Publication Cover
Neurocase
Behavior, Cognition and Neuroscience
Volume 23, 2017 - Issue 2
810
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Can 8 months of daily tDCS application slow the cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease? A case study

, , &
Pages 146-148 | Received 19 Jun 2016, Accepted 21 Apr 2017, Published online: 09 May 2017

References

  • Andrade, C. (2013). Once-to twice-daily, 3-year domiciliary maintenance transcranial direct current stimulation for severe, disabling, clozapine-refractory continuous auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia. The Journal of ECT, 29, 239–242. doi:10.1097/YCT.0b013e3182843866
  • Berlim, M. T., Van den Eynde, F., & Daskalakis, Z. J. (2013). Clinical utility of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for treating major depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 47, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.09.025
  • Bernick, C., Cummings, J., Raman, R., Sun, X., & Aisen, P. (2012). Age and rate of cognitive decline in Alzheimer disease: Implications for clinical trials. Archives of Neurology, 69, 901–905. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2011.3758
  • Boggio, P. S., Ferrucci, R., Mameli, F., Martins, D., Martins, O., Vergari, M., … Priori, A. (2012). Prolonged visual memory enhancement after direct current stimulation in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Stimulation, 5, 223–230. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2011.06.006
  • Brunoni, A. R., Nitsche, M. A., Bolognini, N., Bikson, M., Wagner, T., Merabet, L., … Fregni, F. (2012). Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Challenges and future directions. Brain Stimulation, 5, 175–195. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2011.03.002
  • Dubois, B., Feldman, H. H., Jacova, C., DeKosky, S. T., Barberger-Gateau, P., Cummings, J., … Scheltens, P. (2007). Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: Revising the NINCDS–ADRDA criteria. The Lancet Neurology, 6, 734–746. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70178-3
  • Duff, K., Beglinger, L. J., Schoenberg, M. R., Patton, D. E., Mold, J., Scott, J. G., & Adams, R. L. (2005). Test-retest stability and practice effects of the RBANS in a community dwelling elderly sample. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27, 565–575. doi:10.1080/13803390490918363
  • Duff, K., Humphreys Clark, J. D., Obryant, S. E., Mold, J. W., Schiffer, R. B., & Sutker, P. B. (2008). Utility of the RBANS in detecting cognitive impairment associated with Alzheimer’s disease: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive powers. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23, 603–612. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2008.06.004
  • Elder, G. J., & Taylor, J.-P. (2014). Transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation: Treatments for cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms in the neurodegenerative dementias? Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy, 6, 74. doi:10.1186/s13195-014-0074-1
  • Fregni, F., Nitsche, M. A., Loo, C. K., Brunoni, A. R., Marangolo, P., Leite, J., … Bikson, M. (2015). Regulatory considerations for the clinical and research use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Review and recommendations from an expert panel. Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs, 32, 22–35. doi:10.3109/10601333.2015.980944
  • Hsu, W.-Y., Ku, Y., Zanto, T. P., & Gazzaley, A. (2015). Effects of noninvasive brain stimulation on cognitive function in healthy aging and Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurobiology of Aging, 36, 2348–2359. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.04.016
  • Kessler, S. K., Turkeltaub, P. E., Benson, J. G., & Hamilton, R. H. (2012). Differences in the experience of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimulation, 5, 155–162. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2011.02.007
  • Murphy, D. N., Boggio, P., & Fregni, F. (2009). Transcranial direct current stimulation as a therapeutic tool for the treatment of major depression: Insights from past and recent clinical studies. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 22, 306–311. doi:10.1097/YCO.0b013e32832a133f
  • Syse, A. (2000). Norway: Valid (as opposed to informed) consent. The Lancet, 356, 1347–1348. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02828-2

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.