1,335
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Reading-through be-longing: Towards a methodology for political sciences otherwise

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 21 Aug 2023, Accepted 15 Nov 2023, Published online: 13 Feb 2024

References

  • Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2019). The making of global international relations: Origins and evolution of IR at its centenary. Cambridge University Press.
  • Ahmed, S. (1998). Differences that matter: Feminist theory and postmodernism. Cambridge University Press.
  • Ahmed, S. (2006). Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others. Duke University Press.
  • Ahmed, S. (2015). Introduction: Sexism - A problem With a name. New Formations, 86(86), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.3898/NEWF.86.INTRODUCTION.2015
  • Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism. Verso Books.
  • Azoulay, A. A. (2019). Potential history: Unlearning imperialism. Verso Books.
  • Bhambra, G. K. (2014). Connected sociologies. Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Bhandar, B., & Ziadah, R. (2020). Revolutionary feminisms: Conversations on collective action and radical thought. Verso Books.
  • Blaney, D. L., & Tickner, A. B. (2017). Worlding, ontological politics and the possibility of a decolonial IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 45(3), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829817702446
  • Bosniak, L. (2008). The citizen and the alien: Dilemmas of contemporary membership. Princeton University Press.
  • Bragato, F. F., & Gordon, L. R. (Eds.) (2017). Geopolitics and decolonization: Perspectives from the global South. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Buzan, B., & Acharya, A. (2021). Re-imagining international relations: World orders in the thought and practice of Indian, Chinese, and Islamic civilizations. Cambridge University Press.
  • Césaire, A. (1955). Discourse on colonialism. (J. Pinkham Trans.). Monthly Review Press.
  • Chakrabarty, D. (1992). Provincializing Europe: Postcoloniality and the critique of history. Cultural Studies, 6(3), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502389200490221
  • Channa, L. A. (2017). Letter writing as a reflective practice: Understanding the shuffling, shifting, and shaping of a researcher identity. Reflective Practice, 18(3), 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2017.1294531
  • Chen, K. (2010). Asia as method: Toward deimperialization. Duke University Press.
  • Choi, D. M. (2020). Translation is a mode = translation is an anti-neocolonial mode. Ugly Duckling Press.
  • choi, s. (2015). Love’s cruel promises: Love, unity and North Korea. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 17(1), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2013.790656
  • choi, s. (2021). Telling our racism and sexism stories safely is a global security problem: A conversation between complainers. Critical Studies on Security, 9(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2021.1904188
  • choi, s., Särmä, S., Masters, C., Zalewski, M., Brown, M. L., & Parashar, S. (2023). Ripping, cutting, stitching: Feminist knowledges destruction and creation in global politics. Rowman and Littlefield.
  • choi, s., Selmeczi, A., & Strausz, E. (Eds.) (2019). Critical methods for the study of world politics: Creativity and transformation. Routledge.
  • Cisneros, N. A. (2018). To my relations’: Writing and refusal toward an indigenous epistolary methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 31(3), 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2017.1401147
  • Cixous, H., Cohen, K., & Cohen, P. (1976). The laugh of the Medusa. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1(4), 875–893. https://doi.org/10.1086/493306
  • Daigle, M. (2016). Writing the lives of others: Storytelling and international politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 45(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829816656415
  • Dauphinee, E. (2019). Narrative and inquiry in international politics. In J. Edkins (Ed.), Routledge handbook of critical international relations (pp. 114–125). Routledge.
  • Doyle, L. (2020). Inter-imperiality: Vying empires, gendered labor, and the literary arts of alliance. Duke University Press.
  • Dussel, E. (2008). Twenty theses on politics. Duke University Press.
  • Edkins, J., César Díaz Calderón, J., Hozić, A. A., Muppidi, H., Inayatullah, N., Rutazibwa, O., & Shilliam, R. (2021). Tales of entanglement. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 49(3), 604–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298211034918
  • Eget, M. (2023). We open ourselves: Autoethnographic research as a healing process. The Classic Journal.
  • El-Malik, S. S. (2023). A letter to Baba. Review of International Studies, 49(4), 539–546. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210523000232
  • Estes, N., Wilson Gilmore, R., & Loperena, C. (2021). United in struggle. NACLA Report on the Americas, 53(3), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714839.2021.1961444
  • Faye, G. (2018). Small country: A novel (S. Ardizzone Trans.). Hogarth.
  • Gabriel-Puri, A. (2023). To/for Syrialism: Towards an ‘embodied’ kind of war story. Security Dialogue, https://doi.org/10.1177/09670106231194917
  • Grosfoguel, R. (2007). The epistemic decolonial turn: Beyond political-economy paradigms. Cultural Studies, 21(2-3), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162514
  • Grosfoguel, R. (2013). The structure of knowledge in westernised universities: Epistemic racism/sexism and the four genocides/epistemicides. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge, 11(1), 73–90.
  • Halperin, S., & Heath, O. (2020). Political research: Methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press.
  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The Science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
  • Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
  • hooks, B. (2000). Remembered rapture: Dancing with words. The Journal of Japan Society for Clinical Anesthesia, 20(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2199/jjsca.20.1
  • hooks, B. (2014). Teaching to transgress. Routledge.
  • Inayatullah, N. (Ed.) (2011). Autobiographical international relations: I, IR. Routledge.
  • Inayatullah, N. (2022). Pedagogy as encounter: Beyond the teaching imperative. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Inayatullah, N., & Dauphinee, E. (2016). Narrative global politics: Theory, history and the personal in international relations. Routledge.
  • Kapoor, I. (2020). Confronting desire. Cornell University Press.
  • Koomen, J. (2021). Special issue: International relations as if people matter. Journal of Narrative Politics, 8(1).
  • Kothari, A., Salleh, A., Escobar, A., Demaria, F., & Acosta, A. (2019). Pluriverse: A post-development dictionary. Tulika Books.
  • Krishna, S. (2001). Race, amnesia, and the education of international relations. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 26(4), 401–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540102600403
  • Lapadat, J. C. (2017). Ethics in autoethnography and collaborative autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(8), 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417704462
  • Lee, M. J. (2017). Pachinko. Head of Zeus.
  • Ling, L. H. (2013). The Dao of world politics: Towards a post-Westphalian, worldist international relations. Routledge.
  • Longino, H. (1993). Subjects, power, and knowledge: Description and prescription in feminist philosophies of science. In L. Alcoff, & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 101–120). Routledge.
  • Lowe, L. (2015). The intimacies of four continents. Duke University Press.
  • Löwenheim, O. (2010). The ‘I’ in IR: An autoethnographic account. Review of International Studies, 36(4), 1023–1045. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000562
  • McKittrick, K. (2021). Dear science and other stories. Duke University Press.
  • Minh-ha, T. T. (1989). Woman, native, other: Writing postcoloniality and feminism. Indiana University Press.
  • Muppidi, H. (2012). The colonial signs of international relations. Columbia University Press.
  • Muppidi, H. (2023). Who forms the mass in mass destruction? Review of International Studies, 49(4), 547–556. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210523000244
  • Nagar, R. (2006). Playing with fire: Feminist thought and activism through seven lives in India. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Nagar, R. (2013). Storytelling and co-authorship in feminist alliance work: Reflections from a journey. Gender, Place & Culture, 20(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2012.731383
  • Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2018a). Provincializing Europe and deprovincialising Africa: Prospects for decolonizing the humanities. Présence Africaine, 197(1), 337–362. https://doi.org/10.3917/presa.197.0337
  • Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2018b). Racism and “blackism” on a world scale. In O. U. Rutazibwa, & R. Shilliam (Eds.), Routledge handbook of postcolonial politics (pp. 72–85). Routledge.
  • Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2018c). Epistemic freedom in Africa: Deprovincialization and decolonization. Routledge.
  • Ngugi, W. T. O. (2009). Re-membering Africa. East African Educational Publishers.
  • Nyamnjoh, F. B. (2017). Incompleteness: Frontier Africa and the currency of conviviality. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 52(3), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909615580867
  • Pan, C. (2018). Toward a new relational ontology in global politics: China’s rise as holographic transition. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 18(3), 339–367. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcy010
  • Parvulescu, A., & Boatcă, M. (2022). Creolizing the modern: Transylvania across empires. Cornell University Press.
  • Penttinen, E. (2013). Joy and international relations: A new methodology. Routledge.
  • Pierre, B., Petigny, N., Nagar, R., & Shakhsari, S. (2019). Performing embodied translations: Decolonizing methodologies of knowing and being. Commoning Ethnography, 2(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.26686/ce.v2i1.5665
  • Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power and eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology, 15(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005
  • Robinson, D. (2020). Hungry listening: Resonant theory for indigenous sound studies. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Rodney, W. (1972). Tanzanian Ujamaa and scientific socialism. African Review, 1(4), 61–76.
  • Rowe, A. C. (2005). Be Longing: Toward a feminist politics of relation. NWSA Journal, 17(2), 15–46. https://doi.org/10.2979/NWS.2005.17.2.15
  • Rutazibwa, O. U. (2020). Hidden in plain sight: Coloniality, capitalism and race/ism as far as the eye can see. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 48(2), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829819889575
  • Rutazibwa, O. U. (2023). After inclusion. Thinking with Julian Go’s ‘Thinking against empire: Anticolonial thought as social theory’. The British Journal of Sociology, 74(3), 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.13006
  • Rutazibwa, O. U., & Shilliam, R. (Eds.) (2018). Routledge handbook of postcolonial politics. Routledge.
  • Said, E. (1979). Orientalism. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
  • Salami, M. (2020). Sensuous knowledge: A black feminist approach for everyone. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Seo, J., & Cho, Y. C. (2021). The emergence and evolution of international relations studies in postcolonial South Korea. Review of International Studies, 47(5), 619–636. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210521000504
  • Seo, J., & Lee, H. (2019). Indigenization of international relation theories in Korea and China: Tails of two essentialisms. In K. Shimizu (Ed.), Critical international relations theories in East Asia. Relationality, subjectivity and pragmatism (pp. 50–63). Routledge.
  • Shapiro, I., & Bedi, S. (2007). Introduction: Contingency’s challenge to political science. In I. Shapiro, & S. Bedi (Eds.), Political contingency: Studying the unexpected, the accidental, and the unforeseen (pp. 1–20). New York University Press.
  • Shilliam, R. (2015). The black Pacific: Anti-colonial struggles and Oceanic connections. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Siklodi, N. (2020). The politics of mobile citizenship in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Singh, J. (2017). Unthinking mastery: Dehumanism and decolonial entanglements. Duke University Press.
  • Solórzano, D. G. (2021). Critical race theory's intellectual roots: My email epistolary with Derrick Bell. In M. Lynn, & A. D. Dixson (Eds.), Handbook of critical race theory in education (pp. 44–61). Routledge.
  • Somar, H. (n.a.). https://hanaleisomar.wordpress.com/.
  • Strausz, E. (2018). Writing the self and transforming knowledge in international relations: Towards a politics of liminality. Routledge.
  • Szabó, M. (2005). The Door (L. Rix Trans.) Harvill Press.
  • Thúy, K. (2012). Ru: A novel (S. Fischman Trans.). Bloomsbury USA.
  • Tieku, T. K. (2021). The Legon school of international relations. Review of International Studies, 47(5), 656–671. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210521000395
  • Trownsell, T. A., Tickner, A. B., Querejazu, A., Reddekop, J., Shani, G., Shimizu, K., Behara, N. C., & Arian, A. (2021). Differing about difference: Relational IR from around the world. International Studies Perspectives, 22(1), 25–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekaa008
  • Wekker, G. (2017). White innocence: Paradoxes of colonialism and race. Duke University Press.
  • Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Belonging and the politics of belonging. Patterns of Prejudice, 40(3), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313220600769331
  • Yuval-Davis, N. (2016). Power, intersectionality and the politics of belonging. In W. Harcourt (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of gender and development: Critical engagements in feminist theory and practice (pp. 367–381). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Zalewski, M. (2010). Feminist international relations: Making sense … . In L. J. Shepherd (Ed.), Global politics: A feminist introduction to international relations (pp. 28–43). Routledge.
  • Zalewski, M. (2019). Forget(ting) feminism? Investigating relationality in international relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32(5), 615–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1624688