76
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Communicating particulate matter risk: the effects of empoweredness and trust in government information on protective behaviour

, , &
Received 15 Aug 2023, Accepted 13 Mar 2024, Published online: 24 Apr 2024

References

  • Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., & Wheaton, M. (2023). Leveraging collective action and environmental literacy to address complex sustainability challenges. Ambio, 52(1), 30–44. doi:10.1007/s13280-022-01764-6
  • Baber, W. F., & Bartlett, R. V. (2021). Democratic norms of earth system governance: Deliberative politics in the anthropocene. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bakir, V. (2006). Policy agenda setting and risk communication: Greenpeace, shell, and issues of trust. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(3), 67–88. doi:10.1177/1081180(06289213
  • Ban, J., Zhou, L., Zhang, Y., Anderson, G. B., & Li, T. (2017). The health policy implications of individual adaptive behavior responses to smog pollution in urban China. Environment International, 106, 144–152.
  • Bastasa, P. C., Gulada, K. N., Valderama, J. R. E., & Dagohoy, R. G. (2022). Perceived effectiveness of government preventive measures as predictor of attitude and acceptance toward COVID-19 vaccines. Journal of Government and Political Issues, 2(1), 30–42. doi:10.53341/jgpi.v2i1.36
  • Batliwala, S. (2007). Taking the power out of empowerment – an experiential account. Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 557–565. doi:10.1080/09614520701469559
  • Bennett, N. J., Whitty, T. S., Finkbeiner, E., Pittman, J., Bassett, H., Gelcich, S., & Allison, E. H. (2018). Environmental stewardship: A conceptual review and analytical framework. Environmental Management, 61, 597–614.
  • Biswas, A. (2020). A nexus between environmental literacy, environmental attitude and healthy living. Environtal Science Pollution Research, 27(6), 5922–5931. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-07290-5
  • Bubeck, P., Osberghaus, D., & Thieken, A. H. (2023). Explaining changes in threat appraisal, coping appraisal, and flood risk-reducing behavior using panel data from a nation-wide survey in Germany. Environment and Behavior, 55(4), 211–235.
  • Calvès, A.-E. (2009). Empowerment: The history of a key concept in contemporary development discourse. Revue Tiers Monde, 200(4), 735–749.
  • Chanley, V. A., Rudolph, T. J., & Rahn, W. M. (2000). The origins and consequences of public trust in government: A time series analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(3), 239–256. doi:10.1086/317987
  • Chen, L., & Chen, M. (2022). Danger control and fear control during public health emergencies: Considering the roles of fear and hope in the EPPM across different levels of trust. Risk Analysis, 43(5), doi:10.1111/risa.13985
  • Chryssochoidis, G., Strada, A., & Krystallis, A. (2009). Public trust in institutions and information sources regarding risk management and communication: Towards integrating extant knowledge. Journal of Risk Research, 12(2), 137–185. doi:10.1080/13669870802637000
  • Chu, Q., Gu, T., Li, A., Chen, J., Wang, H., Liu, N., … He, Y. (2021). Perceived effectiveness of public health measures and positive attitudes during a pandemic: A large cross-sectional study in Shanghai, China. BMJ Open, 11(5), e047231. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047231
  • Coy, D., Malekpour, S., & Saeri, A. K. (2022). From little things, big things grow: Facilitating community empowerment in the energy transformation. Energy Research & Social Science, 84, 102353.
  • Coy, D., Malekpour, S., Saeri, A. K., & Dargaville, R. (2021). Rethinking community empowerment in the energy transformation: A critical review of the definitions, drivers and outcomes. Energy Research & Social Science, 72, 101871.
  • Edwards, J. L., Green, K. E., & Lyons, C. A. (2002). Personal empowerment, efficacy, and environmental characteristics. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(1), 67–86.
  • Engdahl, E., & Lidskog, R. (2014). Risk, communication and trust: Towards an emotional understanding of trust. Public Understanding of Science, 23(6), 703–717.
  • Ertürk, A. (2010). Exploring predictors of organizational identification: Moderating role of trust on the associations between empowerment, organizational support, and identification. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19(4), 409–441. doi:10.1080/13594320902834149
  • Ertürk, A. (2012). Linking psychological empowerment to innovation capability: Investigating the moderating effect of supervisory trust. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(14), 153–165.
  • Eseyneh, T., Wondiye, H., Fentaw, Z., Eseyneh, N., Bogale, E. K., & Gutema, H. (2022). Behavioral responses for facemask use messages to prevent COVID-19 among residents of Bahir Dar City, Ethiopia: An application of extended parallel process model. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 2409. doi:10.1186/s12889-022-14872-5
  • European Environment Agency. (2019). Assessing air quality through citizen science.
  • Fan, Z., & Lin, L. (2011). Exposure science: Contaminant mixtures. In J. O. Nriagu (Ed.), Encyclopedia of environmental health (pp. 645–656). Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-52272-6.00122-7
  • Guak, S., Lee, S. G., An, J., Lee, H., & Lee, K. (2021). A model for population exposure to PM(2.5): identification of determinants for high population exposure in Seoul. Environmental Pollution, 285, 117406. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117406
  • Henderson, J., Ward, P. R., Tonkin, E., Meyer, S. B., Pillen, H., McCullum, D., … Wilson, A. (2020). Developing and maintaining public trust during and post-COVID-19: Can we apply a model developed for responding to food scares? Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 369. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00369
  • Hmielowski, J. D., Donaway, R., & Wang, M. Y. (2019). Environmental risk information seeking: The differential roles of anxiety and hopelessness. Environmental Communication, 13(7), 894–908.
  • Hoffmann, B. L., Scartascini, C., & Cafferata, F. G. (2021). How can we improve air pollution? Try increasing trust first. Environment and Development Economics, 27(5), 393–413. doi:10.1017/s1355770/(2100036x
  • Hoffmann, B. L., Scartascini, C., & Cafferata, F. G. (2022). How can we improve air pollution? Try increasing trust first. Environment and Development Economics, 27(5), 393–413.
  • Horton, D. E., Skinner, C. B., Singh, D., & Diffenbaugh, N. S. (2014). Occurrence and persistence of future atmospheric stagnation events. Nature Climate Change, 4(8), 698–703.
  • Jacob, D. J., & Winner, D. A. (2009). Effect of climate change on air quality. Atmospheric Environment, 43(1), 51–63.
  • Jahangiry, L., Bakhtari, F., Sohrabi, Z., Reihani, P., Samei, S., Ponnet, K., & Montazeri, A. (2020). Risk perception related to COVID-19 among the Iranian general population: An application of the extended parallel process model. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1571. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-09681-7
  • Jasemzadeh, M., Jaafarzadeh, N., Khafaie, M. A., Malehi, A. S., & Araban, M. (2016). Predicator of pregnant women's self-care behavior against air pollution: An explanation based on the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM). Electronic Physician, 8(9), 2871–2877. doi:10.19082/2871
  • Jasemzadeh, M., Khafaie, M. A., Jaafarzadeh, N., & Araban, M. (2018). Effectiveness of a theory-based mobile phone text message intervention for improving protective behaviors of pregnant women against air pollution: A randomized controlled trial. Environ Science Pollution Research, 25(7), 6648–6655. doi:10.1007/s11356-017-1034-7
  • Jugert, P., Greenaway, K. H., Barth, M., Büchner, R., Eisentraut, S., & Fritsche, I. (2016). Collective efficacy increases pro-environmental intentions through increasing self-efficacy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 12–23. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.08.003
  • Julliard, R., Prévot, A.-C., Dozières, A., & Bedessem, B. (2023). Science knowledge and trust in science in biodiversity citizen science projects. Journal of Science Communication, 22(01), doi:10.22323/2.22010205
  • Keles, R. (2012). The quality of life and the environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 23–32. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.059
  • Kim, B., Yoon, E. J., Kim, S., & Lee, D. K. (2020). The effects of risk perceptions related to particulate matter on outdoor activity satisfaction in South Korea. International Journal of Environtal Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1613. doi:10.3390/ijerph17051613
  • Kim, H. K., & Kim, Y. (2021). Protective behaviors against particulate air pollution: Self-construal, risk perception, and direct experience in the theory of planned behavior. Environmental Communication, 15(8), 1092–1108. doi:10.1080/17524032.2021.1944891
  • Kim, M. G., Lee, S. J., Park, D., Kim, C. H., Lee, K. H., & Hwang, J. M. (2020). Relationship between the actual fine dust concentration and media exposure that influenced the changes in outdoor activity behavior in South Korea. Scientific Repports, 10(1), 12006. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-68580-4
  • Kim, S. K., & Lee, E. (2019). Spatial injustice of particulate matter: The case of California. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 23(4), 484–497. doi:10.1080/12265934.2018.1473044
  • Ko, D., & Song, H. (2020). Effects on preventive behavior intention to particulate matter by risk perception attitude and anxiety: Focus on adoption of RPA model. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18(10), 517–526. doi:10.14400/JDC.2020.18.10.517
  • Konisky, D. M., Milyo, J., & Richardson, L. E. (2008). Environmental policy attitudes: Issues, geographical scale, and political trust. Social Science Quarterly, 89(5), 1066–1085. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00574.x
  • Korea Environment Corporation. (n.d.). Air Korea. Retrieved from https://www.airkorea.or.kr/eng/
  • Korea Meteorological Administration. (2022, May 1). According to the current trend, the number of days of atmospheric congestion at the end of the 21st century will increase by up to 58% [Press release]. Retrieved from https://shorturl.at/avzA2
  • Korean Statistical Information Service. (2023). Statistical database. Korean statistical information service. Retrieved from https://kosis.kr/eng/statisticsList/statisticsListIndex.do?parentId = A.1&menuId = M_01_01&vwcd = MT_ETITLE&parmTabId = M_01_01#content-group
  • Kuehnhanss, C. R. (2019). The challenges of behavioural insights for effective policy design. Policy and Society, 38(1), 14–40. doi:10.1080/14494035.2018.1511188
  • Lascoumes, P., & Le Gales, P. (2007). Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments? From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance, 20(1), 1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00342.x
  • Layard, R. (2021). Wellbeing as the goal of policy. LSE Public Policy Review, 2(2), 1–8. doi:10.31389/lseppr.46
  • Lee, J., Kim, H., & Byrne, J. (2021). Operationalising capability thinking in the assessment of energy poverty relief policies: Moving from compensation-based to empowerment-focused policy strategies. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 22(2), 292–315. doi:10.1080/19452829.2021.1887108
  • Lin, T.. (2020). The role of exposure to communication channels, institutional trust and moral norm in predicting PM2.5 risk-reduction intention in China: A study of the theory of planned behavior. [Master's thesis, Syracuse University]. Syracuse. https://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1446&context=thesis
  • Lin, T. T. C., & Bautista, J. R. (2016). Predicting intention to take protective measures during haze: The roles of efficacy, threat, media trust, and affective attitude. Journal of Health Communication, 21(7), 790–799. doi:10.1080/10810730.2016.1157657
  • Lithopoulos, A., Liu, S., Zhang, C.-Q., & Rhodes, R. E. (2021). Predicting physical distancing in the context of COVID-19: A test of the extended parallel process model among Canadian adults. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie Canadienne, 62(1), 56–64. doi:10.1037/cap0000270
  • Liu-Lastres, B., & Wen, H. (2022). Using the extended parallel process model (EPPM) to explore US consumers’ dining behaviors during COVID-19. British Food Journal, 125(3), 921–936. doi:10.1108/bfj-02-2022-0145
  • Lubell, M., Vedlitz, A., Zahran, S., & Alston, L. T. (2006). Collective action, environmental activism, and air quality policy. Political Research Quarterly, 59(1), 149–160.
  • Ma, X., Yang, Y., & Chen, L. (2023). Promoting behaviors to mitigate the effects of climate change: Using the extended parallel process model at the personal and collective level in China. Environmental Communication, 1–17. doi:10.1080/17524032.2023.2181134
  • Mahajan, S., Chung, M.-K., Martinez, J., Olaya, Y., Helbing, D., & Chen, L.-J. (2022). Translating citizen-generated air quality data into evidence for shaping policy. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1)), doi:10.1057/s41599-022-01135-2
  • Majid, U., Wasim, A., Truong, J., & Bakshi, S. (2022). Public trust in governments, health care providers, and the media during pandemics: A systematic review. Journal of Trust Research, 11(2), 119–141. doi:10.1080/21515581.2022.2029742
  • Marquart, H., Schlink, U., & Nagendra, S. M. S. (2022). Complementing mobile measurements with walking interviews: A case study on personal exposure of commuters in Chennai, India. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 26(1), 148–161. doi:10.1080/12265934.2020.1871060
  • McMakin, A. H., & Lundgren, R. E. (2018). Risk communication: A handbook for communicating environmental, safety, and health risks. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Mohanty, M. (1995). On the concept of ‘empowerment’. Economic and Political Weekly, 30(24), 1434–1436.
  • Mukherjee, A., & Agrawal, M. (2017). World air particulate matter: Sources, distribution and health effects. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 15(2), 283–309. doi:10.1007/s10311-017-0611-9
  • Nam, K. M., Li, M., Wang, Y., & Wong, K. K. H. (2019). Spatio-temporal boundary effects on pollution-health costs estimation: The case of PM2.5 pollution in Hong Kong. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 13(4), 498–518. doi:10.1080/12265934.2018.1473044
  • OECD. (2015). Government at a glance 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Ojala, M. (2008). Recycling and ambivalence: Quantitative and qualitative analyses of household recycling among young adults. Environment and Behavior, 40(6), 777–797.
  • Ojala, M. (2012). Hope and climate change: The importance of hope for environmental engagement among young people. Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 625–642.
  • Ojala, M., Cunsolo, A., Ogunbode, C. A., & Middleton, J. (2021). Anxiety, worry, and grief in a time of environmental and climate crisis: A narrative review. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46, 35–58.
  • Ordoñez, C. C., López, J., Guañarita, H. A., & Ordoñez, J. A. (2019). Monitoring and analysis of air quality for community empowerment in environmental health. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1247(1), 012054.
  • Pakmehr, S., Yazdanpanah, M., & Baradaran, M. (2020). How collective efficacy makes a difference in responses to water shortage due to climate change in southwest Iran. Land Use Policy, 99, 104798. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104798
  • Pautz, M. C., & Wamsley, C. S. (2011). Pursuing trust in environmental regulatory interactions. Administration & Society, 44(7), 853–884. doi:10.1177/0095399711429108
  • Popova, L. (2012). The extended parallel process model: Illuminating the gaps in research. Health Education & Behavior, 39(4), 455–473. doi:10.1177/1090198111418108
  • Pu, S., Shao, Z., Fang, M., Yang, L., Liu, R., Bi, J., & Ma, Z. (2019). Spatial distribution of the public's risk perception for air pollution: A nationwide study in China. Science of the Total Environment, 655, 454–462.
  • Ramirez, A. S., Ramondt, S., Van Bogart, K., & Perez-Zuniga, R. (2019). Public awareness of air pollution and health threats: Challenges and opportunities for communication strategies to improve environmental health literacy. Journal of Health Communication, 24(1), 75–83. doi:10.1080/10810730.2019.1574320
  • Rao, S., Klimont, Z., Smith, S. J., Van Dingenen, R., Dentener, F., Bouwman, L., … Tavoni, M. (2017). Future air pollution in the shared socio-economic pathways. Global Environmental Change, 42, 346–358. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.012
  • Reichl, J., Cohen, J. J., Klöckner, C. A., Kollmann, A., & Azarova, V. (2021). The drivers of individual climate actions in Europe. Global Environmental Change, 71, 102390. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102390
  • Riley, R., de Preux, L., Capella, P., Mejia, C., Kajikawa, Y., & de Nazelle, A. (2021). How do we effectively communicate air pollution to change public attitudes and behaviours? A review. Sustainability Science, 1–21. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-01038-2
  • Ruan, H., Qiu, L., Chen, J., Liu, S., & Ma, Z. (2022). Government trust, environmental pollution perception, and environmental governance satisfaction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16), 9929. doi:10.3390/ijerph19169929
  • Ruan, W., Kang, S., & Song, H. (2020). Applying protection motivation theory to understand international tourists’ behavioural intentions under the threat of air pollution: A case of Beijing, China. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(16), 2027–2041. doi:10.1080/13683500.2020.1743242
  • Sangervo, J., Jylhä, K. M., & Pihkala, P. (2022). Climate anxiety: Conceptual considerations, and connections with climate hope and action. Global Environmental Change, 76, 102569. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102569
  • Seoul Research Institute of Public Health and Environment. (2021). 2020 Seoul Air Quality Report.
  • Sexton, K. (2013). Evolution of public participation in the assessment and management of environmental health risks: A brief history of developments in the United States. Journal of Public Health Research, 2(2279-9028 (Print)), 106–112.
  • Sianipar, C. P. M., Yudoko, G., Adhiutama, A., & Dowaki, K. (2013). Community empowerment through appropriate technology: Sustaining the sustainable development. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 17, 1007–1016. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2013.02.120
  • Simon, B. L. (1994). The empowerment tradition in American social work: A history. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Sisco, M. R., O’Brien, S., Constantino, S. M., Aleluia Reis, L., & Bosetti, V. (2022). Humans are dangerously unaware of and unresponsive to daily air pollution a multi-national study on human worry, awareness, and adaptation to air pollution. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id = 4144380
  • So, J. (2013). A further extension of the Extended Parallel Process Model (E-EPPM): implications of cognitive appraisal theory of emotion and dispositional coping style. Health Communication, 28(1), 72–83. doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.708633
  • So, J., Kuang, K., & Cho, H. (2016). Reexamining fear appeal models from cognitive appraisal theory and functional emotion theory perspectives. Communication Monographs, 83(1), 120–144. doi:10.1080/03637751.2015.1044257
  • Southerland, V. A., Brauer, M., Mohegh, A., Hammer, M. S., van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., … Anenberg, S. C. (2022). Global urban temporal trends in fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) and attributable health burdens: Estimates from global datasets. Lancet Planet Health, 6(2), e139–e146. doi:10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00350-8
  • Statistics Korea. (2022). Report on the social survey. Retrieved from https://kostat.go.kr/board.es?mid = a10301060300&bid = 219&act = view&list_no = 421772
  • Suldovsky, B., & Frank, L. (2022). Strengthening public engagement on environmental hazards: Insights from cross-disciplinary air pollution research. Environmental Hazards, 21(3), 218–234. doi:10.1080/17477891.2021.1938506
  • Tannenbaum, M. B., Hepler, J., Zimmerman, R. S., Saul, L., Jacobs, S., Wilson, K., & Albarracin, D. (2015). Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories. Psychological Bulletin, 141(6), 1178–1204. doi:10.1037/a0039729
  • Tengland, P. A. (2008). Empowerment: A conceptual discussion. Health Care Analysis, 16(2), 77–96. doi:10.1007/s10728-007-0067-3
  • Thaker, J., Howe, P., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. (2019). Perceived collective efficacy and trust in government influence public engagement with climate change-related water conservation policies. Environmental Communication, 13(5), 681–699. doi:10.1080/17524032.2018.1438302
  • Trettin, L., & Musham, C. (2000). Is trust a realistic goal of environmental risk communication? Environment and Behavior, 32(3), 410–426. doi:10.1177/00139160021972595
  • Tummers, L. (2019). Public policy and behavior change. Public Administration Review, 79(6), 925–930. doi:10.1111/puar.13109
  • Turner, M. M., Rimal, R. N., Morrison, D., & Kim, H. (2006). The role of anxiety in seeking and retaining risk information: Testing the risk perception attitude framework in two studies. Human Communication Research, 32(2), 130–156. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00006.x
  • Ugwu, F. O., Onyishi, I. E., & Rodríguez-Sánchez, A. M. (2014). Linking organizational trust with employee engagement: The role of psychological empowerment. Personnel Review, 43(3), 377–400. doi:10.1108/pr-11-2012-0198
  • UNEP. (2021). Pollution action note – data you need to know. Retrieved from https://www.unep.org/interactive/air-pollution-note/?gclid = Cj0KCQiAnsqdBhCGARIsAAyjYjROUMTnpYqP4G8CiN-leAozyngbMyC6JfL_QTPpsQSu27TKtxlynFcaAkXlEALw_wcB
  • Vahle, J. L. (2013). Chapter 32 - risk communication for toxicologic pathologists. In W. M. Haschek, C. G. Rousseaux, & M. A. Wallig (Eds.), Haschek and Rousseaux's handbook of toxicologic pathology (3rd ed.). (pp. 999–1008). Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-415759-0.00032-7
  • van Zomeren, M., Pauls, I. L., & Cohen-Chen, S. (2019). Is hope good for motivating collective action in the context of climate change? Differentiating hope’s emotion- and problem-focused coping functions. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101915. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.04.003
  • Vincenz, L. M. (1990). Development of the Vincenz empowerment scale. College Park: University of Maryland.
  • Wang, Z. H., Zhao, W. H., Wang, B., Liu, J., Xu, S. L., Zhang, B., … Guan, D. B. (2022). Environmentally vulnerable or sensitive groups exhibiting varying concerns toward air pollution can drive government response to improve air quality. iScience, 25(6), 104460. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104460
  • WHO. (2021). WHO global air quality guidelines: Particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. World Health Organization. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/345329
  • WHO. (2022a). Ambient (outdoor) air pollution. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-air-quality-and-health
  • WHO. (2022b). Compendium of WHO and other UN guidance on health and environment: 2022 update (Chapter 2. Air pollution). Retrieved from https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/environmental-health-impact/who_compendium_air_pollution_01042022_eo_final.pdf?sfvrsn = 1c4cecb5_3
  • Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communications Monographs, 59(4), 329–349.
  • Witte, K. (1994). Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communications Monographs, 61(2), 113–134.
  • Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27(5), 591–615.
  • Wu, G., Deng, X., & Liu, B. (2021). Using fear appeal theories to understand the effects of location information of patients on citizens during the COVID-19 pandemic. Current Psychology, 1–13. doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01953-8
  • Xu, Y., Liu, Y., Chang, X., & Huang, W. (2021). How does air pollution affect travel behavior? A big data field study. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 99, 103007. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2021.103007
  • Yang, F., & Huang, Z. (2021). Health communication and trust in institutions during the COVID-19 lockdown in China's urban communities. Urban Governance, 1(1), 17–22. doi:10.1016/j.ugj.2021.10.001
  • Yeo, M. J., & Kim, Y. P. (2019). Trends of the PM10 concentrations and high PM10 concentration cases in Korea. Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 35(2), 249–264. doi:10.5572/kosae.2019.35.2.249
  • Yoon, H., You, M., & Shon, C. (2022). An application of the extended parallel process model to protective behaviors against COVID-19 in South Korea. PLoS One, 17(3), e0261132. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261132
  • Yu, Y., Lau, J. T. F., & Lau, M. M. C. (2022). Competing or interactive effect between perceived response efficacy of governmental social distancing behaviors and personal freedom on social distancing behaviors in the Chinese adult general population in Hong Kong. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 11(4), 498–507. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2020.195
  • Zajchowski, C. A. B., Brownlee, M. T. J., Blacketer, M. J., Rose, J., Rumore, D. L., Watson, J. M., & Dustin, D. L. (2019). Can you take me higher?”: Normative thresholds for air quality in the Salt Lake City Metropolitan Area. Journal of Leisure Research, 50(2), 157–180. doi:10.1080/00222216.2018.1560238
  • Zajchowski, C. A. B., Koenigstorfer, J., & Mostafanezhad, M. (2023). Human dimensions of air quality: Introduction to the special issue. Society & Natural Resources, doi:10.1080/08941920.2023.2226628
  • Zajchowski, C. A. B., & Rose, J. (2020). Sensitive leisure: Writing the lived experience of air pollution. Leisure Sciences, 42(1), 1–14. doi:10.1080/01490400.2018.1448026

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.