-Rated health in later life. Activities, Adaptation, & Aging. 2017;41(2):175–190. doi:10.1080/01924788.2017.1306384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole MB. Group dynamics in occupational therapy: the theoretical basis and practice application of group intervention. 5th ed. Thorofare, NJ.: SLACK incorporated; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay L. Groupwork in occupational therapy. Cheltenham/UK: Nelson Thomes Ltd; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Lauttamäki, V. P. Practical guide for facilitating a futures workshop. Turku (Finland): Finlands Futures Research Center, Turku School of Economics, University of Turku; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Apel H. The futures workshop. Deutsches Institut für Erwachsenenbildung; 2004. http://www.die-bonn.de/esprid/dokumente/doc-2004/apel04_02.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nordin T, Coe AB, Nilsson I. Teaming up to traverse loneliness: a co-creative journey toward a home care work model for supporting social participation among older adults. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):1159. doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08524-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre, A. Participatory action research. Los Angeles, Calif; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Benner P. The roles of embodiment, emotion and lifeworld for rationality and agency in nursing practice. Nursing Philosophy. 2000;1(1):5–19. doi:10.1046/j.1466-769x.2000.00014.x.
   Google Scholar
• Kruse E, Chancellor J, Lyubomirsky S. State humility: measurement, conceptual validation, and intrapersonal processes. Self and Identity. 2017;16(4):399–438. doi:10.1080/15298868.2016.1267662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellman D. Open-mindedness: a virtue for professional practice. Nurs Philos. 2003;4(1):17–24. doi:10.1046/j.1466-769x.2003.00113.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kidd SA, Kral MJ. Practicing participatory action research. J Couns Psychol. 2005;52(2):187–195. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. Statistik om socialtjänstinsatser till äldre och personer med funktionsnedsättning efter regiform 2020. 2021. Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/statistik/2021-3-7266.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty M. The phenomenology of perception. New York, NY: Routledge; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend E, Hocking C. Relaunching teaching occupation. J Occup Sci. 2019;26(1):140–144. doi:10.1080/14427591.2018.1541698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plamondon KM. Reimagining researchers in health research comment on “experience of health leadership in partnering with University-Based researchers in Canada: a call to ‘Re-Imagine’ research”. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021;10(2):86–89. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2020.05.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schei E, Fuks A, Boudreau JD. Reflection in medical education: intellectual humility, discovery, and know-how. Med Health Care Philos. 2018;22(2):167–178. doi:10.1007/s11019-018-9878-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault M. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews & other writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips L. The promise of dialogue: the dialogic turn in the production and communication of knowledge. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson C, Farias L. Deepening our collective understanding of decolonising education: a commentary on simaan’s learning activity based on a global South community. Journal of Occupational Science. 2020;27(3):445–448. doi:10.1080/14427591.2020.1790408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan-Graham J, Cott C. Phronesis: practical wisdom the role of professional practice knowledge in the clinical reasoning of bobath instructors. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017;23(5):935–948. doi:10.1111/jep.12641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar