Cognitive continuum theory in interprofessional healthcare: A critical analysis

References

• ABC Research Group, Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, A., Hasnain, N., & Venkatesan, M. (2012). Decision making in relation to personality types and cognitive styles of business students. IUP Journal of Management Research, 11(2), 20–29.
   Google Scholar
• Appelt, K. C., Milch, K. F., Handgraaf, M. J. J., & Weber, E. U. (2011). The decision making individual differences inventory and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(3), 252–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, H. (1998). Competent to collaborate: Towards a competency-based model for interprofessional education. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 12, 181–187. doi:10.3109/13561829809014104
   Google Scholar
• Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307–359. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bero, L. A., Grilli, R., Grimshaw, J. M., Harvey, E., Oxman, A. D., & Thomson, M. A. (1998). Closing the gap between research and practice: An overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementations of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group. British Medical Journal, 317(7156), 465–469. doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7156.465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørk, I. T., & Glenys, A. H. (2011). Clinical decision making of nurses working in hospital settings. Nursing Research and Practice, 2011(524918). doi:10.1155/2011/524918
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boblin-Cummings, S., Baumann, A., & Deber, R. (1998). Critical elements in the process of decision making: A nursing perspective. Canadian Journal of Nursing Leadership, 12(1), 6–13. doi:10.12927/cjnl.1999.19066
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, A. A., & Enns, J. T. (2015). When two heads are better than one: Interactive versus independent benefits of collaborative cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 2(4), 1076–1082. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0765-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A.-M., & Clarke, D. E. (2014). Reducing uncertainty in triage mental health presentations: Examining triage decision making. International Emergency Nursing, 22(1), 47–51. doi:10.1016/j.ienj.2013.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cabantous, L., & Gond, J.-P. (2011). Rational decision making as performance praxis: Explaining rationality’s éternal retour. Organization Science, 22(3), 573–586. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cader, R. R., Campbell, S., & Watson, D. (2005). Cognitive continuum theory in nursing decision-making. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 49(4), 397–405. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03303.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchman, C. W. (1971). The design of inquiring systems: Basic concepts of systems and organization. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, P. G. (2006). What would a theory of interprofessional education look like? Some suggestions for developing a theoretical framework for teamwork training. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 20, 577–589. doi:10.1080/13561820600916717
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark, P. G. (2013). Towards a transtheroetical model of interprofessional education: Stages, processes and forces supporting institutional change. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27(43–49). doi:10.3109/13561820.2012.730074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooksey, R. W. (2000). Commentary on ‘cognitive adaption and its consequences: A test of cognitive continuum theory’. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1), 55–59. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côté, G., Lauzon, C., & Kyd-Strickland, B. (2008). Environmental scan of interprofessional collaborative practice initiatives. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 22, 449–460. doi:10.1080/13561820802210950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, L. A., O’Cathain, A., Clark, V. L. P., Aroni, R., Fetters, M., & Berg, D. (2012). The role of group dynamics in mixed methods health sciences research teams. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(1), 5–20. doi:10.1177/1558689811416941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Custers, E. J. F. M. (2013). Medical education and cognitive continuum theory: An alternative perspective on medical problem solving and clinical reasoning. Academic Medicine, 88(8), 1074–1080. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31829a3b10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damon, W., & Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three methods of peer education. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 9–19. doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90013-X
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D. A., Thomson, M. A., Oxman, A. D., & Haynes, R. B. (1995). Changing physician performance: A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical strategies. Journal of the American Medical Association, 274(9), 700–705. doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530090032018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhami, M. K., Hertwig, R., & Hoffrage, U. (2004). The role of representative design in ecological approach to cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 959–988. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhami, M. K., & Thomson, M. E. (2012). The relevance of cognitive continuum theory and quasi-rationality for understanding management judgment and decision making. European Management Journal, 30(4), 316–326. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2012.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 497–509. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, M. E., & Kurz, E. M. (1996). Social judgement theory. Thinking and Reasoning, 2(2–3), 109–140. doi:10.1080/135467896394474
   Google Scholar
• Dunwoody, P. T., Haarbauer, E., Mahan, R. P., Marino, C., & Tang, -C.-C. (2000). Cognitive adaptation and its consequences: A test of cognitive continuum theory. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1), 35–54. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<35::AID-BDM339>3.0.CO;2-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, W., Lindman, H., & Savage, J. (1963). Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research. Psychological Review, 70, 193–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, R. J., & Donnelly, G. W. (2006). A model to describe the relationship between knowledge, skill, and judgment in nursing practice. Nursing Forum, 41(4), 150–157. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6198.2006.00053.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galanter, C. A., & Patel, V. L. (2005). Medical decision making: A selective review for child psychiatrists and psychologists. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(7), 675–689. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01452.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glendon, A. I., & Clarke, S. G. (2016). Human safety and risk management: A psychological perspective (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hamm, R. M. (1988). Moment-by-moment variation in experts’ analytic and intuitive cognitive activity. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18(5), 757–776. doi:10.1109/21.21602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamm, R. M. (1989). The need to consider modes of inquiry in designing systems that require distributed decision making. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Hamm, R. M., Clark, J. A., & Bursztajn, H. (1984). Psychiatrists’ thorny judgments: Describing and improving decision making processes. Medical Decision Making, 4(4), 425–447. doi:10.1177/0272989X8400400406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, K. R. (1978). Toward increasing competence of thought in public policy formation. In K. R. Hammond (Ed.), Judgment and decision in public policy formation (pp. 11–32). Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, K. R. (1996). Human judgment and social policy: Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, K. R. (2000). Judgment under stress. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, K. R., Hamm, R. M., Grassia, J., & Pearson, T. (1997). Direct comparison of intuitive and analytical cognition in expert judgment. In R. M. Hogarth, & W. Goldstein (Eds.), Research judgment and decision making: Currents, Connections and Controversies (pp. 144–180). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hepp, S. L., Suter, E., Jackson, K., Deutschlander, S., Makwarimba, E., Jennings, J., & Birmingham, L. (2015). Using an interprofessional competency framework to examine collaborative practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 29, 131–137. doi:10.3109/13561820.2014.955910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson, G. P., Langan-Fox, J., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2008). Intuition: A fundamental bridging construct in the behavioural sciences. British Journal of Psychology, 99(1), 1–27. doi:10.1348/000712607X216666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson, G. P., Sadler-Smith, E., Burke, L. A., Claxton, G., & Sparrow, P. R. (2009). Intuition in organizations: Implications for strategic management. Long Range Planning, 42(3), 277–297. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornby, S., & Atkins, J. (2000). Collaborative care (2nd ed.). Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Hyman, I. E., Jr., Cardwell, B. A., & Roy, R. A. (2013). Multiple causes of collaborative inhibition in memory for categorised word lists. Memory, 21(7), 875–890. doi:10.1080/09658211.2013.769058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John-Steiner, V., Weber, R. J., & Minnis, M. (1998). The challenge of studying collaboration. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 773–783. doi:10.3102/00028312035004773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keene, J., Bailey, S., Swift, L., & Janacek, G. (2000). The tracking project: A collaborative multi-agency database for shared clients/patients to inform policy development. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 14, 325–336. doi:10.1080/13561820020003883
   Google Scholar
• Kutschera, I., & Byrd, J. T. (2005). Applying the concept of cognitive continuum to leadership training. Journal of American Academy of Business, 6(1), 20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Lahey, W., & Fierlbeck, K. (2016). Legislating collaborative self-regulation in Canada: A comparative policy analysis. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 30, 211–216. doi:10.3109/13561820.2015.1109501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamond, D., & Thompson, C. (2000). Intuition and analysis in decision making choice. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 32(4), 411–414. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2000.00411.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrick, R. P. (1993). Motivational factors in decision theories: The role of self-protection. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 440–450. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822–832. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauri, S., & Salanterä, S. (2002). Developing an instrument to measure and describe clinical decision making in different nursing fields. Journal of Professional Nursing, 18(2), 93–100. doi:10.1053/jpnu.2002.32344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauri, S., Salanterä, S., Chalmers, K., Ekman, S.-L., Kim, H. S., Kappeli, S., & MacLeod, M. (2001). An exploratory study of clinical decision making in five countries. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 83–90. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00083.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Légaré, F., Stacey, D., Pouliot, S., Gauvin, F.-P., Desroches, S., Kryworuchko, J., … Graham, I. D. (2011). Interprofessionalism and shared decision-making in primary care: A stepwise approach towards a new model. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 25, 18–25. doi:10.3109/13561820.2010.490502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, K. J., Giordano, C., Speakman, E., Smith, K., & Horowitz, J. A. (2016). Jefferson teamwork observation guide (JTOG): An instrument to observe teamwork behaviours. Journal of Allied Health, 45(1), 49–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahan, R. P. (1994). Stress-induced strategy shifts toward intuitive cognition: A cognitive continuum framework approach. Human Performance, 7(2), 85–118. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup0702_1
   Google Scholar
• Mathwicka, C., Malhotrab, N. K., & Rigdon, E. (2002). The effect of dynamic retail experiences on experiential perceptions of value: An internet and catalogue comparison. Journal of Retailing, 78(1), 51–60. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00066-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickan, S., Hoffman, S. J., & Nasmith, L. (2010). Collaborative practice in a global health context: Common themes from developed and developing countries. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 24, 492–502. doi:10.3109/13561821003676325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, S., & Schwall, A. (2009). Individual differences and decision making. What we know and where we go from here. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 24, 249–312.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, B. (1987). Self-attention theory. In B. Mullen, & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 125–146). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nokes-Malach, T. J., Meade, M. L., & Morrow, D. G. (2012). The e-ect of expertise on collaborative problem solving. Thinking and Reasoning, 18(1), 32–58. doi:10.1080/13546783.2011.642206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyatanga, B., & Vocht, H. D. (2008). Intuition in clinical decision-making: A psychological penumbra. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 14(10), 492–496. doi:10.12968/ijpn.2008.14.10.31493
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Offredy, M., Kendall, S., & Goodman, C. (2008). The use of cognitive continuum theory and patient scenarios to explore nurse prescribers’ pharmacological knowledge and decision making. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(6), 855–868. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.01.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, W. J., Fletcher, J. M., Marks, A. D. G., & Hine, D. W. (2016). Thinking styles and decision making: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 142(3), 260–290. doi:10.1037/bul0000027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, S. (2012). The rise and rise of interprofessional competence. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 26, 253–255. doi:10.3109/13561820.2012.695542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, S., & Hean, S. (2013). Why we need theory to help us better understand the nature of interprofessional education, practice and care. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27, 1–3. doi:10.3109/13561820.2013.751293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas, E., Rosen, M. A., & Diaz-Granados, D. (2010). Expertise-based intuition and decision making in organisations. Journal of Management, 36(4), 941–973. doi:10.1177/0149206309350084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M., Blue, A., Aschengrener, C. A., & Viggiano, T. R. (2011). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Reforming healthcare by transforming health professionals’ education. Academic Medicine, 86(11), 1351–1351. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182308e39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroder, C., Medves, J., Paterson, M., Byrnes, V., Chapman, C., O’Riordan, A., … Kelly, C. (2011). Development and pilot testing of the collaborative practice assessment tool. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 25, 189–195. doi:10.3109/13561820.2010.532620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherif, C. W., Sherif, M. S., & Nebergall, R. E. (1965). Attitude and attitude change. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders Company.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397–420). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, G. (2015). Conceptualizing the intersubjective group. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(3), 209–217. doi:10.1007/s11412-015-9220-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standing, M. (2007). Clinical decision-making skills on the developmental journey from student to registered nurse: A longitudinal inquiry. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(3), 257–269. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04407.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standing, M. (2008). Clinical judgment and decision-making in nursing – nine modes of practice in a revised cognitive continuum. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 124–134. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04583.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standing, M. (2010). Clinical judgment and decision-making in nursing and interprofessional healthcare. New York, NY: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1998). Cognitive ability and variation in selection task performance. Thinking & Reasoning, 4(3), 193–230. doi:10.1080/135467898394139
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Advancing the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 701–717. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00623439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group processes and productivity. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suter, E., Goldman, J., Martimianakis, T., Chatalalsingh, C., DeMatteo, D. J., & Reeves, S. (2013). The use of systems and organizational theories in the interprofessional field: Findings from a scoping review. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27, 57–64. doi:10.3109/13561820.2012.739670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thistlethwaite, J. E., Forman, D., Mathews, L. R., Rogers, G. D., Steketee, C., & Yassine, T. (2014). Competencies and frameworks in interprofessional education: A comparative analysis. Academic Medicine, 89(6), 869–875. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thistlethwaite, J., Jackson, A., & Moran, M. (2013). Interprofessional collaborative practice: A deconstruction. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27, 50–56. doi:10.3109/13561820.2012.730075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C., & Yang, H. (2009). Nurses’ decisions, irreducible uncertainty and maximising nurses’ contribution to patient safety. Healthcare Quarterly, 12, 178–185. doi:10.12927/hcq.2009.20946
   Google Scholar
• Tollefsen, D. P. (2006). From extended mind to collective mind. Cognitive Systems Research, 7(2–3), 140–150. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2006.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, C. (2015). Understanding cultural identification through intersubjective cultural representation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(10), 1267–1272. doi:10.1177/0022022115610213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh, I., & Lyons, C. M. (2001). Evidence-based care and the case for intuition and tacit knowledge in clinical assessment and decision making in mental health nursing practice: An empirical contribution to the debate. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 8(4), 299–305. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2850.2001.00386.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2003). Is probability matching smart? Associations between probabilistic choices and cognitive ability. Memory and Cognition, 31(2), 243–251. doi:10.3758/BF03194383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). A situationist perspective on the psychology of evil: Understanding how good people are transformed into perpetrators. In A. G. Miller (Ed.), The social psychology of good and evil (pp. 21–50). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Zsambok, C. E., & Klein, G. (2014). Naturalistic decision making. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zwarenstein, M., Goldman, J., & Reeves, S. (2009). Interprofessional collaboration: Effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, CD000072. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar