The tale of uncertain choices: inclusion versus exclusion

References

• Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). Resting on laurels: The effects of discrete progress markers as subgoals on task performance and preferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(5), 1158–1171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, L. R. (1993). Broadening the definition of decision making: The role of prechoice screening of options. Psychological Science, 4(4), 215–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birrell, J., Meares, K., Wilkinson, A., & Freeston, M. (2011). Towards a definition of intolerance of uncertainty: A review of factor analytical studies of intolerance of uncertainty scale. Clinical Psychological Review, 31(7), 1198–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?. Perspectives on Psychological Science : A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell, D. J. (1988). Task complexity: A review and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 40–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carleton, R. N. (2012). The intolerance of uncertainty construct in the context of anxiety disorders: Theoretical and practical perspectives. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 12(8), 937–947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carleton, R. N. (2016). Into the unknown: A review and synthesis of contemporary models involving uncertainty. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 39, 30–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carleton, R. N., Mulvogue, M. K., Thibodeau, M. A., McCabe, R. E., Antony, M. M., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2012). Increasingly certain about uncertainty: Intolerance of uncertainty across anxiety and depression. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26(3), 468–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carleton, R. N., Norton, M. A. P. J., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2007). Fearing the unknown: A short version of the intolerance of uncertainty scale. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21(1), 105–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandran, S., & Menon, G. (2004). When a day means more than a year: Effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 375–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, P. C., & Spires, E. E. (2003). Perceptions of accuracy and effort of decision strategies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91(2), 203–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronley, M. L., Mantel, S. P., & Kardes, F. R. (2010). Effects of accuracy motivation and need to evaluate on mode of attitude formation and attitude behavior consistency. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(3), 274–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, K. K., & Hoyer, W. D. (2000). Descriptive characteristics of memory-based consideration sets: Influence of usage occasion frequency and usage location familiarity. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(3), 309–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diggle, P. J., Heagerty, P., Liang, K., & Zeger, S. L. (2002). Analysis of longitudinal data. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, D., & Perretta, S. (2002). Automaticity and eyewitness accuracy: A 10- to 12-second rule for distinguishing accurate from inaccurate positive identifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 951–962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, A. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Fennema, M. G., & Kleinmuntz, D. N. (1995). Anticipations of effort and accuracy in multiattribute choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(1), 21–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, P. (2011). Selective exposure decision uncertainty, and cognitive economy: A new theoretical perspective onconfirmatory information search. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(10), 751–762.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, G. W., Luce, M. F., & Jia, J. (2000). Attribute conflict and preference uncertainty: Effects on judgment time and error. Management Science, 46(1), 88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3), 213–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, F. (1976). Psychological theories of consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 3(3), 117–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harte, J. M., & Koele, P. (2001). Modelling and describing human judgement processes: The multiattribute evaluation case. Thinking & Reasoning, 7(1), 29–49.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, J. H., & Wernerfelt, B. (1990). An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(4), 393–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, D., Levin, I. P., & Goransson, M. (2002). Selection of strategies for narrowing choice options: Antecedents and consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(2), 1194–1213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, V. L., Neale, M. A., & Northcraft, G. B. (1987). Decision bias and personnel selection strategies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40(1), 136–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugenberg, K., Bodenhausen, G. V., & McLain, M. (2006). Framing discrimination: Effects of inclusion versus exclusion mind-sets on stereotypic judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1020–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, J. R., & Naylor, R. W. (2009). Ethical decisions and response mode compatibility: Weighting of ethical attributes in consideration sets formed by excluding versus including product alternatives. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(2), 234–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, B. E., & Meyer, R. J. (1991). Consumer multiattribute judgments under attribute-weight uncertainty. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 508–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogut, T. (2011). Choosing what I want or keeping what I should: The effect of decision strategy on choice consistency. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(1), 129–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, I. P., Huneke, M. E., & Jasper, J. D. (2000). Information processing at successive stages of decision making: Need for cognition and inclusion–exclusion effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(2), 171–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, I. P., Jasper, J. D., & Forbes, W. S. (1998). Choosing versus rejecting options at different stages of decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11(3), 193–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, I. P., Prosansky, C. M., Heller, D., & Brunick, B. M. (2001). Prescreening of choice options in 'positive' and 'negative' decision-making tasks. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14(4), 279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, I. P., Schreiber, J., Lauriola, M., & Gaeth, G. J. (2002). A tale of two pizzas: Building up from a basic product versus scaling down from a fully-loaded product. Marketing Letters, 13(4), 335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipshitz, R., & Strauss, O. (1997). Coping with uncertainty: A naturalistic decision-making analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 149–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohse, G. L., & Johnson, E. J. (1996). A comparison of two process tracing methods for choice tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68(1), 28–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metrick, A. (1995). A natural experiment in "jeopardy!". The American Economic Review, 85(1), 240–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. J. (1987). The learning of multiattribute judgment policies. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(2), 155–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mourali, M., & Nagpal, A. (2013). The powerful select, the powerless reject: Power's influence in decision strategies. Journal of Business Research, 66(7), 874–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, B. R., Rakow, T., Weston, N. J., & Shanks, D. R. (2004). Search strategies in decision making: The success of "success". Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17(2), 117–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor, M., Remus, W., & Griggs, K. (1993). Judgemental forecasting in times of change. International Journal of Forecasting, 9(2), 163–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C. W., Jun, S. Y., & MacInnis, D. J. (2000). Choosing what I want versus rejecting what I do not want: An application of decision framing to product option choice decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), 187–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, J. W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision-making" An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 366–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schoemaker, P. J. H. (2004). Forecasting and scenario planning: The challenges of uncertainty and complexity. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 274–296). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Shafir, E. (1993). Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others. Memory & Cognition, 21(4), 546–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L., Fishbach, A., & Hsee, C. K. (2015). The Motivating-uncertainty effect: Uncertainty increases resource investment in the process of reward pursuit. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(5), 1301–1315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, J., Connolly, T., & Beach, L. R. (1995). Do ranks suffice? A comparison of alternative weighting approaches in value elicitation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(1), 112–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. N., & Ziebart, D. A. (1995). A model of financial incentive effects in decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61(3), 250–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbany, J. E., Dickson, P. R., & Wilkie, W. L. (1989). Buyer uncertainty and information search. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2), 208–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weary, G., & Edwards, J. A. (1996). Causal-uncertainty beliefs and related goal structures. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol.3). The interpersonal context (pp. 148–181). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weary, G., Tobin, S. J., & Edwards, J. A. (2010). The causal uncertainty model revisited. In R. M. Arkin, K. C. Oleson, & P. J. Carroll (Eds.), Handbook of the uncertain self (pp. 78–100). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winer, R. S. (1999). Experimentation in the 21st Century: The Importance of external validity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(3), 349–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaniv, I., & Schul, Y. (1997). Elimination and inclusion procedures in judgment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10(3), 211–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaniv, I., & Schul, Y. (2000). Acceptance and elimination procedures in choice: Noncomplementarity and the role of implied status quo. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(2), 293–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaniv, I., Schul, Y., Raphaelli-Hirsch, R., & Maoz, I. (2002). Inclusive and exclusive modes of thinking: Studies of prediction, preference, and social perception during parliamentary elections. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(4), 352–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziva, K. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar