Interprofessional spanning and building boundaries when supporting potential embryo donors to stem cell research

References

• Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labour. London, UK: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy of Management Reviews, 2(2), 217–230.
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, T. (2005). The distress of infertility: Some thoughts after 22 years of infertility counseling. In P. R. Brinsden (Ed.), Textbook of IVF and assisted reproduction: The Bourn Hall guide to clinical and laboratory practice (3rd ed.). London, UK: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Boivin, J., Scanlan, L. C., & Walker, S. M. (1999). Why are infertile patients not using psychosocial counseling. Human Reproduction, 14(5), 1384–1391. doi:10.1093/humrep/14.5.1384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Covaleski, M. A., Dirsmith, M. W., & Rittenberg, L. (2003). Jurisdictional disputes over professional work: The institutionalization of the global knowledge expert. Accounting Organizations and Society, 28(4), 323–355. doi:10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00029-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Amour, D., Ferrada-Videla, M., Rodriguez, L. S. M., & Beaulieu, M.-D. (2005). The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: Core concepts and theoretical frameworks. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(Suppl. 1), 116–131. doi:10.1080/13561820500082529
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edmunds, J., & Calnan, M. W. (2001). The reprofessionalisation of community pharmacy? An exploration of attitudes to extended roles for community pharmacists amongst pharmacists and general practitioners in the United Kingdom. Social Science & Medicine, 53(7), 943–955. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00393-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, R. G., & Ahuja, K. K. (2001). Legal cases spell big trouble and great opportunities for IVF embryologists. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2(1), 70–71. doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62190-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ehrich, K., Williams, C., Rosamund, S., Sandall, J., & Farsides, B. (2006). Social welfare, genetic welfare? Boundary-work in the IVF/PGD clinic. Social Science & Medicine, 63(5), 1213–1224. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilertsen, M. E. B., Kristiansen, K., Reinfjell, T., Rannestad, T., Indredavik, M. S., & Vik, T. (2009). Professional collaboration – support for children with cancer and their families – focus group interview – a source of information and knowledge – professionals’ perspectives. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 23, 355–368. doi:10.1080/13561820902881726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier, V. (2000). Boundary work and the (un)making of the professions. In N. Malin (Ed.), Professionalism, boundaries and the workplace. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, S. (1990). Deconstructing desperateness: The social construction of infertility in popular representations of new reproductive technologies. In M. McNeil, I. Varcoe, & S. Yearley (Eds.), The new reproductive technologies. London, UK: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, S. (2006). Embryonic economies: The double reproductive value of stem cells. Biosocieties, 1(1), 71–90. doi:10.1017/S1745855205040081
   Google Scholar
• Freeth, D. (2001). Sustaining interprofessional collaboration. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 15, 37–46. doi:10.1080/13561820020022864
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gachoud, D., Albert, M., Kuper, A., Stroud, L., & Reeves, S. (2012). Meanings and perceptions of patient-centeredness in social work, nursing and medicine: A comparative study. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 26, 484–490. doi:10.3109/13561820.2012.717553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gesler, W., Bell, M., Curtis, S., Hubbard, P., & Francis, S. (2004). Therapy by design: Evaluating the UK hospital building program. Health & Place, 10(2), 117–128. doi:10.1016/S1353-8292(03)00052-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795. doi:10.2307/2095325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, D., Pope, C., Mort, M., & Smith, A. (2005). Access, boundaries and their effects: Legitimate participation in anaesthesia. Sociology of Health & Illness, 27(6), 855–871. doi:10.1111/shil.2005.27.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardey, M., Payne, S., Powell, J., Hawker, S., & Kerr, C. (2001). Professional territories and the fragmented landscape of elderly care. Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, 121(3), 159–164. doi:10.1177/146642400112100312
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haug, M. R. (1973). Deprofessionalization: An alternative hypothesis for the future. Sociological Review Monograph, 20(S1), 195–211. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1972.tb03217.x
   Google Scholar
• Haug, M. R. (1988). A re-examination of the hypothesis of physician deprofessionalization. The Millbank Quarterly, 66(sup2), 48–56. doi:10.2307/3349914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heldal, F. (2010). Multidisciplinary collaboration as a loosely coupled system: Integrating and blocking professional boundaries with objects. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 24, 19–30. doi:10.3109/13561820903078322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (1995). The active interview. London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. (2012a). A review of the HFEA’s sperm and egg donation policies – 2011. Retrieved from http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/2011-01-13_Donation_review_background.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. (2012b). National donation strategy group. Retrieved from http://www.hfea.gov.uk/7138.html
   Google Scholar
• Jonlin, E. C. (2015). The voices of the embryo donors. Trends in Molecular Medicine, 21(2), 55–57. doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2014.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroeger, F., & Bachmann, R. (2014). Trusting across boundaries. In J. Langan-Fox, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Boundary-spanning in organizations: Network, influence, and conflict (pp. 253–284). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews. London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Langan-Fox, J., & Cooper, C. L. (2014). Boundary-spanning in organizations: Network, influence, and conflict. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lomax, G. P., & Trounson, A. O. (2013). Correcting misperceptions about cryopreserved embryos and stem cell research. Nature Biotechnology, 31(4), 288–290. doi:10.1038/nbt.2541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machin, L. L. (2011). A hierarchy of needs? Embryo donation, in vitro fertilisation and the provision of infertility counselling. Patient Education and Counseling, 85(2), 264–268. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machin, L. L., Brown, N., & McLeod, D. (2012). ‘Two’s company – three’s a crowd’: The collection of umbilical cord blood for commercial stem cell banks in England and the midwifery profession. Midwifery, 28(3), 358–365. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2011.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesler, M. A. (1991). Boundary encroachment and task delegation: Clinical pharmacists on the medical team. Sociology of Health & Illness, 13(3), 310–331. doi:10.1111/shil.1991.13.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monach, J. (2003). Counselling – its role in the infertility team. Human Fertility, 6(Suppl. 2), s17–s21. doi:10.1080/1464770312331369193
   Google Scholar
• Pape, B., Thiessen, P. S., Jakobsen, F., & Hansen, T. B. (2013). Interprofessional collaboration may pay off: Introducing a collaborative approach in an orthopaedic ward. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27, 496–500. doi:10.3109/13561820.2013.808611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, S. (2006). (Re)constructing embryos in stem cell research: Exploring the meaning of embryos for people involved in fertility treatments. Social Science & Medicine, 62(10), 2349–2359. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.10.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, Y., & Sutanto, J. (2012). Facilitating knowledge sharing through a boundary spanner. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 55(2), 142–155. doi:10.1109/TPC.2012.2188590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provoost, V., Pennings, G., De Sutter, P., & Dhont, M. (2012). A private matter: How patients decide what to do with cryopreserved embryos after infertility treatment. Human Fertility, 15(4), 210–216. doi:10.3109/14647273.2012.745015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provoost, V., Pennings, G., De Sutter, P., Gerris, J., van de Velde, A., & Dhont, M. (2010). Reflections by patients who undergo IVF on the use of their supernumerary embryos for science. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 20(7), 880–891. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.03.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, S., Lewin, S., Espin, S., & Zwarenstein, M. (2010). Interprofessional teamwork for health and social care. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Samorinha, C., Pereira, M., Machado, H., Figueiredo, B., & Silva, S. (2014). Factors associated with the donation and non-donation of embryos for research: A systematic review. Human Reproduction Update, 20(5), 641–655. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmu026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seale, C., & Kelly, M. (1998). Coding and analysing data. In C. Seale (Ed.), Researching society and culture (pp. 146–163). London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, N., Atkinson, P., & Glasner, P. (2008). The UK stem cell bank as performative architecture. New Genetics and Society, 27(2), 87–98. doi:10.1080/14636770802076977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedlow, B. (2007). Using the boundaries of science to do boundary-work among scientists: Pollution and purity claims. Science and Public Policy, 34(9), 633–643. doi:10.3152/030234207X264953
   Google Scholar
• Tellioglu, H., & Wagner, I. (2001). Work practices surrounding PACS: The politics of space in hospitals. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 10(2), 163–188. doi:10.1023/A:1011298824442
   Google Scholar
• Timmons, S., & Tanner, J. (2004). A disputed occupational boundary: Operating theatre nurses and operating department practitioners. Sociology of Health & Illness, 26(5), 645–666. doi:10.1111/shil.2004.26.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zyl, C., Van Dyk, A. C., & Niemandt, C. (2005). The embryologist as counsellor during assisted reproduction procedures. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 11(5), 545–551. doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61160-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wackerhausen, S. (2009). Collaboration, professional identity and reflection across boundaries. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 23, 455–473. doi:10.1080/13561820902921720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainwright, S. P., Williams, C., Michael, M., Farsides, B., & Cribb, A. (2006). Ethical boundary-work in the embryonic stem cell laboratory. Sociology of Health & Illness, 28(6), 732–748. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00539.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilemon, D. (2014). Boundary-spanning as enacted in three organizational functions: New venture management, project management, and product management. In J. Langan-Fox, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Boundary-spanning in organizations: Network, influence, and conflict (pp. 230–250). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. (2011). The life and times of the boundary spanner. Journal of Integrated Care, 19(3), 26–33. doi:10.1108/14769011111148140
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. (2013). We are all boundary spanners now? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(1), 17–32. doi:10.1108/09513551311293417
   Google Scholar