Enabling infrastructure: seeing infrastructure as the urban commons

References

• Alphandéry, C., et al. (2014). Abridged version of the Convivialist manifesto. [www document]. Retrieved September 15, 2023, from https://lesconvivialistes.fr
   Google Scholar
• Anand, N. (2017). Hydraulic city: Water and the infrastructures of citizenship in Mumbai. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Retrieved from https://www.dukeupress.edu/hydraulic-city
   Google Scholar
• Anand, N., Gupta, A., & Appel, H. (Eds.). (2018). The promise of infrastructure. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Retrieved from https://www.dukeupress.edu/the-promise-of-infrastructure
   Google Scholar
• Anguelovski, I., Shi, L., Chu, E., Gallagher, D., Goh, K., Lamb, Z., … Teicher, H. (2016). Equity impacts of urban land use planning for climate adaptation. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 36(3), 333–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, S., & Marcucci, M. E. (2013). Legalizing the occupation: The Teatro Valle as a cultural commons. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 112(2), 396–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. (2016). The commons: Infrastructures for troubling times. Environment and planning D: Society and Space, 34(3), 393–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollier, D. (2014). Think like a commoner: A short introduction to the life of the commons. Gabriola Island, BC: New society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bollier, D. (2015). Bologna, a laboratory for urban commoning. [www document]. Retrieved September 15, 2023, from http://www.bollier.org/blog/bologna-laboratory-urban-commoning
   Google Scholar
• Bollier, D. (2021). The Commoner’s catalog for changemaking: Tools for the transitions ahead. Schumacher Center for a New Economics. https://www.commonerscatalog.org/
   Google Scholar
• Borch, C., & Kornberger, M. (Eds.). (2015). Urban commons: Rethinking the city. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brooke, R. (1991). The enabling authority. Public Administration, 69, 525–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchardt, M., & Laak, D. (Eds.). (2023). Making spaces through infrastructure: Visions, technologies, and tensions (Vol. 16). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
   Google Scholar
• Camponeschi, C. (2010). The enabling city: Place-based creative problem solving and the power of the everyday [www document]. Retrieved September 15, 2023, from https://www.enablingcity.com/read
   Google Scholar
• Camponeschi, C. (2013). Enabling City 2: Enhancing creative community resilience. [www document]. Retrieved September 15, 2023, from https://www.enablingcity.com/read
   Google Scholar
• Chester, M. V., & Allenby, B. (2019). Toward adaptive infrastructure: Flexibility and agility in a non-stationarity age. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 4(4), 173–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowley, R., & Caprotti, F. (2019). Smart city as anti-planning in the UK. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 37(3), 428–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degens, P., Hilbrich, I., & Lenz, S. (2022). Analyzing infrastructures in the anthropocene. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 47(4), 7–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lange, M., & de Waal, M. (2019). The Hackable city: Digital media and collaborative city-making in the network society. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dembski, S. (2013). Case study Amsterdam Buiksloterham, the Netherlands: The challenge of planning organic transformation. Context Report, 2. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. [www document]. Retrieved September 15, 2023, from https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/1523659/124693_CONTEXT_Report_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Derrible, S. (2016). Complexity in future cities: The rise of networked infrastructure. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 21(1), 68–86.
   Google Scholar
• Dhakal, S., Zhang, L., & Lv, X. (2021). Understanding infrastructure resilience, social equity, and their interrelationships: Exploratory study using social media data in hurricane Michael. Natural Hazards Review, 22(4), 04021045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eligendo. (2011). Referendum 12/06/2011 Area ITALIA. [www document]. Retrieved September 15, 2023, from https://elezioni.interno.gov.it
   Google Scholar
• Foster, S., & Iaione, C. (2019). Ostrom in the city: Design principles and practices for the urban commons. In B. Hudson, J. Rosenbloom, & D. Cole (Eds.), Routledge handbook of the study of the commons (pp. 52–62). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (2022). Cannibal capitalism: How our system is devouring democracy, care, and the planet – and what we can do about it. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Frischmann, B. (2012). Infrastructure: The social value of shared resources. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gladek, E., van Odijk, S., Theuws, P., & Herder, A. (2016). Transitioning Amsterdam to a circular city: Circular Buiksloterham vision and ambition. [www document]. Retrieved September 15, 2023, from https://buiksloterham.nl/
   Google Scholar
• Goh, B. (2023). 포함의 정치를 넘어 공동의 삶으로 - 시민사회에 대한 장애운동의 도전(2021∼2023) [Making communal life beyond the politics of inclusion – the disability movement’s challenge to civil society in Korea (2021∼2023)]. 경제와 사회 [Economy and Society], 139, 92–117.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2010). Disrupted cities: When infrastructure fails. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological motilities and the urban condition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & McFarlane, C. (Eds.). (2014). Infrastructural lives: Urban infrastructure in context. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Green, S. (2016). When infrastructures fail: An ethnographic note in the middle of an Aegean crisis. In P. Harvey, C. Jensen, & A. Morita (Eds.), Infrastructures and social complexity (pp. 289–301). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Han, D. K. (2019). Weaving the common in the financialized city: A case of urban cohousing experience in South Korea. In Y. L. Chen & H. Shin (Eds.), Neoliberal urbanism, contested cities and housing in Asia (pp. 171–192). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Han, D. K. (2021). Practicing urban commons between autonomy and togetherness: A genealogical analysis of the urban precariat movements in Tokyo and Seoul (Doctoral dissertation). London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, P., & Knox, H. (2015). Roads: An anthropology of infrastructure and expertise. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, J. T. (2023). Urban commons and the state: Critical reflections on Korean experiences. City, 27(5–6), 795–811.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, Y. W. (2023, May 16). Jihacheolsiwileul balaboneun uli sahoeui du siseon [Two perspectives on the subway struggle]. KBS [www document]. Retrieved September 15, 2023, from https://n.news.naver.com/article/056/0011485597?type=editn&cds=news_edit
   Google Scholar
• Joss, S., Sengers, F., Schraven, D., Caprotti, F., & Dayot, Y. (2019). The smart city as global discourse: Storylines and critical junctures across 27 cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 26(1), 3–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanoi, L., Koh, V., Lim, A., Yamada, S., & Dove, M. R. (2022). ‘What is infrastructure? What does it do?’: Anthropological perspectives on the workings of infrastructure(s). Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability, 2(1), 012002.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. (2013). Financial repression and housing investment: An analysis of the Korean Chonsei. Journal of Housing Economics, 22(4), 338–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinenberg, E. (2018). Palaces for the people: How social infrastructure can help fight inequality, polarization, and the decline of civic life. New York, NY: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Kostakis, V., & Bauwens, M. (2014). Network society and future scenarios for a collaborative economy. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kourtit, K., Elmlund, P., & Nijkamp, P. (2020). The urban data deluge: Challenges for smart urban planning in the third data revolution. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 24(4), 445–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, B. (2013). The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42, 327–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Babcock, J., Pham, S., Bui, T., & Kang, M. (2023). Smart city as a social transition towards inclusive development through technology: a tale of four smart cities. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 27(sup1), 75–100.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1967). Le droit à la ville. L Homme et la société, 6(1), 29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (2003). The urban revolution. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749j.ctt5vkbkv
   Google Scholar
• Luque-Ayala, A., & Marvin, S. (2015). Developing a critical understanding of smart urbanism? Urban Studies, 52(12), 2105–2116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. (2010). Infrastructure, interruption, and inequality: Urban life in the global south. In S. Graham (Ed.), Disrupted cities: When infrastructure fails. London: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203894484-14/infrastructure-interruptioninequality-urban-life-global-south
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, J. (2015). The city is not a Menschenpark: Rethinking the tragedy of the urban commons beyond the human/non-human divide. In C. Borch & M. Kornberger (Eds.), Urban commons: Rethinking the city (pp. 22–46). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mitlin, D. (2008). With and beyond the state — co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment and Urbanization, 20(2), 339–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Na, K. H. (2022, April 11). Ijunseog daepyonim neomu geobnaeji masibsio [Do not be intimidated, Mr. Lee]. Sisain [WWW document]. Retrieved September 15, 2023, from https://www.sisain.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=47240
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014). Private financing and governmental support to promote long-term investments in infrastructure. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford languages. (2023). Definition of infrastructure. Retrieved December 14, 2023, from https://google.com
   Google Scholar
• Plantin, J. C., & Punathambekar, A. (2019). Digital media infrastructures: Pipes, platforms, and politics. Media, Culture & Society, 41(2), 163–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poderi, G. (2019). Sustaining platforms as commons: Perspectives on participation, infrastructure, and governance. CoDesign, 15(3), 243–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, V. (2007). Proximate distances: The phenomenology of density in Mumbai. Built Environment, 33(2), 227–248.
   Google Scholar
• Savini, F., Boterman, W., van Gent, W., & Majoor, S. (2016). Amsterdam in the 21st century: Geography, housing, spatial development and politics. Cities, 52, 103–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwenkel, C. (2015). Spectacular infrastructure and its breakdown in socialist Vietnam. American Ethnologist, 42(3), 520–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simone, A. (2004). People as infrastructure: Intersecting fragments in Johannesburg. Public culture, 16(3), 407–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simone, A. (2021). Ritornello: “People as infrastructure”. Urban Geography, 42(9), 1341–1348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B. (2000). The concept of an ‘enabling’ local authority. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 18, 79–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Urban Media Lab. (2014). Bologna regulation on public collaboration for urban commons. [WWW document]. Retrieved September 15, 2023, from https://labgov.city/theurbanmedialab/bologna-regulation-on-public-collaboration/
   Google Scholar
• Unger, R. M. (2015). Conclusion: The task of the social innovation movement. In A. Nicholls, J. Simon, & M. Gabriel (Eds.), New frontiers in social innovation research (pp. 233–251). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/27885.
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. (2022). World cities Report 2022: Envisaging the future of cities assessing city performance. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.
   Google Scholar
• Vercellone, A. (2020). The Italian experience of the commons: Right to the city, private property, fundamental rights. The Cardozo Electronic Law Bulletin, 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, A. (2015). Reality as commons: A poetics of participation for the Anthropocene. In B. David & H. Silke (Eds.), Patterns of commoning. Amherst, MA: The Commons Strategy Group. Retrieved from https://patternsofcommoning.org/reality-as-commons-a-poetics-of-participation-for-the-anthropocene/
   Google Scholar
• Wistow, G., Knapp, M., Hardy, B., & Allen, C. (1992). From providing to enabling: Local authorities and the mixed economy of social care. Public Administration, 70, 25–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar