Filtering politicisation towards a more social Europe? The European Parliament and EU social legislation

References

• Ahrens, P., & Abels, G. (2017). Die Macht zu gestalten – die Mutterschutzrichtlinie im legislativen Bermuda-Dreieck der Europäischen Union. FEMINA POLITICA – Zeitschrift für Feministische Politikwissenschaft, 26(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.3224/feminapolitica.v26i1.03
   Google Scholar
• Ahrens, P., Gaweda, B., & Kantola, J. (2022). Reframing the language of human rights? Political group contestations on women’s and LGBTQI rights in European Parliament debates. Journal of European Integration, 44(6), 803–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2021.2001647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy. Pearson Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Berthet, V. (2022). Norm under fire: Support for and opposition to the European union’s ratification of the Istanbul convention in the European parliament. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 24(5), 675–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2022.2034510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A., Broniecki, P., Hartlapp, M., & Obholzer, L. (2023). Contesting Europe: Eurosceptic dissent and integration polarization in the European parliament. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 61(4), 1100–1118. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brack, N., & Behm, A. S. (2022). How do Eurosceptics wage opposition in the European Parliament? Patterns of behaviour in the 8th legislature. In P. Ahrens, A. Elomäki, & J. Kantola (Eds.), European parliament’s political groups in turbulent times (pp. 147–172). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brack, N., & Costa, O. (2018). Democracy in parliament vs. democracy through parliament? Defining the rules of the game in the European Parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 24(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2018.1444625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremer, B., & McDaniel, S. (2020). The ideational foundations of social democratic austerity in the context of the great recession. Socio-Economic Review, 18(2), 439–463. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwz001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressanelli, E., & Chelotti, N. (2018). The European Parliament and economic governance: Explaining a case of limited influence. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 24(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2018.1444627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressanelli, E., Koop, C., & Reh, C. (2020). EU Actors under pressure: Politicisation and depoliticisation as strategic responses. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1713193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulmer, S., & Burch, M. (1998). Organizing For Europe: Whitehall, The British state and European union. Public Administration, 76(4), 601–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, P. (2022). The Juncker Commission as a politicising bricoleur and the renewed momentum in social Europe. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 60(6), 1629–1644. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, P., & Daly, M. (2012). Varieties of poverty reduction: Inserting the poverty and social exclusion target into Europe 2020. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(3), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928712440203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespy, A., & Gajewska, K. (2010). New parliament, new cleavages after the eastern enlargement? The conflict over the services directive as an opposition between the liberals and the regulators. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(5), 1185–1208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02109.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crum, B. (2020). Party groups and ideological cleavages in the European Parliament after the 2019 elections. In S. Kritzinger, C. Pledcia, K. Raube, J. Wilhelm, & J. Wouters (Eds.), Assessing the 2019 European parliament elections (pp. 54–65). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Ville, F., & Gheyle, N. (2024). How TTIP split the social-democrats: Reacting to the politicisation of EU trade policy in the European parliament. Journal of European Public Policy, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2223226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wilde, P., Leupold, A., & Schmidtke, H. (2016). Introduction: The differentiated politicisation of European governance. West European Politics, 39(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1081505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diogini, M. K. (2017). Lobbying in the European parliament. Battle for influence. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Elomäki, A. (2023). Austerity and its alternatives in the European parliament: From the Eurozone crisis to the COVID-19 crisis. Comparative European Politics, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-023-00363-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elomäki, A., & Gaweda, B. (2022). Looking for the ‘social’ in the European semester: The ambiguous ‘socialisation’ of EU economic governance in the European parliament. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 18(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v18i1.1227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genschel, P., & Jachtenfuchs, M. (2014). Introduction: Beyond market regulation. Analysing the European integration of core state powers. In P. Genschel, & M. Jachtenfuchs (Eds.), Beyond the regulatory polity? The European integration of core State powers (pp. 1–23). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., & Taylor, R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, S., Noury, A. G., & Roland, G. (2007). Democratic politics in the European parliament. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From PermissiveConsensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantola, J. (2022). Parliamentary politics and polarisation around gender: Tackling inequalities in political groups in the European Parliament. In P. Ahrens, A. Elomäki, & J. Kantola (Eds.), European parliament’s political groups in turbulent times (pp. 221–243). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kantola, J., Elomäki, A., & Ahrens, P. (2022). Introduction: European parliament’s politics groups in turbulent times. In P. Ahrens, A. Elomäki, & J. Kantola (Eds.), European parliament’s political groups in turbulent times (pp. 1–23). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kreppel, A., & Hix, S. (2003). From ‘grand coalition’ to left-right confrontation: Explaining the shifting structure of party competition in the European Parliament. Comparative Political Studies, 36(1-2), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414002239372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibfried, S. (2010). Social policy: Left to the markets and the judges. In H. Wallace, W. Wallace, & M. Pollack (Eds.), Policy making in the European union (pp. 253–282). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, C. (2018). The European Parliament: A working parliament without a public? The Journal of Legislative Studies, 24(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2018.1444624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michon, S., & Weill, P. E. (2023). An ‘East-West split’ about the posting of workers? Questioning the representation of socio-economic interests in the European Parliament. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 31(3), 719–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2022.2029370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, S., Rozenberg, O., & Bendjaballah, S. (2021). Enduring consensus: Why the EU legislative process stays the same. Journal of European Integration, 43(4), 475–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2020.1800679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petri, F., & Biedenkopf, K. (2021). Weathering growing polarization? The European Parliament and EU foreign climate policy ambitions. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(7), 1057–1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripoll Servent, A. (2015). Institutional and policy change in the European Parliament: Deciding on freedom, security and justice. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ripoll Servent, A. (2018). The European parliament. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ripoll Servent, A. (2019). The European parliament after the 2019 elections: Testing the boundaries of the 'Cordon sanitaire'. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 15(4), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v15i4.1121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos, M. (2021). The parliamentary roots of European social policy: Turning talk into power. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2020). Politicisation management in the European union. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 342–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1712458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settembri, P., & Neuhold, C. (2009). Achieving consensus through committees: Does the European parliament manage?*. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(1), 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.01835.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, K., & Steinmo, S. (1992). Historical Institutionalism in comparative politics. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, & F. Longstreth (Eds.), Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis (pp. 1–32). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vesan, P., & Corti, F. (2019). New tensions over social Europe? The European pillar of social rights and the debate within the European parliament. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(5), 977–994. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesan, P., Corti, F., & Sabato, S. (2021). The European commission's entrepreneurship and the social dimension of the European semester: From the European pillar of social rights to the COVID-19 pandemic. Comparative European Politics, 19(3), 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-020-00227-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendler, F. (2019). The European Parliament as an arena and agent in the politics of climate change: Comparing the external and internal dimension. Politics and Governance, 7(3), 327–338. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i3.2156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yordanova, N. (2009). The rationale behind committee assignment in the European Parliament: Distributive, informational and partisan perspectives. European Union Politics, 10(2), 253–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116509103377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar