Rigidness of planning law causing fragile grounds for crafting planning tools: neoliberal power and ideology immersed on urban space

References

• Aksoy, A. (2012). Riding the Strom: “New Istanbul”. City: Analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 16(1-2), 93–111. doi:10.1080/13604813.2012.662373
   Google Scholar
• Balaban, O. (2016). İnşaat sektörü neyin lokomotifi [What the construction sector islocomotive of]. İnşaat Ya Resulullah. İstanbul: Birikim Kitapları, 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bank, A., & Karadag, R. (2012). The political Economy of regional Power: Turkey under the AKP, GIGA working papers, 204.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco, H. (1995). Community and the four jewels of planning. In S. Hendler (Ed.), A reader in planning ethics: Planning theory, practice and education (pp. 66–82). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, P. (2005). The nature of difference: Traditions of law and government and their effects on planning in Britain and France. In B. Sanyal (Ed.), Comparative planning cultures (1st ed.) (pp. 259–284). London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203826508.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). After neoliberalization? Globalizations, 7(3), 327–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism.’. In N. Brenner, & N. Theodore (Eds.), Spaces of neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe (pp. 1–32). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2006). American nightmare: Neoliberalism, neoconservatism, and de-democratization. Political Theory, 34(6), 690–714. doi:10.1177/0090591706293016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugra, A., & Savaskan, O. (2014). New capitalism in Turkey: The relationship between politics, religion and business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cavusoglu, E. (2016). İnşaata Dayalı Büyüme Modelinin Yeni-Osmanlıcılıkla Bütünleşerek Ulusal Popüler Proje Haline Gelişi: Kadim İdeoloji Korporatizme AKP Makyajı [Integration of the Construction Based Growth Model with New Ottomanism in Turning into a Popular National Project]. In T. Bora (Ed.), İnşaat Ya Resulullah [Construction for the Prophet’s Sake] (pp. 77–94). Birikim: İstanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Dikeç, M., & Swyngedouw, E. (2017). Theorizing the politicizing city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(1), 1–18. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drozdz, M., Appert, M., & Harris, A. (2017). High-Rise urbanism in contemporary Europe. Built Environment, 43(4), 469–480.
   Google Scholar
• Eraydin, A., & Tasan-Kok, T. (2013). Introduction: Resilience thinking in urban planning. In A. Eraydin, & T. Tasan-Kok (Eds.), Resilience thinking in urban planning (pp. 1–16). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ersoy, M. (2001). A critical evaluation of planning system in Turkey: Democracy through decentralization. Shanghai: World Planning Schools Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., & Richardson, T. (2002). Planning and foucault: In search of the dark side of planning theory. In P. Allmendinger, & M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds.), Planning futures : New directions for planning theory (pp. 44–62). London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, L. R. (2008). World cities and global change: observations on monumentality in urban design. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 49(3), 237–262. doi:10.2747/15397216.49.3.237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1994). Power: Essential works of foucault 1954-1984. Vol. 3. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Genç, F., Keyder, Ç, Keyman, E. F., & Badur, A. K. (2021). Kentlerin Türkiyesi: İmkânlar, Sınırlar ve Çatışmalar [Turkey of Cities: Opportunities, Borders and Conflicts]. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1976). Social justice and the city. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2005). Spaces of neoliberalization: Towards a theory of uneven geographical development. Munich: Franz Steiner Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2006a). The limits to capital. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2006b). The political economy of public space. In S. Low, & N. Smith (Eds.), The politics of public space (pp. 17–34). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. (2002). Shadows of power: An allegory of prudence in land-use planning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2002). Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance: A state–theoretical perspective. Antipode, 34(3), 452–472. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaman, O. (2013). Urban neoliberalism with Islamic characteristics. Urban Studies, 50(16), 3412–3427. doi:10.1177/0042098013482505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyder, Ç, & Öncü, A. (1994). Globalization of a third-world metropolis: Istanbul in the 1980s. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 17(3), 383–421. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40241297.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, L. (2018). Always crashing in the same city. City, 22(1), 152–168. doi:10.1080/13604813.2018.1434295
   Google Scholar
• Nethercote, M. (2018). Theorising vertical urbanisation. City, 22(5-6), 657–684. doi:10.1080/13604813.2018.1549832
   Google Scholar
• Oncu, A. (1988). The politics of the urban land market in Turkey: 1950-1980. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 12(1), 38–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, A. (2006). Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ozdemir Sonmez, F. N. (2017). Planlamada Yeni Yasal Düzenlemeler – Recent Legal Regulations in Planning. In S. S. Ozdemir, O. Burcu Ozdemir Sarı, & N. Uzun (Eds.), Kent Planlama – Urban Planning, İmge. Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2005). Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(4), 740–770. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00620.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., Theodore, N., & Brenner, N. (2009). Neoliberal urbanism: Models, moments, mutations. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 29(1), 49–66. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27000166.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, K., & Aksoy, A. (1996). Istanbul between civilisation and discontent. City, 1(5), 6–33. doi:10.1080/13604819608713454
   Google Scholar
• Ruming, K. J. (2005). Partnership, master planning and state provision: A case study of 'Actually existing neoliberalism' on the central coast of New South Wales. Geographical Research, 43(1), 82–92. doi:10.1111/j.1745-5871.2005.00299.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, T. (2011). Neo-liberal urban planning policies: A literature survey 1990–2010. Progress in Planning, 76(4), 147–199. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2011.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanli, T., & Townshend, T. (2018). Hegemonic power relations in real practices of spatial planning: The case of Turkey. European Planning Studies, 26(6), 1242–1268. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1448755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanyal, B. (2005). Hybrid planning cultures: The search for the global cultural commons. In B. Sanyal (Ed.), Comparative planning cultures (pp. 3–25). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Serin, B., Smith, H., & McWilliams, C. (2020). The role of the state in the commodification of urban space: The case of branded housing projects, Istanbul. European Urban and Regional Studies, 27(4), 342–358. doi:10.1177/0969776420920921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, H. B. (2014). Contesting speculative urbanisation and strategising discontents. City, 18(4-5), 509–516. doi:10.1080/13604813.2014.939471
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. (2008). Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• ŞPOİST. (2017). TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası İstanbul Şubesi: İstanbul Kent Almanağı 2016, Kurumsal Baskı Hizmetleri Sanayi Ticaret Ltd. Şti, July, pp.277-289.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, E. (2000). An integrative theory of urban design. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(3), 265–278. doi:10.1080/01944360008976106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekeli, I. (2001). Modernite asilirken kent planlamasi. Ankara: Imge.
   Google Scholar
• TUİK. (2021). Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, Adrese Dayalı Nüfus Kayıt Sistemi Sonuçları, 2020 URL: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Adrese-Dayali-Nufus-Kayit-Sistemi-Sonuclari-2020-37210 accessed 21.03.2021].
   Google Scholar
• Turkun, A. (2011). Urban regeneration and hegemonic power relationships. International Planning Studies, 16(1), 61–72. doi:10.1080/13563475.2011.552473
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. (2012). Three steps to a historical anthropology of actually existing neoliberalism. Social Anthropology, 20(1), 66–79. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8676.2011.00189.x
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, A. (2020). Planning culture – dynamics of power relations between actors. European Planning Studies, 28(11), 2213–2236. doi:10.1080/09654313.2020.1714553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavuz, H. (2003). Islamic political identity in Turkey. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yiftachel, O. (1998). Planning and social control: Exploring the dark side. Journal of Planning Literature, 12(4), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/088541229801200401
   Google Scholar